Citations

Acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (ACLF) characterized with ≥2 extrahepatic organ failures in cirrhosis carries a high mortality. Outcomes of patients listed for liver transplantation (LT) after ACLF and after LT are largely unknown. The North American Consortium for the Study of End‐Stage Liver Disease prospectively enrolled 2793 nonelectively hospitalized patients with cirrhosis; 768 were listed for LT. Within 3 months, 265 (35%) received a LT, 395 remained alive without LT, and 108 died/delisted. Compared with nonlisted patients, those listed were younger and more often had ACLF, acute kidney injury, and a higher admission Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score. ACLF was most common in patients who died/delisted, followed by those alive with and without LT respectively, (30%, 22%, and 7%, respectively; P < 0.001). At LT, median MELD was 27.9% and 70% were inpatients; median time from hospitalization to LT was 26 days. Post‐LT survival at 6 months was unchanged between those with and without ACLF (93% each at 6 months). There was no difference in 3‐ and 6‐month mean post‐LT creatinine in those with and without ACLF, despite those with ACLF having a higher mean pre‐LT creatinine and a higher rate of perioperative dialysis (61%). In conclusion, patients with and without ACLF had similar survival after transplant with excellent renal recovery in both groups.

OBJECTIVES: Antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for prevention of the first episode of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP; primary prophylaxis 1°) and subsequent episodes (secondary prophylaxis 2°). We aimed to compare outcomes in cirrhotic inpatients on 1° vs 2° SBP prophylaxis. METHODS: Data from North American Consortium for the Study of End-Stage Liver Disease were evaluated for cirrhosis details, reasons for admission/medications, inpatient course recorded, and outcomes over 90 days. Outcomes (intensive care units, acute kidney injury, inpatient/90-day mortality) were compared between the 2 groups after propensity-matching on admission model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score and serum albumin. RESULTS: Among the 2,731 patients enrolled, 305 were on 1° and 187 on 2° SBP prophylaxis. After propensity-matching, 154 patients remained in each group. Patients on 1° prophylaxis were more likely to have admission systemic inflammatory response syndrome ( P = 0.02), with higher intensive care unit admissions (31% vs 21%; P = 0.05) and inpatient mortality (19% vs 9%; P = 0.01) than the 2° prophylaxis group. Patients on 2° prophylaxis had higher total (22% vs 10%; P = 0004), readmission (16% vs 9%; P = 0.03), and nosocomial (6% vs 0.5%; P = 0.01) SBP rates with predominant Gram-negative organisms compared to 1° prophylaxis patients. At 90 days, 1° prophylaxis patients had a higher mortality (35% vs 22%; P = 0.02) and acute kidney injury incidence (48% vs 30%; P = 0.04) compared to 2° prophylaxis patients. DISCUSSION: In this inpatient cirrhosis study, despite prophylaxis, a high proportion of patients developed SBP, which was associated with mortality. Cirrhotic inpatients on 1° prophylaxis had worse outcomes than those on 2° prophylaxis when propensity-matched for the MELD score and serum albumin during the index admission and 90-day follow-up.

Screening for hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) using pulse oximetry is recommended in liver transplant (LT) candidates because mortality is increased, independently of the severity of the oxygenation defect. LT exception points may be afforded to those with HPS and severe hypoxemia. We assessed the screening characteristics of pulse oximetry for HPS. The Pulmonary Vascular Complications of Liver Disease 2 study is a multicenter, prospective cohort study of adults undergoing their first LT evaluation. Patients underwent protocolized assessment of oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry (SpO2), arterial blood gas, spirometry, and contrast‐enhanced echocardiography (CE). HPS was defined as an alveolar‐arterial gradient ≥15 mm Hg (≥20 mm Hg if age >64 years), intrapulmonary vascular dilatation on CE, and absence of lung disease. The study sample included 363 patients. Of these, 75 (20.7%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 16.6%‐25.2%) met the criteria for HPS. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (or c‐statistic) for SpO2 in discriminating HPS was 0.59 (95% CI, 0.51‐0.66). An SpO2 <96%, recommended by practice guidelines as a threshold to require further testing, had low sensitivity (28%; 95% CI, 18%‐28%). The c‐statistic of SpO2 in discriminating HPS with a partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2) <60 mm Hg (eligible for LT exception points) was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.46‐1.00). An SpO2 cutoff of <96% had higher sensitivity for detecting HPS with PaO2 <60 mm Hg (71%; 95% CI, 38%‐100%) but was still inadequate. Conclusion: Pulse oximetry is not sufficiently sensitive to screen for HPS in LT candidates. Arterial blood gas and CE are required in LT candidates for diagnosis of HPS.

Mayo Clinic, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MinnesotaPlatelets are believed to play an important role in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis and thrombotic occlusive arterial disease. As part of a prospective study of peripheral occlusive arterial disease in diabetes mellitus, platelet survival half-life (PS) was determined in years 1 and 2 from the disappearance pattern of 51cr-labeled platelets obtained by measuring radioactivity in serial samples over 8 days in four groups of patients age 50-70. Using computer assisted least-square analysis, a single exponent is fitted to the data and half-life determined.Groups included (1) normal subjects (NC); (2) subjects with clinical and objective evidence (transcutaneous doppler ultrasound and treadmill exercise) of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (AS0); (3) subjects with diabetes mellitus without AS0 (DM); (A) subjects with both diabetes mellitus and AS0 (DM+AS0). 112 subjects were tested in year 1 and 75 of these were available for retesting in year 2.In year 1, there is a difference in the distribution of platelet survival (PS) for the four groups (p=.002). PS is significantly short in groups AS0 and DM+AS0 compared with controls (NC), Year 2 values for PS (75 subjects) were compared to year 1. Using the t test on mean differences PS for each group was not significantly different year 2 vs year 1; mean percent differences year 2 vs year 1 were 1.2% (NC), 0.2% (ASO), 3.2% (DM), and -9.3% (9-3% lower than year 1 for DM+ ASO).Platelet survival half-life (PS) does distinguish popula tion groups and is reproducible when repeated.

Distinguishing between in vitro and in vivo release of platelet specific proteins has led to problems in interpretation of clinical studies with PF4, and with BTG.As part of a prospective study of peripheral occlusive arterial disease in diabetes mellitus PF4 and BTG were measured together by specific radioimmunoassay in four groups of subjects age 50-70 years. Groups included (1) 106 normal subjects (NC); (2) 126 with clinical and objective evidence (transcutaneous doppler ultrasound and treadmill exercise) of peripheral arterial occlusive disease (ASO); (3) 244 with diabetes mellitus without ASO and (4) 101 with both diabetes mellitus and ASO.PF4 did not distinguish among the four groups: NC vs ASO p=. 18, NC vs DM p=.52, NC vs DM+ASO p=.73, NC vs all diabetics p=.61, and NC vs all ASO p=.46. However, BTG did distinguish the groups with vascular disease from NC: NC vs ASO p=.02, NC vs DM+ASO p<.001, NC vs DM p=.32, DM vs DM+ASO p<.01, all ASO vs all nonASO p<.001.Normal range for PF4 is 0-13 ng/ml with a median of 3.0 ng/ml, a mean of 3.0 ng/ml, and SD 1.97. Normal range for BTG is 14-46 ng/ml with a median of 26 ng/ml, a mean of 27.2 ng/ml, and SD 10.3. When PF4 and BTG are correlated (all groups included) r=.41 p<.001.PF4 and BTG levels should be performed together. When done together low PF4 levels support the absence of in vitro platelet release due to sample collection and handling. BTG levels are significantly increased in subjects with peripheral arterial disease, supporting the active role of platelets in thrombotic occlusive arterial disease.

The North American Consortium for the Study of End‐Stage Liver Disease's definition of acute‐on‐chronic liver failure (NACSELD‐ACLF) as two or more extrahepatic organ failures has been proposed as a simple bedside tool to assess the risk of mortality in hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. We validated the NACSELD‐ACLF's ability to predict 30‐day survival (defined as in‐hospital death or hospice discharge) in a separate multicenter prospectively enrolled cohort of both infected and uninfected hospitalized patients with cirrhosis. We used the NACSELD database of 14 tertiary care hepatology centers that prospectively enrolled nonelective hospitalized patients with cirrhosis (n = 2,675). The cohort was randomly split 60%/40% into training (n = 1,605) and testing (n = 1,070) groups. Organ failures assessed were (1) shock, (2) hepatic encephalopathy (grade III/IV), (3) renal (need for dialysis), and (4) respiratory (mechanical ventilation). Patients were most commonly Caucasian (79%) men (62%) with a mean age of 57 years and a diagnosis of alcohol‐induced cirrhosis (45%), and 1,079 patients had an infection during hospitalization. The mean Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score was 19, and the median Child score was 10. No demographic differences were present between the two split groups. Multivariable modeling revealed that the NACSELD‐ACLF score, as determined by number of organ failures, was the strongest predictor of decreased survival after controlling for admission age, white blood cell count, serum albumin, Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score, and presence of infection. The c‐statistics were 0.8073 for the training set and 0.8532 for the validation set. Conclusion: Although infection status remains an important predictor of death, NACSELD‐ACLF was independently validated in a separate large multinational prospective cohort as a simple, reliable bedside tool to predict 30‐day survival in both infected and uninfected patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of cirrhosis. (H epatology 2018;67:2367‐2374).

Abstract Introduction Genetic loci for Alzheimer's disease (AD) have been identified in whites of European ancestry, but the genetic architecture of AD among other populations is less understood. Methods We conducted a transethnic genome‐wide association study (GWAS) for late‐onset AD in Stage 1 sample including whites of European Ancestry, African‐Americans, Japanese, and Israeli‐Arabs assembled by the Alzheimer's Disease Genetics Consortium. Suggestive results from Stage 1 from novel loci were followed up using summarized results in the International Genomics Alzheimer's Project GWAS dataset. Results Genome‐wide significant (GWS) associations in single‐nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)–based tests ( P < 5 × 10 −8 ) were identified for SNPs in PFDN1/HBEGF , USP6NL/ECHDC3 , and BZRAP1‐AS1 and for the interaction of the (apolipoprotein E) APOE ε4 allele with NFIC SNP. We also obtained GWS evidence ( P < 2.7 × 10 −6 ) for gene‐based association in the total sample with a novel locus, TPBG ( P = 1.8 × 10 −6 ). Discussion Our findings highlight the value of transethnic studies for identifying novel AD susceptibility loci.

Goals/Background: Data on acute variceal hemorrhage (AVH) in the United States is limited and the best method to stratify risk is not clear. Taking advantage of a prospective US cohort study, we aimed to (1) describe clinical outcomes of AVH and their predictors; (2) compare predictors of 6-week mortality. Study: Prospective 15-center US cohort of patients with cirrhosis presenting with endoscopically proven AVH, all of whom received antibiotics, vapreotide (a somatostain analog) infusion and endoscopic band ligation. Patients were enrolled between August 2006 and April 2008. Primary outcome was 6-week mortality. Secondary outcome was 5-day treatment failure. The prognostic value of Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class, Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score and a recent recalibrated MELD were compared. Results: Seventy eligible patient were enrolled; 18 (26%) patients died within 6-weeks of index bleed. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were compared between survivors and nonsurvivors. Multivariate models showed that admission CTP or the MELD score (separately) were independent predictors of survival. The discriminative values of CTP (area under receiver operating characteristic: 0.75) and MELD (area under receiver operating characteristic: 0.79) were good and not significantly different (P=0.27). However, calibration (correlation between observed and predicted mortality) test was significantly better for CTP than for MELD, with the recently described recalibrated MELD model having the worst agreement. Predicted mortality for CTP-A was <10%, CTP-B 10% to 30%; and CTP-C >33%. Conclusions: AVH mortality of 26% in the United States is in the upper range limit compared with recent series but may be due to inclusion of patients with more advanced cirrhosis. CTP score has the best overall performance in the prediction of 6-week mortality and is best at stratifying risk.

In smaller single‐center studies, patients with cirrhosis are at a high readmission risk, but a multicenter perspective study is lacking. We evaluated the determinants of 3‐month readmissions among inpatients with cirrhosis using the prospective 14‐center North American Consortium for the Study of End‐Stage Liver Disease cohort. Patients with cirrhosis hospitalized for nonelective indications provided consent and were followed for 3 months postdischarge. The number of 3‐month readmissions and their determinants on index admission and discharge were calculated. We used multivariable logistic regression for all readmissions and for hepatic encephalopathy (HE), renal/metabolic, and infection‐related readmissions. A score was developed using admission/discharge variables for the total sample, which was validated on a random half of the total population. Of the 1353 patients enrolled, 1177 were eligible on discharge and 1013 had 3‐month outcomes. Readmissions occurred in 53% (n = 535; 316 with one, 219 with two or more), with consistent rates across sites. The leading causes were liver‐related (n = 333; HE, renal/metabolic, and infections). Patients with cirrhosis and with worse Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score or diabetes, those taking prophylactic antibiotics, and those with prior HE were more likely to be readmitted. The admission model included Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease and diabetes (c‐statistic = 0.64, after split‐validation 0.65). The discharge model included Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease, proton pump inhibitor use, and lower length of stay (c‐statistic = 0.65, after split‐validation 0.70). Thirty percent of readmissions could not be predicted. Patients with liver‐related readmissions consistently had index‐stay nosocomial infections as a predictor for HE, renal/metabolic, and infection‐associated readmissions (odds ratio = 1.9‐3.0). Conclusions: Three‐month readmissions occurred in about half of discharged patients with cirrhosis, which were associated with cirrhosis severity, diabetes, and nosocomial infections; close monitoring of patients with advanced cirrhosis and prevention of nosocomial infections could reduce this burden. (Hepatology 2016;64:200–208)

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of decisions made at operation for primary neck tumor on survival and cause of death—specifically, whether bilateral dissection, unilateral dissection, or delayed dissection influences eventual outcome. Of 244 patients with primary cancer of the supraglottis who were treated surgically, 22 (9%) had no neck treatment, 188 (77%) had unilateral neck dissection, and 34 (14%) had bilateral simultaneous neck dissection. Dissection on one or both sides of the neck was required later in 6 (27%) of the 22 patients with no neck treatment and in 32 (17%) of the 188 patients who had unilateral dissection. There were no differences among the treatment groups in the incidence of death from any cause or in the incidence of death from cancer, although neck stage did differ from group to group. The influence of delayed metastasis on survival was analyzed to explain these findings. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that death occurred at a rate 1.81 times higher in a person with a positive neck stage than in a person of the same age who had a negative stage. Also, death occurred at a rate 1.5 times higher for a person 10 years older than for a person with the same stage of disease. The influence of stage on the probability of need for a second dissection indicated that a patient with a positive neck stage had a 6.3 times greater likelihood of requiring a subsequent neck dissection than a person with a negative neck stage.