Abstract In clinical cancer treatment, genomic alterations would often affect the response of patients to anticancer drugs. Studies have shown that molecular features of tumors could be biomarkers predictive of sensitivity or resistance to anticancer agents, but the identification of actionable mutations are often constrained by the incomplete understanding of cancer genomes. Recent progresses of next-generation sequencing technology greatly facilitate the extensive molecular characterization of tumors and promote precision medicine in cancers. More and more clinical studies, cancer cell lines studies, CRISPR screening studies as well as patient-derived model studies were performed to identify potential actionable mutations predictive of drug response, which provide rich resources of molecularly and pharmacologically profiled cancer samples at different levels. Such abundance of data also enables the development of various computational models and algorithms to solve the problem of drug sensitivity prediction, biomarker identification and in silico drug prioritization by the integration of multiomics data. Here, we review the recent development of methods and resources that identifies mutation-dependent effects for cancer treatment in clinical studies, functional genomics studies and computational studies and discuss the remaining gaps and future directions in this area.
GWAS4D: multidimensional analysis of context-specific regulatory variant for human complex diseases and traits
Integrated transcriptomic and regulatory network analyses identify microRNA-200c as a novel repressor of human pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte differentiation and maturation
Abstract Motivation: Prediction and prioritization of human non-coding regulatory variants is critical for understanding the regulatory mechanisms of disease pathogenesis and promoting personalized medicine. Existing tools utilize functional genomics data and evolutionary information to evaluate the pathogenicity or regulatory functions of non-coding variants. However, different algorithms lead to inconsistent and even conflicting predictions. Combining multiple methods may increase accuracy in regulatory variant prediction. Results: Here, we compiled an integrative resource for predictions from eight different tools on functional annotation of non-coding variants. We further developed a composite strategy to integrate multiple predictions and computed the composite likelihood of a given variant being regulatory variant. Benchmarked by multiple independent causal variants datasets, we demonstrated that our composite model significantly improves the prediction performance. Availability and Implementation: We implemented our model and scoring procedure as a tool, named PRVCS, which is freely available to academic and non-profit usage at http://jjwanglab.org/PRVCS. Contact: wang.junwen@mayo.edu, jliu@stat.harvard.edu, or limx54@gmail.com Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.