Citations

Abstract Background: The association of clinical trial participation with outcomes in cancer patients is controversial, with some studies reporting better outcomes for trial participants while others do not. It is possible that the difference in outcomes is due to differences in baseline characteristics of participants and non-participants. The Blood and Marrow Transplant Clinical Trials Network (BMT CTN) 0201 trial was a large randomized, multi-center study comparing peripheral blood (PB) with bone marrow (BM) for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) from HLA-matched or 1 allele mismatched unrelated donors (URD) in patients with acute leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic syndromes. The trial reported no significant survival differences between PB and BM; there was decreased risk of graft failure but increased risk of chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) with PB grafts (Anasetti et al NEJM 2012). Methods: We compared characteristics of BMT CTN 0201 study participants (n=494) with HCT recipients who did not participate on the trial (n=1384) but were potentially eligible by virtue of known characteristics. These patients received similar conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis as trial participants at 38 United States trial centers during the study time-period. Centers that had no eligible non-trial participants were excluded. Outcomes between patients on and off trial were compared using Cox proportional hazards regression models. Data were obtained from the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) that collects patient data on all trial and non-trial allogeneic HCT recipients through its registry function. Results: Approximately 29% [494/1878] of apparently eligible patients were randomized and analyzed as part of the trial. There were no significant differences between study participants and non-participants in age or sex distribution, disease types, HLA or sex matching, comorbidities, or interval from diagnosis to HCT. Higher proportions of non-participants were Hispanic, had a lower performance status and lower disease risk, and received myeloablative conditioning and antithymocyte globulin (ATG) or Campath than the study participants. PB was used more commonly as the graft source in the non-participants as compared to the study participants (65% vs. 50%, p<0.001). In multivariate models, overall mortality (HR 1.09, 95% CI 0.95-1.25, p=0.22), transplant-related mortality (HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.89-1.32, p=0.42) and risks of acute grade II-IV (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.82-1.12, p=0.57) and chronic GVHD (HR 1.06, 95% CI 0.92-1.23, p=0.41) were comparable between study non-participants and participants. Non-participants were at higher risk for relapse than participants (HR 1.24, 95%CI 1.04-1.49, p=0.02) in the multivariate analysis adjusted for disease risk and other clinical variables. Center effect was examined and was not found to be significant (p=0.10). There was no significant interaction between graft source and trial participation (P=0.22) and the risk of mortality was comparable for BM (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.80-1.22, p=0.90) and PB recipients (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.97-1.41, p=0.09) whether on trial or off trial. (Figure) Conclusion: Approximately 29% of patients who appeared eligible and were treated with conditioning and GVHD prophylaxis regimens allowed on the trial were enrolled. Despite some differences in clinical characteristics, most of the outcomes of non-trial participants were comparable to trial participants, suggesting that there is no definitive evidence that the outcomes of patients in a clinical trial are superior to those of the non-participants treated in a similar fashion. The comparable outcomes also indicate that the results of this trial were not seriously affected by selection bias and are therefore representative of the larger population. Figure 1: Adjusted overall survival in BMT CTN 0201 trial participants and non-participants Figure 1:. Adjusted overall survival in BMT CTN 0201 trial participants and non-participants Figure 2 Figure 2. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 731 Background: Treatment with bortezomib achieves high hematologic response rates and rapid and durable responses in AL patients (pts), providing the rationale for proteasome inhibition in this population. MLN9708 is an investigational, oral, potent, reversible, and specific 20S proteasome inhibitor (PI). In preclinical studies, MLN9708 has shown improved antitumor activity compared to bortezomib in a range of xenograft models. This phase 1 study (NCT01318902) assessed weekly doses of oral MLN9708 in pts with relapsed or refractory AL. Methods: Pts aged ≥18 years with relapsed or refractory AL after ≥1 prior therapy, cardiac biomarker stage I/II disease, and measurable major organ (heart/kidney) involvement, received increasing doses of oral MLN9708 (standard 3+3 dose escalation fixed doses of 4.0 and 5.5 mg), on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles for up to 12 cycles. Pts with no major hematologic response (<PR) after 3 cycles received dexamethasone (dex; 40 mg, days 1–4). Two expansion cohorts of PI-naïve and PI-exposed pts were enrolled at the MTD. The primary objectives were to determine the safety, tolerability, and MTD. Secondary objectives included analysis of plasma pharmacokinetic (PK) and whole blood pharmacodynamic effects of MLN9708, and assessment of overall hematologic response rate, time to and duration of hematologic and organ response. Adverse events (AEs) were graded using NCI-CTCAE version 4.03. Blood samples were collected at multiple timepoints pre- and post-MLN9708 dosing for PK analysis during cycle 1. Hematologic response and amyloid-related organ assessments were performed according to standardized criteria. Results: At data cut-off (June 29, 2012) 16 pts had been enrolled and received ≥1 MLN9708 dose (safety population). The median age was 66.5 years (range 54–78) and 7 were male. Median number of prior therapies was 3 (range 1–7); 10 received prior transplant, 7 received prior bortezomib. Major organ involvement, defined by standard criteria, included heart, kidney, or both in 7/5/4 pts, respectively, with a median of 2 (range 1–5) involved organ systems, and Mayo cardiac biomarker risk stage was I, II, III in 6, 9, 1 pts. Five pts were treated in the 5.5 mg cohort and 11 pts were treated in the 4.0 mg (n=6 dose escalation; n=5 dose expansion) cohorts. Of the 11 pts treated at 4.0 mg, 4 were PI-naïve, 7 were PI-exposed. Pts received a median of 3 cycles (range 1–12); 5 pts received ≥5 cycles, and 8 pts remain on treatment. Dex was added in 4 pts (2 in each MLN9708 dose level). There were no on-study deaths. Pts discontinued due to disease progression (n=5), AE, withdrawal by pt, or unsatisfactory response (each n=1); 2 pts completed planned 1 year of therapy. One pt in the 4.0 mg cohort experienced a DLT of grade 3 thrombocytopenia. Two pts in the 5.5 mg dose cohort experienced DLTs: grade 3 diarrhea in 1 pt, and renal failure, respiratory failure (both grade 2), and cardiac arrest (grade 4) in another pt. The MTD was determined as 4.0 mg. AEs were reported in 14 pts. The most common drug-related AEs included nausea (n=5), diarrhea and thrombocytopenia (each n=4), abdominal pain and fatigue (each n=3). Grade ≥3 AEs (any cause) reported in >1 pt were thrombocytopenia (n=4), dyspnea (n=3), maculo-papular rash, dehydration, and abdominal pain (each n=2); all were grade 3. Preliminary response data are shown in the table. At data cut-off, one responder had progressed, and the median duration of hematologic response was 7.4 months (range 1.3–11.5+); 2 pts had cardiac organ response. Preliminary PK data showed that MLN9708 was rapidly absorbed, with a median Tmax of 1 hr (range 0.5–6). MLN9708 day 15 plasma Cmax was 73.6 ± 40.2 ng/mL (mean ± SD) and AUC0–168was 1250 ±530 ng*hr/mL (n=8 at 4.0 mg dose cohort). MLN9708 PK parameter values in this study appear similar to other MLN9708 studies in myeloma pts. Conclusions: These data suggest weekly oral administration of MLN9708 is feasible in pts with relapsed or refractory AL. The MLN9708 MTD was determined as 4.0 mg. Assessment is ongoing, with preliminary evidence of hematologic responses noted. A phase 3 study of MLN9708 plus dex versus physician's choice of treatment is planned (NCT01659658). Disclosures: Merlini: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Off Label Use: Use of the investigational agent MLN9708, an oral proteasome inhibitor, in the treatment of relapsed or refractory light-chain amyloidosis. Sanchorawala:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Zonder:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc: Consultancy, Research Funding. Kukreti:Roche: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene: Honoraria; Janssen: Honoraria. Schonland:Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Janssen: Honoraria. Dispenzieri:Janssen Research & Development: Research Funding; Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding. Cohen:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol-Meyers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Onyx: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Berg:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Liu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Di Bacco:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Gupta:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Hui:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Comenzo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 800 Background: Ruxolitinib (RUX), an oral JAK1/JAK2 inhibitor, reduced spleen volume (SV), improved myelofibrosis (MF)-associated symptoms and quality of life (QoL), and appeared to exhibit a survival advantage over placebo (PBO) in patients (pts) with MF regardless of JAK2V617F mutation status in the phase III COMFORT-I study. We describe long-term efficacy and safety of RUX from COMFORT-I, with 1 year of additional follow up beyond previously published data. Methods: Eligible pts (N=309) were randomized (1:1) to RUX or PBO. The primary analysis occurred when all pts completed 24 weeks (wks) and when half the pts completed 36 wks of treatment. All pts receiving PBO were eligible for crossover to RUX after the primary analysis; crossover before wk 24 was permitted if pts met protocol-defined criteria for worsening splenomegaly. The proportion of pts with ≥35% SV reduction at 24 wks (primary endpoint) and durability of SV response were assessed. Although symptom burden (measured daily using the modified MF Symptom Assessment Form v2.0) was only measured up to wk 24, QoL continued to be evaluated beyond wk 24 (every 24 wks) using the EORTC QoL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Overall survival (OS) was assessed according to original randomized treatment. Results: In this updated analysis, median follow-up of pts randomized to RUX was 102 wks. All pts receiving PBO completed crossover or discontinued within 3 months of the primary analysis. Of 134 pts randomized to RUX who remained on treatment after the primary data analysis, 100 continue on study. Mean SV reduction in pts randomized to RUX was 31.6% at wk 24 and has remained stable with additional follow up through wk 96 (Table). In pts who achieved a ≥35% SV reduction, response was durable, with a median response duration of 108 wks. RUX treatment was also associated with durable improvements in the Global Health Status/QoL (Table) and the 5 functional domains of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Twenty-seven (27) pts randomized to RUX and 41 pts randomized to PBO died, representing a continued OS benefit in favor of RUX (HR=0.58; 95% CI: 0.36, 0.95; P = 0.028; Fig 1) similar in magnitude to that previously reported. OS favored RUX across subgroups including starting dose as well as baseline risk status and hemoglobin (Hgb). Of 34 pts randomized to RUX who discontinued after the primary analysis, 4 discontinued for an adverse event (AE). In pts who continued on RUX, anemia and thrombocytopenia remained the most frequently reported AEs. New onset of grade 3 or 4 anemia and thrombocytopenia was reported in only 12 and 5 pts, respectively. One pt discontinued for anemia. Overall, among all pts randomized to RUX, Grade 3 and 4 anemia regardless of baseline Hgb was reported in 37.4% and 14.8% of pts, respectively. Similarly, Grade 3 and 4 thrombocytopenia was reported in 11.0% and 5.2% of pts, respectively. These rates were similar to those reported in the primary analysis. By wk 36, the proportion of pts receiving red blood cell transfusions decreased to the level seen with PBO and remained stable thereafter (Fig 2). Rates of nonhematologic AEs adjusted for increased follow-up duration remain similar to those seen at the time of the primary data analysis. No additional cases of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in pts randomized to RUX were reported. Two pts originally randomized to PBO developed AML, 21 and 178 days after crossover to RUX. There continued to be no reports of a withdrawal syndrome after RUX discontinuation. Conclusions: RUX provides durable reductions in SV and improvements in QoL. Although all pts randomized to PBO crossed over to RUX shortly after the primary analysis, with 1 year of additional follow up, RUX continues to be associated with a survival advantage over PBO. RUX continues to be well tolerated; the AE profile with long-term treatment is consistent with that previously reported. The proportion of pts receiving transfusions decreased over time to rates similar to PBO, and there were no reports of a specific withdrawal syndrome or cytokine rebound phenomenon after RUX discontinuation. Disclosures: Verstovsek: Incyte Corporation: Research Funding. Mesa:Incyte: Research Funding; Lilly: Research Funding; Sanofi: Research Funding; NS Pharma: Research Funding; YM Bioscience: Research Funding. Gotlib:Incyte: Consultancy, travel to congress Other. Levy:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gupta:Incyte: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Celgene: Research Funding; YM Biosciences: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Sanofiå]Aventis: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Catalano:Incyte: Consultancy. Deininger:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy; Ariad: Consultancy. Miller:Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau, development of educational presentations Other; Incyte: development of educational presentations, development of educational presentations Other. Talpaz:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; B.M.S.: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Ariad: Research Funding; Sanofi: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Teva: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Winton:Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria. Arcasoy:Incyte: Research Funding. Lyons:Incyte: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Telik: Research Funding. Paquette:Incyte: Consultancy. Vaddi:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Erickson-Viitanen:Incyte: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sun:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Sandor:Incyte Corporation: Employment, Equity Ownership. Kantarjian:Incyte: grant support Other.

Abstract Abstract 925 Diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) consists of biologically distinct subtypes: Germinal Center B-cell (GCB)–like and Activated B-cell (ABC)-like. Studies to date suggest that patients with tumors that have ABC features have an inferior survival; therefore, it is important to develop new therapies specifically for ABC-type DLBCL based on mechanistic differences. It has been shown that the ABC-DLBCL has high levels of total and phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3) protein and this STAT3 activity may play a role in the survival of ABC-DLBCL cells. Indeed, when ABC and GCB cell were incubated with the novel JAK2 inhibitor TG101348 (TargeGen, San Diego, CA) we found potent cytotoxicity (LD50 2μM) in ABC DLBCL but not in GCB DLBCL. This provides further rationale to study the regulation of STAT3 in the survival of ABC type DLBCL cells. In studies of HDAC expression in ABC DLBCL cells, we found over-expression of the class 1 histone deacetylases, specifically HDAC1 and HDAC3. We then performed co-immunoprecipitation experiments to learn the functional interaction between STAT3 and HDACs. We found that STAT3 formed complexes with HDAC1 to a greater extent than HDAC3. We also showed that STAT3 did co-precipitate with HDAC1 suggesting a reciprocal relationship between these two proteins. These results suggested that HDAC1 (but not HDAC3) might be involved in the regulation of STAT3. The HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (LBH, Novartis Pharm) was more cytotoxic to ABC (LD50, 10-20nM) than GCB (LD50, 50-100nM) and was shown to dephosphorylate STAT3. These results led to experiments designed to determine the effect of LBH on STAT3 acetylation. When ABC cells were incubated with LBH, co-immunoprecipitation data showed a dose-dependent increased in acetylation of STAT3 without significant change on the levels of STAT3 immunoprecipitated. Next, we asked that how LBH is dephosphorylating STAT3. One potential mechanism is activation of a protein phosphatase. Immunoprecipitation of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) in the lysates of LBH-treated cells followed by western blotting of STAT3 demonstrated a positive correlation between LBH dose and amount of STAT3 co-immunoprecipitated with PP2A. Our data show that when LBH is incubated with ABC cells, the LBH increases binding of PP2A to STAT3 and the increased phosphatase activity turns off STAT3 signaling. Since both HDAC inhibitor (LBH) and the JAK2 inhibitor (TG) had selective cytotoxic effects on ABC cells, and since both agents dephosphorylate STAT3, we combined the two drugs. We found that the combination exhibited enhanced inhibitory effects on the growth of ABC cells and was able to alter the association of STAT3 with HDAC1 and subsequently dephosphorylate STAT3 to greater extent than either agent alone. Furthermore, we knocked down HDAC1 expression (through siRNA) in OCILy10 (ABC) cells and showed that inhibition of HDAC1 inhibits constitutively activated STAT3. This data suggests that inhibiting HDAC1 expression results in STAT3 dephosphorylation. In summary, we have demonstrated that a key consequence of HDAC expression in ABC cells is continuous activation of STAT3. These data indicate that HDACs activate STAT3 and that PP2A may be important in maintaining STAT3 in the activated state in the ABC cells. This study describes a new mechanism by which STAT3 mediates ABC cell survival and provides the rationale for targeting ABC type DLBCL by simultaneously inhibiting HDAC activity and STAT3 activation by pharmacologic grade inhibitors such as LBH589 and TG101348, which are currently in clinical trial. A phase 1 and 2 trial of JAK2 inhibitor, TG101348 for ABC/GCB type DLBCL is planned. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNA) are key regulatory RNAs that do not code for protein. Recently lncRNAs have been recognized as key regulators of gene expression and chromatin organization. Although, deregulation of lncRNAs such as HOTAIR, MALAT1 and H19 has been reported in solid cancers, role of lncRNAs in lymphoma or other hematologic malignancies is not known. The aim of this study is to identify lymphoma-associated lncRNAs and elucidate their role in disease pathogenesis. Next generation RNA-sequencing and validation studies were carried out on mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patient samples along with normal controls. As a result, hundreds of lncRNAs were found overexpressed in the MCL samples as compared with normal B cells, including RP11-24J23.2 (50 fold), RP11-12A2.3 (36 fold) and DLEU7-AS1 (19 fold). Quantitative RT-PCR (QRT-PCR) confirmed higher expression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 in MCL patient samples as compared to normal B cells. To investigate the biological significance of lncRNAs in MCL cells, we overexpressed RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs and analyzed effects on cell proliferation and apoptosis. To achieve overexpression lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 were cloned individually in expression pcDNA3.1 generating constructs: pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1and then transfected into MCL cell lines along with pcDNA3.1. QRT-PCR revealed effective overexpression (~100 fold increase over baseline) for each transfected lncRNAs construct in Granta and Mino cells. Analysis of proliferation and survival showed that overexpressing RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 promotes cell proliferation and survival in these cells as compared to the vector controls. Most of the lncRNAs found so far have been linked to the transcriptional regulation of the target genes through their association with chromatin remodeling factors such as Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2). To identify the functional relevance of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs, we examined the binding of the lymphoma specific lncRNAs with PRC2 complex, by performing RNA immunoprecipitation (RNA-IP) using specific antibodies to EZH2, EED and SUZ12. The RNA-IP results demonstrate high affinity binding of all three lncRNAs with SUZ12 and EED but a weak binding with EZH2. Furthermore, RNA-IP using antibody to histone 3-lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3), a suppressive histone mark associated with PRC2 complex, also showed efficient binding with RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1. These results suggest that RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3, and DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs can directly associated with PRC2 complex at chromatin. To understand the mechanism of increased cell growth after overexpression of lncRNAs, RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1, we analyzed expression level of important genes signature of MCL pathogenesis that include cyclin D1, cyclin D3, c-Myc, P14, and SOX11, a member of the group C SOX (SRY-related HMG-box) transcription factor family. Our results demonstrate that overexpression of lncRNAs RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 enhanced the levels of cyclin D1 (>2 fold) mRNA without any impact on cyclin D3 or c-Myc transcript levels. In contrast overexpression of RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 or DLEU7-AS1 lncRNAs decreased SOX11 (0.08, 0.1 and 0.06 respectively) and P14 (0.06, 0.7 and 0.40 respectively) mRNA expression in Mino cells. To gain understanding of the mechanism involved in the suppression of SOX11 by the lncRNAs, we performed Chromatin immunoprecipitation assays with EZH2, EED and SUZ12 antibodies on Mino cells transfected with pcDNA3RP11-24J23.2, pcDNA3RP11-12A2.3 and pcDNA3DLEU7-AS1 or vector control. The data showed that overexpression of RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1 significantly increased the binding of EED and to a lesser extent of EZH2 to SOX11 promoter while the binding of SUZ12 to SOX11 promoter was not changed as compared to vector alone. In conclusion, our results imply that lncRNAs are overexpressed in the MCL. Moreover, lymphoma associated lncRNAs (RP11-24J23.2, RP11-12A2.3 and DLEU7-AS1) regulate SOX11 expression via PRC2 complex contributing towards growth of MCL cells. Specific nature of lncRNAs found in lymphoma samples suggests that lncRNAs can be used as potential biomarkers for mantle cell lymphoma. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 115 Patients with diffuse large B- cell lymphoma (DLBCL) tumors that have an activated B-cell like (ABC) gene expression profile have a poorer prognosis. Understanding the mechanism(s) used by ABC tumor cells to resist the effects of common chemotherapy agents may lead to alternative approaches for the treatment of these tumors. ABC cell lines have been shown to have high levels of phosphorylated STAT3 (pSTAT3); however, the mechanisms that regulate STAT3 signaling in ABC DLBCL remain unclear. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) are enzymes that can deacetylate both non-histone and histone substrates. In this study we tested the hypothesis that HDACs in the tumor cells target a non-histone protein STAT3 in ABC DLBCL. In studies of HDAC expression in DLBCL tumors, we found over-expression of the type 1 HDACs, specifically HDAC1and HDAC3, in the pSTAT3- positive ABC tumors as compared to germinal centre B like (GCB) tumors. We then performed a co-immunoprecipitation (Co-IP) assay to learn the functional interaction between STAT3 and HDAC1. We found that STAT3 formed complexes with HDAC1 or HDAC3. Further Co-IP studies demonstrated that p300, a histone acetyltransferase (HAT), STAT3, and HDAC1 are all in the same complex. To determine whether p300 acetylates STAT3 in ABC cells, we immuno-precipitated endogenous p300 and blotted with acetylated STAT3 and showed that p300 acetylates STAT3 at lysine 685. We next tested whether HDAC inhibition could affect p300 mediated STAT3 acetylation in ABC cells. Inhibition of HDAC activity through the HDAC inhibitor LBH589 (LBH, Novartis Pharmaceuticals) increased STAT3 acetylation in a dose- dependent manner. Similar results were obtained when we used antiacetyl- lysine antibody. Furthermore HDAC1 over-expression inhibits STAT3 acetylation at lysine 685. This data implies a tight regulation of STAT3 acetylation and deacetylases in vivo in ABC lymphoma. In addition to acetylation, STAT3 can be modified by phosphorylation, thus the effect of HDAC inhibition on pSTAT3 both at serine and tyrosine residues was studied. We observed a dose-dependent decrease in pSTAT3 with some inhibitory effect on total STAT3. LBH was found to mediate STAT3 dephosphorylation by inhibiting the tyrosine phosphorylation of JAK2 and TYK2, the STAT3 upstream activators, in a dose- dependent manner. Since ABC lymphoma has higher levels of HDAC1 or HDAC3 and pSTAT3/STAT3 than GCB, we hypothesized that ABC cells will be more sensitive to HDAC inhibition than GCB. In fact, when ABC and GCB DLBCL cells were treated with LBH we observed that LBH was more cytotoxic to ABC than GCB as evidenced by annexin/PI staining and PARP cleavage. LD90 was 25 nM for ABC cells, however GCB cells required 5 times more LBH to kill 90% cells. STAT3 activation regulates genes involved in cell survival, including Bcl-2, Mcl-1, Bcl-XL, and c-Myc. LBH treatment resulted in down-regulation of Mcl-1 and c-Myc in ABC cells but has no effect in GCB cells; however, Bcl-2 and Bcl-XL levels were not decreased in both the subtype. Having established that HDAC1 physically associated with STAT3 and that LBH treatment elevated STAT3 acetylation in ABC cells, we proceeded to deplete endogenous HDAC1 with siRNA in Ly3 cells and found that HDAC1 knockdown up-regulated STAT3 acetylation indicating that HDAC1 negatively regulates the acetylation in vivo. HDAC1 inhibition also prevented phopshorylation of STAT3 and induces aopotosis in ABC cells. In summary, we have demonstrated that a key consequence of HATs and HDACs expression and activity is modulation of the STAT3 pathway in ABC lymphoma. Inhibition of this pathway with the HDAC inhibitor LBH inhibits constitutive STAT3 signaling and induces Mcl-1 mediated apoptosis. These studies provide the rationale for targeting the poorly responsive ABC-type DLBCL by inhibiting HDAC activity with epigenetic inhibitors such as LBH. We are currently testing LBH589 in relapsed DLBCL in a phase I clinical trial. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 1691 Poster Board I-717 Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM) is a B-cell malignancy that is characterized by the production of a monoclonal IgM protein and a lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate in the bone marrow. The aberrant production of the monoclonal IgM can result in serum hyperviscosity that can cause significant morbidity in patients with this disease. In previous work, we have shown that IL-6 significantly upregulates IgM secretion by WM cells and that IL-6 secretion is regulated by CCL5 (Rantes). We have also shown that IL-6 mediated IgM secretion in WM requires phosphorylation of Stat1 and Stat3. Because IL-6 induced signaling involves the Jak/Stat pathway, we tested whether the use of a Jak/Stat inhibitor, TG101348, would result in down regulation of CCL5, IL-6 and IgM production and inhibit cell proliferation and viability in WM. First, we determined whether TG101348 could inhibit the production of CCL5 because other Jak inhibitors have been shown to inhibit cytokine production. Using the BCWM.1 cell line as well CD19+ malignant cells from bone marrow specimens from WM patients, we measured CCL5 by ELISA in the culture supernatant 24 hours after treatment with increasing concentrations of the inhibitor. We found that CCL5 secretion was decreased by 50% at a concentration of TG101348 of 250nM and was completely inhibited at 2μM. Next, we measured IL-6 production after treatment with TG101348. We had previously shown that stromal cells are the primary source of IL-6 and therefore used the stromal cell line HS-5 to measure IL-6 by ELISA after treatment with the inhibitor. Our previous work had also shown that IL-6 secretion was mediated by GLI (a member of the Hedgehog pathway) rather than the Jak/Stat pathway. Interestingly, we found that IL-6 secretion was inhibited in a dose dependent fashion but required higher doses for complete suppression (8μM). We then measured IgM production by malignant B-cells 24 hours after treatment with TG101348. Our previous work had shown that IL-6 mediated IgM secretion was dependent on the Jak/Stat pathway. We found that IgM production was inhibited by 50% at 500nM and completely suppressed at 2μM. Finally, we measured the effect of TG101348 on cell proliferation and survival. Using the BCWM.1 cell line, we found that cell proliferation as determined by tritiated thymidine uptake was inhibited in a dose dependent fashion with 50% inhibition at 1μM. Inhibition of cell viability as measured by Annexin V/propidium iodide staining, however, required higher concentrations and cell viability was inhibited with an IC50 of 8μM. These data confirm the role of Jak/Stat signaling in the CCL5-IL-6-IgM axis in WM. We found that TG101348 generally suppressed the signaling and growth of WM cells but that pathways that were known to be Jak/Stat dependent required significantly lower doses to be completely inhibited. These data provide a strong rationale for the use of inhibitors of this pathway, such as TG101348, in the treatment of patients with WM. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

INTRODUCTION: The association of Acute Pancreatitis and Celiac Disease (CD) has been sparingly reported in the literature. CD is known to affect approximately 1% of the western population. A Swedish national database study reported a 3-fold increased risk of developing pancreatitis in patients with CD. The exact mechanism of this is unknown, but it could be related to an untreated celiac disease affecting the major papilla causing stenosis or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency that has been reported previously. This study aimed to look at the association between acute pancreatitis and celiac disease. We also looked at whether there was any association between chronic pancreatitis and celiac disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study using the 2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We included all patients who were hospitalized with either acute pancreatitis (ICD Code 577.0) or Chronic Pancreatitis (577.1). Patients who had diagnoses of both acute and chronic pancreatitis were considered to have acute on chronic pancreatitis and combined with the chronic pancreatitis group. We then analyzed both groups for the presence or absence of celiac disease. Continuous variables were compared using t-tests, and categorical variables were compared using Rao-Scott chi-square tests. All analyses were performed using SAS Survey Procedures (version 9.4, The SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: We analyzed more than 35 million hospitalizations in 2013 out of which 378,715 had a primary discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and 155,130 had a primary discharge diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The mean age in the acute pancreatitis group was 53.3 yrs and in chronic pancreatitis group was 51.7 yrs. There were more males in chronic pancreatitis group (55.1%) than females (44.9%). There was significantly higher prevalence of acute pancreatitis in CD (2.3%) than non-CD patients (1.2%) (Figure 1, P = 0.001). Similarly, there was higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis (1.2%) than the control group (0.43%) (Figure 1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a higher prevalence of acute pancreatitis in patients with CD. Patients were also found to have much higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis in CD. This could be related to recurrent acute pancreatitis episodes in CD patients. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.

INTRODUCTION: The association of Acute Pancreatitis and Celiac Disease (CD) has been sparingly reported in the literature. CD is known to affect approximately 1% of the western population. A Swedish national database study reported a 3-fold increased risk of developing pancreatitis in patients with CD. The exact mechanism of this is unknown but it could be related to untreated celiac disease affecting the major papilla causing stenosis or exocrine pancreatic insufficiency that has been reported previously. The aim of this study was to look at the association between acute pancreatitis and celiac disease. We also looked whether there was any association between chronic pancreatitis and celiac disease. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional cohort study using the 2013 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We included all patients who were hospitalized with either acute pancreatitis (ICD Code 577.0) or Chronic Pancreatitis (577.1). Patients who had diagnoses of both acute and chronic pancreatitis were considered to have acute on chronic pancreatitis and combined with the chronic pancreatitis group. We then analyzed both groups for presence or absence of celiac disease. Continuous variables were compared using t-tests and categorical variables were compared using Rao-Scott chi-square tests. All analyses were performed using SAS Survey Procedures (version 9.4, The SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: We analyzed more than 35 million hospitalizations in 2013 out of which 378,715 had a primary discharge diagnosis of acute pancreatitis and 155,130 had a primary discharge diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis. The mean age in the acute pancreatitis group was 53.3 yrs and in chronic pancreatitis group was 51.7 yrs. There were more males in chronic pancreatitis group (55.1%) than females (44.9%). There was significantly higher prevalence of acute pancreatitis in CD (2.3%) than non-CD patients (1.2%) (Figure 1, P = 0.001). Similarly, there was higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis (1.2%) than the control group (0.43%) (Figure 1, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a higher prevalence of acute pancreatitis in patients with CD. Patients were also found to have much higher prevalence of chronic pancreatitis in CD. This could be related to recurrent acute pancreatitis episodes in CD patients. Further studies are needed to validate these findings.