Citations

Introduction: patients exposed to chest, breast or mediastinal RT, may present with accelerated atherosclerosis and CAD due to diffuse micro and macrovascular fibrosis. However, CAD risk has not been well established in a community-based study. Aims: Describe CAD risk in patients treated with chemotherapy with and without RT and evaluate the cumulative incidence of CAD (coronary revascularization, MI and abnormal stress test and coronary angiogram). Methods: From 1985-2010, we identified 744 patients with a new diagnosis of breast cancer or lymphoma, using the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) who received chemotherapy with or without RT. CAD risk was assessed by a proportional hazards model for time to event. RT was treated as a time dependent co-variable, with index date being chemotherapy start date, significance was considered as a p<.05. Characteristics were evaluated by a multivariable Cox model to consider RT and time censoring. Results: 744 patients treated with chemotherapy were identified, of these 488 (65.6%) had breast cancer, 256 (34.4%) lymphoma, and 367 (49%) also received RT. The mean total RT dose was 5.5 ± 1.2 (Gy) for those that had CAD and 5.4 (Gy) ± 1.1 for non-CAD patients, p=0.4. The cumulative incidence of CAD events (accounting for death as a competing risk) at 5 and 10 years of follow-up was 1.9% (CI 1.14-3.2) and 3.06% (CI 2.01-4.7), respectively p<.05 figure1. Baseline differences between those receiving RT or not, were not significant for DM and HTN; however, males and ages 70-79 were less likely to receive RT, table1. In a multivariable model, there was no difference in the CAD outcomes between those with and without RT, HR= 1.21 [0.48-3.06] p=.69, after adjusting for age, gender, DM, and HTN and those <49 y/o had a lower risk of CAD. Table2 Conclusion: In this REP retrospective cohort study, the risk of developing a CAD event was similar between chemotherapy plus RT and chemotherapy only regimens, even after considering gender, age, HTN and DM.

Introduction: Gain-of-function mutations in SCN5A- encoded cardiac sodium channel (Na V 1.5) cause type 3 long QT syndrome (LQT3). Patients with SCN5A variants localizing to the local anesthetic binding domain might not be sensitive to lidocaine or mexiletine treatment. Hypothesis: Phenytoin, a sodium channel blocker used to treat epilepsy, may be a novel LQT3-directed therapy for a variant involving a critical residue of the Nav1.5’s local anesthetic binding domain. Methods: SCN5A-F1760C was identified in a now deceased infant with severe LQT3 (QTc of 680-1200 ms) who was refractory to left cardiac sympathetic denervation and pharmacological treatments with either lidocaine or mexiletine. SCN5A-F1760C was engineered by site directed mutagenesis and expressed in TSA201 cells. Patient-specific pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes (iPSC-CMs) from the SCN5A-F1760C-positive infant and gene-edited/variant-corrected isogenic control (IC) iPSC-CMs were generated. Na V 1.5 currents were recorded in TSA201 cells transfected with SCN5A-WT/ F1760C and action potentials (APs) from iPSC-CMs were recorded before and after treatment with 5μM Phenytoin using the whole cell patch-clamp technique. Results: SCN5A-F1760C did not change the NaV1.5 current density. However, the V1/2 of inactivation was right-shifted significantly by +14.1 mV from -86.3±0.9 mV (WT) to -72.2±0.7 mV (F1760C, p<0.0001) resulting in a marked increase in window current. F1760C increased sodium late current 2-fold from 0.18±0.04% in WT to 0.49±0.07% in F1760C (p=0.0005). Baseline APD to 90% repolarization (APD90) was prolonged significantly in F1760C-derived iPSC-CMs (641±40 ms) compared to IC iPSC-CMs (412±22 ms, p<0.0001). Treatment with 5μM phenytoin normalized the APD90 in F1760C-derived iPSC-CMs to 423+34 ms (p<0.0001), values approximating the ‘gene/variant-edited’ cure. Conclusions: Na V 1.5 gain-of-function caused by a novel SCN5A-F1760C variant results in marked APD90 prolongation which were rescued by phenytoin indicating the antiepileptic drug, phenytoin, may be a mutation-specific, LQT3-directed therapy for those LQT3-causative variants that disrupt the local anesthetic/lidocaine-binding domain.

Abstract Objective Assess the long‐term efficacy and safety of erenumab in patients with chronic migraine with acute medication overuse. Background Overuse of acute medication in patients with chronic migraine has been linked to greater pain intensity and disability and may diminish the effectiveness of preventive therapies. Methods This 52‐week open‐label extension study followed a 12‐week double‐blind placebo‐controlled study in which patients with chronic migraine were randomized 3:2:2 to placebo or once‐monthly erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg. Patients were stratified by region and medication overuse status. Patients received erenumab 70 mg or 140 mg throughout or switched from erenumab 70 to 140 mg (based on protocol amendment to augment safety data at higher dose). Efficacy was assessed in patients with and without medication overuse at parent study baseline. Results Of 609 patients enrolled in the extension study, 252/609 (41.4%) met the criteria for medication overuse at parent study baseline. At Week 52, the mean change in monthly migraine days from parent study baseline was −9.3 (95% confidence interval: −10.4, −8.1 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus −9.3 (−10.1, −8.5 days) in the non‐medication overuse subgroup (combined erenumab doses); proportion of patients achieving ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days at Week 52 was 55.9% (90/161; 48.2%, 63.3%) versus 61.3% (136/222; 54.7%, 67.4%), respectively. Among baseline users of acute migraine‐specific medication, the mean change in monthly migraine‐specific medication days at Week 52 was −7.4 (−8.3, −6.4 days) in the medication overuse subgroup versus −5.4 (−6.1, −4.7 days) in the non–medication overuse subgroup. Most patients (197/298; 66.1%) in the medication overuse subgroup transitioned to non‐overuse status by Week 52. Erenumab 140 mg was associated with numerically greater efficacy than erenumab 70 mg across all endpoints. No new safety signals were identified. Conclusion Long‐term erenumab treatment demonstrated sustained efficacy and safety in patients with chronic migraine with and without acute medication overuse.

Abstract Optic pathway gliomas (OPG) are generally low-grade lesions arising from the astrocytes of the visual pathway, most commonly of the optic nerves and chiasm. Uncertainty remains regarding the optimal management of this patient population. We sought to leverage population-level data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database to develop a predictive calculator for overall survival (OS) amongst pediatric patients with OPG. A total of 1,052 patients who had been diagnosed with OPG were included. Multivariate cox proportional hazard model demonstrated patients of “other” race (hazard ratio [HR]=4.109, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.076-15.694, p=0.039) exhibited a decreased overall survival, while patients with a median household income ≥$55,000 (HR=0.172, 95% CI 0.065-0.457, &lt;0.001) and those who underwent subtotal resection (HR=3.549, 95% CI 1.092-13.364, p=0.047) had a higher overall survival rate. An online, interactive survival prediction tool (https://spine.shinyapps.io/optic_glioma/) was created to estimate 5-, 10-, and 15-year overall survival probability as well as median survival months. C-index was 0.722 (95% CI 0.642-0.776) for the training set and 0.745 (95% CI 0.661-0.790) for the validation set. Good concordance between the predicted probability and the actual probability of the dataset was also observed. This calculator may serve as a useful clinical tool during patient counseling. Further investigations aimed at developing calculators of visual acuity preservation and progression-free survival are merited; progress toward this end will benefit from continued multicenter collaborations.

Abstract Introduction We sought to determine what type of treatment reengagement after smoking relapse would increase long-term cessation. Aims and Methods Participants were military personnel, retirees, and family members (TRICARE beneficiaries) recruited across the United States from August 2015 through June 2020. At baseline, consented participants (n = 614) received a validated, four-session, telephonic tobacco-cessation intervention with free nicotine replacement therapy. At the 3-month follow-up, 264 participants who failed to quit or relapsed were offered the opportunity to reengage in cessation. Of these, 134 were randomized into three reengagement conditions: (1) repeat initial intervention (“recycle”), (2) Smoking reduction with eventual cessation goal (“rate reduction”), or (3) Choose #1 or #2 (“choice”). Prolonged abstinence and 7-day point prevalence abstinence were measured at 12 months. Results Despite being in a clinical trial advertised as having the opportunity for reengagement, only 51% (134 of the 264) of participants who still smoked at 3-month follow-up were willing to reengage. Overall, participants randomized to recycle had higher prolonged cessation rates at 12 months than rate reduction conditions (OR = 16.43, 95% CI: 2.52 to 107.09, Bonferroni adjusted p = .011). When participants who randomly received recycle or rate reduction were pooled, respectively, with participants who chose recycle or rate reduction in the Choice group, recycle had higher prolonged cessation rates at 12 months than rate reduction (OR = 6.50, 95% CI: 1.49 to 28.42, p = .013). Conclusions Our findings suggest service members and their family members who fail to quit smoking but are willing to reengage in a cessation program are more likely to benefit from repeating the same treatment. Implications Finding methods that are both successful and acceptable to reengage people who smoke who want to quit can have a significant impact on improving the health of the public by reducing the portion of the population who smoke. This study suggests that repeating established cessation programs will result in more people ready to quit successfully achieving their goal.

The impact of bariatric surgery (BS) on kidney transplantation (KT) outcomes in patients with obesity remains controversial. We systematically searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for studies reporting outcomes of KT recipients that underwent prior BS. Common/random effects meta-analyses were performed to obtain summary ratios of the postoperative outcomes. Eighteen eligible studies involving 315 patients were identified. Sleeve gastrectomy was the most common BS type (65.7%) followed by Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (27.6%) and gastric banding (4.4%). Across studies that provided the data, the %excess weight loss from BS to KT was 62.79% (95% confidence interval [CI], 52.01-73.56; range, 46.2%-80.3%). The rates of delayed graft function and acute rejection were 16% (95% CI, 7%-28%) and 16% (95% CI, 11%-23%) in 14 and 11 studies that provided this data, respectively. The rates of wound, urinary, and vascular complications following KT were 5% (95% CI, 0%-13%),19% (95% CI, 2%-42%), and 2% (95% CI, 0%-5%), in 12, 9, and 11 studies that provided this data, respectively. Follow-up time after KT was reported in 11 studies (61.1%) and ranged from 16 mo to >5 y. Graft loss was reported in 14 studies with an average of 3% (95% CI, 1%-6%). Four studies that included a comparator group of patients with obesity who did not undergo BS before KT showed comparable outcomes between the groups. We conclude that currently there is a paucity of robust evidence to suggest that pretransplant BS has a major effect on post-KT outcomes. High-quality studies are needed to fully evaluate the impact of BS on KT outcomes.

7513 Background: While Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi) can induce sustained remissions, ongoing response requires continuous treatment and thus long-term safety/tolerability is critical for adherence, maintaining dose intensity, and delivering maximum efficacy. Pirtobrutinib is a highly selective, non-covalent (reversible) BTKi approved by the FDA in January 2023 for R/R mantle cell lymphoma after 2 prior lines of therapy including a BTKi. Pirtobrutinib has demonstrated promising efficacy with low discontinuation and dose reduction rates in patients (pts) with multiple subtypes of R/R B-cell malignancies. However, the long-term safety and tolerability of pirtobrutinib has not yet been reported. Here we report the clinical safety in pts with long-term (≥12 months) pirtobrutinib treatment from the phase 1/2 BRUIN trial. Methods: Pts with R/R B-cell malignancies who received ≥12 months of pirtobrutinib were included. Median time to onset, dose reduction, discontinuation, and cumulative incidence rates were determined for treatment emergent adverse event (TEAE) that occurred in ≥20% of pts and select AE of interest associated with BTKi. Results: As of 29 July 2022, 773 pts were enrolled, and 326 (42%) pts received treatment for ≥12 months. Among these 326 pts, median time on treatment was 19 months (IQR: 16,25), with 231 (71%) remaining on pirtobrutinib. The most common TEAE (all grade, regardless of attribution) in this long-term 326 pt cohort were fatigue (32%), diarrhea (31%), Covid-19 (29%), contusion (26%), cough (25%), and back pain (21%). TEAE leading to dose reduction or discontinuation occurred in 23 (7%) and 11 (3%) pts, respectively. Four (1%) pts discontinued due to a treatment-related AE, and 1 pt had a fatal treatment-related AE (Covid-19 pneumonia). Select AE of interest for the long-term pts are shown in the Table. Comprehensive safety analyses describing the frequency of TEAE over time will be presented. Conclusions: Prolonged pirtobrutinib therapy continues to demonstrate a safety profile amenable to long-term administration at the recommended dose without evidence of new or worsening toxicity signals. The safety and tolerability observed in pts on therapy for ≥12 months was similar to previously published safety analyses on all pts enrolled regardless of follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT03740529 . [Table: see text]

11524 Background: Ripretinib is a switch-control tyrosine kinase inhibitor approved for patients (pts) with gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) who received prior treatment with ≥3 kinase inhibitors, including imatinib. Sunitinib is approved for advanced GIST after imatinib failure. In the first interim analysis (IA) for overall survival (OS) in the INTRIGUE trial, data were immature (OS event rate, 22.3%), and median OS was not reached in either arm for the KIT exon 11 intent-to-treat (ITT) and all-patient (AP) ITT populations (S Bauer, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022). Additionally, ripretinib had a more favorable safety profile with fewer grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) than sunitinib. Here, we present the second IA of OS and updated safety from INTRIGUE. Methods: INTRIGUE is a global, open-label, phase 3 study that enrolled adult pts with advanced GIST who had disease progression on or intolerance to imatinib (NCT03673501). Randomization was 1:1 to ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) or sunitinib 50 mg QD (4 wks on/2 wks off) and was stratified by KIT mutational status and imatinib intolerance. OS was a key secondary endpoint; data cutoff for the second IA was Sept 1, 2022. Results: Of 453 pts in the AP ITT population, 444 received treatment; 51 remain on treatment (33/223 [14.8%] with ripretinib and 18/221 [8.1%] with sunitinib). Common reasons for treatment discontinuation were progressive disease (PD) assessed by independent radiologic review (55.4%), PD assessed by investigator (10.6%), clinical PD (5.9%), withdrawal of consent (5.4%), and adverse event (AE; 4.5%); fewer pts discontinued due to an AE for ripretinib vs sunitinib (2.7% vs 6.3%). Following study treatment discontinuation, 58 pts (25.6%) from the sunitinib arm received ripretinib; 139 pts (61.5%) from the ripretinib arm later received sunitinib. There were 185 OS events (40.8%) in the AP ITT population; median duration of follow-up was 28.7 and 28.5 months for ripretinib and sunitinib, respectively. OS was similar with ripretinib vs sunitinib in the AP ITT (median 35.5 vs 30.9 months; HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.66 to 1.18; nominal P = 0.39) and KIT exon 11 ITT populations (median 34.0 vs 31.5 months; HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.48; nominal P = 0.77). The updated safety profile was consistent with the primary analysis; fewer pts had grade 3/4 TEAEs with ripretinib vs sunitinib (95 [42.6%] vs 149 [67.4%]). Dose interruptions and reductions were lower with ripretinib vs sunitinib. The median (range) treatment duration was 7.9 (0.2–38.2) months for ripretinib and 6.5 (0.2–38.3) months for sunitinib. Conclusions: In the second IA from INTRIGUE, OS was similar between treatment arms. The safety profile remained consistent with additional data, and results demonstrate favorable safety with ripretinib in pts with advanced GIST previously treated with imatinib. Clinical trial information: NCT03673501 .