Citations

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common and lethal primary brain tumor in adults. Within the tumor, there is a subtype of cells deemed brain tumor initiating cells (BTICs), which contribute to tumor progression, therapy resistance, and tumoral heterogeneity. The tumor microenvironment, surrounding tumors, contains an ecosystem of cells in which BTICs can interact with and further promote tumor progression. In the lateral wall of the lateral ventricles, the neurogenic niche of the subventricular zone (SVZ), contains neural progenitor cells (NPCs) that self-renew and generate highly migratory neuroblasts. Interestingly, GBM tumors proximal to the SVZ are more proliferative, migratory, and negatively impact the survival of patients. We have previously observed that the presence of GBM induces reciprocal changes to the SVZ altering its neurogenic capacity and resulting in a more proliferative tumor. BTICs share similar self-renewal capacity to NPCs and may exert intercellular communication resulting in increased malignancy features. The mechanisms of intercellular communication, present in the SVZ include paracrine, autocrine, direct cell contact, gap junctions, nanotubes, and more recently extracellular vesicles (EVs). However, the exact mechanisms of how BTICs communicate with NPCs is not well understood. EVs are a heterogenous group of cell-derived membranous structures that serve as means of intercellular communication, allowing for cells to exchange proteins, lipids, RNA, and other genetic material. Cancer cells release higher amounts of EVs than non-malignant cells, and these EVs help communicate with other nearby cells, leading to promotion of tumorigenesis. We have observed that BTICs-derived EVs increase the proliferation of human NPCs, while altering their morphology and expression of stem cell markers. These effects are not observed when NPCs are treated with vesicle-free BTIC-derived secreted factors. To investigate the distinctions between BTIC secreted factors and protein cargo contained in BTIC-EVs, we employ the proximity protein labelling system, TurboID, and express this system in BTIC-EVs. The overarching goal of this project is to characterize BTIC-derived EV cargo to identify proteins that modify the GBM tumor microenvironment. We hypothesize that the phenotype of non-cancer NPCs is altered by distinct protein cargo contained in BTIC-derived EVs. The results of these experiments will help us to elucidate what BTIC-specific EV cargo impacts the tumor microenvironment, with the potential of revealing therapeutic targets for GBM. Citation Format: Marissa Russo, Maria Jose Ulloa Navas, Emily Norton-Ramos, Alfredo Quiñones Hinojosa, Hugo Guerrero Cazares. Exploring the differences between brain tumor initiating cell extracellular vesicles and secreted factors that influence the tumor microenvironment [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 2776.

Abstract Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is a highly lethal human cancer thought to originate from a self-renewing and therapeutically-resistant population of glioblastoma stem cells (GSCs). The intrinsic mechanisms enacted by GSCs during 3D tumor formation, however, remain unclear, especially in the stages prior to angiogenic/immunological infiltration. In this study, we performed a deep characterization of the genetic, immune, and metabolic profiles of GBM organoids from several patient-derived GSCs (GBMO). Despite being devoid of immune cells, transcriptomic analysis across GBMO revealed a surprising immune-like molecular program, enriched in cytokine, antigen presentation and processing, T-cell receptor inhibitors, and interferon genes. We find two important cell populations thought to drive GBM progression, Special AT-rich sequence-binding protein 2 (SATB2+) and homeodomain-only protein homeobox (HOPX+) progenitors, contribute to this immune landscape in GBMO and GBM in vivo. These progenitors, but not other cell types in GBMO, are resistant to conventional GBM therapies, temozolomide and irradiation. Our work defines a novel intrinsic immune-like landscape in GBMO driven, in part, by SATB2+ and HOPX+ progenitors and deepens our understanding of the intrinsic mechanisms utilized by GSCs in early GBM formation.

OBJECTIVE Traditionally, resection of nondominant hemisphere brain tumors was performed under general anesthesia. An improved understanding of right-lateralized neural networks has led to a paradigm shift in recent decades, where the right or nondominant hemisphere is no longer perceived as "functionally silent." There is an increasing interest in awake brain mapping for nondominant hemisphere resections. The objective of this study was to perform a comprehensive review of the existing brain mapping paradigms for patients with nondominant hemisphere gliomas undergoing awake craniotomies. METHODS In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, systematic searches of the Medline, Embase, and American Psychological Association PsycInfo databases were undertaken from database inception to July 1, 2023. Studies providing a description of the intraoperative mapping paradigm used to assess cognition during an awake craniotomy for resection of a nondominant hemisphere glioma were included. RESULTS The search yielded 1084 potentially eligible articles. Thirty-nine unique studies reporting on 788 patients were included in the systematic review. The most frequently tested cognitive domains in patients with nondominant hemisphere tumors were spatial attention/neglect (17/39 studies, 43.6%), speech-motor/language (17/39 studies, 43.6%), and social cognition (9/39 studies, 23.1%). Within the frontal lobe, the highest number of positive mapping sites was identified for speech-motor/language, spatial attention/neglect, dual tasking assessing motor and language function, working memory, and social cognition. Within the parietal lobe, eloquence was most frequently found upon testing spatial attention/neglect, speech-motor/language, and calculation. Within the temporal lobe, the assessment of spatial attention/neglect yielded the highest number of positive mapping sites. CONCLUSIONS Cognitive testing in the nondominant hemisphere is predominantly focused on evaluating two domains: spatial attention/neglect and the motor aspects of speech/language. Multidisciplinary teams involved in awake brain mapping should consider testing an extended range of functions to minimize the risk of postoperative deficits and provide valuable information about anatomo-functional organization of cognitive networks.