Citations

Abstract Systemic mastocytosis (SM) is a clinically heterogeneous disease with prognosis chiefly assigned based on World Health Organization (WHO) morphologic subclassification. We assessed the feasibility of developing contemporary risk models for SM based on clinical and integrated clinical-genetics information. Diagnosis of SM was per WHO criteria, and karyotype and next-generation sequencing data were available in a subset of the total 580 patients (median age, 55 years; range, 18-88 years) seen at the Mayo Clinic between 1968 and 2015. Morphologic subcategories were indolent/smoldering in 291 (50%) and “advanced” in 289 (50%): SM with an associated hematological neoplasm in 199, aggressive SM in 85, and mast cell leukemia in 5. Multivariable analysis of clinical variables identified age >60 years, advanced SM, thrombocytopenia <150 × 109/L, anemia below sex-adjusted normal, and increased alkaline phosphatase (ALP) as independent risk factors for survival; respective hazard ratios (HRs) 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were 2.5 (1.9-3.4), 2.7 (1.8-4.0), 2.5 (1.9-3.4), 2.2 (1.6-3.1), and 2.1 (1.5-3.0). In addition, ASXL1 (HR, 4.5; 95% CI, 2.6-7.6), RUNX1 (HR, 4.3; 95% CI, 1.3-10.8), and NRAS (HR, 5.0, 95% CI, 1.5-13.2) mutations were independently associated with inferior survival. Combined clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular risk factor analysis confirmed the independent prognostic contribution of adverse mutations (2.6, 1.6-4.4), advanced SM (4.0, 1.8-10.0), thrombocytopenia (2.8, 1.7-4.5), increased ALP (2.1, 1.2-4.0), and age >60 years (2.2, 1.3-3.6). These data were subsequently used to develop clinical and hybrid clinical-molecular risk models. The current study advances 2 complementary risk models for SM and highlights the independent prognostic contribution of mutations.

Abstract Disease Overview: Polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) are myeloproliferative neoplasms respectively characterized by erythrocytosis and thrombocytosis; other disease features include leukocytosis, splenomegaly, thrombosis, bleeding, microcirculatory symptoms, pruritus, and risk of leukemic or fibrotic transformation. Diagnosis: Bone marrow morphology remains the cornerstone of diagnosis. In addition, the presence of JAK2 mutation is expected in PV while approximately 90% of patients with ET express mutually exclusive JAK2, CALR, or myeloproliferative leukemia mutations. In ET, it is most important to exclude the possibility of prefibrotic myelofibrosis. Survival: Median survivals are 14 years for PV and 20 years for ET; the corresponding values for younger patients are 24 and 33 years. Certain mutations (mostly spliceosome) and abnormal karyotype might compromise survival in PV and ET. Life‐expectancy in ET is inferior to the control population. Driver mutations have not been shown to affect survival in ET. Risk of thrombosis is higher in JAK2‐mutated ET. Leukemic transformation rates at 10 years are estimated at <1% for ET and 3% for PV. Thrombosis Risk: In PV, 2 risk categories are considered: high (age > 60 years or thrombosis history present) and low (absence of both risk factors); in ET, 4 risk categories are considered: very low (age ≤ 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild‐type), low (same as very low but JAK2 mutation present), intermediate (age > 60 years, no thrombosis history, JAK2 wild‐type) and high (thrombosis history present or age > 60 years with JAK2 mutation). Risk‐Adapted Therapy: The main goal of therapy in both PV and ET is to prevent thrombohemorrhagic complications. All patients with PV require phlebotomy to keep hematocrit below 45% and once‐ or twice‐daily aspirin (81 mg), in the absence of contraindications. Very low‐risk ET might not require therapy while aspirin therapy is advised for low‐risk disease. Cytoreductive therapy is recommended for high‐risk ET and PV but it is not mandatory for intermediate‐risk ET. First‐line drug of choice for cytoreductive therapy, in both ET and PV, is hydroxyurea and second‐line drugs of choice are interferon‐α and busulfan. We do not recommend treatment with ruxolutinib in PV, unless in the presence of severe and protracted pruritus or marked splenomegaly that is not responding to the aforementioned drugs.

AbstractFirst‐line cytoreductive drug of choice in high risk essential thrombocythemia (ET) is currently hydroxyurea, a practice based on the results of a randomized study; second‐line drugs of choice include pegylated interferon‐α, busulfan and anagrelide. Anagrelide clinical trials were pioneered by the late Murray N. Silverstein (1928‐1998) of the Mayo Clinic whose studies led to FDA approval in March 1997. The current study represents a retrospective examination of the potential impact of anagrelide therapy on survival and disease complications in ET. 1076 patients with ET were considered (median age 58 years; females 63%); risk distribution, according to the international prognostic score for ET (IPSET), was 28% high, 42% intermediate, and 30% low. Overall (OS), myelofibrosis‐free (MFFS) and thrombosis‐free survival data were compared for ET patients diagnosed before and after the 1997 FDA approval date for anagrelide; a significant difference was apparent in OS (P = .006; HR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1‐1.7) and MFFS (P < .001; HR 4.2, 95% CI 2.7‐6.5), in favor of patients diagnosed prior to 1997; the difference was sustained during multivariable analysis that included IPSET. Similarly stratified survival data in polycythemia vera (n = 665) and primary myelofibrosis (n = 1282) showed no similar impact on survival (P = .3 and .17, respectively). The current study represents a retrospective analysis and suggests significantly decreased OS and MFFS in ET patients diagnosed after the FDA approval date of anagrelide. Whether or not anagrelide therapy was to blame for the worsening of OS and MFFS over time cannot be assumed and requires validation in a prospective study.

Key PointsSerum albumin and cholesterol levels predict survival in primary myelofibrosis, independent of each other and contemporary risk models. The cachexia index, determined by serum albumin and cholesterol levels, might further refine current prognostic models in myelofibrosis.

e18521 Background: The FDA-approved drug trabectedin is a DNA minor groove binder (MGB) with activity against translocation-associated sarcomas. Lurbinectedin is a next-generation MGB, with activity against myeloid leukemia cells. A phase I clinical trial was initiated to determine recommended doses in MDS/AML. Further assessment of its safety, tolerability, and pharmacogenetics were studied. Methods: In total, 42 patients with relapsed/refractory MDS/AML received lurbinectedin, using a 3+3 study design. It was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion first at 3.5, 5, 6, and 7mg per dose on days 1 and 8. Subsequently, it was administered on days 1, 2, and 3, using 1, 1.5, 2, or 3mg per dose per patient. Results: Three patients had dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), which were rhabdomyolysis (up to gr 4), hyperbilirubinemia (gr 3), and oral herpes (gr 3). All DLTs occurred in the 6 and 7mg cohorts. Adverse events included febrile neutropenia/infections (n = 3), GI (n = 6) and pulmonary (n = 2) toxicity, hyperhidrosis (n = 1), and QT prolongation (n = 1). Overall, 33 of 42 patients (79%) had reduction of blasts in peripheral blood (PB) or bone marrow (BM) at nadir, including 23 (55%) with > 50% reduction in PB blasts alone (n = 18) or both BM and PB blasts (n = 5). One patient had PR, 2 patients had morphologic leukemia-free survival, and most (n = 30) were discontinued for progressive disease. Early deaths occurred from disease-related causes, not attributable to lurbinectedin. Thirty-two patients treated at MD Anderson were analyzed for clinical characteristics and responses. Notably, among patients with follow-up bone marrow biopsy, those with a cytogenetic abnormality at chromosome 11q21-23 had significantly greater bone marrow blast reduction than those without such abnormality (change in percentage blasts: -31±14% [n = 4] vs. 8±8% [n = 16], respectively; P= 0.04). Conclusions: Lurbinectedin is generally safe and tolerated at dose levels tested. While no sustained remissions > 3 cycles were observed in these highest-risk patients, single-agent lurbinectedin was transiently leukemia suppressive for some patients, including some with abnormal chr11q or TP53 mutation. Rational combinations and situational uses of lurbinectedin are under consideration. Clinical trial information: NCT01314599.

e18514 Background: Standard induction therapy for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) includes “cytarabine and anthracycline”. Anthracyclines are known to cause acute, subacute and chronic cardiac complications ( Lefrak , EA et al, Cancer 1973:32(2):302-314; Singal, PK et al, NEJM 1998;339(13):900-905). It is recommended to do base line cardiac function assessment with echocardiogram prior to induction therapy containing anthracycline. This study was done to find the frequency of changes made in avoiding anthracycline usage following this evaluation. Methods: The Mayo clinic data base was interrogated to identify patients with newly diagnosed AML who underwent echocardiogram prior to anthracycline containing induction chemotherapy. Echocardiogram results, including left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), diastolic dysfunction, valvular disease, and any resultant treatment alterations were reviewed. Results: Three hundred twenty six patients were identified. The median (range) age was 61 (17-82) years and 62% were male. The median (range) LVEF was 65% (30-87), and 3 (0.9%) patients had LVEF < 50% (range 30-47%). Of these 3 patients, 1 had 4 vessel CABG a decade ago, his EF was 46% and treated with full dose idarubicin; 2 of them presented with blastic crisis, 1 had EF 46% and improved to 51% after 5 days and then given daunorubicin, the other one had an EF of 30% and treated with 50% dose reduced cytarabine alone. Sixty five (23%) patients had previous chemotherapy or radiation exposure, including 24 (7.4 %) with previous anthracycline, 14 (4.3%) had prior radiation to the chest wall. No patient with previous chemotherapy or radiation exposure had a reduced LVEF. Conclusions: Echocardiography prior to anthracycline therapy rarely detects abnormal LVEF. Screening echo may be helpful in those presented with leukemic blastic crisis or had previous exposure to chemo-radiation.

7058 Background: The 2016 WHO classification includes myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasms, unclassifiable (MDS/MPN-U), as an MDS/MPN overlap syndrome not meeting criteria for well-defined entities such as CMML. No standard prognostication or treatment guidelines exist for such patients. Methods: We retrospectively identified MDS/MPN-U cases from 1990-2016 through our myeloid malignancies database. All bone marrow reports were reviewed to ensure compliance with 2016 WHO criteria. Clinical & cytogenetic parameters at diagnosis were assessed & compared with treatment outcomes. Results: Eighty nine patients met study criteria, with a median age of 69 years (range: 37-93); 58 (65%) males. Median follow-up was 22.2 months (range: 0-172), with 41 (46%) deaths & 13 (15%) leukemic transformations. Median OS was 24.8 months (range: 0-172). 43 (53%) patients had an abnormal karyotype, with common abnormalities being trisomy 8 (12%), complex karyotype (9%) & del (20q) (6%). Given the fewer types of abnormalities identified, the IPSS cytogenetic stratification was more effective than IPSS-R, with risk categorization including; 45 good (55%), 20 intermediate (25%) & 16 high risk (20%) respectively (8 unavailable). On univariate analysis, increased age (p = 0.05), decreased hemoglobin (p = 0.02), higher ANC (p = 0.03), circulating immature myeloid cells (p = 0.02), higher LDH (p = 0.009), absence of bone marrow ring sideroblasts (p = 0.001) & higher risk (intermediate & high) IPSS cytogenetic categories (p = 0.01) adversely impacted OS. In a multivariate model that included the aforementioned variables, higher risk IPSS cytogenetics retained a negative prognostic impact (p = 0.04). 28 patients received a median of 6 cycles (range: 1-21) of hypomethylating agent therapy (HMA), with an overall response rate of 18% (CR-3, PR-2). All responders had an abnormal karyotype (p = 0.01). However, HMA did not affect either OS or LFS. Conclusions: Intermediate & high risk IPSS cytogenetic categories independently & adversely impact survival in WHO defined MDS/MPN-U patients. HMA use did not impact OS; however, patients with abnormal karyotypes were more likely to respond.