Citations

Abstract Background. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and statin drugs have been suggested as protective agents against the development of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), but data are limited, particularly for NHL subtypes. Further, some in vitro, animal and epidemiologic data suggest there may be a synergistic effect of these two agents in cancer prevention, but there has been no test of this hypothesis in NHL. Methods. We evaluated the use of NSAIDs and statins in a clinic-based study of 1683 newly diagnosed cases and 2168 frequency matched controls enrolled from 2002-2012. Regular use (at least once/week for at least one year) of low dose (baby) aspirin, standard or extra strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs (e.g., naproxen, etc), COX-2 inhibitors, as well as statins or other cholesterol lowering drugs, was ascertained using a self-administered questionnaire. Frequency, amount and duration of use were also collected. Unconditional logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), adjusted for age, sex, residence, education, body mass index, smoking history, alcohol use, and history of rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis. Pathologic classification of NHL subtypes was centrally reviewed, and subtype-specific NHL risks were estimated using polychotomous logistic regression for chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL, N = 495), diffuse large B-cell (DLBCL, N = 326), follicular (FL, N = 410) and marginal zone (MZL, N = 134) lymphomas. Results. The mean age of cases was 61.8 years and 59% were men, while the mean age of controls was 61.6 years and 53% were men. We observed an inverse association of low dose aspirin use with risk of NHL (OR = 0.82; 95% CI 0.70-0.96), with stronger associations for more pills per day, longer duration of use and greater number of pill-years. In contrast, we observed no evidence of an association with NHL risk with use of regular or extra-strength aspirin, ibuprofen, other NSAIDs, or COX-2 inhibitors, nor use of statins or other cholesterol-lowering drugs. When we modeled the joint use of low dose aspirin and statins, the strongest inverse association was observed for low dose aspirin use only, followed by use of both aspirin and statins; there was no association with statin use only and no evidence for any interaction of low dose aspirin and statins on NHL risk. For low dose aspirin, the strongest inverse trends were observed for DLBCL, followed by FL and MZL, while there were no consistent associations for CLL/SLL. Conclusions. We found a strong inverse association of low dose aspirin use with risk of NHL and the subtypes of DLBCL, FL, and MZL, but no association for regular/extra strength aspirin, other NSAIDs or statin use. While confirmation is needed, our findings for low dose aspirin but not use of other NSAIDs suggest that anti-platelet or other effects of low dose aspirin may be of etiologic significance in lymphomagenesis. Citation Format: James R. Cerhan, Megan M. O'Bryne, Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Timothy G. Call, Carrie A. Thompson, Tait D. Shanafelt, William R. Macon, Neil E. Kay, Thomas M. Habermann, Susan L. Slager, Mark Liebow. Aspirin and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, statins, and risk of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 877. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-877

Abstract Background: Copanlisib is a novel pan-Class I phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitor with potent preclinical inhibitory activity against both PI3K-δ and PI3K-α isoforms. A phase II study of copanlisib in patients with relapsed/refractory indolent or aggressive lymphoma reported a promising overall response rate of up to 53% for patients in the indolent NHL group (Dreyling et al., ENA 2014). The objective of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of copanlisib in patients with indolent B-cell NHL relapsed after or refractory to standard therapy. Methods: In this study, patients meeting the following criteria will be eligible for enrollment: histologically confirmed diagnosis of indolent B-cell NHL, with follicular lymphoma (FL) grade 1-2-3a, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL; splenic, nodal, or extra-nodal), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) with absolute lymphocyte count < 5 × 109/L at the time of diagnosis and at study entry, or lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma/Waldenström macroglobulinemia (LPL/WM), and who have previously received ≥ 2 prior lines of therapy with rituximab and an alkylating agent and must be refractory to the last treatment with rituximab (refractory defined as not responding or progressing within 6 months of the last course of treatment). Patients will be randomized in 2:1 manner to receive 60 mg of copanlisib administered intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28-day cycle or placebo administered on the same schedule. Patients will be treated until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Patients in the placebo arm will be allowed to cross-over to receive follow-up treatment with copanlisib, after confirmed disease progression. Dose reductions due to toxicities to 45 mg and 30 mg will be allowed. Radiologic tumor assessment will be performed every 12, 16 or 24 weeks for years 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The primary endpoint will be progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary objectives include overall objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), time to progression (TTP), complete response rate (CRR), overall survival (OS), time to deterioration as well as time to improvement in disease-related symptoms. Exploratory objectives will include secondary PFS after first progression in placebo-treated patients who cross over to receive copanlisib and time to improvement and the time to deterioration in disease-related symptoms-physical (DRS-P) of at least 3 points as measured by the FLymSI-18 questionnaire. Approximately 189 patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be randomized 2:1, with approximately 126 patients in the copanlisib monotherapy arm and approximately 63 patients in placebo arm. The study is planned to detect a 132% increase in median PFS in copanlisib versus placebo (i.e. to detect a hazard ratio of 0.43), using a stratified log-rank test. Citation Format: Grzegorz S. Nowakowski, Igor Gorbatchevsky, Florian Hiemeyer, Lisa Cupit, Barrett H. Childs. CHRONOS-2: A randomized, double-blind phase III study of phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase alpha/delta inhibitor copanlisib versus placebo in patients with rituximab-refractory indolent non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (iNHL). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr CT212. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-CT212

Abstract Primary lymphoma of the lung is a rare entity. Clinical features, optimal treatment, role of surgery and outcomes are not well defined, and the follow‐up is variable in published data. Clinical data of 205 patients who were confirmed to have bronchus mucosa‐associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma from December 1986 to December 2011 in 17 different centres worldwide were evaluated. Fifty‐five per cent of the patients were female. The median age at diagnosis was 62 (range 28–88) years. Only 9% had a history of exposure to toxic substances, while about 45% of the patients had a history of smoking. Ten per cent of the patients had autoimmune disease at presentation, and 19% patients had a reported preexisting lung disease. Treatment modalities included surgery alone in 63 patients (30%), radiotherapy in 3 (2%), antibiotics in 1 (1%) and systemic treatment in 128 (62%). Patients receiving a local approach, mainly surgical resection, experienced significantly improved progression‐free survival ( p = 0.003) versus those receiving a systemic treatment. There were no other significant differences among treatment modalities. The survival data confirm the indolent nature of the disease. Local therapy (surgery or radiotherapy) results in long‐term disease‐free survival for patients with localized disease. Systemic treatment, including alkylating‐containing regimens, can be reserved to patients in relapse after incomplete surgical excision or for patients with advanced disease. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Personalized therapy for the treatment of patients with cancer is rapidly approaching and is an achievable goal in the near future. A substantial number of novel targets have been developed into therapeutic agents. There is a substantial variability to antitumor activity by novel therapeutics because of the unique heterogeneity and biology that exists both between and within lymphoma subtypes. Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Approximately 40% of patients have refractory disease or disease that will relapse after an initial response, and the majority of patients with relapsed DLBCL will succumb to the disease. There are two major biologically distinct molecular subtypes of DLBCL: germinal center B-cell (GCB) and activated B-cell (ABC). ABC DLBCL is associated with substantially worse outcomes when treated with standard chemoimmunotherapy. In addition to GCB and ABC subtypes, double-hit lymphomas (approximately 5% to 10% of patients) and double-expressor lymphomas, which overexpress MYC and BCL2 protein, are aggressive DLBCLs and are also associated with a poor prognosis. Double-hit lymphomas have concurrent chromosomal rearrangements of MYC plus BCL2 (or less likely, BCL6). Advances in molecular characterization techniques and the development of novel agents targeting specific subtypes of DLBCL have provided a foundation for personalized therapy of DLBCL based on molecular subtype. A number of early clinical trials evaluating combinations of novel targeted agents with standard chemotherapy (R-CHOP) have been completed and have demonstrated the feasibility of this approach with encouraging efficacy. As such, molecular classification of DLBCL is not only important for prognostication, but moves to center stage for personalization of therapy for DLBCL.

Key Points The mTOR pathway is constitutively activated in the TCL cells and is responsible for TCL proliferation. This is first trial to demonstrate that mTORC1 inhibitors (everolimus) have substantial antitumor activity (44% overall response rate) in patients with relapsed TCL.

Key Points BCL2 mutations in FL correlate with activation-induced cytidine deaminase expression and frequently alter the amino acid sequence of the protein. Mutations in the BCL2 coding sequence at diagnosis are associated with shortened time to transformation and earlier death due to lymphoma.

AbstractImmune and nonimmune microenvironmental factors play a critical role in the progression, transformation, and resistance to therapy in follicular lymphoma (FL). A recent increase in our understanding of the role of microenvironment in FL biology has led to the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeting the nonimmune and immune microenvironment. These include immunomodulatory drugs, immune checkpoint inhibitors, immnunoconjugates, and small-molecule inhibitors with an impact on the microenvironment in addition to direct antitumor activity. These agents are now at different stages of clinical development, ranging from early clinical trials in relapsed disease to phase 3 studies in the upfront setting, including combinations with other agents such as monoclonal antibodies and chemotherapy. It is important to recognize that, although the current upfront therapy of FL is associated with favorable outcomes in the majority of patients, a significant proportion experience early disease progression and develop treatment resistance and transformation to aggressive lymphoma. Although the development of “chemo-free” combinations using drugs targeting the microenvironment offers a promising approach to minimize toxicity, the identification of patients at risk of relapse and the use of biomarkers allowing the personalization of therapy will likely play a major role in the development of maintenance strategies. Against this landscape of currently available therapy options, this chapter discusses the clinical status of therapies targeting the microenvironment in FL.