Citations

Importance The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) is a well-validated instrument widely used to detect and stage dementia due to Alzheimer disease. The digital Electronic Clinical Dementia Rating (eCDR) can be remotely self-administered and automatically scored, with potential to facilitate efficient dementia screening and staging. Objective To evaluate the association of the eCDR with the CDR and other in-clinic assessments for screening older adults for cognitive impairment. Design, Setting, and Participants This multisite, cross-sectional study used baseline data from a longitudinal, observational study from 2020 to 2023, including up to 3 years of follow-up. Participants were enrolled from 3 Alzheimer Disease Research Centers and the Brain Health Registry. Participants (aged ≥55 years, with a study partner, and no acute or unstable major medical conditions) were recruited during in-clinic visits or by automated emails. Exposures Participants completed the Uniform Data Set Version 3 (UDS; including the CDR) in supervised clinical research settings, and then completed the eCDR remotely, online and unsupervised, using their own device. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were eCDR scores (item; categorical box and global; continuous box and global), CDR scores (item; categorical box and global), and UDS assessment scores. Associations were evaluated using linear and logistic regressions. Results A total of 3565 participants were contacted, and 288 were enrolled. Among 173 participants with item-level data (mean [SD] age, 70.84 [7.65] years; 76 women [43.9%]), eCDR to CDR concordance was 90% or higher for 33 items (63%) and 70% to 89% for 13 items (25%). Box (domain) level concordance ranged from 80% (memory) to 99% (personal care). The global score concordance rate was 81%. κ statistics were fair to moderate. Among 206 participants with box and global scores (mean [SD] age, 71.34 [7.68] years; 95 women [46.1%]), eCDR continuous global score was associated with CDR global (categorical) score with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.70-0.87). Correlations between eCDR and in-clinic UDS assessments were similar to those between CDR sum of box scores and the same in-clinic assessments. Conclusions and Relevance These findings suggest that the eCDR is valid and has potential use for screening and assessment of older adults for cognitive and functional decline related to Alzheimer disease. Instrument optimization and validation in diverse cohorts in remote settings are crucial for evaluating scalability and eCDR utility in clinical research, trials, and health care settings.

Abstract Graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract is the main cause of nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation. Ann Arbor (AA) scores derived from serum biomarkers at onset of GVHD quantify GI crypt damage; AA2/3 scores correlate with resistance to treatment and higher NRM. We conducted a multicenter, phase 2 study using natalizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that blocks T-cell trafficking to the GI tract through the α4 subunit of α4β7 integrin, combined with corticosteroids as primary treatment for patients with new onset AA2/3 GVHD. Seventy-five patients who were evaluable were enrolled and treated; 81% received natalizumab within 2 days of starting corticosteroids. Therapy was well tolerated with no treatment emergent adverse events in >10% of patients. Outcomes for patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids were compared with 150 well-matched controls from the MAGIC database whose primary treatment was corticosteroids alone. There were no significant differences in overall or complete response between patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids and those treated with corticosteroids alone (60% vs 58%; P = .67% and 48% vs 48%; P = 1.0, respectively) including relevant subgroups. There were also no significant differences in NRM or overall survival at 12 months in patients treated with natalizumab plus corticosteroids compared with controls treated with corticosteroids alone (38% vs 39%; P = .80% and 46% vs 54%; P = .48, respectively). In this multicenter biomarker–based phase 2 study, natalizumab combined with corticosteroids failed to improve outcome of patients with newly diagnosed high-risk GVHD. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as # NCT02133924.

This cross-sectional study evaluates the consistency of US medical license renewal applications with the Federation of State Medical Boards recommendations for questions regarding physician mental health.

AbstractThe Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) aims to improve Alzheimer's disease (AD) clinical trials. Since 2006, ADNI has shared clinical, neuroimaging, and cognitive data, and biofluid samples. We used conventional search methods to identify 1459 publications from 2021 to 2022 using ADNI data/samples and reviewed 291 impactful studies. This review details how ADNI studies improved disease progression understanding and clinical trial efficiency. Advances in subject selection, detection of treatment effects, harmonization, and modeling improved clinical trials and plasma biomarkers like phosphorylated tau showed promise for clinical use. Biomarkers of amyloid beta, tau, neurodegeneration, inflammation, and others were prognostic with individualized prediction algorithms available online. Studies supported the amyloid cascade, emphasized the importance of neuroinflammation, and detailed widespread heterogeneity in disease, linked to genetic and vascular risk, co‐pathologies, sex, and resilience. Biological subtypes were consistently observed. Generalizability of ADNI results is limited by lack of cohort diversity, an issue ADNI‐4 aims to address by enrolling a diverse cohort.

Abstract BACKGROUND The microenvironment of glioblastoma is complex and defined in part by protumorigenic metabolic changes. Within this microenvironment, blood-brain barrier disruption is often associated with the most aggressive portions of the tumor. To date, the metabolic tumor microenvironments of enhancing, blood-brain barrier (BBB) disrupted portions of gliomas, as compared to BBB-intact tumor, remain poorly understood. Specifically, it is unclear if the associated blood-brain barrier disruption merely reflects or functionally supports tumor aggressiveness. METHODS Intra-operative high-molecular weight microdialysis was utilized under an investigational device exemption (NCT NCT04047264) to sample the extracellular metabolome of radiographically diverse regions during fifteen neurosurgical resections. The global extracellular metabolome of recovered microdialysate from contrast-enhancing and non-enhancing tumor, as well as brain adjacent to tumor, was evaluated via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) on the Metabolon platform and assessed using enrichment and correlation analyses. RESULTS Among 162 named metabolites identified via ultra-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry, a novel glioma-associated metabolite, guanidinoacetate (GAA), was 126.32x higher in enhancing tumor than in adjacent brain and 13.63x higher in non-enhancing tumor than brain. Forty-eight additional metabolites were 2.05-10.18x more abundant in enhancing tumor than brain, including carnitine family members and all nine large neutral amino acids. Except for GAA and 2-hydroxyglutarate in IDH-mutant gliomas, differences between non-enhancing tumor and brain microdialysate were comparatively modest and less consistent, suggesting heterogeneity in the glioma metabolic microenvironment of blood-brain barrier (BBB) intact areas as compared to BBB-disrupted portions of gliomas. Interestingly, the enhancing but not the non-enhancing glioma metabolome was significantly enriched for plasma-associated metabolites, largely comprising amino acids and carnitines. CONCLUSION Our patient-derived data suggest that the BBB-disrupted metabolome of high-grade gliomas is characterized by metabolite diffusion from circulation into the tumor microenvironment. Further studies are ongoing to determine how this alteration in the glioma extracellular metabolome impacts glioma behavior and how it could be therapeutically targeted via BBB-modulating drugs.

Abstract Carvedilol is a widely used beta-adrenoreceptor antagonist for multiple cardiovascular indications; however, it may induce cholestasis in patients, but the mechanism for this effect is unclear. Carvedilol also prevents the development of various forms of experimental liver injury, but its effect on nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is largely unknown. In this study, we determined the effect of carvedilol (10 mg/kg/day p.o.) on bile formation and bile acid (BA) turnover in male C57BL/6 mice consuming either a chow diet or a western-type NASH-inducing diet. BAs were profiled by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and BA-related enzymes, transporters, and regulators were evaluated by western blot analysis and qRT-PCR. In chow diet-fed mice, carvedilol increased plasma concentrations of BAs resulting from reduced BA uptake to hepatocytes via Ntcp transporter downregulation. Inhibition of the β-adrenoreceptor-cAMP-Epac1-Ntcp pathway by carvedilol may be the post-transcriptional mechanism underlying this effect. In contrast, carvedilol did not worsen the deterioration of BA homeostasis accompanying NASH; however, it shifted the spectra of BAs toward more hydrophilic and less toxic α-muricholic and hyocholic acids. This positive effect of carvedilol was associated with a significant attenuation of liver steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis in NASH mice. In conclusion, our results indicate that carvedilol may increase BAs in plasma by modifying their liver transport. In addition, carvedilol provided significant hepatoprotection in a NASH murine model without worsening BA accumulation. These data suggest beneficial effects of carvedilol in patients at high risk for developing NASH.

Purpose To establish consensus statements on platelet‐rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of musculoskeletal pathologies. Methods A consensus process on the treatment of PRP using a modified Delphi technique was conducted. Thirty‐five orthopaedic surgeons and sports medicine physicians participated in these consensus statements on PRP. The participants were composed of representatives of the Biologic Association, representing 9 international orthopaedic and musculoskeletal professional societies invited due to their active interest in the study of orthobiologics. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement. Results There was consensus on 62% of statements about PRP. Conclusions (1) PRP should be classified based on platelet count, leukocyte count, red blood count, activation method, and pure‐plasma versus fibrin matrix; (2) PRP characteristics for reporting in research studies are platelet count, leukocyte count, neutrophil count, red blood cell count, total volume, the volume of injection, delivery method, and the number of injections; (3) the prognostic factors for those undergoing PRP injections are age, body mass index, severity/grade of pathology, chronicity of pathology, prior injections and response, primary diagnosis (primary vs postsurgery vs post‐trauma vs psoriatic), comorbidities, and smoking; (4) regarding age and body mass index, there is no minimum or maximum, but clinical judgment should be used at extremes of either; (5) the ideal dose of PRP is undetermined; and (6) the minimal volume required is unclear and may depend on the pathology. Level of Evidence Level V, expert opinion.