Citations

Abstract Introduction Narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is characterized by excessive daytime sleepiness, heterogeneous symptom severity, and typically normal endogenous orexin levels. The Vibrance-2 phase 2 study evaluated alixorexton, a selective orexin 2 receptor agonist, in patients with NT2. Methods Vibrance-2 was a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging phase 2 study. After a 2-week washout from current narcolepsy medications, adults with NT2 meeting ICSD-3-TR diagnostic criteria were randomized 1:1:1:1 to receive placebo or alixorexton once daily at doses of 10, 14, or 18mg for 8 weeks, followed by an optional 5-week open-label extension. Dual primary endpoints were the change from baseline to week 8 in mean sleep latency (MSL) on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) and on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS). Safety evaluation included treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). P-values were adjusted for multiplicity. Results Ninety-three patients were randomized to placebo (n=24) or alixorexton (10mg, n=23; 14mg, n=22; 18mg, n=24); 90 completed double-blind treatment. At baseline, patients had severe symptoms (MWT: 5.6 minutes; ESS: 17.4). The study met its dual primary endpoints. At week 8, MSL on MWT increased 9.3, 6.7, and 6.7 minutes at 10, 14, and 18mg, respectively, from baseline versus placebo, with statistically significant differences observed for the 14 and 18mg doses (adjusted p< 0.05). ESS improved by -2.1, -3.2, and -3.6 points from baseline versus placebo at week 8 for the 10, 14, and 18mg groups, respectively, with statistical significance observed for the 18mg dose (adjusted p< 0.05), where more than 70% of patients achieved normalization. TEAEs in 10% of all alixorexton-treated patients through week 8 were pollakiuria, insomnia, micturition urgency, dizziness, and headache. Most TEAEs were mild-to-moderate with no serious TEAEs. Conclusion Vibrance-2 was the first large clinical trial in patients with NT2 to demonstrate positive results with an orexin 2 receptor agonist. Alixorexton resulted in statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in wakefulness and daytime sleepiness at Week 8 and was generally well tolerated. These results support phase 3 clinical development of alixorexton as a treatment for NT2. Support (if any) Alkermes, Inc.

Abstract INTRODUCTION : Despite expanding use of plasma biomarkers for Alzheimer's disease (AD), minimal examination has been undertaken in early‐onset AD (EOAD). Prior analyses assessed criterion and convergent validity of common plasma biomarkers in a well‐characterized sample with sporadic EOAD. METHODS : Plasma amyloid beta (Aβ) 42/40, tau phosphorylated at threonine 231 (p‐tau231), glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light change (NfL) levels were obtained for 189 EOAD, 52 early‐onset non‐AD (EOnonAD), and 83 cognitively normal (CN) participants. Diagnostic group differences, convergence with imaging biomarkers, and the capacity to predict specific cognitive domains were investigated. RESULTS : After controlling for cognitive status, EOAD participants exhibited more pathologic levels of Aβ42/40, p‐tau231, and GFAP relative to EOnonAD participants. However, NfL displayed the greatest sensitivity to non‐amnestic cognitive impairment across the sample. DISCUSSION : These results establish criterion and convergent validity of plasma biomarkers in sporadic EOAD and highlight complementary roles that AD‐specific and non‐specific plasma markers may play across the course of AD care.

Introduction Individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI) are increasingly reaching reproductive age, yet guidance on fertility preservation, genetic counseling, medication adjustments in pregnancy and breastfeeding, monitoring for complications, and multidisciplinary coordination is lacking. This joint effort between two committees of the Clinical Immunology Society (CIS), the Women of the Clinical Immunology Society (WCIS) and the Adult Immune Deficiency Committee (AID) survey aimed to characterize current reproductive care practices for IEI patients. Methods A survey was disseminated to 809 CIS members. The response rate was 6.43% (52 respondents). The 24-item questionnaire addressed management of pregnancy in IEI, medications adjustment, participation in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) care and fertility preservation, and maternal/neonatal outcomes. Results Because survey items were optional, the number of respondents varies by question. Forty-two participants completed core items: 64% (27/42) allergists/immunologists, 71% (30/42) practicing at academic centers, and 48% (20/42) with >50% immunology-focused practices. Most respondents (78%, 41/52) currently or previously cared for pregnant/planning IEI patients. Preconception counseling was common (90%, 37/41), yet only 2% (1/41) have access to a formal reproductive multidisciplinary team. Among clinicians involved in HSCT care, 45% (13/29) referred patients for fertility preservation. More than half, 52% (22/42), observed reduced fertility in IEI patients, and 56% (20/36) observed adverse maternal outcomes. Medication management varied: 61% (24/39) discontinued known teratogenic medications, and 64% (25/39) adjusted dosing during pregnancy. Regarding immunoglobulin replacement therapy, 79% adjusted dosing based on IgG levels and 42% increased dosing by trimester. Conclusions This CIS survey reveals practice variability and notable gaps in reproductive health support for individuals with IEIs. Due to the relatively low response rate, generalizability across providers and practice settings is challenging. However, the results of this survey suggest that although most clinicians provide preconception counseling and manage IgG and immunomodulatory therapy during pregnancy, formal multidisciplinary structures are rare. High rates of reported fertility concerns and maternal complications underscore the need for enhanced collaboration with obstetrics/gynecology and the development of structured, evidence-based, multidisciplinary guidelines for reproductive care in IEI. Tabular data are included as downloadable supplement files.

Abstract Context Bilateral adrenalectomy (BLA) and autoimmune adrenal insufficiency (AAI) are 2 major causes of primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI). Comparative data between etiologies are limited. Objective To compare management, quality of life (QoL), and frequency of adrenal crises between participants post-BLA vs AAI. Methods We conducted a dual-center, cross-sectional study of adults with AAI or BLA between 2018 and 2025. All participants completed questionnaires on management, adrenal crises, and the Addison Disease-specific QoL Questionnaire (AddiQoL). Results Of 343 participants, 203 had AAI (median age 54 years, 72% women) and 139 had BLA (median age 57 years, 76% women). AddiQoL scores were similar between participants with AAI and BLA (median 84 vs 83, P = .947), but better in participants post-BLA for pheochromocytoma versus hypercortisolism (median 88 vs 81, P = .031). Participants with AAI reported a higher number of adrenal crises within the past year than those post-BLA (25% vs 13%, P = .022). In multivariable analyses of age, sex, glucocorticoid dose and type, PAI type, AddiQoL score, and autoimmune comorbidities, only PAI type was associated with higher number of reported adrenal crisis within the last year (AAI vs BLA: odds ratios of 2.1-2.2, P < .05 for all models). Conclusion QoL was comparable between participants with AAI and BLA, though patients post-BLA for pheochromocytoma reported better QoL than patients post-BLA for hypercortisolism. Adrenal crises were more common in participants with AAI than those post-BLA, a finding that was not explained by patients’ glucocorticoid management, underscoring the need for tailored crisis prevention strategies.

Abstract Osteochondral lesions of the knee, particularly in patients with early osteoarthritic changes, remain a clinical challenge. The Agili‐C implant (CartiHeal, Smith & Nephew), an aragonite‐based osteochondral scaffold, offers a single‐stage, off‐the‐shelf solution designed to regenerate both cartilage and subchondral bone. Unlike cell‐based therapies, Agili‐C eliminates the need for cell harvesting, culturing, or bioreactors, and avoids the morbidity associated with autografts and allografts. Recent multicenter randomized controlled trials have showed superior functional outcomes and pain reduction with Agili‐C compared to microfracture and debridement, even in patients with early osteoarthritis (Kellgren‐Lawrence grades 0‐3). This Technical Note describes the surgical technique for Agili‐C implantation and highlights key technical pearls to optimize outcomes.

Objectives: Amyloidosis is a group of rare diseases that often manifest in multi-organ symptoms requiring an effective multidisciplinary team of care providers to manage. This study aimed to identify the best practices and key barriers to patient-centric care at US specialized amyloidosis centers (SACs) which have emerged as central hubs for multidisciplinary amyloidosis care. Methods: We conducted and analyzed interviews with 77 stakeholders of amyloidosis diseases, including specialist physicians from 17 SACs across the US, patients, patient advocacy group representatives, and referring physicians. Results: The most commonly mentioned best practices were patient-centric multidisciplinary care, timely intake of new high-risk patients, and responsiveness to patient questions. Expanding local physician education was noted as critical to earlier diagnosis. Fifteen out of 17 SACs are actively involved in clinical trials for amyloidosis treatments. Key barriers to care identified were patient distance to SACs, limited medical records and data sharing, and insurance hurdles. Most SACs keep track of metrics, such as patient volume, patient demographics, time to first appointment, as part of internal or in external registries to measure progress. Conclusion: These findings offer practical insights for optimizing amyloidosis care and highlight the structural and informational gaps that must be addressed to improve access and outcomes.

The traditional combined hematology and oncology fellowship model is increasingly strained by accelerating subspecialization and therapeutic complexity. This commentary focuses on structural reforms within fellowship training to better align education with contemporary clinical practice and evolving workforce demands. We propose standardized, career-aligned tracks, earlier subspecialty focus within fellowship, and redesigned continuity clinic models that preserve foundational breadth while enabling depth of expertise. We further highlight how emerging assessment reforms and educational tools can support these structural changes. By aligning fellowship training with both real-world clinical demands and established educational science, we can ensure a more sustainable and effective pathway for preparing future hematologists and oncologists.