Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

743 citation(s) found for "Xu, Ming".

Molecular profiling of liquid biopsies from patients (pts) with bone metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (BM-CRPC) treated with radium-223 (RA-223) to reveal differential enrichment for markers that correlate with overall survival (OS).
Araujo, John C. , Vardaki, Ioulia , Tu, Shi‐Ming, Pagliaro, Lance C. , Zurita, Amado J. , Corn, Paul Gettys , Subudhi, Sumit Kumar , Aparicio, Ana M , Tu, Shi‐Ming , Logothetis, Christopher J. , Panaretakis, Theocharis

Journal of Clinical Oncology | February 26, 2018 | Volume: 36 | Issue: 6_suppl | Pages: 259-259

10.1200/jco.2018.36.6_suppl.259 Get It

259 Introduction: RA-223 prolongs OS in BM-CRPC pts but predictive markers are lacking. We hypothesized that molecular profiling of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles (EVs) from BM-CRPC pts treated with RA-223 would predict efficacy and inform development of combinations. Methods: Paired baseline (BL) and end of treatment (EoT) blood samples were collected from 25 pts treated with RA-223. Pts were stratified by median OS into 3 groups: 1) 6.3 months (range 3.3-8.5, n=5 pts, UnFav OS), 2) 18.2 months (range 12.6-19.4, n=7 pts, Middle OS) and 3) 27.6 months (range 23.1-33.8, n=13 pts, Fav OS). EVs were isolated from plasma and analyzed for specific proteins and RNA transcripts. Marker profiles by domain and analytic method were determined in pts from the stratified OS groups. Results: At EoT, there is enrichment of RNA transcripts and proteins involved in regulating immune responses, DNA Damage Response (DDR) and bone metabolism (Table). By benchmarking molecular signatures in pts with UnFav Os and Fav OS, we could analyze the molecular profiles of pts in the Middle OS group and stratify them to UnFav OS or Fav OS groups. Conclusion: Plasma-based molecular markers are predictive for RA-223 efficacy. An association between OS and immune and DDR profiles in men with BM-CRPC may indicate mechanism of action and identify subsets most likely to benefit. These preliminary results provide rationale for combination therapy with RA-223 and immune-checkpoint blockade or PARP inhibition. Clinical trial information: NCT02135484. [Table: see text]
Abstract PD6-14: Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer
Sanil, Ashish, Singhrao, Ruby , Investigators, I-SPY 2 TRIAL, Asare, Smita , Berry, Donald A. , Esserman, L., Veer, Laura van ‘t , Nanda, Rita , Yau, Christina , Wolf, Denise M. , Swigart, Lamorna Brown , Hirst, Gillian L. , Investigators, I-SPY 2 TRIAL, DeMichele, Angela , Veer, Laura J. van’t , Liu, Ming , Yee, Douglas

Cancer Research | February 15, 2018 | Volume: 78 | Issue: 4_Supplement | Pages: PD6-14-PD6-14

10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs17-pd6-14 Get It

Abstract Background: Pembrolizumab (P), an anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, has been approved for treatment of microsatellite instability-high and mismatch repair deficient cancers. In I-SPY 2, patients were randomized to receive standard chemotherapy alone or in combination with an experimental agent. P was one of the experimental agents evaluated in HER2- patients in I-SPY 2 and graduated in the TN, HR+HER2-, and HER2- signatures. We hypothesize that a combination of two signatures predicting response to veliparib/carboplatin therapy in I-SPY 2 [MammaPrint High2 (MP2)/PARPi7-high] and reflecting DNA damage repair deficiency, may also predict response to P. In addition, we also tested 9 gene expression signatures reflecting different aspects of DNA damage and repair: FA, MMR, BER, HR, TLS, NER, NHEJ, DR, and DNA damage sensing (DDS) pathways. Methods: Data from 249 patients (P: 69 and controls: 180) were available. Pre-treatment biopsies were assayed using Agilent gene expression arrays. All I-SPY 2 qualifying biomarker analyses follow a pre-specified analysis plan. We used logistic modeling to assess biomarker performance. A biomarker is considered a specific predictor of P response if it associates with response in the P arm but not the control arm, and if the biomarker x treatment interaction is significant (likelihood ratio test, p<0.05). This analysis is also performed adjusting for HR status as a covariate, and within receptor subsets, sample size permitting. For successful biomarkers, we use Bayesian modeling to estimate the pCR rates of 'predicted sensitive' patients in each arm. Our statistics are descriptive rather than inferential and do not adjust for multiplicities of other biomarkers outside this study. Results: MP2 status associates with pCR in P (OR=7.7; p=0.00021), but also to a lesser extent in the control arm (OR=2.4:p=0.045), with an OR ratio of 3.3 which trends toward significance, even after adjusting for HR status (LR p=0.083). A majority of TN patients are MP2; and TN/MP2 patients have an estimated pCR rate of 67% in P (vs. 23% in control). Although only ~30% of HR+HER2- patients were MP2, their estimated pCR rate in P is 61%, compared to 29% in unselected HR+/HER2- patients. PARPi7 predicted response in the P arm only in the HR+HER2- group (LR p= 0.025), but not in the population as a whole or the TN subtype. Combining MP2 and PARPi7 into MP2/PARPi7-high did not improve performance over MP2 as a single biomarker. Of the 9 DDR pathway signatures tested, both BER and DDS associate with pCR in P, but only DDS (which includes ATM, ATR, CHEK1-2) associates with pCR in the P arm (LR p=0.00029), and not the control arm (LR p=0.53), with a significant interaction with treatment (LR p=0.0064) that retains significance in a model adjusting for HR status. When dichotomized to optimize the biomarker x treatment interaction, the estimated pCR rate is 75% in P vs 18% in control, in the DDS+ subset. Conclusion: In this small study, MP2 status and a DNA damage sensing pathway but not the PARPi7 or other repair pathways show promise as predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibition therapy in breast cancer. Citation Format: Yau C, Wolf D, Brown-Swigart L, Hirst G, Sanil A, Singhrao R, I-SPY 2 TRIAL Investigators, Asare S, DeMichele A, Berry D, Esserman L, van 't Veer L, Nanda R, Liu M, Yee D. Analysis of DNA repair deficiency biomarkers as predictors of response to the PD1 inhibitor pembrolizumab: Results from the neoadjuvant I-SPY 2 trial for stage II-III high-risk breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2017 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2017 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2018;78(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD6-14.
Mutations causing congenital myasthenia reveal principal coupling pathway in the acetylcholine receptor ε-subunit
Shen, Xin‐Ming , Brengman, Joan M., Shen, Shelley , Durmuş, Hacer , Preethish‐Kumar, Veeramani , Yüceyar, Nur , Vengalil, Seena , Deymeer, Feza , Sine, Steven M. , Engel, Andrew G. , Nalini, Atchayaram

JCI Insight | January 24, 2018 | Volume: 3 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1172/jci.insight.97826 | PMID 29367459 Get It

We identify 2 homozygous mutations in the ε-subunit of the muscle acetylcholine receptor (AChR) in 3 patients with severe congenital myasthenia: εR218W in the pre-M1 region in 2 patients and εE184K in the β8-β9 linker in 1 patient. Arg218 is conserved in all eukaryotic members of the Cys-loop receptor superfamily, while Glu184 is conserved in the α-, δ-, and ε-subunits of AChRs from all species. εR218W reduces channel gating efficiency 338-fold and AChR expression on the cell surface 5-fold, whereas εE184K reduces channel gating efficiency 11-fold but does not alter AChR cell surface expression. Determinations of the effective channel gating rate constants, combined with mutant cycle analyses, demonstrate strong energetic coupling between εR218 and εE184, and between εR218 and εE45 from the β1-β2 linker, as also observed for equivalent residues in the principal coupling pathway of the α-subunit. Thus, efficient and rapid gating of the AChR channel is achieved not only by coupling between conserved residues within the principal coupling pathway of the α-subunit, but also between corresponding residues in the ε-subunit.
Utility of Pathology Imagebase for standardisation of prostate cancer grading
Egevad, Lars , Delahunt, Brett , Bostwick, David G., Cheville, John C. , Evans, Andrew , Fine, Samson W. , Grignon, David J. , Humphrey, Peter A. , Hörnblad, Jonas, Iczkowski, Kenneth A. , Kench, James G. , Leite, Kátia Ramos Moreira , McKenney, Jesse K. , Pan, Chin‐Chen , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Srigley, John R., Takahashi, Hiroyuki , True, Lawrence D. , Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Varma, Murali , Zhou, Ming , Clements, Mark , McKenney, Jesse K , Pan, Chin-Chen , Tsuzuki, Toyonori , Samaratunga, Hemamali , Berney, Daniel M. , Compérat, Éva , Kristiansen, Glen , Magi‐Galluzzi, Cristina , OXLEY, JON D. , Kwast, Theodorus van der

Histopathology | January 23, 2018 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 8-18

10.1111/his.13471 | PMID 29359484 Get It

AimsDespite efforts to standardise grading of prostate cancer, even among experts there is still a considerable variation in grading practices. In this study we describe the use of Pathology Imagebase, a novel reference image library, for setting an international standard in prostate cancer grading.Methods and resultsThe International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) recently launched a reference image database supervised by experts. A panel of 24 international experts in prostate pathology reviewed independently microphotographs of 90 cases of prostate needle biopsies with cancer. A linear weighted kappa of 0.67 (95% confidence interval = 0.62–0.72) and consensus was reached in 50 cases. The interobserver weighted kappa varied from 0.48 to 0.89. The highest level of agreement was seen for Gleason score (GS) 3 + 3 = 6 (ISUP grade 1), while higher grades and particularly GS 4 + 3 = 7 (ISUP grade 3) showed considerable disagreement. Once a two‐thirds majority was reached, images were moved automatically into a public database available for all ISUP members at www.isupweb.org. Non‐members are able to access a limited number of cases.ConclusionsIt is anticipated that the database will assist pathologists to calibrate their grading and, hence, decrease interobserver variability. It will also help to identify instances where definitions of grades need to be clarified.
The unfolding landscape of the congenital myasthenic syndromes
Engel, Andrew G. , Shen, Xin‐Ming , Selcen, Duygu

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences | January 22, 2018 | Volume: 1413 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 25-34

10.1111/nyas.13539 | PMID 29355968 Get It

AbstractCongenital myasthenic syndromes (CMS) are heterogeneous disorders in which the safety margin of neuromuscular transmission is impaired by one or more specific mechanisms. Since the advent of next‐generation sequencing methods, the discovery of novel CMS targets and phenotypes has proceeded at an accelerated rate. Here, we review the current classification of CMS and describe our findings in five of these targets identified and investigated in our laboratory in the past 5 years. Defects in LRP4 hinder synaptic development and maintenance; the defects in PREPL are predicted to diminish filling of the synaptic vesicle with acetylcholine; and defects in SNAP25, Munc13‐1, and synaptotbrevin‐1 impede synaptic vesicle exocytosis.
Integrated transcriptomic and regulatory network analyses identify microRNA-200c as a novel repressor of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation
Hao, Baixia , Guan, Daogang , Li, Mulin Jun , Lu, Jun, Yang, Yong , Wu, Binbin , Wu, Stanley Chun-ming, Webb, Sarah , Liang, Yan , Yao, Xiaoqiang , Wang, Junwen , Yan, Bin , Wang, Junwen , Poon, Ellen Ngar-Yun , Miller, Andrew L. , Boheler, Kenneth R.

Cardiovascular Research | January 22, 2018 | Volume: 114 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 894-906

10.1093/cvr/cvy019 | PMID 29373717 Get It

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation
Calkins, Hugh , Hindricks, Gerhard , Cappato, Riccardo , Kim, Young‐Hoon , Aguinaga, Luis, Akar, Joseph G. , Badhwar, Vinay , Camm, A. John , Chen, Peng‐Sheng , Chen, Shih‐Ann , Chung, Mina K. , Nielsen, Jens Cosedis , Curtis, Anne B. , Davies, D. Wyn, Groot, Natasja M.S. de , Duytschaever, Mattias , Edgerton, James R. , Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. , Ernst, Sabine , Fenelon, Guilherme , Gerstenfeld, Edward P. , Haines, David E. , Haïssaguerre, Michel , Jackman, Warren M. , Jalife, José , Kalman, Jonathan M. , Kautzner, Josef , Kottkamp, Hans , Kuck, Karl Heinz, Kumagai, Koichiro , Lee, Richard, Lewalter, Thorsten , Lindsay, Bruce D., Mansour, Moussa , Michaud, Gregory F., Nakagawa, Hiroshi , Natale, Andrea , Okumura, Ken , Packer, Douglas L. , Reynolds, Matthew R. , Sanders, Prashanthan , Scanavacca, Maurício , Schilling, Richard J. , Tondo, Claudio , Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Verma, Atul , Wilber, David J. , Reviewers:, Document, Paola, Ângelo Amato Vincenzo de , Kistler, Peter M. , Pisani, Cristiano , Raviele, Antonio , Satomi, Kazuhiro , Stiles, Martin K. , Willems, Stephan , Haı̈ssaguerre, Michel , Packer, Douglas, Verma, Atul , Natale, Andrea , Sanders, Prashanthan , Nielsen, Jens C , de Groot, Natasja M S , Saad, Eduardo , Brugada, Josép , Day, John , d'Avila, Andre , Biase, Luigi Di , Ellinor, Patrick T. , Haissaguerre, Michel , Helm, Robert H. , Hylek, Elaine M. , Macle, Laurent , Marchlinski, Francis E. , Michaud, Gregory F. , Nattel, Stanley , Pokushalov, Evgeny A. , Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Yamane, Teiichi , Reviewers:, Document, Blomström‐Lundqvist, Carina , Lip, Gregory Y H , Peters, Nicholas Simon , Scanavacca, Maurício , Tondo, Claudio , Ernst, Sabine , Ellenbogen, Kenneth A

EP Europace | January 17, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e1-e160

10.1093/europace/eux274 | PMID 29016840 Get It

Lifestyle Intervention and Medical Management With vs Without Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Control of Hemoglobin A 1c , LDL Cholesterol, and Systolic Blood Pressure at 5 Years in the Diabetes Surgery Study
Ikramuddin, Sayeed , Körner, Judith , Thomas, Avis J., Connett, John E. , Bantle, John P., Leslie, Daniel B. , Wang, Qi , Inabnet, William B. , Jeffery, Robert W., Chong, Keong , Chuang, Lee‐Ming , Jensen, Michael D. , Ahmed, Leaque , Belani, Kumar G. , Lee, Wei‐Jei , Vella, Adrian , Billington, Charles J.

JAMA | January 16, 2018 | Volume: 319 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 266

10.1001/jama.2017.20813 | PMID 29340678 Get It

2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: Executive summary
Calkins, Hugh , Hindricks, Gerhard , Cappato, Riccardo , Kim, Young‐Hoon , Aguinaga, Luis, Akar, Joseph G. , Badhwar, Vinay , Camm, A. John , Chen, Peng‐Sheng , Chen, Shih‐Ann , Chung, Mina K. , Nielsen, Jens Cosedis , Curtis, Anne B. , Davies, D. Wyn, Groot, Natasja M.S. de , Duytschaever, Mattias , Edgerton, James R. , Ellenbogen, Kenneth A. , Ernst, Sabine , Fenelon, Guilherme , Gerstenfeld, Edward P. , Haines, David E. , Haïssaguerre, Michel , Jackman, Warren M. , Jalife, José , Kalman, Jonathan M. , Kautzner, Josef , Kottkamp, Hans , Kuck, Karl Heinz, Kumagai, Koichiro , Lee, Richard, Lewalter, Thorsten , Lindsay, Bruce D., Mansour, Moussa , Michaud, Gregory F., Nakagawa, Hiroshi , Natale, Andrea , Okumura, Ken , Packer, Douglas L. , Reynolds, Matthew R. , Sanders, Prashanthan , Scanavacca, Maurício , Schilling, Richard J. , Tondo, Claudio , Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Verma, Atul , Wilber, David J. , Haı̈ssaguerre, Michel , Packer, Douglas, Verma, Atul , Natale, Andrea , Sanders, Prashanthan , Nielsen, Jens C , de Groot, Natasja M S , Saad, Eduardo , Brugada, Josép , Day, John , d'Avila, Andre , Biase, Luigi Di , Ellinor, Patrick T. , Haissaguerre, Michel , Helm, Robert H. , Hylek, Elaine M. , Macle, Laurent , Marchlinski, Francis E. , Michaud, Gregory F. , Nattel, Stanley , Pokushalov, Evgeny A. , Tsao, Hsuan-Ming, Yamane, Teiichi , Scanavacca, Maurício , Tondo, Claudio , Ernst, Sabine , Ellenbogen, Kenneth A

EP Europace | January 5, 2018 | Volume: 20 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 157-208

10.1093/europace/eux275 | PMID 29016841 Get It

Defining the minimum clinically important difference for grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: insights from the Quality Outcomes Database
Asher, Anthony L. , Kerezoudis, Panagiotis , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Bisson, Erica F. , Glassman, Steven D. , Foley, Kevin T. , Slotkin, Jonathan R., Potts, Eric A. , Shaffrey, Mark E., Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Coric, Domagoj , Knightly, John J. , Park, Paul , Fu, Kai-Ming, Devin, Clinton J. , Archer, Kristin R. , Chotai, Silky , Chan, Andrew K. , Virk, Michael S. , Bydon, Mohamad

Neurosurgical Focus | January 1, 2018 | Volume: 44 | Issue: 1 | Pages: E2

10.3171/2017.10.focus17554 | PMID 29290132 Get It

OBJECTIVE Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) play a pivotal role in defining the value of surgical interventions for spinal disease. The concept of minimum clinically important difference (MCID) is considered the new standard for determining the effectiveness of a given treatment and describing patient satisfaction in response to that treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine the MCID associated with surgical treatment for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS The authors queried the Quality Outcomes Database registry from July 2014 through December 2015 for patients who underwent posterior lumbar surgery for grade I degenerative spondylolisthesis. Recorded PROs included scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), EQ-5D, and numeric rating scale (NRS) for leg pain (NRS-LP) and back pain (NRS-BP). Anchor-based (using the North American Spine Society satisfaction scale) and distribution-based (half a standard deviation, small Cohen’s effect size, standard error of measurement, and minimum detectable change [MDC]) methods were used to calculate the MCID for each PRO. RESULTS A total of 441 patients (80 who underwent laminectomies alone and 361 who underwent fusion procedures) from 11 participating sites were included in the analysis. The changes in functional outcome scores between baseline and the 1-year postoperative evaluation were as follows: 23.5 ± 17.4 points for ODI, 0.24 ± 0.23 for EQ-5D, 4.1 ± 3.5 for NRS-LP, and 3.7 ± 3.2 for NRS-BP. The different calculation methods generated a range of MCID values for each PRO: 3.3–26.5 points for ODI, 0.04–0.3 points for EQ-5D, 0.6–4.5 points for NRS-LP, and 0.5–4.2 points for NRS-BP. The MDC approach appeared to be the most appropriate for calculating MCID because it provided a threshold greater than the measurement error and was closest to the average change difference between the satisfied and not-satisfied patients. On subgroup analysis, the MCID thresholds for laminectomy-alone patients were comparable to those for the patients who underwent arthrodesis as well as for the entire cohort. CONCLUSIONS The MCID for PROs was highly variable depending on the calculation technique. The MDC seems to be a statistically and clinically sound method for defining the appropriate MCID value for patients with grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. Based on this method, the MCID values are 14.3 points for ODI, 0.2 points for EQ-5D, 1.7 points for NRS-LP, and 1.6 points for NRS-BP.