Citations

Abstract Objectives There are an increasing number of centres performing research on high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging (VW-MRI) in GCA. However, harmonized approaches to VW-MRI in GCA are lacking and are essential to performing multicentre studies. Using a data-driven, consensus-based approach, an international expert group developed a standardized MRI protocol and scoring system to advance multi-centred research in cranial GCA. Methods A targeted literature review of VW-MRI in cranial GCA was conducted. A working group comprised of radiologists, rheumatologists and ophthalmologists with expertise in VW-MRI and GCA reviewed the results of the literature search, presented relevant data and images from their respective centres, and then reached consensus on recommendations related to key MRI structures, MRI sequences, scoring system and other important considerations. Results A total of 21 relevant articles were identified and reviewed. Based on published literature, structures to be evaluated on MRI were categorized based on anatomic location (extradural cranial, intradural cranial and orbits) and prioritization (core vs elective). Essential and elective sequences to comprehensively image cranial and orbital structures while minimizing scan time were determined along with scoring systems to grade contrast enhancement. Conclusion This report describes a standardized approach to facilitate research of VW-MRI in cranial GCA that is the result of a multidisciplinary, international collaboration of experts in VW-MRI and/or GCA.

Abstract Rationale Fibrosing mediastinitis (FM) is an uncommon fibroinflammatory condition without established or effective medical therapies. Infiltrating B lymphocytes are commonly present, and progressive fibrosis compromises mediastinal structures, including blood vessels and airways, resulting in significant morbidity and mortality. Objective To evaluate the benefits and side effects of rituximab in patients with progressive and symptomatic FM. Methods We treated 22 patients (median age, 35 yr; range, 15–68 yr; 45% female) with metabolically active, progressive FM with rituximab on an off-label basis. Additionally, patients were administered pneumocystis and antifungal prophylaxis when immunosuppressed with rituximab. Modeling of longitudinal treatment response based on changes in relative lesion volume from baseline was performed retrospectively using functional data analysis, and time-to-event modeling was performed to estimate treatment response rates based on a >30% reduction in pretreatment volume. The primary endpoints were lack of disease progression and change in mediastinal lesion volume on computed tomography (evaluated retrospectively). Results No patient experienced disease progression after rituximab therapy. Median clinical follow-up was 42 months (range, 7–94 mo) and imaging follow-up 21 months (range, 7–62 mo). A total of 82% of patients had confirmed histoplasmosis-associated FM. After rituximab treatment, a 49.6% (95% confidence interval, 17.5–64.4%) mean estimated decrease in pretreatment lesion volume was observed at 24 months. The estimated objective treatment response rate was 47.9% (95% confidence interval, 26.7–70.3%). Conclusions This observational study suggests that rituximab is a well tolerated and potentially effective therapy in a cohort of patients with symptomatic and progressive FM.

ImportanceThe prognosis of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus and esophagogastric junction (AEG) is poor. From current evidence, it remains unclear to what extent preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) or preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy achieve better outcomes than surgery alone.ObjectiveTo assess the association of preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy in patients with AEG with overall survival and other outcomes.Data SourcesLiterature search in PubMed, Cochrane Library, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, ClinicalTrials.gov, and International Clinical Trials Registry Platform was performed from inception to April 21, 2023.Study SelectionTwo blinded reviewers screened for randomized clinical trials comparing preoperative CRT plus surgery with preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery, 1 intervention with surgery alone, or all 3 treatments. Only data from participants with AEG were included from trials that encompassed mixed histology or gastric cancer. Among 2768 initially identified studies, 17 (0.6%) met the selection criteria.Data Extraction and SynthesisThe Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) reporting guidelines were followed for extracting data and assessing data quality by 2 independent extractors. A bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted using the 2-stage approach.Main Outcomes and MeasuresOverall and disease-free survival, postoperative morbidity, and mortality.ResultsThe analyses included 2549 patients (2206 [86.5%] male; mean [SD] age, 61.0 [9.4] years) from 17 trials (conducted from 1989-2016). Both preoperative CRT plus surgery (hazard ratio [HR], 0.75 [95% credible interval (CrI), 0.62-0.90]; 3-year difference, 105 deaths per 1000 patients) and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy plus surgery (HR, 0.78 [95% CrI, 0.64-0.91]; 3-year difference, 90 deaths per 1000 patients) showed longer overall survival than surgery alone. Comparing the 2 modalities yielded similar overall survival (HR, 1.04 [95% CrI], 0.83-1.28]; 3-year difference, 15 deaths per 1000 patients fewer for CRT). Similarly, disease-free survival was longer for both modalities compared with surgery alone. Postoperative morbidity was more frequent after CRT plus surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.94 [95% CrI, 1.01-8.59]) than surgery alone. Postoperative mortality was not significantly more frequent after CRT plus surgery than surgery alone (OR, 2.50 [95% CrI, 0.66-10.56]) or after chemotherapy plus surgery than CRT plus surgery (OR, 0.44 [95% CrI, 0.08-2.00]).Conclusions and RelevanceIn this meta-analysis of patients with AEG, both preoperative CRT and preoperative and/or perioperative chemotherapy were associated with longer survival without relevant differences between the 2 modalities. Thus, either of the 2 treatments may be recommended to patients.

ObjectiveAvacopan, an activated complement factor 5 receptor antagonist, has been approved as adjunct therapy for severe active antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody–associated vasculitis (AAV). Current evidence supports the management of AAV presenting with diffuse alveolar hemorrhage (DAH) by administering glucocorticoids combined with either rituximab or cyclophosphamide in addition to supportive care. The role of avacopan in patients with DAH as a primary severe disease manifestation of AAV has not been well established. Furthermore, concerns remain regarding timely access to avacopan, the best glucocorticoid tapering regimen, and long‐term efficacy and safety of the drug. We sought to identify clinical features and outcomes of patients presenting with DAH secondary to AAV who received avacopan in addition to glucocorticoids and rituximab or cyclophosphamide.MethodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of all consecutive patients presenting with DAH as part of active severe granulomatosis with polyangiitis or microscopic polyangiitis. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at presentation and follow‐up.ResultsFifteen patients met inclusion criteria and were observed for a median time of 17 weeks (interquartile range [IQR] 6–37 weeks) after initiation of avacopan. Patients were predominantly female and White, had never smoked, and were a median age of 66 years (IQR 52–72 years) at diagnosis. The majority had newly diagnosed severe AAV with renal involvement. Three patients progressed to respiratory failure. The timing of avacopan introduction and patterns of glucocorticoid tapers varied widely in this cohort. Two serious adverse events related to infection were observed, including one opportunistic infection leading to the patient's death, although neither was directly attributed to avacopan administration.ConclusionWe describe the clinical course of patients who presented with the severe AAV disease manifestation of DAH and received avacopan as adjunct therapy. Most patients achieved remission during follow‐up, and adverse events, including infection, were observed.

Abstract Objective ANCA-negative granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) remains a diagnosis of exclusion. Clinical differences between patients with ANCA-negative vs ANCA-positive GPA have not been analysed in sizable case-control studies, and the effects of ANCA-seroconversion from negative to positive are not well documented. Methods A single-centre, sex and age matched case-control study evaluated ANCA-negative vs ANCA-positive GPA from 1 January 1996 to 31 December 2015. Patients who experienced seroconversion were the subject of a case-crossover study. Clinical data and outcomes were retrieved from electronic medical records. Results ANCA-negative GPA was identified in 110 patients; 65% were female; median age was 55 (IQR 39–65) years at time of diagnosis. Disease severity was milder in ANCA-negative GPA (BVAS/WG = 2 vs 6, P < 0.001). Mucous membranous/eye manifestations were more frequent in ANCA-negative GPA. General symptoms, pulmonary and renal involvement were more frequent in ANCA-positive GPA. Patients with ANCA-positive GPA relapsed more over 60 months (21.8% vs. 9.1%, P = 0.009) compared with ANCA-negative GPA and had shorter time to event (P = 0.043). Patients with general manifestations, BMI > 30kg/m2 and necrotizing granulomatous inflammation were more likely to relapse. The 16 patients who seroconverted into ANCA-positive during follow-up had higher mean BVAS/WG at time of diagnosis (P < 0.001) and increased incidence of relapses (P = 0.004) after seroconversion. Necrotizing granulomatous inflammation on biopsy in ANCA-negative GPA patients was identified as a risk factor for subsequent seroconversion to ANCA-positivity. Conclusion Patients with ANCA-negative GPA have milder disease and a lower frequency of relapse than those with ANCA-positive GPA. ANCA appearance portended higher disease severity and an increased frequency of relapses.

AbstractINTRODUCTIONThe apolipoprotein E gene (APOE) is an established central player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease (AD), with distinct apoE isoforms exerting diverse effects. apoE influences not only amyloid‐beta and tau pathologies but also lipid and energy metabolism, neuroinflammation, cerebral vascular health, and sex‐dependent disease manifestations. Furthermore, ancestral background may significantly impact the link between APOE and AD, underscoring the need for more inclusive research.METHODSIn 2023, the Alzheimer's Association convened multidisciplinary researchers at the “AAIC Advancements: APOE” conference to discuss various topics, including apoE isoforms and their roles in AD pathogenesis, progress in apoE‐targeted therapeutic strategies, updates on disease models and interventions that modulate apoE expression and function.RESULTSThis manuscript presents highlights from the conference and provides an overview of opportunities for further research in the field.DISCUSSIONUnderstanding apoE's multifaceted roles in AD pathogenesis will help develop targeted interventions for AD and advance the field of AD precision medicine.Highlights APOE is a central player in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer's disease. APOE exerts a numerous effects throughout the brain on amyloid‐beta, tau, and other pathways. The AAIC Advancements: APOE conference encouraged discussions and collaborations on understanding the role of APOE.

Abstract Shoulder arthroscopy is a versatile method for treating a variety of shoulder pathologies in a minimally invasive manner. Typically, it is performed with the patient positioned in a beach‐chair or lateral decubitus position with the latter being conventionally preferred for shoulder instability work given the use of traction and creation of a distracted joint. This allows ideal visualization and accessibility of the anterior, inferior, and posterior aspects of the glenoid, labrum, and axillary pouch. Despite the apparent advantages, the lateral decubitus position comes with its own technical challenges. Many of these may stem from surgeon training, experience, and level of familiarity with the positioning and arthroscopic view. This Technical Note demonstrates a reproducible and teachable method for efficient and effective diagnostic shoulder arthroscopy in the lateral decubitus position, along with presenting its associated advantages and disadvantages. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract A broad range of shoulder pathologies are treated with shoulder arthroscopy due to its minimally invasive nature. Mastering the fundamentals is critical for high‐quality care; this includes patient positioning. Surgeons must consider the advantages and disadvantages of the 2 most prominent patient positions: lateral decubitus and beach chair. The beach‐chair position offers an intuitive anatomic view with the advantage of shoulder maneuverability. Understanding the associated pitfalls related to patient hemodynamics; head, neck, and shoulder positioning; and protection of bony prominences can guide the operative care team to obtaining a safe position for the patient. The purpose of this Technical Note and video is to present and demonstrate a reproducible and teachable method for safely positioning a patient in the beach‐chair position for shoulder arthroscopy, as well as to describe the associated advantages and disadvantages. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Shoulder arthroscopy is one of the most common orthopaedic procedures. Since its introduction in the 1970s, significant advances have been made in surgical techniques and instrumentation. Shoulder arthroscopy is often performed in either the beach‐chair or lateral decubitus position, and each positioning technique has its own benefits. In this work, we will describe the history of lateral decubitus positioning for shoulder arthroscopy. We outline a detailed guide for safe and consistent lateral decubitus positioning, and key steps of lateral decubitus positioning will be emphasized. Pearls, pitfalls, advantages, and disadvantages of this positioning technique will also be discussed. With appropriate technique, lateral decubitus positioning is safe and effective for arthroscopic treatment of various shoulder pathologies. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract Shoulder arthroscopy is a popular modality for the treatment of shoulder pathology. Since its advent in the 1970s, significant advancements have been made in both technology and technique. Shoulder arthroscopy is performed in either the beach‐chair or lateral decubitus positions, and each position has its unique benefits and considerations. Beach‐chair positioning, initially described in the 1980s, has become the preferred method of positioning for most arthroscopic procedures. In this work, we describe the history of beach‐chair positioning for shoulder arthroscopy. We outline a reproducible and teachable method for consistent and comprehensive diagnostic arthroscopy in the beach‐chair position. Pearls, pitfalls, advantages, and disadvantages of diagnostic arthroscopy in this position are discussed. When properly executed, diagnostic arthroscopy in the beach‐chair position can effectively identify and characterize intra‐articular shoulder pathologies. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.