Citations

Simultaneous four-channel (ipsilateral, contralateral, horizontal, and noncephalic) ABR recordings were reviewed by three audiologists for 187 ears of nontumor patients, and 13 ears of patients having eighth nerve tumors. Waveforms from a subgroup of 63 ears were reexamined by the same audiologists to assess inter- and intra-judge consistency. For nontumor ears, the ipsilateral tracings provided the best identification of Waves I and III; the ipsilateral and noncephalic recordings allowed equal identification of Wave V. Waves I, III, and V generally were more robust from the ipsilateral electrode array than from any of the other electrode montages for the tumor ears. Three-way inter-judge agreement ranged from 82% to 87% for ipsilateral Waves I, III, and V and for noncephalic Wave V. Agreement between pairs of judges ranged from 86% to 100%. Intra-judge agreement ranged from 87% to 94% for ipsilateral Waves I, III, and V, and from 92% to 95% for noncephalic Wave V.

Audiologic test results were reviewed for 30 patients whose hearing was preserved following eighth nerve tumor surgery. Speech reception thresholds, 4,000-Hz thresholds, acoustic reflexes, and ABR wave I absolute latencies were generally unchanged or poorer following surgery; word recognition scores were essentially unchanged. By contrast, ABR waves III and V, and the I–III and I–V interpeak intervals, were generally improved postoperatively, including several patients who had clear waves following surgery despite absent preoperative responses. The improved ABR tracings likely indicate increased neural synchrony due to reduced pressure on the cochlear nerve following surgery, whereas the reduced hearing sensitivity probably reflects cochlear damage coincident to the surgery.

ABR absolute latencies and interpeak intervals were reviewed for 684 non-tumor ears and 75 eighth-nerve tumor ears having various degrees of high frequency hearing loss. For non-tumor ears, the percentage of abnormal absolute latencies for waves I, III, and V increased rather systematically as hearing loss increased, whereas absolute latencies for eighth-nerve tumor ears were largely abnormal regardless of hearing loss. Interpeak intervals were normal for most of the non-tumor ears, but the I–III and I–V intervals were abnormal for most of the tumor ears. The most sensitive index for otoneurologic assessment was a combination of abnormal wave V interaural latency differences or I–V interpeak interval, and the most specific criterion was the I–V interpeak interval. Tumor size influenced sensitivity of most ABR indices.

Multichannel ABR recordings for 30 otoneurologic patients were reviewed independently by three audiologists to assess interjudge consistency in determining absolute latencies and overall interpretation of ABR results. Four months later, the tracings were reviewed a second time to evaluate intrajudge consistency in interpretation of ABR waveforms. Interjudge agreement in marking latencies for waves I, III, and V within 0.2 ms was on the order of 90% or better. Intrajudge consistency was slightly higher. Only rarely did inter- or intrajudge differences in latency measurements exceed 0.3 ms. Agreement in overall interpretation of ABR results as "normal" or "abnormal" was unanimous for 90% of the patients. Across pairs of judges, the agreement for "normal" and "abnormal" classification of the ABR tracings was 97%. Intrajudge consistency for "normal" and "abnormal" categorization of the ABR results was 100% for one judge, 97% for the other two judges.

This study examined the possibility that hearing-impaired listeners, in addition to displaying poorer-than-normal recognition of speech presented in background noise, require a larger signal-to-noise ratio for the detection of the speech sounds. Psychometric functions for the detection and recognition of stop consonants were obtained from both normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. Expressing the speech levels in terms of their short-term spectra, the detection of consonants for both subject groups occurred at the same signal-to-noise ratio. In contrast, the hearing-impaired listeners displayed poorer recognition performance than the normal-hearing listeners. These results imply that the higher signal-to-noise ratios required for a given level of recognition by some subjects with hearing loss are not due in part to a deficit in detection of the signals in the masking noise, but rather are due exclusively to a deficit in recognition.

RVOT Atypical VariantsBackgroundRight ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) arrhythmias are a common form of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structurally normal heart. The underlying mechanism is due to triggered activity. Mapping and ablation is relatively straightforward targeting the earliest point of activation. Previously reported causes of difficult ablation in the RVOT region include under recognized right ventricular cardiomyopathy/sarcoidosis, presence of endocavitary structures, close proximity to the coronary vasculature, and origin from non‐RVOT structures.Methods and ResultsWe identified all patients undergoing PVCs/sustained RVOT VT ablation from January 2013 to December 2013. This included 33 patients. Of these, we identified procedures that were considered difficult despite a single morphology arrhythmia being targeted and no underlying cardiomyopathy present. Difficulty was specifically considered when ablation at the earliest site of activation was not successful and eventual successful ablation was at a distance of greater than 15 mm from the early activation site. We identified 3 patients (n = 3, 100% male) with evidence of reentrant arrhythmia based on slow conduction zones necessary for the tachycardia/arrhythmia, mid diastolic signals during VT or preceding bigeminal PVCs, pace mapping from the site abnormal signals reproducing the arrhythmia morphology but with prominent conduction delay, the entire cycle length of the tachycardia or coupling interval for the PVCs being mapping, or based on reset characteristics.ConclusionIn patients with atypical forms of RVOT VT, careful mapping and ablation of the myocardial sleeves near the pulmonic valve can eliminate the arrhythmia.

Anomalies in the course and drainage of the Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) may complicate normal functioning, correct diagnosis, and therapeutic interventions within the abdomen. Development of the IVC occurs during the 4th to 8th week of gestation, and due to its developmental complexity, there are many opportunities for malformations to occur. Although most IVC anomalies are clinically silent and are usually discovered incidentally on abdominal imaging, aberrations may be responsible for formation of thrombosis, back pain, and anomalous circulation of blood to the heart. In this review, we will discuss the most common variations and abnormalities of the IVC, which include the posterior cardinal veins, the subcardinal veins, the supracardinal veins, persistent left IVC, IVC duplication, situs inversus, left retroaortic renal vein, left circumaortic renal collar, scimitar syndrome, and IVC agenesis. For each abnormality outlined above, we aim to discuss relevant embryology and potential clinical significance with regards to presentation, diagnosis, and treatment as is important for radiologists, surgeons, and clinicians in current clinical practice. Clin. Anat. 27:1234–1243, 2014. © 2014 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.