Citations

The American Board of Neurological Surgery (ABNS) was incorporated in 1940 in recognition of the need for detailed training in and special qualifications for the practice of neurological surgery and for self-regulation of quality and safety in the field. The ABNS believes it is the duty of neurosurgeons to place a patient’s welfare and rights above all other considerations and to provide care with compassion, respect for human dignity, honesty, and integrity. At its inception, the ABNS was the 13th member board of the American Board of Medical Specialties (ABMS), which itself was founded in 1933. Today, the ABNS is one of the 24 member boards of the ABMS. To better serve public health and safety in a rapidly changing healthcare environment, the ABNS continues to evolve in order to elevate standards for the practice of neurological surgery. In connection with its activities, including initial certification, recognition of focused practice, and continuous certification, the ABNS actively seeks and incorporates input from the public and the physicians it serves. The ABNS board certification processes are designed to evaluate both real-life subspecialty neurosurgical practice and overall neurosurgical knowledge, since most neurosurgeons provide call coverage for hospitals and thus must be competent to care for the full spectrum of neurosurgery. The purpose of this report is to describe the history, current state, and anticipated future direction of ABNS certification in the US.

AbstractBackgroundIn patients presenting with recurrent pleomorphic adenoma (rPA), clinical evaluation can fail to recognize carcinoma ex PA (cxPA). We aim to identify the risk factors for cxPA.MethodsThis is a single institution retrospective case‐control study from 2000 to 2015. CxPA was diagnosed based on surgical pathology. Demographics, clinical, and social histories were collected.ResultsA number of 13/106 (12.3%) patients were diagnosed with cxPA, of which only 4/13 (31%) had clinical features suspicious for malignancy. Compared to benign rPA, factors associated with cxPA included age >50 (odds ratio [OR] 6.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.71‐25.98, P < .01), >10 pack‐years of smoking history (OR 3.36, 95% CI: 1.01‐11.14, P = .04), and the largest tumor being >2 cm on pathology (OR 4.42, 95% CI: 1.14‐17.10, P = .03).ConclusionsIn patients presenting with rPA, risk factors for malignant transformation include age >50, significant smoking history, and tumors larger than 2 cm. Clinical signs of malignancy such as rapid growth or pain are not always present.

Summary As the awareness among gastroenterologists regarding endoscopic features suggesting eosinophilic esophagitis is increasing, individuals without symptoms of esophageal dysfunction are increasingly being found to have esophageal eosinophilia on biopsies performed during upper gastrointestinal endoscopies. However, the course of disease and the management of these asymptomatic individuals with esophageal eosinophilia remain elusive. In this review, we propose a definition of asymptomatic individuals with esophageal eosinophilia and discuss the prevalence, risk factors, and course of disease of this specific patient group. Furthermore, we have established a diagnostic and therapeutic pathway based on the most recent available data.

ABSTRACT Background There is only partial overlap in the genetic background of isolated rapid‐eye‐movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective To examine the role of autosomal dominant and recessive PD or atypical parkinsonism genes in the risk of iRBD. Methods Ten genes, comprising the recessive genes PRKN , DJ‐1 (PARK7) , PINK1 , VPS13C , ATP13A2 , FBXO7 , and PLA2G6 and the dominant genes LRRK2 , GCH1 , and VPS35 , were fully sequenced in 1039 iRBD patients and 1852 controls of European ancestry, followed by association tests. Results We found no association between rare heterozygous variants in the tested genes and risk of iRBD. Several homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers were identified, yet there was no overrepresentation in iRBD patients versus controls. Conclusion Our results do not support a major role for variants in these genes in the risk of iRBD. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

ObjectiveTo ascertain the prevalence of and associations with distress and professional burnout among academic otolaryngology attending physicians.Study DesignCross‐sectional survey.SettingTwelve US academic otolaryngology programs.MethodsA questionnaire was administered that encompassed sociodemographic and professional features, the Expanded Physician Well‐being Index for distress, the 2‐item Maslach Burnout Inventory for professional burnout, the Patient Health Questionnaire–2 screen for major depressive disorder, and the Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 screen for generalized anxiety disorder.ResultsThe survey response rate was 56% and included 186 attending physicians. The average respondent age was 47 years; 72% were men; 93% were married or partnered; and 86% had children. Distress was present in 40%, professional burnout in 26%, positive depression screening in 8%, and positive anxiety screening in 11%. In a univariable setting, age, hours worked in a typical week, nights on call in a typical week, and years of practice were significantly associated with distress, although in a multivariable setting, only hours worked in a typical week remained significantly associated with a positive Expanded Physician Well‐being Index screen (odds ratio for each 10‐hour increase, 2.61; 95% CI, 1.73‐3.93; P <. 001). In a univariable setting, hours worked in a typical week was significantly associated with a positive Maslach Burnout Inventory screen.ConclusionDistress or professional burnout occurs in more than a quarter of academic otolaryngology attending physicians, whereas the prevalence of depression or anxiety is approximately 10%. The number of hours worked per week had the strongest association with distress and burnout. These findings may be used to develop and implement programs to promote physician well‐being and mitigate professional burnout.

ObjectiveTo assess the prevalence of distress and burnout in otolaryngology trainees, including associations with relevant sociodemographic and professional factors, and to compare these results with those of attending otolaryngologists.Study DesignA cross‐sectional survey of trainees and attending physicians.SettingTwelve academic otolaryngology programs.MethodsDistress and burnout were measured with the Expanded Physician Well‐being Index and the 2‐item Maslach Burnout Inventory. The Patient Health Questionnaire–2 and Generalized Anxiety Disorder–2 were used to screen for depressive disorders and anxiety disorders, respectively. Associations with sociodemographic and professional characteristics were assessed.ResultsOf the 613 surveys administered to trainees and attending physicians, 340 were completed (56%). Among 154 trainees, distress was present in 49%, professional burnout in 35%, positive depressive disorder screening in 5%, and positive anxiety disorder screening in 16%. In univariable analysis, female gender, hours worked in a typical week (HW), and nights on call in a typical week (NOC) were significantly associated with distress. In multivariable analysis, female gender (odds ratio, 3.91; P =. 001) and HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.89; P =. 003) remained significantly associated with distress. Female gender, HW, and NOC were significantly associated with burnout univariably, although only HW (odds ratio for each 10 HW, 1.92; P =. 003) remained significantly associated with burnout in a multivariable setting. Attending physicians had less distress than trainees (P =. 02) and felt less callous and less emotionally hardened than trainees (P <. 001).ConclusionOtolaryngology trainees experience significant work‐place distress (49%) and burnout (35%). Gender, HW, and NOC had the strongest associations with distress and burnout.

AbstractBackgroundEligibility criteria and endpoints for cancer cachexia trials—and whether weight loss should be included—remain controversial. Although most cachexia trials enrol patients after initial cancer diagnosis, few studies have addressed whether weight loss well after a cancer diagnosis is prognostic.MethodsWe pooled data from non‐small cell lung cancer patients from prospectively conducted trials within the Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology (1998–2008), a nationally funded infrastructure. We examined (i) weight data availability and weight changes and (ii) survival.ResultsA total of 822 patients were examined. Of these, 659 (80%) were on treatment at the beginning of Cycle 2 of chemotherapy; weight was available for 656 (80%). By Cycles 3 and 4, weight was available for 448 (55%) and 384 (47%), respectively. From baseline to immediately prior to Cycle 2, 208 (32%) gained weight; 225 (34%) lost <2% of baseline weight; and 223 (34% of 656) lost 2% or more. Median survival from the beginning of Cycle 2 was 13.0, 10.9, and 6.9 months for patients with weight gain, weight loss of <2%, and weight loss of 2% or more, respectively. In multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, sex, performance score, type of treatment, and body mass index, weight loss of 2% or more was associated with poor overall survival compared with weight gain [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.66; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.33–2.07; P < 0.001] and compared with weight loss of <2% (HR = 1.57; 95% CI: 1.27–1.95; P < 0.001). Although weight loss of <2% was not associated with poorer overall survival compared with weight gain, it was associated with poorer progression‐free survival (HR = 1.24; 95% CI: 1.01–1.51; P = 0.036). Similar findings were observed in a separate 255‐patient validation cohort.ConclusionsWeight should be integrated into cancer cachexia trials because of its ease of frequent measurement and sustained prognostic association.

AbstractCOVID-19 is also manifested with hypercoagulability, pulmonary intravascular coagulation, microangiopathy, and venous thromboembolism (VTE) or arterial thrombosis. Predisposing risk factors to severe COVID-19 are male sex, underlying cardiovascular disease, or cardiovascular risk factors including noncontrolled diabetes mellitus or arterial hypertension, obesity, and advanced age. The VAS-European Independent Foundation in Angiology/Vascular Medicine draws attention to patients with vascular disease (VD) and presents an integral strategy for the management of patients with VD or cardiovascular risk factors (VD-CVR) and COVID-19. VAS recommends (1) a COVID-19-oriented primary health care network for patients with VD-CVR for identification of patients with VD-CVR in the community and patients' education for disease symptoms, use of eHealth technology, adherence to the antithrombotic and vascular regulating treatments, and (2) close medical follow-up for efficacious control of VD progression and prompt application of physical and social distancing measures in case of new epidemic waves. For patients with VD-CVR who receive home treatment for COVID-19, VAS recommends assessment for (1) disease worsening risk and prioritized hospitalization of those at high risk and (2) VTE risk assessment and thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban, betrixaban, or low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for those at high risk. For hospitalized patients with VD-CVR and COVID-19, VAS recommends (1) routine thromboprophylaxis with weight-adjusted intermediate doses of LMWH (unless contraindication); (2) LMWH as the drug of choice over unfractionated heparin or direct oral anticoagulants for the treatment of VTE or hypercoagulability; (3) careful evaluation of the risk for disease worsening and prompt application of targeted antiviral or convalescence treatments; (4) monitoring of D-dimer for optimization of the antithrombotic treatment; and (5) evaluation of the risk of VTE before hospital discharge using the IMPROVE-D-dimer score and prolonged post-discharge thromboprophylaxis with rivaroxaban, betrixaban, or LMWH.

Abstract Introduction: Cer is an oral ALK/ROS1 inhibitor. Aberrancies in ALK and ROS1 have been observed in many cancer types and ALK inhibition has synergistic effects with chemotherapy in ALK or ROS1 rearranged tumors in preclinical models. We launched a Phase I study of Cer in combination with Gem-based chemotherapy in advanced solid tumors. Herein we present initial results of this study. Methods: Phase I, dose-escalation study of Cer in combination with A1: Gem 1000 mg IV D1/8/15 q28 days; A2: Gem 1000 mg IV + nanoparticle albumin-bound Paclitaxel 125 mg IV both D1/8/15 q28 days; A3: Gem 1000 mg IV + Cisplatin 60 mg IV D1/8 q21 days in pts with advanced, solid malignancies until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or withdrawal. A 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was used starting at Cer 450 mg once daily (DL1) in all arms; DL2 was 600 mg once daily. Primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Cer. Key inclusion criteria: diagnosis of advanced solid malignancy for which Gem-based treatment was appropriate, &gt;18 years old, ECOG PS 0/1, adequate bone marrow/renal/liver function. Key exclusion criteria: interstitial lung fibrosis/disease, recent acute coronary event, CHF NYHA III/IV, corrected QTc &gt; 450 ms. Pts in A3 could have up to 2 prior lines of therapy. Prior use of ALK inhibitors allowed. Plasma was collected for PK on C1D1, C2D1, and C1D15. Archival tumor tissue was tested for ALK/ROS1/JNK/MET by IHC. Results: Thirty-eight patients were enrolled with 21 evaluable for dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in A1 and A3. A2 (n=4) closed to accrual for toxicity. Median age was 61 years. Seven pts (41%) had cholangiocarcinoma. A1 had one DLT (G3 ALT increase) in DL2; MTD was 600 mg. A3 had one DLT in DL1 (G3 acute renal failure) and two DLTs in DL2 (G3 thrombocytopenia and G3 dyspnea); MTD was 450 mg. G3-5 AEs in all pts: anemia (A1: 3/19, A3: 2/15), nausea (A1: 1/19, A3: 2/15), emesis (A1: 1/19, A3: 1/15), neutropenia (A1: 2/19, A3: 8/15), thrombocytopenia (A1: 1/19, A3: 4/15), hyperbilirubinemia (A3: 3/15), pneumonia (A1: 2/19), acute renal failure (A3: 1/15), fatigue (A3: 2/15). Fifteen patients were evaluable for response; the overall response rate was 20% with two PR (pt with head and neck carcinoma in A1 and pt with carcinoma of unknown primary in A3) - and one CR in a pt with cholangiocarcinoma (A3) lasting 10.3 months. Overall, disease control rate was 47%. Of 5 evaluable pts with cholangiocarcinoma 3 had clinical benefit. Median PFS 3.4 mo (A1)/4.8 mo (A3) and OS 13.7 mo (A1)/29.1 mo (A3). PK and IHC data will be presented at the conference. Conclusions: The MTD of Cer is 600 mg in combination with Gem and 450 mg in combination with Gem/Cisplatin. Further evaluation of Cer plus Gem-based chemotherapy is planned in ALK/ROS1 positive cholangiocarcinomas. Citation Format: Christos Fountzilas, Alex Adjei, Mateusz Opyrchal, Rachel Evans, Kristopher Attwood, Andrew Goey, John Wilton, Wen Wee Ma, Renuka Iyer. Ceritinib (Cer) in combination with gemcitabine (Gem)-based chemotherapy in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors, a phase I study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr CT139.