Citations

TPS595 Background: Patients (pts) with HER2+ early breast cancer (EBC) and invasive residual disease (RD) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) have a higher risk of relapse than pts with a pathologic complete response (pCR). Post neoadjuvant T-DM1 has improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS), but pts with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative or nodal RD have suboptimal outcomes and recurrences in the central nervous system are a problem. More effective treatment strategies are needed. The CompassHER2 trials, EA1181 and A011801, leverage pCR to tailor post neoadjuvant therapy in HER2+ EBC. EA1181 is a NAT de-escalation trial of a taxane, trastuzumab and pertuzumab (THP) in clinical stage II-III HER2+ EBC; pts with a pCR complete HP +/- adjuvant radiation (RT) +/- endocrine therapy (ET). A011801 is an escalation trial for pts with high risk HER2+ RD after NAT, examining addition of the HER2 selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) tucatinib to adjuvant T-DM1. Methods: Eligibility and Intervention: Pts. with high-risk HER2+ RD (e.g. ER-,node-positive, or both) after a predefined course of neoadjuvant HER2-directed treatment are randomized 1:1 to adjuvant T-DM1+ placebo (pb), vs. T-DM1 and tucatinib with adjuvant RT +/- ET. Eligibility criteria include completion of ≥ 6 cycles of NAT, including ≥ 9 weeks of T and H +/- P. All chemotherapy (CT) must be completed preoperatively unless participating in EA1181 (̃15-30% enrollees); these pts must receive postoperative CT to complete ≥ 6 cycles prior to enrollment on A011801. Pts who received prior HER2-targeted TKIs or antibody-drug conjugates are ineligible. Objectives: The primary objective is to determine if iDFS is higher with addition of T-DM1 to tucatinib in pts with HER2+ EBC with RD after NAT; secondary endpoints include overall survival, breast cancer free survival, distant recurrence-free survival, brain metastases-free survival and disease-free survival. Correlative objectives include the association of i) tumor infiltrating lymphocyte (TILs) levels in the primary tumor and RD with iDFS, ii) TILs with tucatinib benefit, iii) iDFS and circulating tumor cells (CTC) at serial timepoints and iv) the magnitude of benefit of tucatinib (iDFS) in pts with/without detectable pretreatment CTCs. Quality of life and pharmacokinetic endpoints will also be evaluated. Statistics: A011801 is a prospective, double-blind, randomized, phase III superiority trial; stratified by i) receipt of postoperative CT (Y/N), ii) hormone receptor-status (+/-),and iii) pathologic lymph node status (+/-). The study targets an absolute difference of 5% in iDFS (control vs. experimental arm 82% & 87%, HR = 0.7), with a two-sided alpha of 0.05 and power of 80%. The sample size is 981; target accrual = 1031 pts; activation and completion dates are 01/6/21 and ̃ 01/2028. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; Seagen Inc; ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04457596 Clinical trial information: NCT04457596.

Abstract Background: Cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and endocrine therapy (ET) have improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC), but progression of disease is inevitable. Serum thymidine kinase-1 (TK1) is a secreted marker of proliferation that is prognostic in patients (pts) with HR-positive, HER2-negative MBC and may be predictive of ET and CDK 4/6i response. PROMISE (NCT0281902) is a prospective study enrolling women with HR-positive MBC starting palbociclib (Pb) + letrozole (L) (1st line) or Pb + fulvestrant (2nd line). We undertook a comprehensive “omic” assessment of blood, tumor, urine and the fecal microbiome in order to identify novel genomic variants and pathways associated with an early decline in TK1 (measured after 2 months) and PFS. Additionally, patient derived xenografts/organoids were generated at baseline and progression to test new therapeutic approaches to overcome resistance to CDK4/6i and ET. We report the initial association between the baseline genomic landscape and baseline TK1 levels. Methods: FFPE tumor biopsies were obtained for DNA/RNA sequencing (TempusTM) and blood samples for TK1 (Divitum® assay, Biovica) were collected pretreatment (pre-Pb) and after 2 cycles of Pb + ET (post-Pb2). Both whole-exome (exome capture) sequencing (WES) and RNA-Seq used the Integrated DNA Technologies xGen Exome Research Panel v1.0 capture kit. TK1+ disease was defined as > 200 Du/L and TK1- disease as below limit of detection up to 200 Du/L. We tested the association between genomic and transcriptomic characteristics with baseline TK1 data in pretreatment samples where both WES and RNA-seq and TK1 was available. The data were analyzed using bioinformatics pipelines for somatic and germline mutations and copy number alterations. The current analysis focuses on baseline 1st-line pre-Pb omics data in conjunction with baseline TK1 levels. The database was locked for analysis on 5/29/2020. Results: Thirty-three pts (median age: 59 yrs.) were evaluable, with paired samples for TK1 in 32. Six pts had TK1+ disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Twenty-two pts had TK1- disease pre-Pb and post-Pb2. Four pts had a decrease in TK1 after 2 cycles of treatment that altered the classification from TK1+ to TK1-. Both baseline RNA seq and serum TK1 (n=16) were available for 4 TK1+ and 12 TK1- pts. In this group, 476 genes were differentially regulated (398 upregulated; 78 downregulated). Pathway analysis demonstrated enrichment in complement and coagulation cascade pathway, PPAR signaling pathway, and metabolism-related pathways related to up-regulation of CYP and UGT gene families. Further testing for the association of WES data with baseline TK1+ (n=8) and TK1- (n=16) disease demonstrated somatic copy number variations on chromosomes 6, 11, 12 and 15. CDK4 copy number gains were observed in 3/8 TK1+ pts and 0/16 TK1- pts. We also observed that somatic mutations (LOH, copy number and/or SNV/INDELs) were more prevalent in the TK1+ compared to the TK1- pre-Pb group in several cancer-associated genes (FAS [p=0.06] PTEN, PIK3CB, NAB2, SOX9 and FAT1 [p=0.08], TP53, and MAP2K4 [p=0.22]). Conversely, we also noted that 6/7 pts with GATA3 mutations had TK1- disease (p=0.23). Conclusions: Using a comprehensive “omics” approach, our data suggest that a secreted biomarker of proliferation (TK1) obtained prior to initiating CDK4/6i and ET for the first line treatment of HR+ MBC is associated with established and novel genes and pathways associated with prognosis of pts receiving ET and CDK 4/6i. Analysis of on-treatment (after 2 cycles) tumor RNA seq and its association with change in TK1 as well as data from the 2nd-line cohort will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Peter T Vedell, Ann Moyer, Abraham D Eyman Casey, Jason Sinnwell, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald W Northfelt, Minetta C Liu, Tufia C Haddad, Saranya Chumsri, Prema Peethambaram, Kathryn J Ruddy, Karthik V Giridhar, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Adrian Nordmark, Mattias Bergqvist, Brendan P McMenomy, Richard M Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Matthew P Goetz. Novel genomic variants and pathways associated with baseline serum thymidine kinase 1 levels in HR-positive HER2-negative MBC patients commencing palbociclib and letrozole [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS5-24.

Abstract Background: The tamoxifen (TAM) metabolite, ENDX, demonstrated promising antitumor activity in endocrine resistant breast cancer (BC) in both phase I and phase II settings. Furthermore, ENDX resulted in superior in vivo antitumor activity compared to TAM and letrozole in aromatase-expressing aromatase inhibitor-sensitive and resistant MCF7AC1 models. Recently, we identified protein kinase C beta 1 (PKCβ1), which regulates cell proliferation and tumorigenic transformation, as a novel target of ENDX. ENDX-bound PKCβ1 at concentrations achieved in phase I/II ENDX studies (100-300 nM). In contrast, TAM binding to PKCβ1 occurred at concentrations 7-10 folds higher (2 μM) than achievable with TAM 20 mg/day dosing. However, the clinical relevance of targeting PKCβ1 kinase activity is unclear, since drugs that target PKCβ1 (enzastaurin) have been ineffective in BC and other solid tumors. Therefore, we sought to understand how ENDX altered PKCβ1 and to further compare and contrast ENDXs effects to that of PKCβ1 kinase inhibition in ERα+ BC. Methods: The effects of PKCβ1 silencing and ENDX treatment on gene expression was analyzed by RNAseq in MCF7AC1 cells. The impact of PKCβ1-silencing on cell cycle was evaluated by flow cytometry. Protein expression of cell cycle regulators in PKCβ1 and ENDX-treated MCF7AC1 and T47D cells were compared to TAM and enzastaurin in vitro and to letrozole, TAM or control in vivo. The effects of PKCβ1 and drugs on growth were analyzed by cell proliferation assays. PRKCB gene amplification was assessed in primary tumors using TCGA data and in metastatic tumors using whole-exome sequencing data from patients enrolled in the PROMISE study (NCT 03281902). Results: RNAseq analysis revealed E2F targets and G2M checkpoints as the top hallmark genesets significantly downregulated in both PKCβ1-silenced and ENDX-treated MCF7AC1 cells. Flow cytometry demonstrated that PKCβ1 silencing increased G1 and reduced S phases of the cell cycle. Western blot analyses of PKCβ1-silenced MCF7AC1 and T47D cells displayed reduced protein levels of the cell cycle regulators Cyclin D1, Retinoblastoma (Rb), phospho-RbS807/811, CDK4, Chk1 and E2F1 that regulate G1/S transition. While short term ENDX (48 hours) treatment did not alter PKCβ1 levels, prolonged in vitro ENDX treatment profoundly reduced PKCβ1 protein levels and the aforementioned cell cycle regulators, faithfully replicating PKCβ1 silencing effects. In contrast, enzastaurin had no impact on proliferation or cell cycle proteins in either model. Consistent with this finding, ENDX, but not TAM or letrozole, reduced protein levels of ERα and cell cycle regulators in vivo. Overexpression of PKCβ1 induced TAM, but not ENDX, resistance and had little impact on responsiveness to enzastaurin. While PRKCB gene amplification was uncommon in newly diagnosed ERα+/HER2- BC (5%, TCGA), PRKCB was amplified in 40% of metastatic ERα+/HER2- BC (PROMISE study). Conclusion: We have confirmed the relevance of a new ENDX target, PKCβ1, in ERα+/HER2- BC. While targeting PKCβ1 kinase activity elicited no anticancer effects in ERα+ cells, PKCβ1 downregulation, either by siRNA or ENDX, resulted in profound ERα turnover, reduced protein levels of essential cell cycle mediators and profoundly inhibited cell proliferation. Furthermore, PKCβ1 protein expression is associated with TAM, but not ENDX, resistance, a finding whose clinical relevance is further magnified by identification of PRKCB amplification in metastatic ERα+ BC, confirming its potential importance in progression. Efforts are currently underway to elucidate the mechanistic basis for ENDX-induced PKCβ1 and ERα degradation and the contribution of these effects to the superior antitumor activity of ENDX in ERα+ BC. Citation Format: Swaathi Jayaraman, Mary J Kuffel, Krishna R Kalari, Kevin J Thompson, Xiaojia Tang, Vera J Suman, Elizabeth S Bruinsma, Ciara C O'Sullivan, Liewei Wang, Richard Weinshilboum, James N Ingle, John R Hawse, Matthew P Goetz. Antitumor activity of Z-endoxifen (ENDX) is mediated via PKCβ1-dependent ERα loss and cell cycle arrest in ERα-positive breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD8-04.

Abstract Background: In ER+ breast cancer (BC) models, Aurora A kinase (AURKA) activation is associated with expansion of CD44+/CD24low/- tumor initiating cells, down-regulation of ERα, and endocrine therapy resistance. Alisertib, a selective AURKA inhibitor, can restore ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity. Early phase studies evaluating alisertib alone or with fulvestrant for ER+ metastatic BC (MBC) demonstrated a favorable safety profile and promising antitumor activity [Haddad, Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2018]. A phase II trial was conducted to determine if the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib improved objective response rate (ORR) and to assess clinical activity of alisertib alone or with fulvestrant in patients (pts) with prior fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 inhibitor (CDK 4/6i). Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to Arm A, alisertib (50 mg PO BID Days 1-3, 8-10, 15-17 q 28 days) or Arm B, alisertib with fulvestrant (500 mg IM Day 1, 15 for Cycle 1 and q 28 days thereafter). Eligibility included postmenopausal women, history of ER+ BC, prior fulvestrant, ≤ 2 prior chemotherapy lines, and measurable disease. Stratification factors included prior CDK4/6i, ER level (<10%, ≥10%), and primary/secondary endocrine resistance. Pts on Arm A could cross over to Arm B at progression. With 45 pts per arm, a one sided alpha=0.15 sequential binomial test would have an 85% chance of detecting an increase of ≥ 20% in the ORR of ArmB when the true ORR for Arm A is ≤ 20%. ORR was defined as a partial response (PR) + complete response (CR) by RECIST v.1.1 criteria. Secondary endpoints include progression free survival (PFS), 24-week clinical benefit rate (CBR = CR + PR + absence of progression for> 6 cycles), overall survival, duration of response (DoR), and safety. Blood and tumor specimens were collected at baseline, end of Cycle 1, and progression. Results: Pts enrolled July 2017 - November 2019 with 118 pre-registered, 96 registered, and 90 evaluable for the primary endpoint (Arm A: 45, Arm B: 45). Median age was 60 (range 33, 85). Nearly all received prior fulvestrant (n=89, 98.9%), aromatase inhibitor (n=83, 92.2%), and CDK4/6i (n=88, 97.8%). Most had secondary endocrine resistance (n=71, 78.9%). Pre-registration biopsy for ER was positive in 84 pts (86.7%) and negative in 6 pts (13.3%). More pts on Arm B had prior everolimus (A: 35.6%, B: 57.8%) and prior chemotherapy (A: 44.4%, B: 55.6%) for MBC. The ORR for alisertib and fulvestrant was 20.0% (90% CI: 10.9-32.3%), not significantly greater than alisertib alone 17.8% (90% CI: 9.2-29.8%). The 24-week CBR for Arm A was 42.2% (90% CI: 29.7-55.6%; n=19, including 7 PR) and Arm B was 31.1% (90% CI: 19.9-44.3%; n=14, including 8 PR). As of July 1, 2020, the median DoR was not reached in either arm. The median PFS time was 5.6 months (95% CI: 3.9 - 9.3) for Arm A and 5.1 months (95%CI: 3.8 - 7.6) for Arm B. Seventeen pts (18.9%) remain on treatment (A: 12, B: 5) having received at least 11 cycles (range up to 32+ cycles). At least one dose reduction was required for pts (A: 19, B: 18), most commonly due to neutropenia. The most common severe (grade ≥3) adverse events included neutropenia (n=19, 42.2% in each arm), anemia (A: 15.6%, B: 8.8%), and fatigue (n=5, 11.1% Arm B only). Pts discontinued therapy due to disease progression equally in each arm (n=28, 62.2%), however more pts on Arm B (n=12) than Arm A (n=5) discontinued therapy due to toxicity, refusal or other reasons. Conclusion: While the addition of fulvestrant to alisertib did not improve ORR, promising clinical activity with alisertib monotherapy was observed overall and notably for pts with endocrine and CDK 4/6i-resistant MBC. More severe toxicities and treatment discontinuation were observed in pts receiving combination therapy. Correlative blood (CTC/cfDNA) and tissue (AURKA, ERα, and stemness biomarkers) studies are underway. Citation Format: Tufia Haddad, Antonino D'Assoro, Vera Suman, Jodi Carter, Brendan McMenomy, Erica Mayer, Meghan Karuturi, Aki Morikawa, Paul Marcom, Claudine Isaacs, Sun Young Oh, Amy Clark, Ingrid Mayer, Khandan Keyomarsi, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Ciara O'Sullivan, Prema Peethambaram, Timothy Hobday, Minetta Liu, James Ingle, Matthew Goetz. Randomized phaseII trial to evaluate alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant for advanced, endocrine-resistant breast cancer (TBCRC 041) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-05.

Abstract The management of human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER2)–positive breast cancer (BC) has rapidly evolved over the last 20 years. Major advances have led to US Food and Drug Administration approval of 7 HER2‐targeted therapies for the treatment of early‐stage and/or advanced‐stage disease. Although oncologic outcomes continue to improve, most patients with advanced HER2‐positive BC ultimately die of their disease because of primary or acquired resistance to therapy, and patients with HER2‐positive early BC who have residual invasive disease after preoperative systemic therapy are at a higher risk of distant recurrence and death. The concept of treatment de‐escalation and escalation is increasingly important to optimally tailor therapy for patients with HER2‐positive BC and is a major focus of the current review. Research efforts in this regard are discussed as well as updates regarding the evolving standard of care in the (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, including the use of novel combination therapies. The authors also briefly discuss ongoing challenges in the management of HER2‐positive BC (eg, intrinsic vs acquired drug resistance, the identification of predictive biomarkers, the integration of imaging techniques to guide clinical practice), and the treatment of HER2‐positive brain metastases. Research aimed at superseding these challenges will be imperative to ensure continued progress in the management of HER2‐positive BC going forward.

Abstract Background: The combination of cyclin dependent 4/6 kinase inhibitors (CDK4/6i) with endocrine therapy (ET) has resulted in clinically significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in hormone-receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC). However, most patients’ disease ultimately progresses on CDK4/6i and ET. Therefore, further research is necessary to understand the mechanisms driving primary and secondary resistance. PROMISE is a multicenter prospective cohort study enrolling women with HR-positive MBC commencing treatment with palbociclib + letrozole (1st line) or palbociclib + fulvestrant (2nd Line). The study provides a comprehensive “omic” assessment of blood, tumor, urine and the fecal microbiome to identify molecular or cellular features associated with primary endocrine resistance (e.g. disease progression ≤ 12 months on treatment) and acquired resistance to CDK 4/6i. Additionally, patient derived xenografts and organoids are created to test new drug strategies designed to overcome resistance to CDK 4/6i and ET. Here, we present initial sequencing results from pretreatment biospecimens collected from PROMISE study participants. Methods: On-study tumor biopsies and blood samples were collected for DNA/RNA sequencing (TempusTM). The analyzed biospecimens were all obtained prior to initiation of palbociclib and ET. We correlated patient clinical characteristics (phenotypes) with molecular data and responses to protocol treatment. The data were analyzed using a series of cutting-edge bioinformatics pipelines for somatic and germline mutations in addition to copy number alterations (CNAs). The study database was locked for analysis on 06/20/2019. Results: We analyzed the somatic single nucleotide variants/INDELs (sSNV/INDEL) profiles across the tumor samples to determine the genes that were least likely to occur as a result of background mutation processes. Twenty-six patients had somatic copy number alterations (sCNA) and/or sSNV/INDEL in at least one of 18 genes with the most significant sSNV/INDEL profiles (p < 0.03) which included clinically and biologically relevant genes. The genes with the most statistically significant sSNV/INDEL mutation profiles were GATA3, PIK3CA, CDH1, and ESR1 (p < 0.0009). We observed a high percentage of tumors with somatic alterations in GATA3 (23% sSNV/INDEL, 15% sCNA), PIK3CA (38%, 12%), CDH1 (19%, 50%) and ESR1 (19%, 58%). ESR1 mutations were more frequent in patients receiving 2nd line treatment. Other frequently altered genes included TP53 (15%, 46%), MAP2K4 (8%, 50%), DNAAF1 (8%, 50%), and CDKN1B (8%, 35%). Further, ZNF317 and F3 were altered in 9 and 7 patients, respectively. Twenty-four samples had alterations in at least one of the CDK4/6 pathway genes (RB1, CCNE2, CCND1, CDK6, ESR1, CDKN2A, CCND3, CDK4, CDK2 and CCNE1). Four patients progressed on therapy; three of the four patients had mutations in PIK3CA, and one had a mutation in ESR1. Results of the RNA sequencing data (N=26) will be presented at the SABCS meeting. Conclusions: This is the first report of a prospective study designed to characterize the genomic landscape of ER+/HER2- MBC prior to palbociclib treatment. We observed high frequencies of known targetable alterations in PIK3CA and ESR1, including in patients that progress, which is consistent with previous reports. RNA sequencing data will be presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Ciara C O Sullivan, Krishna R Kalari, Vera J Suman, Peter T Vedell, Ann Moyer, Erin Carlson, Jason Sinnwell, Tejaswi Alaparthi, Xiaojia Tang, Kevin Thompson, Jaeyun Sung, Alvaro Moreno-Aspitia, Donald Northfelt, Minetta C Liu, Tufia C Haddad, Prema Peethambaram, Saranya Chumsri, Kathryn J Ruddy, Karthik V Giridhar, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Paula Gill, Mohammad Ranginwala, Asad Javed, Sameer Batoo, Brendan P. McMenomy, Richard Weinshilboum, Liewei Wang, Matthew P Goetz. Comprehensive tumor sequencing to identify biomarkers of palbociclib response: First report of the PROMISE study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P2-11-07.

Abstract Introduction: CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) are FDA approved for treatment of hormone receptor (HR) positive, HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Recent work demonstrated that a rise in MCV was correlated with longer median progression free survival (Anampa et al, Haemoatologica 2018). We performed a single-institution retrospective analysis to evaluate whether palbociclib induced early changes in MCV serve as a pharmacodynamic biomarker to predict response to CDK4/6i. Methods: We identified a retrospective cohort of 81 patients with HR+, HER2- MBC treated with CDK4/6i as first line metastatic treatment at Mayo Clinic, Rochester. Hematologic indices were abstracted pretreatment and at the start of each cycle through the start of cycle 4 (C4). Wilcoxon signed test was used to examine the changes in MCV (ΔMCV) comparing pretreatment up to C4 and ΔMCV between cycles. Optimal cut points for ΔMCV were determined using Cutoff finder (Budczies et al., PLOS One 2012). Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was performed to evaluate associations of MCV and time to treatment failure (TTF), which was defined as the time from the start of the analyzed cycle to treatment discontinuation for any reason(in months). As eight comparisons were made, a Bonferroni correction established p-value <0.00625 as the adequate cutoff for statistical significance. Statistical analyses were performed using JMP (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC). Results: 60/81 patients had pretreatment and at least one subsequent lab data point that included MCV. The pretreatment mean hemoglobin (Hgb) was 12.8 [standard deviation (SD) 1.37 g/dL] and 6/60 (10.2%) patients with Hgb <11.0 g/dL. Mean pretreatment MCV was 89.0 femtoliters/cell [fl (SD 4.63)] and no macrocytosis (defined as MCV >100 fl) was observed. At C4, the mean Hgb was 12.1 g/dL (SD 1.11) with 4/49 (8.2%) with Hgb <11.0 g/dL. The C4 mean MCV was 96.6 fl (SD 5.23) and 8/29 (16.3%) developed macrocytosis. Wilcoxon signed analysis showed a significant increase in ΔMCV pretreatment to C2 [n=51, median 1.5 with interquartile range (IQR) -0.1-3.2, p<0.0001], C2 to C3 (n=44, median 2.9, IQR 1.4-5.2, p<0.0001), and C3 to C4 (n=41, median 3.4, IQR 1.9-4.9, p<0.0001). A rise in MCV≥8.15 from pretreatment to C4 was associated with a non-statistically significant improvement in TTF [n=49, hazard ratio (HR) 0.38, p = 0.06]. Between C2 and C3, a rise in MCV ≥2.9 was associated favorably with TTF (n=44, HR 0.36, p = 0.029). The estimated probability of remaining on treatment at 30 months was higher in those with C2-C3 ΔMCV ≥2.9 [44.1%; 95% Confidence Interval (CI) 17.3-68.2%] compared to those with a C2-C3 ΔMCV <2.9 (10.1%; 95%CI 1.5-28.7%). Discussion: We observed an increase in MCV in all patients receiving CDK4/6i by start of C4. The rise in MCV during CDK4/6i treatment may reflect drug induced cell-cycle arrest in hematopoietic cells. Evaluation in larger studies is needed to validate dynamic changes in MCV as a predictive biomarker of response to CDK4/6i therapy. Citation Format: Grace Mei Yee Choong, Roberto A Leon-Ferre, Ciara C O'Sullivan, Kathyrn J Ruddy, Tufia C Haddad, Timothy J Hobday, Prema P Peethambaram, Charles L Loprinizi, Minetta C Liu, Vera J Suman, Matthew P Goetz, Karthik V Giridhar. Evaluation of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) as a pharmacodynamic predictive biomarker in patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitors for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-42.

Prior to the advent of the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab, human epidermal growth-factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC) was associated with an aggressive clinical course and poor survival outcomes. In the era of effective HER2-directed therapies, median survival rates for patients with metastatic HER2+ BC now approach 5 years. Despite these improvements, the majority of affected patients unfortunately die from disease. Therapies to overcome treatment resistance are being actively pursued. One strategy has been to target the cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6), as they are downstream of HER2 and many of the cellular pathways driving resistance to HER2-targeted therapies, and play a key role in proliferation by controlling transition through the G1 restriction point to the S phase of the cell cycle. In this article, we review the published literature with regard to the rationale for CDK4/6-directed therapies in HER2+ BC and discuss ongoing clinical research and new challenges in the field.

PURPOSE Evidence-based treatments for metastatic, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–positive breast cancer to the CNS are limited. We previously reported modest activity of neratinib monotherapy for HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases. Here we report the results from additional study cohorts. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with measurable, progressive, HER2-positive brain metastases (92% after receiving CNS surgery and/or radiotherapy) received neratinib 240 mg orally once per day plus capecitabine 750 mg/m 2 twice per day for 14 days, then 7 days off. Lapatinib-naïve (cohort 3A) and lapatinib-treated (cohort 3B) patients were enrolled. If nine or more of 35 (cohort 3A) or three or more of 25 (cohort 3B) had CNS objective response rates (ORR), the drug combination would be deemed promising. The primary end point was composite CNS ORR in each cohort separately, requiring a reduction of 50% or more in the sum of target CNS lesion volumes without progression of nontarget lesions, new lesions, escalating steroids, progressive neurologic signs or symptoms, or non-CNS progression. RESULTS Forty-nine patients enrolled in cohorts 3A (n = 37) and 3B (n = 12; cohort closed for slow accrual). In cohort 3A, the composite CNS ORR = 49% (95% CI, 32% to 66%), and the CNS ORR in cohort 3B = 33% (95% CI, 10% to 65%). Median progression-free survival was 5.5 and 3.1 months in cohorts 3A and 3B, respectively; median survival was 13.3 and 15.1 months. Diarrhea was the most common grade 3 toxicity (29% in cohorts 3A and 3B). Neratinib plus capecitabine is active against refractory, HER2-positive breast cancer brain metastases, adding additional evidence that the efficacy of HER2-directed therapy in the brain is enhanced by chemotherapy. For optimal tolerance, efforts to minimize diarrhea are warranted.