Citations

Abstract Purpose: The heterogeneity of androgen receptor (AR)-activity (AR-A) is well-characterized in heavily treated metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the diversity and clinical implications of AR-A in treatment-naïve primary prostate cancer is largely unknown. We sought to characterize AR-A in localized prostate cancer and understand its molecular and clinical implications. Experimental Design: Genome-wide expression profiles from prostatectomy or biopsy samples from 19,470 patients were used, all with independent pathology review. This was comprised of prospective discovery (n = 5,239) and validation (n = 12,728) cohorts, six retrospective institutional cohorts with long-term clinical outcomes data (n = 1,170), and The Cancer Genome Atlas (n = 333). Results: A low AR-active subclass was identified, which comprised 9%–11% of each cohort, and was characterized by increased immune signaling, neuroendocrine expression, and decreased DNA repair. These tumors were predominantly ERG and basal subtype. Low AR-active tumors had significantly more rapid development of recurrence or metastatic disease across cohorts, which was maintained on multivariable analysis [HR, 2.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.22–5.60; P = 0.014]. Low AR-active tumors were predicted to be more sensitive to PARP inhibition, platinum chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, and less sensitive to docetaxel and androgen-deprivation therapy. This was validated clinically, in that low AR-active tumors were less sensitive to androgen-deprivation therapy (OR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.21–0.80; P = 0.008). Conclusions: Leveraging large-scale transcriptomic data allowed the identification of an aggressive subtype of treatment-naïve primary prostate cancer that harbors molecular features more analogous to mCRPC. This suggests that a preexisting subgroup of patients may have tumors that are predisposed to fail multiple current standard-of-care therapies and warrant dedicated therapeutic investigation.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients with t(8;16)(p11.2;p13) constitute a small subgroup with a distinct genetic and clinical profile. We present a unique case of a female infant with monocytic AML associated with t(8;19)(p11.2;q13.3), a rarely reported variation of t(8;16)(p11.2;p13). The patient presented with leukemia cutis and demonstrated erythrophagocytosis in the diagnostic bone marrow. She responded well to standard AML chemotherapy and is currently in remission. Here, we highlight her case as the youngest AML patient with t(8;19) described in the literature, discuss the significance and prognostic implications of this genetic variant, and review 8p11.2 fusion proteins in AML.

Abstract Assessment of x-ray angiography system performance is typically performed using stationary test objects with simple geometries such as a disk on a uniform background. However, these methods do not represent realistic imaging conditions in interventional cardiology as anatomy and devices are inherently non-stationary due to cardiac motion. In this work, a novel implementation of the channelized Hotelling observer (CHO) was used to assess the influence of motion blur on object detectability. A standard CHO model assumes imaging system stationarity whereby the detectability index of a test object is independent of location. However, real angiography systems are inherently non-stationary. While vendor correction gain factors and offset maps are used to compensate for visual non-uniformities, these corrections do not restore stationarity to the images. Methods to accommodate non-stationarity and allow assessment of the influence of motion blur on test object detectability will be presented. The effect of motion blur was quantified with the relative detectability index ( ), where the for an object when moving with constant linear velocity was compared to a low velocity ‘pseudo-stationary’ condition to account for system non-stationarity. The pseudo-stationary condition was used to isolate the influences of spatial non-stationarity and motion blur. Three different test object shapes (disks, spheres and capsules) with linear velocity in the range 0–30 cm · s −1 were tested. For 1 mm diameter objects and linear velocity 30 cm · s −1 , was degraded by 37%, 33% and 42% for the disk, sphere and capsule respectively, relative to the pseudo-stationary condition. Considering all test objects with diameter greater than 2 mm and linear velocity 30 cm · s −1 , was degraded by less than 10% due to motion. In summary, this work describes a new approach to assess performance of x-ray angiography systems using the CHO model and moving test objects.

Abstract Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in United States with a 5-year survival rate of only 8%. Inherited predisposition plays an important role in PDAC risk. Rare, moderately to highly penetrant mutations in hereditary cancer and pancreatitis genes, identified in families with a high incidence of disease, account for a small fraction of cases. At the other end of the spectrum, common risk variants of low penetrance have been discovered through genome-wide association studies (GWAS). Currently, over 20 common PDAC risk signals have been identified through GWAS in populations of European ancestry. However, these loci explain only a small fraction of genetic heritability for PDAC, and the causal genes for the large majority of these are unknown. Most susceptibility alleles discovered through GWAS are located in noncoding regions of the genome and are likely to function through allele specific regulation of gene expression. Transcriptome-wide association studies integrate expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) with GWAS data to discover genes whose cis-regulated expression is associated with complex traits. To identify novel susceptibility loci and likely causal genes, we applied this approach to PDAC. Firstly, we used two reference datasets generated from histologically normal pancreatic tissue samples from individuals of European ancestry, the DCEG/LTG (n=95) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx v7, n=174), to build robust predictors for gene expression (n=2,872-5,906; r2>0.01), using 5 different models (Top1, Lasso, Enet, Blup and Bslmm) in FUSION and PrediXcan. Gene expression predictors (n=2,043-21,422) were also generated by Enet in 48 different tissues (n=74-421 samples) from 608 individuals of European ancestry (GTEx). We then applied these predictor models to PDAC GWAS summary statistics from 9,040 PC cases and 12,496 controls. We discovered 24 genes whose genetically predicted expression is significantly associated with PDAC risk (FDR < 0.05), including 13 candidate genes at 10 novel loci (CELA3B, SMC2, SMC2-AS1, RP11-80H5.9, SMUG1, BTBD6, RCCD1, PNMT, CDK12, PGAP3, SUPT4H1, RP11-888D10.3 and PGPEP1) and 11 at 5 known risk loci (TERT, CLPTM1L, ZDHHC11B, INHBA, ABO, PDX1, KLF5, WDR59, CFDP1, BCAR1 and TMEM170A). Pathway enrichment analysis for genes differentially expressed in the top vs. bottom quartile of CELA3B expression highlighted higher expression of inflammatory and immune response genes in both the DCEG/LTG and GTEx pancreatic transcriptome datasets, indicating that low expression of this gene may be associated with an inflammatory state in the pancreas. Our findings showcase the utility of integrating multiple datasets to generate hypotheses and provide novel clues for the genetic mechanisms underlying pancreatic cancer risk. Citation Format: Jun Zhong, Ashley Jermusyk, Lang Wu, Jason W. Hoskins, Irene Collins, Mingfeng Zhang, Song Lei, Charles C. Chung, Tongwu Zhang, Wenming Xiao, Rachael Stolzenberg-Solomon, Alison P. Klein, Brian M. Wolpin, Xiao-Ou Shu, Stephen J. Chanock, Sara Olson, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Jill Smith, Jianxin Shi, Peter Kraft, Gloria M. Petersen, Wei Zheng, Laufey T. Amundadottir. Large-scale transcriptome-wide association study (TWAS) identifies novel candidate susceptibility genes for pancreatic cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2019; 2019 Mar 29-Apr 3; Atlanta, GA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 1591.