Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

223 citation(s) found for "Taı̈eb, Julien".

Towards Sustainable Magnetic Resonance Neuro Imaging: Pathways for Energy Optimization and Cost Reduction Strategies
Alerte, Zélie , Chodorowski, Mateusz , Ammari, Samy , Rovira, Àlex , Ognard, Julien , Salem, D. Ben , Rovira, Àlex , Ognard, Julien

Applied Sciences | January 27, 2025 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 1305

10.3390/app15031305 Get It

We evaluated the energy consumption of a 3T MRI using a central monitoring system, focusing on hospital energy costs during peak winter months from 2021 to 2023. We analyzed consumption during non-productive phases like end-of-day standby and assessed their impact. For active use, we compared standard and AI-enhanced protocols on phantoms, scheduling high-demand protocols during off-peak hours to benefit from lower energy prices. Standard protocols consumed 3.4 to 15 kWh, while optimized protocols used 2.3 to 10.6 kWh, reducing consumption by 32% on average. Savings per scan ranged from EUR 0.03 to EUR 3.7. The electrical consumption of a brain MRI protocol is equivalent to that of 3–4 knee protocols or 2–3 lumbar spine protocols. Using AI-optimized protocols and management, 41 protocols can be completed in 12 h, up from 30, reducing daily costs by EUR 2.38 to EUR 29.18. Annually, AI-optimized protocols could save 7900 to 8800 kWh per MRI unit, totaling 10,500 to 11,600 MWh across France’s MRI fleet, equivalent to the yearly consumption of about 4700 to 5300 people. Optimizing MRI resource use can expand patient access while significantly reducing the associated energy footprint. These findings support the implementation of more sustainable practices in medical imaging without compromising care quality.
Depressive Symptoms and Amyloid Pathology
Oomens, Julie Elisabeth , Engelborghs, Sebastiaan , Arnim, Christine A. F. Von , Boada, Merçé , Didic, Mira , Dubois, Bruno, Fröhlich, Lutz, Gill, Kiran Dip, Grimmer, Timo, Hildebrandt, Helmut , Itoh, Yoshiaki , Lee, Dong Young , Lleó, Alberto, Meyer, Philipp T. , Kapaki, Elisabeth, Pardini, Matteo , Popp, Julius , Rami, Lorena , Reiman, Eric M. , Rinne, Juha O. , Sánchez‐Juan, Pascual, Sarazin, Marie , Scarmeas, Nikolaos , Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wallin, Anders, Vos, Stephanie J. B. , Jansen, Willemijn J. , group, Amyloid Biomarker Study, Altomare, Daniele , Baldeiras, Inês , Blennow, Kaj, Braber, Anouk den , Cerman, Jiří , Chipi, Elena , Eckerström, Marie , Ekblad, Laura L. , Förster, Stefan , Guedj, Éric , Hausner, Lucrezia , Huey, Edward D. , Jiménez‐Bonilla, J., Johnson, Keith A. , Juaristi, Arantxa, Kern, Silke , Kirsebom, Bjørn‐Eivind , Landau, Susan , Legdeur, Nienke , Guerra, Jorge J. Llibre, Maserejian, Nancy N., Marquié, Marta , Minatani, Shinobu, Olivieri, Pauline , Perrin, Richard J., Peters, Oliver , Prabhakar, Sudesh, Ramakers, Inez H., Rodríguez‐Rodríguez, Eloy , Ruiz, Agustín, Rüther, E., Selnes, Per , Spiru, Luiza , Takeda, Akitoshi , Teichmann, Marc , Thompson, Loisa I., Vogelgsangs, Jonathan, Wallin, Åsa K., Zettergren, Anna , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Boada, Merce , Oomens, Julie E , Bottlaender, Michel , Wiels, Wietse A. , Baeken, Chris , Dubois, Bruno , Fladby, Tormod , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Fröhlich, Lutz, Grimmer, Timo , Hort, Jakub , Iwatsubo, Takeshi , Klimkowicz‐Mrowiec, Aleksandra , Lleó, Alberto , Martínez‐Lage, Pablo , Mendonça, Alexandre de , Parchi, Piero , Parnetti, Lucilla , Rodrigue, Karen M. , Santana, Isabel , Skoog, Ingmar , Snyder, Peter J. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Wiltfang, Jens , Zetterberg, Henrik , Ossenkoppele, Rik , Verhey, Frans R.J. , Visser, Pieter Jelle , Alcolea, Daniel , Baiardi, Simone , Bateman, Randall J. , Blennow, Kaj , Buchem, Mark A. van , Byun, Min Soo , Chen, Kewei , Day, Gregory S. , Drzezga, Alexander E. , Epelbaum, Stéphane , Fortea, Juan , Freund‐Levi, Yvonne , Frings, Lars , Hellwig, Sabine , Kandimalla, Ramesh , Paraskevas, George P. , Kornhuber, Johannes , Lagarde, Julien , Morbelli, Silvia , Mroczko, Barbara , Ntanasi, Eva , Oliveira, Catarina Resende , Olivieri, Pauline , Orellana, Adelina , Ruiz, Agustı́n , Silva, Dina , Soininen, Hilkka S. , Tijms, Betty M. , Teunissen, Charlotte E. , Vöglein, Jonathan , Waldemar, Gunhild , Yannakoulia, Mary , Yi, Dahyun

JAMA Psychiatry | January 22, 2025 | Volume: 82 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 296

10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4305 | PMID 39841452 Get It

Importance Depressive symptoms are associated with cognitive decline in older individuals. Uncertainty about underlying mechanisms hampers diagnostic and therapeutic efforts. This large-scale study aimed to elucidate the association between depressive symptoms and amyloid pathology. Objective To examine the association between depressive symptoms and amyloid pathology and its dependency on age, sex, education, and APOE genotype in older individuals without dementia. Design, Setting, and Participants Cross-sectional analyses were performed using data from the Amyloid Biomarker Study data pooling initiative. Data from 49 research, population-based, and memory clinic studies were pooled and harmonized. The Amyloid Biomarker Study has been collecting data since 2012 and data collection is ongoing. At the time of analysis, 95 centers were included in the Amyloid Biomarker Study. The study included 9746 individuals with normal cognition (NC) and 3023 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) aged between 34 and 100 years for whom data on amyloid biomarkers, presence of depressive symptoms, and age were available. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to February 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures Amyloid-β1-42 levels in cerebrospinal fluid or amyloid positron emission tomography scans were used to determine presence or absence of amyloid pathology. Presence of depressive symptoms was determined on the basis of validated depression rating scale scores, evidence of a current clinical diagnosis of depression, or self-reported depressive symptoms. Results In individuals with NC (mean [SD] age, 68.6 [8.9] years; 5664 [58.2%] female; 3002 [34.0%] APOE ε4 carriers; 937 [9.6%] had depressive symptoms; 2648 [27.2%] had amyloid pathology), the presence of depressive symptoms was not associated with amyloid pathology (odds ratio [OR], 1.13; 95% CI, 0.90-1.40; P = .29). In individuals with MCI (mean [SD] age, 70.2 [8.7] years; 1481 [49.0%] female; 1046 [44.8%] APOE ε4 carriers; 824 [27.3%] had depressive symptoms; 1668 [55.8%] had amyloid pathology), the presence of depressive symptoms was associated with a lower likelihood of amyloid pathology (OR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.61-0.89; P = .001). When considering subgroup effects, in individuals with NC, the presence of depressive symptoms was associated with a higher frequency of amyloid pathology in APOE ε4 noncarriers (mean difference, 5.0%; 95% CI 1.0-9.0; P = .02) but not in APOE ε4 carriers. This was not the case in individuals with MCI. Conclusions and Relevance Depressive symptoms were not consistently associated with a higher frequency of amyloid pathology in participants with NC and were associated with a lower likelihood of amyloid pathology in participants with MCI. These findings were not influenced by age, sex, or education level. Mechanisms other than amyloid accumulation may commonly underlie depressive symptoms in late life.
Characterization of the heterogeneity of amyloid‐PET‐negative patients with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic early‐onset AD: an FDG‐PET study in the LEADS cohort
Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Apostolova, Liana G. , Windon, Charles , Lagarde, Julien , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Maiti, Piyush , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Nudelman, Kelly , Koeppe, Robert A. , Carrillo, María C. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.092804 Get It

AbstractBackgroundDiagnosing sporadic early‐onset AD (EOAD, age‐at‐onset<65) is challenging: in the multi‐center Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study, ∼25% of patients with clinically diagnosed EOAD are amyloid‐PET‐negative. Here we used FDG‐PET to characterize the heterogeneity of hypometabolic profiles in these patients and better identify underlying etiologies.MethodSeventy‐four amyloid‐PET‐negative patients with clinical diagnosis of sporadic EOAD (MCI or mild dementia stage) underwent FDG‐PET. Patients were classified as having normal or hypometabolic FDG‐PET based on a data‐driven approach that compared each patient to a group of 61 age‐matched amyloid‐PET‐negative controls using 12 methodological combinations (3 reference regions, 2 voxel‐level thresholds, 2 outlier detection methods). We then assessed clinical and demographic differences between patients with normal versus hypometabolic FDG‐PET, and further compared groups using independent biomarkers of neurodegeneration (structural MRI and fluid biomarkers). Finally, we applied hierarchical clustering to hypometabolic FDG‐PET scans to identify patterns of hypometabolism.ResultThirty‐six amyloid‐negative patients (49%) had hypometabolic FDG‐PET scans. They were older and more severely impaired across most cognitive domains than patients with normal FDG‐PET (Table 1). They also had reduced hippocampal volumes and cortical thickness (Figure 1A), higher plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, and elevated plasma GFAP compared to patients with normal FDG‐PET (Figure 1B). In contrast, the latter, who had intermediate cognitive scores between hypometabolic patients and controls, had MRI and fluid biomarker levels in the range of controls (Figure 1). In hypometabolic patients, hierarchical clustering identified four profiles: i) anterior temporal extending to temporo‐parietal and frontal regions (n=5), ii) anterior temporal and orbitofrontal (n=11), iii) occipito‐parietal (n=6), and iv) lateral frontal and parietal (n=14) (Figure 2). Genetic testing identified two patients with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD)‐associated pathogenic variants, both considered hypometabolic and assigned to the first (MAPT) and second (c9orf72) metabolic profiles.ConclusionFifty‐one percent of amyloid‐negative patients had normal FDG‐PET: they had milder clinical impairment, normal MRI measures, and normal NfL values, suggesting non‐neurodegenerative etiologies. Patients with abnormal FDG showed heterogeneous hypometabolic patterns suggestive of multiple etiologies including Lewy body disease, FTLD or corticobasal degeneration. Longitudinal follow‐up to autopsy will ultimately clarify the amyloid‐negative clinical mimics of sporadic EOAD.
Amyloid‐PET in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic early‐ versus late‐onset AD: comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts
Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Landau, Susan, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Apostolova, Liana G. , Windon, Charles , Lagarde, Julien , Maiti, Piyush , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Raya, Maison Abu , Vrillon, Agathe , Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Nudelman, Kelly , Koeppe, Robert A. , Carrillo, María C. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.092903 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLarge‐scale studies comparing sporadic early‐onset AD (EOAD, age<65) and late‐onset AD (LOAD, age≥65) are lacking. We compared amyloid‐PET outcomes (positivity rate and amyloid burden) between patients clinically diagnosed with sporadic EOAD vs LOAD, leveraging data from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset AD Study (LEADS) and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3 (ADNI3).Method731 patients meeting the 2011 NIA‐AA criteria for AD dementia or MCI were included (505 early‐onset from LEADS, 226 late‐onset from ADNI3, Table 1). All participants underwent amyloid‐PET with [18F]Florbetaben or [18F]Florbetapir. Amyloid positivity was centrally determined by a process involving a visual read by a trained expert and PET‐only quantification; in case of a discrepancy, a read from an independent physician acted as a tiebreaker. Logistic regressions in each cohort examined relations between amyloid positivity and age, sex, MMSE and APOE4 genotype. Amyloid burden was independently quantified in Centiloids using an MRI‐based pipeline. Mean Centiloids in LEADS and ADNI were compared with two‐way ANOVA, for visually positive and visually negative scans.ResultAmyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (76%) than ADNI (64%, p<0.001, Figure 1A). Lower MMSE and APOE4 genotype increased odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts, although the APOE4 effect was stronger in ADNI than LEADS (OR=10.1 versus 2.4, p=0.007, Table 2). Amyloid positivity was more common in females across cohorts, but this effect was only statistically significant in LEADS (Table 2). Centiloids were bimodally distributed in both cohorts, although the separation between positive and negative scans was more prominent in LEADS (Figure 1B). Visually positive scans had significantly higher Centiloids in LEADS than in ADNI, whereas no cohort difference was observed for visually negative scans (Figure 1C). Sensitivity analyses showed that this effect was driven by patients with MCI (CDR≤0.5; Figure 1D‐E).ConclusionThe lower amyloid positivity rate in ADNI might be due to AD‐mimicking pathologies being more common at an older age. The higher amyloid burden in early‐onset, amyloid‐positive patients could reflect younger patients being diagnosed later in the disease course compared to typical, late‐onset patients. Alternatively, younger patients might tolerate higher neuropathology burden due to higher brain reserve or fewer co‐pathologies.
Amyloid‐PET in patients with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic early‐ versus late‐onset AD: comparison of the LEADS and ADNI cohorts
Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Landau, Susan, Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Apostolova, Liana G. , Windon, Charles , Lagarde, Julien , Maiti, Piyush , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Raya, Maison Abu , Vrillon, Agathe , Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Nudelman, Kelly , Koeppe, Robert A. , Carrillo, María C. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.094101 Get It

AbstractBackgroundLarge‐scale studies comparing sporadic early‐onset AD (EOAD, age<65) and late‐onset AD (LOAD, age = 65) are lacking. We compared amyloid‐PET outcomes (positivity rate and amyloid burden) between patients clinically diagnosed with sporadic EOAD vs LOAD, leveraging data from the Longitudinal Early‐Onset AD Study (LEADS) and the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative 3 (ADNI3).Method731 patients meeting the 2011 NIA‐AA criteria for AD dementia or MCI were included (505 early‐onset from LEADS, 226 late‐onset from ADNI3, Table 1). All participants underwent amyloid‐PET with [18F]Florbetaben or [18F]Florbetapir. Amyloid positivity was centrally determined by a process involving a visual read by a trained expert and PET‐only quantification; in case of a discrepancy, a read from an independent physician acted as a tiebreaker. Logistic regressions in each cohort examined relations between amyloid positivity and age, sex, MMSE and APOE4 genotype. Amyloid burden was independently quantified in Centiloids using an MRI‐based pipeline. Mean Centiloids in LEADS and ADNI were compared with two‐way ANOVA, for visually positive and visually negative scans.ResultAmyloid positivity rate was higher in LEADS (76%) than ADNI (64%, p<0.001, Figure 1A). Lower MMSE and APOE4 genotype increased odds of amyloid positivity in both cohorts, although the APOE4 effect was stronger in ADNI than LEADS (OR = 10.1 versus 2.4, p = 0.007, Table 2). Amyloid positivity was more common in females across cohorts, but this effect was only statistically significant in LEADS (Table 2). Centiloids were bimodally distributed in both cohorts, although the separation between positive and negative scans was more prominent in LEADS (Figure 1B). Visually positive scans had significantly higher Centiloids in LEADS than in ADNI, whereas no cohort difference was observed for visually negative scans (Figure 1C). Sensitivity analyses showed that this effect was driven by patients with MCI (CDR = 0.5; Figure 1D‐E).ConclusionThe lower amyloid positivity rate in ADNI might be due to AD‐mimicking pathologies being more common at an older age. The higher amyloid burden in early‐onset, amyloid‐positive patients could reflect younger patients being diagnosed later in the disease course compared to typical, late‐onset patients. Alternatively, younger patients might tolerate higher neuropathology burden due to higher brain reserve or fewer co‐pathologies.
Characterization of the heterogeneity of amyloid‐PET‐negative patients with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic early‐onset AD: an FDG‐PET study in the LEADS cohort
Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Zeltzer, Ehud , Windon, Charles , Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Touroutoglou, Alexandra , Apostolova, Liana G. , Windon, Charles , Lagarde, Julien , Schonhaut, Daniel R. , Maiti, Piyush , Zhang, Jiaxiuxiu, Hammers, Dustin B , Dage, Jeffrey L. , Nudelman, Kelly , Koeppe, Robert A. , Carrillo, María C. , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2025 | Volume: 20 | Issue: S9 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.094087 Get It

AbstractBackgroundDiagnosing sporadic early‐onset AD (EOAD, age‐at‐onset<65) is challenging: in the multi‐center Longitudinal Early‐onset Alzheimer’s Disease Study, ∼25% of patients with clinically diagnosed EOAD are amyloid‐PET‐negative. Here we used FDG‐PET to characterize the heterogeneity of hypometabolic profiles in these patients and better identify underlying etiologies.MethodSeventy‐four amyloid‐PET‐negative patients with clinical diagnosis of sporadic EOAD (MCI or mild dementia stage) underwent FDG‐PET. Patients were classified as having normal or hypometabolic FDG‐PET based on a data‐driven approach that compared each patient to a group of 61 age‐matched amyloid‐PET‐negative controls using 12 methodological combinations (3 reference regions, 2 voxel‐level thresholds, 2 outlier detection methods). We then assessed clinical and demographic differences between patients with normal versus hypometabolic FDG‐PET, and further compared groups using independent biomarkers of neurodegeneration (structural MRI and fluid biomarkers). Finally, we applied hierarchical clustering to hypometabolic FDG‐PET scans to identify patterns of hypometabolism.ResultThirty‐six amyloid‐negative patients (49%) had hypometabolic FDG‐PET scans. They were older and more severely impaired across most cognitive domains than patients with normal FDG‐PET (Table 1). They also had reduced hippocampal volumes and cortical thickness (Figure 1A), higher plasma and CSF neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels, and elevated plasma GFAP compared to patients with normal FDG‐PET (Figure 1B). In contrast, the latter, who had intermediate cognitive scores between hypometabolic patients and controls, had MRI and fluid biomarker levels in the range of controls (Figure 1). In hypometabolic patients, hierarchical clustering identified four profiles: i) anterior temporal extending to temporo‐parietal and frontal regions (n = 5), ii) anterior temporal and orbitofrontal (n = 11), iii) occipito‐parietal (n = 6), and iv) lateral frontal and parietal (n = 14) (Figure 2). Genetic testing identified two patients with Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration (FTLD)‐associated pathogenic variants, both considered hypometabolic and assigned to the first (MAPT) and second (c9orf72) metabolic profiles.ConclusionFifty‐one percent of amyloid‐negative patients had normal FDG‐PET: they had milder clinical impairment, normal MRI measures, and normal NfL values, suggesting non‐neurodegenerative etiologies. Patients with abnormal FDG showed heterogeneous hypometabolic patterns suggestive of multiple etiologies including Lewy body disease, FTLD or corticobasal degeneration. Longitudinal follow‐up to autopsy will ultimately clarify the amyloid‐negative clinical mimics of sporadic EOAD.
Early treatment discontinuation in patients with deficient mismatch repair or microsatellite instability high metastatic colorectal cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors
Ambrosini, Margherita , Alouani, Emily , Lonardi, Sara , Hafliger, Émilie , Mazard, Thibault , Pernot, Simon , Parent, Pauline , Ros, Javier , Overman, Michael J. , Guimbaud, Rosine , Cremolini, Chiara , Taieb, Julien , Ambrosini, Margherita , Lonardi, Sara , Overman, Michael J , Tougeron, David , Pietrantonio, Filippo , Cremolini, Chiara , Taı̈eb, Julien , Sinicrope, Frank A. , Decraecker, Marie , Boilève, Alice , Jayachandran, Priya , Nasca, Vincenzo , Salvatore, Lisa , Tougeron, David , Pietrantonio, Filippo

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer | January 6, 2025 | Volume: 13 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e010424

10.1136/jitc-2024-010424 | PMID 39755579 Get It

Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are recommended to treat patients with deficient mismatch repair/microsatellite instability high (dMMR/MSI-H) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Pivotal trials have fixed a maximum ICI duration of 2 years, without a compelling rationale. A shorter treatment duration has the potential to improve patients' quality of life and reduce both toxicity and cost without compromising efficacy. Here we examine whether early treatment discontinuation (ETD) before 13 months in patients without progressive disease (PD) can lead to similar long-term disease control compared with a longer treatment duration (LTD). Methods To assess whether ETD is associated with similar outcomes compared with LTD, we assembled an international cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with ICIs who stopped treatment for a reason other than PD within 395 days (ETD group) and compared them to those who continued for >395 days (LTD group). Outcomes were adjusted for patient/tumor characteristics. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) and secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results Of 976 patients, 137 and 394 were allocated to the ETD and LTD groups, respectively. In the ETD group, treatment was discontinued due to toxicity (n=56), objective response (n=43), surgery (n=28), patient decision (n=2) or other reasons (n=8). Baseline characteristics were well balanced between the two groups: 22% in both groups received both anti-programmed death-(ligand) 1 (anti-PD-(L)1) + anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (anti-CTLA-4); all others received anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. ORR to ICIs was 81% in both groups. Median duration of treatment was ~7 months in the ETD and ~24 months in the LTD group. After a median follow-up of 44 months (IQR: 30–67), similar PFS (HR: 0.92, 95% CI: 0.60 to 1.40, p=0.69) and OS (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 0.66 to 1.99, p=0.62) from the start of ICIs were observed in ETD and LTD patients. In the ETD group, 28 (20%) patients had a PFS event and 9 restarted ICIs with a disease control rate of 66%. Conclusions In our international series of dMMR/MSI-H mCRC, ETD of ICIs in the absence of PD did not seem detrimental in terms of PFS and OS compared with continuing treatment beyond 1 year. Randomized clinical trials to compare short and long treatment duration are now warranted.
Longitudinal cognitive performance of participants with sporadic early onset Alzheimer's disease from LEADS
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Taurone, Alexander, Thangarajah, Maryanne, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul, Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David W. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Grant, Ian , Honig, Lawrence S., Johnson, Erik C. B. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Rogalskı, Emily , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, Marı́a C., Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Carrillo, María C. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Reman, Rema, Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, S. J. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14439 | PMID 39713873 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) manifests prior to the age of 65, and affects 4%–8% of patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The current analyses sought to examine longitudinal cognitive trajectories of participants with early‐onset dementia. METHODS Data from 307 cognitively normal (CN) volunteer participants and those with amyloid‐positive EOAD or amyloid‐negative cognitive impairment (EOnonAD) were compared. Cognitive trajectories across a comprehensive cognitive battery spanning 42 months were examined using mixed‐effects modeling. RESULTS The EOAD group displayed worse cognition at baseline relative to EOnonAD and CN groups, and more aggressive declines in cognition over time. The largest effects were observed on measures of executive functioning domains, while memory declines were blunted in EOAD. DISCUSSION EOAD declined 2–4× faster than EOnonAD, and EOAD pathology is not restricted to memory networks. Early identification of deficits is critical to ensure that individuals with sporadic EOAD can be considered for treatment using disease‐modifying medications. Highlights Represents the most comprehensive longitudinal characterization of sporadic EOAD to date. The trajectory of cognitive declines was steep for EOAD participants and worse than for other groups. Executive functioning measures exhibited the greatest declines over time in EOAD.
Differences in baseline cognitive performance between participants with early‐onset and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease: Comparison of LEADS and ADNI
Hammers, Dustin B. , Eloyan, Ani , Thangarajah, Maryanne, Taurone, Alexander, Gao, Sujuan , Polsinelli, Angelina J. , Kirby, Kala, Dage, Jeffrey L. , Aisen, Paul , Reman, Rema, Joie, Renaud La , Clark, David A. , Day, Gregory S. , Duara, Ranjan , Graff‐Radford, Neill R. , Masdeu, Joseph C. , Mendez, Mario F. , Onyike, Chiadi U. , Riddle, Meghan , Grant, Ian , Rogalskı, Emily , Johnson, Erik C. B. , Salloway, Steven, Sha, Sharon J. , Turner, Raymond Scott , Wingo, Thomas S. , Carrillo, María C. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Apostolova, Liana G. , Day, Gregory S , La Joie, Renaud , Rabinovici, Gil D , Wingo, Thomas S , Dage, Jeffrey L , Hammers, Dustin B , Beckett, Laurel , Kirby, Kala, Nudelman, Kelly , Lagarde, Julien , Atri, Alireza , Clark, David, Duara, Ranjan , Honig, Lawrence S. , Jones, David T. , Masdeu, Joseph C , Womack, Kyle , Musiek, Erik , Salloway, Steve , Wolk, David A. , Dickerson, Bradford Clark

Alzheimer's & Dementia | December 23, 2024 | Volume: 21 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.14218 | PMID 39711228 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION Early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) share similar amyloid etiology, but evidence from smaller‐scale studies suggests that they manifest differently clinically. Current analyses sought to contrast the cognitive profiles of EOAD and LOAD. METHODS Z‐ score cognitive‐domain composites for 311 amyloid‐positive sporadic EOAD and 314 amyloid‐positive LOAD participants were calculated from baseline data from age‐appropriate control cohorts. Z‐ score composites were compared between AD groups for each domain. RESULTS After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD displayed worse visuospatial, executive functioning, and processing speed/attention skills relative to LOAD, and LOAD displayed worse language, episodic immediate memory, and episodic delayed memory. DISCUSSION Sporadic EOAD possesses distinct cognitive profiles relative to LOAD. Clinicians should be alert for non‐amnestic impairments in younger patients to ensure proper identification and intervention using disease‐modifying treatments. Highlights Both early‐onset Alzheimer's disease (EOAD) and late‐onset Alzheimer's disease (LOAD) participants displayed widespread cognitive impairments relative to their same‐aged peers. Cognitive impairments were more severe for EOAD than for LOAD participants in visuospatial and executive domains. Memory and language impairments were more severe for LOAD than for EOAD participants Results were comparable after removing clinical phenotypes of posterior cortical atrophy (PCA), primary progressive aphasia (lv‐PPA), and frontal‐variant AD.
Methotrexate and cytarabine in adult LCH: High risk, high reward and maintenance free?
Abeykoon, Jithma P. , Go, Ronald S. , Azoulay, Lévi-Dan , Haroche, Julien, Go, Ronald S , Haroche, Julien

British Journal of Haematology | November 13, 2024 | Volume: 206 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 792-794

10.1111/bjh.19903 | PMID 39535303 Get It

Lin et al. report the long‐term follow‐up of a phase II trial involving 95 adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH), investigating the combination of methotrexate and cytarabine (MA). After a median follow‐up of 6.5 years, the study showed high response rates, with 90% overall response; 55% of patients free from an event such as disease progression, poor response or death; and 93% of patients were alive, though nearly half experienced febrile neutropenia. This prospective study helps fill gaps in understanding adult LCH treatment, indicating that fixed‐duration chemotherapy can yield durable responses despite its associated risks. It emphasizes the importance of personalized treatment decisions, considering both fixed‐duration chemotherapy and continuous targeted agents based on patient and disease‐specific factors.Commentary on: Lin et al. Long term follow‐up of methotrexate and cytarabine in adult patients with Langerhans cell histiocytosis. Br J Haematol 2025; 206:576‐584.