Citations

Endovascular reconstruction has become the standard treatment of chronic obstruction of large veins. Stenting is done with increasing frequency to treat iliac venous obstructions, with or without associated inferior vena caval or femoral vein occlusions. Open reconstruction with venous bypass is performed today in patients who fail attempts at venous stenting or who are not candidates for endovascular reconstructions. Patients with primary or secondary malignancies invading the vena cava undergo open caval reconstruction at the time of tumour excision. Open venous reconstructions are still preferred in patients with large vein injuries due to blunt or penetrating trauma or in those who suffer iatrogenic venous injuries. Hybrid reconstruction can be performed with endophlebectomy of the common femoral or femoral veins combined with iliofemoral stenting.

Purpose: To describe technical tips for recanalization of long-segment flush superior mesenteric artery (SMA) occlusions. Technique: Ultrasound-guided left brachial artery access was gained in 2 patients with a 7F 90-cm sheath being advanced to the supraceliac aorta. The SMA stump was visualized using a selective inferior mesenteric artery (IMA) catheterization via femoral approach. A combination of a 7F 100-cm Multipurpose (MPA) guide and a 5F 125-cm MPA catheter was utilized to provide support for selective catheterization. Subsequently, a 0.018-inch wire and catheter were advanced crossing the area of occlusion. Predilatation was performed, followed by placement of covered stent. Both patients had uncomplicated course and resolution of symptoms. Conclusion: Flush SMA occlusions are challenging lesions but may be treated by antegrade percutaneous recanalization with good results. Technical aspects that facilitate recanalization include brachial approach, use of a stiff system (sheath, guide, and catheter) and concomitant injection to facilitate visualization of the SMA stump.

We present the midterm clinical outcomes and predictors of balloon angioplasty and stent placement in atherosclerotic femoropopliteal (FP) arterial disease. Between January 2002 and August 2006, 155 patients (men = 56%; 71.4 ± 10.5 years) underwent 171 FP angioplasty or stent for claudication (n = 82, 54%) or critical limb ischemia ([CLI] n = 70, 46%). Follow-up was obtained through September 30, 2009. The average follow-up was 3.25 ± 1.73 years. In claudicants versus CLI, the 12-month patency for TransAtlantic InterSociety Consensus II (TASC II) classification (TASC A/B) was 93% versus 80%, respectively, and TASC C/D 83% versus 80%. At 3 years, TASC A/B was 82% versus 80%, respectively, and TASC C/D was 56% versus 80%, respectively. The predictor of clinical failure in claudicants was chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) and in CLI, the predictor of amputation was hyperlipidemia.

Purpose: To review the outcomes of retrograde supra-aortic vessel stent (RSAS) placement combined with open carotid or subclavian artery revascularization. Methods: Retrospective review of all consecutive patients between 1995 and 2010, excluding transfemoral procedures or isolated retrograde stent placement. Results: There were 11 patients (9 females, mean age 65 years). Open revascularization included carotid endarterectomy in 6 patients, carotid-subclavian bypass in 3, and carotid-carotid bypass in 2 patients. There were no operative deaths or neurological events. All symptomatic patients improved. Over a mean follow-up of 24 months, One patient developed common carotid artery (CCA) in-stent dissection and symptomatic restenosis treated with subclavian-carotid bypass. Another 3 patients had asymptomatic restenosis of the carotid bifurcation but required no intervention. Conclusions: Retrograde stenting of the common carotid or innominate artery is a safe and effective method to provide inflow in selected patients with severe supra-aortic vessel disease who require concomitant open carotid or subclavian artery reconstructions.

One of the technical limitations of surgeon-modified fenestrated stent grafts is the lack of a diameter-reducing wire, which facilitates catheterization of target branches if there are errors of device design, alignment, or implantation. This article describes a technique of adding a diameter-reducing wire to the modified TX2 fenestrated stent graft for compassionate use in aortic emergencies or high-risk patients who do not have access to manufactured devices. The modified Cook TX2 stent graft was created using reinforced fenestrations with gold nitinol markers. After the TX2 stent was fully unsheathed, one of the nitinol wires located in the inner cannula was withdrawn and redirected externally through and through the fabric of the stent graft. Each Z stent was constrained using the nitinol wire for support and two nonlocking polypropylene loops. The use of a diameter-reducing wire facilitates side branch catheterization by allowing longitudinal and rotational movement to the modified fenestrated stent graft in patients where there is misalignment between the fenestration and the origin of the target vessel.

Background and Purpose— To evaluate the periprocedural outcome after carotid artery stenting with embolic brain protection (EBP+) versus without embolic brain protection (EBP−). Methods— We retrospectively reviewed data from a prospective nonrandomized database of 357 patients who underwent carotid artery stenting in the neuroradiology division of our institution from 1999 to 2009. One hundred five patients underwent angioplasty and stenting without distal protection, whereas 252 were treated with distal protection. Patients were analyzed according to their EBP status (+ or −) for the primary end points of perioperative stroke, death, or myocardial infarction. Results— Unprotected stenting was mostly performed in the early years of this study and this is reflected in significant baseline differences between the two groups. In our earlier experience, carotid artery stenting was used in patients with more significant comorbidities. Diabetes mellitus ( P =0.04), previous coronary artery disease ( P =0.02) and myocardial infarction ( P =0.04), and symptomatic lesion ( P =0.01) were significantly more common in the EBP− cohort. Despite these baseline differences, there were no significant differences in the primary end points (2% in the EBP+ group and 4.8% in the EBP−, P =0.15). The incidence of ipsilateral stroke in the EBP− and in the EBP+ group was 3.8% versus 0.8%, respectively ( P =0.6). There were 2 perioperative deaths (1 in each group) and 4 myocardial infarctions (3 in the EBP+ arm and 1 in the EBP− arm, all non-Q infarcts; P =nonsignificant). Conclusions— In accordance with recent literature, this series cast doubts as to the real effectiveness of distal embolic protection devices in reducing periprocedural complications.

Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF-1) is an autosomal dominant disorder characterized by café au lait macules, neurofibromas, and iris hamartomas. Internal carotid artery aneurysms rarely affect patients with NF-1 but may be associated with rupture or neurologic complications. We report a 42-year-old female patient with NF-1 and a bilobed right internal carotid artery aneurysm extending to C2. The aneurysm was excised with high exposure of the carotid artery and reconstruction was performed using saphenous vein graft. We review the literature relevant to internal carotid aneurysms associated with NF-1.

Vascular events that occur in the brain also occur in the eye, giving rise to different ophthalmologic manifestations that range from amaurosis fugax to complete blindness due to central retinal artery occlusion. The objective of this study was to ascertain the relative frequency and predictive value of ocular findings suggestive of carotid occlusive disease in patients being investigated for carotid endarterectomy. The charts of 366 patients undergoing carotid angiography for evaluation of cerebrovascular or visual symptoms over a 5-year period were reviewed. The presence of eye symptoms, neurologic symptoms, cervical bruits, and ophthalmologic findings on admission was recorded and correlated with the presence of significant carotid artery stenosis (? 50%). Positive eye findings included retinal plaques, rubeosis iridis, neovascular glaucoma, venous stasis retinopathy, central and branch retinal artery occlusion, ischemic optic neuropathy, and asymmetric hypertensive retinopathy. Seventy-five patients (21%) presented with amaurosis fugax; 41 patients (11%) were found to have one or more ocular findings consistent with carotid artery disease. All patients with positive eye findings were diagnosed by ophthalmologists, who were consulted in 94 cases. Of these 41 patients, 29 (70.3%) were subsequently shown to have greater than 50% stenosis of the common or internal carotid artery. Ten patients had amaurosis fugax, a carotid bruit, and positive eye findings. All were shown to have a significant carotid stenosis. This study shows that ocular pathology, if diagnosed, is correlated with carotid stenosis, especially if other contributing history and physical findings are also considered.

In situ lesser saphenous vein (LSV) graft has been advocated in cases where the greater saphenous vein is not available and the target arteries are confined to the lower leg. This is often the case of diabetic patients, whose occlusive disease pattern typically affects the tibioperoneal vessels, sparing the femoropopliteal segment. The in situ technique offers the potential advantages of decreasing surgical trauma to the vein and its vasa vasorum, better size-matching between vein and artery at the anastomoses, and improving hemodynamics. The authors reviewed the use of in situ LSV graft with attention to its indications and technical requirements. A 73-and a 76-year-old man presented with critical limb ischemia. Both had a history of diabetes, chronic renal failure, and previous use of the greater saphenous veins for coronary or peripheral bypasses. Both had good femoropopliteal inflow and tibioperoneal disease with single runoff through the distal peroneal and common plantar arteries, respectively. Venous mapping showed diminutive veins, with exception of an adequate ipsilateral lesser saphenous vein. The patients were placed in prone position for a posterior approach. The lesser saphenous veins were exposed through a longitudinal incision. Proximal anastomosis was based on the popliteal artery, exposed through the same incision. A successful in situ lesser saphenous vein bypass was performed by using the common plantar and the distal peroneal artery as target vessels. Both bypasses were patent at 24 and 18-months' follow-up, respectively. Selection criteria for in situ LSV bypass are patent femoral arteries; accessible target vessels in prone position through a medial, posterior, or lateral approach; and adequate LSV in diameter and length. In the authors' experience, in situ LSV bypass is a safe and simple option that offers successful distal revascularization.