Citations

AbstractAfter decades on the margins of primary health care, surgical and anaesthesia care is gaining increasing priority within the global development arena. The 2015 publications of the Disease Control Priorities third edition on Essential Surgery and the Lancet Commission on Global Surgery created a compelling evidenced‐based argument for the fundamental role of surgery and anaesthesia within cost‐effective health systems strengthening global strategy. The launch of the Global Alliance for Surgical, Obstetric, Trauma, and Anaesthesia Care in 2015 has further coordinated efforts to build priority for surgical care and anaesthesia. These combined efforts culminated in the approval of a World Health Assembly resolution recognizing the role of surgical care and anaesthesia as part of universal health coverage. Momentum gained from these milestones highlights the need to identify consensus goals, targets and indicators to guide policy implementation and track progress at the national level. Through an open consultative process that incorporated input from stakeholders from around the globe, a global target calling for safe surgical and anaesthesia care for 80% of the world by 2030 was proposed. In order to achieve this target, we also propose 15 consensus indicators that build on existing surgical systems metrics and expand the ability to prioritize surgical systems strengthening around the world.

Abstract Breast cancer risks conferred by many germline missense variants in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, often referred to as variants of uncertain significance (VUS), have not been established. In this study, associations between 19 BRCA1 and 33 BRCA2 missense substitution variants and breast cancer risk were investigated through a breast cancer case–control study using genotyping data from 38 studies of predominantly European ancestry (41,890 cases and 41,607 controls) and nine studies of Asian ancestry (6,269 cases and 6,624 controls). The BRCA2 c.9104A>C, p.Tyr3035Ser (OR = 2.52; P = 0.04), and BRCA1 c.5096G>A, p.Arg1699Gln (OR = 4.29; P = 0.009) variant were associated with moderately increased risks of breast cancer among Europeans, whereas BRCA2 c.7522G>A, p.Gly2508Ser (OR = 2.68; P = 0.004), and c.8187G>T, p.Lys2729Asn (OR = 1.4; P = 0.004) were associated with moderate and low risks of breast cancer among Asians. Functional characterization of the BRCA2 variants using four quantitative assays showed reduced BRCA2 activity for p.Tyr3035Ser compared with wild-type. Overall, our results show how BRCA2 missense variants that influence protein function can confer clinically relevant, moderately increased risks of breast cancer, with potential implications for risk management guidelines in women with these specific variants. Cancer Res; 77(11); 2789–99. ©2017 AACR.

Abstract Mutations in the EGFR gene or transcript fusion involving EML4-ALK result in oncogenic activation of these oncogenes driving lung adenocarcinoma growth in tumors carrying such an alteration. For lung adenocarcinoma with these genetic changes, small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors have been highly effective at reducing tumor burden and improve the outcome of the patients. Unfortunately, drug resistance eventually develops in these tumors and challenges remain in controlling lung cancer recurrence after targeted therapy. To overcome recurrence, we initiated a prove-of-principle study to evaluate the feasibility of an integrated strategy utilizing genomic profiles of the tumor and patient-specific tumor xenografts derived (PDX) from biopsies for ex vivo evaluation of antitumor drugs to help guide personalized treatment of lung cancer in patients who have developed resistance to targeted therapy drugs. Our study has three main objectives. 1) Use tumor biopsies obtained at the time of recurrence for oncogene mutation and RNAseq analyses to identify molecular changes in oncogenes and gene pathways that can be potentially targeted. 2) Evaluate drug efficacy and optimize personalized therapy for each patient using PDX models. 3) Assess clinical feasibility and our experience using integrated approaches for lung cancer patients who failed targeted therapy. This study was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board (IRB) and utilizes both clinical and research biopsies. A dedicated nurse study coordinator reviews clinical patient list and history on weekly basis and informs the study team of each potential candidate patient. A total of 30 patients having ALK positive lung cancers have been identified and followed up from nearly 500 potentially ALK positive cases between April 2014 to Sept. 2015. Most patients were never smokers but six were former smokers and two were current smokers. Age at diagnoses ranged from 27-78 years (median = 61). Seven patients (23%) were 45 years or younger at the time of diagnosis. A total of 22 patients are currently being treated with crizotinib while eight are on ceritinib or alectinib. For each biopsy, tumor tissues are obtained using a 20 gauge needle, transferred on ice in preserving media and implanted within one hour into 6-8 week old NOD/SCID mice. Many patients have been on treatment for 2-3 years with stable disease so they do not require biopsy. Using a similar strategy, we also obtained biopsies from patients with EGFR gene mutations in their tumors and have progressed while on targeted therapy. A total of seven cases have been implanted. We will report our experiences in patient selection, clinical follow up, patient consent, PDX development, time from biopsy to tumor establishment, and the results of molecular analyses. Our study enabled us to gain new insights regarding the molecular changes associated with recurring tumors after they have failed targeted therapy as well as clinical experiences on how to utilize state-of-the art approaches and comprehensive genomic information to further improve cancer patient care upon disease progression. Acknowledgements: This work is supported in part by the Hillsberg Award from the National Foundation for Cancer Research and by the Biomarker Discovery Program at the Mayo Clinic Center for Individualized Medicine. Citation Format: Jin Jen, Aaron Mansfield, Patrick W. Eiken, Shawn Stoddard, Karlyn Pierson, Xiaonan Hou, Hong Zheng Ren, Julian Molina, Joanne Yi, Ping Yang. Integrated Approaches to Treating Lung Adenocarcinoma Resistant to Targeted Therapy. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr B34.

83 Background: Although surgery is traditionally the standard of care for esophageal cancer, esophagectomy carries significant morbidity and mortality. Alternative endoscopic therapies are needed for patients who are not candidates for conventional treatment. The objective of this study was to assess the safety, efficacy, and tolerability of spray cryotherapy of esophageal cancer. Methods: This study includes patients enrolled retrospectively and prospectively in an open-label registry and patients in a retrospective cohort from twelve academic and community practices. Endoscopic spray cryotherapy was performed until local tumor eradication was confirmed by biopsy or until treatment was halted due to progression of disease, patient withdrawal or co-morbidities. Results: One-hundred and eight patients (median age 75.5, 79.6% male, 93.5% adenocarcinoma, mean length 5.2 cm) underwent 442 treatments (mean 4.2 per patient). Tumor stages included 40 with T1a, 27 with T1b, 10 with unspecified T1, 15 with T2, and 16 with no T stage reported. One-hundred and six patients completed treatment with complete response of intraluminal disease in 54.7%, including complete response in 74.4% for T1a, 50% for T1b, 65.3% for all T1, 6.7% for T2, and 50% for those with no T stage reported. Mean follow-up was 17.3 months. There were no deaths or perforations related to spray cryotherapy. Strictures developed in 11 of 108 patients (10.2%) but were present before spray cryotherapy in 3 of 11. Conclusions: This study suggests that endoscopic spray cryotherapy is safe, well tolerated and effective for early esophageal cancer in patients who are not candidates for conventional therapy.