Rudakou, Uladzislau

Abstract Two recent studies suggested that the APOE ε4 haplotype was associated with increased α-synuclein pathology in cell and mouse models. Genetic variants in the SNCA region have strong association with Parkinson’s disease (PD), dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) and idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder (iRBD), while APOE is a genetic risk determinant for only DLB. To determine if genetic-level interactions between SNCA and APOE exists that can explain the protein-level association, we investigated the genotypic interaction of APOE and SNCA in cohorts of PD, DLB and iRBD. We analysed genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from 5229 PD patients and 5480 controls, 2610 DLB patients and 1920 controls, and 1055 iRBD patients and 3667 controls. We used logistic regression interaction models across all three cohorts independently between the (i) top GWAS signals of SNCA single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and APOE haplotypes and (ii) SNP×SNP and three-way SNP interaction across the entire coding region plus 200 kb flanking each gene. No significant interactions were found to be associated with any of the synucleinopathies after correction for multiple testing. Our results do not support a role for genetic interactions between APOE and SNCA across PD, DLB and iRBD. Since the tested genetic variants affect the expression and function of these proteins, it is likely that any interactions between them do not affect the risk of PD, DLB and iRBD.

Abstract Background Levodopa‐induced dyskinesia (LID) is a common adverse effect of levodopa, one of the main therapeutics used to treat the motor symptoms of Parkinson's disease (PD). Previous evidence suggests a connection between LID and a disruption of the dopaminergic system as well as genes implicated in PD, including GBA1 and LRRK2 . Objectives Our goal was to investigate the effects of genetic variants on risk and time to LID. Methods We performed a genome‐wide association study (GWAS) and analyses focused on GBA1 and LRRK2 variants. We also calculated polygenic risk scores (PRS) including risk variants for PD and variants in genes involved in the dopaminergic transmission pathway. To test the influence of genetics on LID risk we used logistic regression, and to examine its impact on time to LID we performed Cox regression including 1612 PD patients with and 3175 without LID. Results We found that GBA1 variants were associated with LID risk (odds ratio [OR] = 1.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21–2.26; P = 0.0017) and LRRK2 variants with reduced time to LID onset (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09–1.84; P = 0.0098). The fourth quartile of the PD PRS was associated with increased LID risk (OR fourth_quartile = 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03–1.56; P = 0.0210). The third and fourth dopamine pathway PRS quartiles were associated with a reduced time to development of LID (HR third_quartile = 1.38; 95% CI, 1.07–1.79; P = 0.0128; HR fourth_quartile = 1.38; 95% CI = 1.06–1.78; P = 0.0147). Conclusions This study suggests that variants implicated in PD and in the dopaminergic transmission pathway play a role in the risk/time to develop LID. Further studies will be necessary to examine how these findings can inform clinical care. © 2024 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.

ABSTRACT Background There is only partial overlap in the genetic background of isolated rapid‐eye‐movement sleep behavior disorder (iRBD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). Objective To examine the role of autosomal dominant and recessive PD or atypical parkinsonism genes in the risk of iRBD. Methods Ten genes, comprising the recessive genes PRKN , DJ‐1 (PARK7) , PINK1 , VPS13C , ATP13A2 , FBXO7 , and PLA2G6 and the dominant genes LRRK2 , GCH1 , and VPS35 , were fully sequenced in 1039 iRBD patients and 1852 controls of European ancestry, followed by association tests. Results We found no association between rare heterozygous variants in the tested genes and risk of iRBD. Several homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers were identified, yet there was no overrepresentation in iRBD patients versus controls. Conclusion Our results do not support a major role for variants in these genes in the risk of iRBD. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society