Citations

OBJECTIVES: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess prevalence and timing of acute kidney injury (AKI) development after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and its association with mortality. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid PsycINFO database, Scopus, and Web of Science thought April 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Titles and abstracts were screened independently and in duplicate to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies reporting the development of AKI following ARDS were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data using a pre piloted abstraction form. We used Review Manager 5.4 software (Cochrane Library, Oxford, United Kingdom) and Open Meta software (Brown University, Providence, RI) for statistical analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 3646 studies identified and screened, 17 studies comprising 9359 ARDS patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. AKI developed in 3287 patients (40%) after the diagnosis of ARDS. The incidence of AKI at least 48 hours after ARDS diagnosis was 20% (95% CI, 0.18–0.21%). The pooled risk ratio (RR) for the hospital (or 30-d) mortality among ARDS patients who developed AKI was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.71–2.18). AKI development after ARDS was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality in ARDS patients, with a pooled odds ratio from multivariable analysis of 3.69 (95% CI, 2.24–6.09). Furthermore, two studies comparing mortality between patients with late vs. early AKI initiation after ARDS revealed higher mortality in late AKI patients with RR of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.19–1.8). However, the certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: While our findings highlight a significant association between ARDS and subsequent development of AKI, the low to very low certainty of evidence underscores the need for cautious interpretation. This systematic review identified a significant knowledge gap, necessitating further research to establish a more definitive understanding of this relationship and its clinical implications.

Background: Ca-NBTE primarily affects the mitral valve (MV) and aortic valve (AV), with rare involvement of the right heart valves. Premortem descriptions of this condition are limited to a few case reports. This study presents an initial clinical series focusing on patients with Ca-NBTE specifically affecting their right heart valves. We describe the underlying cancers, types of valve lesions, and associated embolic complications. Patients and Methods: A electronic search of medical records (March 31, 2002, to June 30, 2022) was followed by a manual review to identify adult patients with echocardiographically detected NBTE, active cancer, and no infectious endocarditis or lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies. Results: Out of 115 identified patients with Ca-NBTE (mean age 63.2±9.7 years, 66.1% female), there were 8 cases (7.0%) affecting right heart valves (mean age 64.5±12.1 years, 3 females) with underlying cancer: pancreatic (n=3), lung (n= 2), genitourinary (n=1), gastric (n=1) and neck sarcomatoid carcinoma (n=1). TV was affected in 8 patients and PV in one case; 4 patients had Ca-NBTE limited only to PV, 2 patients had MV and TV, 1 patient had mitral, aortic and TV, and 1 patient with pancreatic cancer had all four valves affected by NBTE. 5 patients had embolic complications to the brain with one patient in that group also experiencing emboli to the kidney and spleen. Out of 4 patients with NBTE limited to TV, two still had brain emboli, one had only pulmonary embolism, and one patient had no embolic complications. Conclusion: Around 7% of Ca-NBTE cases involve the right heart valves, with half of these cases limited to the TV. The cancer profile in these cases resembles that seen in left heart valve involvement.

Background: The obesity paradox is a phenomenon observed in certain chronic diseases, particularly cardiovascular diseases, where individuals with obesity have better outcomes compared to those of normal weight. We aimed to study how COVID-19 affects MACCE results in metabolically healthy obese (MHO) individuals who have a BMI >30. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample (2020) and appropriate ICD-10-CM codes, we identified adult hospitalizations with COVID-19 and grouped them into two cohorts with and without obesity (MHO+ and MHO-, omitting hypertension, diabetes, and hyperlipidemia). MACCE (all-cause inpatient mortality, cardiac arrest, including ventricular fibrillation, and stroke) in COVID-19-related hospitalizations was the primary outcome. Results: 84,145 (21.9%) of 397,040 COVID-19 hospitalizations were MHO+. The MHO+ group was younger (median 43 vs 52 years), female (56.9% vs. 49.4%), black (19.4% vs 15.1%), Hispanic (35.2% vs 30.5%), and Native American (1.5% vs 1.2%) (p<0.001). Tobacco use disorder, past PCI, prior VTE, depression, chronic pulmonary disease, hypothyroidism, and other thyroid problems were more common in MHO+ patients (p<0.05). MHO+ patients were discharged routinely (76% vs. 66.7%) but stayed longer (5 days vs 4 days). After correcting for baseline variables, the MHO+ cohort had a lower rate of MACCE than the MHO- cohort (8% vs. 11.3%, OR 0.81, 95CI 0.74-0.89, p<0.001), and lower all-cause mortality (6.6 % vs 9.4%) compared to the MHO- cohort. On subgroup analysis, females had lower odds (aOR 0.79) than males (aOR 0.82), older individuals ≥65 years old had lower odds (aOR 0.71) vs 45-64 (aOR 0.79), and race- wise comparison, whites had lower odds of MACCE events (aOR 0.76). Conclusions: MHO+ patients had lower odds of MACCE events. The MHO group was younger, suggesting higher cardiorespiratory fitness, which could explain the obesity paradox and reduced odds of MACCE outcomes.

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) are the most prevalent types of leukemia in the United States. Given the emergence of novel CLL/SLL therapies, it is important to understand real-world treatment characteristics and unmet needs. The objectives of this retrospective cohort study were to examine patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and associated outcomes for patients with CLL/SLL, overall, and by CLL and SLL, respectively. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using Symphony Integrated Dataverse (IDV ®), a comprehensive, longitudinal, open-claims database, and integrated electronic medical record data. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 diagnosis for CLL or SLL and who initiated a first-line or second-line treatment between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022 (index period) were included in the study. Index date was defined as the date of treatment initiation. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled for 365 days prior to the index date and ≥90 days following the index date. Patient data were included until patients were lost to follow-up or to the end of the study period (March 31, 2023). Treatment patterns were examined with the following treatment regimens and stratified by line of therapy: chemotherapy (including bendamustine-based and other chemotherapy), anti-CD20-based, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKiibrutinib- and acalabrutinib-based), and venetoclax-based therapy. Zanubrutinib use was not captured in the BTKi treatment category as its CLL/SLL indication approval date (January 19, 2023) was outside the index period. Discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of patients who discontinued their current treatment regimen within 90 days. Healthcare resource utilization was measured by number of outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and other medical/hospital services per patient per month (PPPM) during the treatment regimen. Results:There were 17,748 and 5,667 patients with CLL/SLL who initiated a first-line or second-line treatment regimen during the index period, respectively. The most frequently used treatment regimens in first line were BTKi (49.9%), followed by anti-CD20 (26.1%), venetoclax (15.4%), and chemotherapy (8.6%). BTKi continued to be the predominant treatment (49.6%) in second line, followed by venetoclax (30.9%), chemotherapy (10.4%), and anti-CD20 (9.2%). First-line patients treated with BTKi regimens were older and Medicare-insured when compared with patients receiving venetoclax-based regimens (65+ years: 77.1% vs 66.9%, P-value &lt;0.001; Medicare: 61.7% vs 53.0%, P-value &lt;0.001). Patients receiving BTKi had significantly lower discontinuation rates compared with other treatment regimens during both first and second lines of therapies (Figure 1). Mean PPPM outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and other medical/hospital services were less frequent with BTKi therapies vs other treatment regimens across both lines of therapy (Table 1). Of the 17,748 patients initiating first line of therapy, 13.3% had SLL while the remaining 86.7% had CLL. The proportion of patients with SLL vs CLL decreased in second line and second line or later (8.0% vs 92.0% and 6.8% vs 93.2%, respectively). Treatment discontinuation rate in SLL patients was higher than that in CLL patients in first line (32.41% and 25.08%, respectively); however, discontinuation rates became comparable with later lines of therapy. Across all lines of therapy, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher in SLL patients than CLL patients. Median PPPM outpatient visits were 1.02 for SLL and 0.67 for CLL. Median PPPM for other medical/hospital services was 0.7 for SLL and 0.23 for CLL. Conclusions: BTKi therapy, the primary treatment regimen across first- and second-line therapies, has significantly lower discontinuation rate and healthcare resource utilization compared with other treatment regimens. Further studies are needed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of CLL/SLL regimens to support evidence-based treatment decisions.

Background: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), an autologous chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy, achieved an overall response rate (ORR) of 94% and a complete response (CR) rate of 79% in patients with relapsed or refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) after two or more prior lines of therapy in the ZUMA-5 trial ( Jacobson et al. Lancet Oncol. 2022). Since its FDA approval in March 2021, there has been little evidence on comparative effectiveness (CE) studies of axi-cel vs standard-of-care (SoC), except ones using ZUMA-5 and historical SCHOLAR-5 data (eg, Ghione et al. Blood. 2022). This study was aimed to address this evidence gap in CE of axi-cel vs SoC used to treat r/r FL in real-world settings. Methods: The two data sources in this study were patients who received commercial axi-cel between March 2021 and May 2023 from the CIBMTR and patients who received historical SoC (eg, chemotherapy, anti-CD20 mAb + chemotherapy, immunomodulatory imide drugs) between July 2014 and December 2020 from SCHOLAR-5, which served as an external control of ZUMA-5 trial. The index date was defined as the initiation date of either the infusion for axi-cel patients or the last eligible systemic therapy for SoC patients. Patients were included if they were age ≥ 18, had documented r/r FL with histological grade 1, 2 or 3a, and received at least 2 prior lines of therapy at the index. Patients were excluded if they had transformed diffused large B-cell lymphoma, central nervous system involvement, prior receipt of CAR T or other non-CAR T cellular therapies or allogeneic stem cell transplant, or no post-index information on outcomes. Four effectiveness outcomes were ORR, CR rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Imbalance in observed prognostic risk factors between the two was adjusted via a propensity score analysis using the standard mortality ratio weighting (SMRW). The primary analyses included weighted univariable analysis and multivariable logistic (ORR and CR rate) or Cox (PFS and OS) regressions that were adjusted for the covariates after the SMRW. A sub-analysis of patients age ≥ 65 was conducted using the same methods as the primary analyses. Results: The unweighted study cohort included 376 patients, in which 256 (68%) received axi-cel . Thepatients who received axi-cel were more likely to be younger (median age 61 for axi-cel vs 67 for SoC), have grade 3a FL (37% vs 12%), received 3 or more prior lines of therapy (83% vs 58%), or remained refractory to the last prior therapy (79% vs 73%) vs those who received SoC. The imbalance in the observed prognostic risk factors was mitigated via the SMRW. The weighted univariable analysis, in which the sample size by treatment reflected the SMRW, is shown in Table 1. In patients of all ages, ORR was 92% in axi-cel vs 67% in SoC, and CR rate was 84% vs 37%. Because of varying follow-up lengths by treatment (median 7 months for axi-cel and 37 months for SoC), survival outcomes were reported at month 6, at which time PFS rate was 88% in axi-cel vs 64% in SoC and OS rate was 97% vs 85%. The corresponding proportions for patients age ≥ 65 were similar to those reported for patients of all ages. In the weighted multivariable regressions, axi-cel was associated with statistically significantly better outcomes by all 4 effectiveness measures vs SoC (Table 1). Specifically, in patients of all ages, the odds ratios for axi-cel were 4.93 (95% CI, 2.35−10.34) for ORR and 16.72 (95% CI, 7.03−39.73) for CR rate, and the hazard ratios for axi-cel were 0.41 (95% CI, 0.22−0.77) for PFS and 0.15 (95% CI, 0.06−0.34) for OS. Similar to the patients of all ages in the primary analyses, patients age ≥ 65 in the sub-analysis also demonstrated improved outcomes associated with axi-cel (Figure 1). Conclusions: This study showed that patients with r/r FL after two or more prior lines of therapy treated with axi-cel experienced better outcomes compared with patients treated with SoC, and that older patients also benefited significantly from axi-cel. These findings suggest that axi-cel addresses an important unmet medical need in patients with r/r FL. Future research should include longer follow-up data on outcomes of axi-cel and CE of axi-cel vs other contemporary SoC therapies.

Background: The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is evolving at a rapid pace, with development of several targeted therapies. The real-world applicability of clinical trial effectiveness is markedly influenced by treatment choices, the specific characteristics of patients' diseases, their overall health, and individual preferences. However, there is limited evidence to understand the impact of multiple treatment options on real-world effectiveness in CLL in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize recent real-world treatment sequencing patterns and associated time to next treatment among patients with CLL in the United States. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with CLL (≥18 years at diagnosis) from January 1, 2018, through January 1, 2023, who received ≥1 treatment after initial diagnosis. Patients were sourced from the ConcertAI RWD360 dataset, a real-world de-identified dataset &gt;6 million patients from across the United States derived from various electronic health record systems and integrated with a large administrative open claims dataset. Patients were followed through the end of the record or death, whichever occurred first. Patients were classified into the following treatment categories: chemotherapy (including bendamustine-based and other chemotherapy), anti-CD20-based, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib), and venetoclax-based therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment sequencing pattern, and time to next treatment were examined across lines of therapy for each treatment category. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to next treatment. Results: The study included 3,431 patients with CLL (median age: 69 years; male: 63.8%). There was a significant variation in average age among the 4 treatment groups ( P&lt;0.0001). Compared with the overall population, patients who received anti-CD20-based therapy were slightly older (median age: 71 years), while patients who received venetoclax-based therapy were relatively younger (median age: 67 years). Patients were primarily treated in community rather than academic settings (76.4% vs 21.3%). First-line patients were most commonly treated with BTKi (60.1%), venetoclax (16.0%), and anti-CD20 (15.4%) regimens. Among patients who initiated BTKi therapies, zanubrutinib use (2.6%) was limited; this may be due to the recent approval date (January 2023). Among CLL patients, 35.0% received second-line treatment and BTKi stayed dominant (35.7%), followed by anti-CD20 (29.6%) and venetoclax (25.8%) therapies. From first- to second-line therapy, the prevailing sequencing pattern was from either one BTKi to another BTKi (23.5%), venetoclax to anti-CD20 (13.2%), or BTKi to an anti-CD20 (9.7%). From second- to third-line therapy, patients most frequently switched from anti-CD20 to venetoclax (24.6%), anti-CD20 to BTKi (13.3%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (12.6%). From third- to fourth-line therapy, the predominant sequencing pattern was from venetoclax to anti-CD20 (21.3%), anti-CD20 back to venetoclax (20.6%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (11.6%). Median time to next treatment in first line was significantly longest for patients receiving BTKi (53.9 months) and shortest for patients treated with venetoclax (7.7 months) ( P&lt;0.0001) (Figure 1). Median time to next treatment in second line was not reached among patients using BTKi, while it was significantly shorter for those on venetoclax and anti-CD20 (10.4 months and 1.5 months, respectively; P&lt;0.0001) (Figure 2). Conclusions: This studydemonstrated unique treatment sequencing patterns among patients with CLL in the real-world setting.As the most commonly used regimen, BTKi therapy was shown to have significantly improved time to next treatment compared with other treatment regimens in first and second lines of therapies. Future studies with extended follow-up are needed to allow for assessment of newer treatments and enable evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes.

ABSTRACT Background: Septic shock is the leading cause of acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. The foundation of early septic shock management includes early fluid resuscitation, but the association between fluid resuscitation rates and kidney outcomes remains unclear. This investigation examines the association between fluid resuscitation rate and AKI recovery. Methods: In the medical intensive care unit of Mayo Clinic Rochester, adult patients with AKI and septic shock were retrospectively studied from January 1, 2006 to May 31, 2018. The surviving sepsis campaign recommends an initial fluid bolus of 30 ml/kg for sepsis resuscitation. The cohort of patients was divided into three groups based on the average fluid resuscitation time (<1 h, 1.1–3 h, >3 h) and the corresponding fluid rate ≥0.5, 0.17–0.49, and <0.17 ml/kg/min, respectively. The primary outcome was the recovery of AKI on day 7. To account for potential confounders, multivariable regression analyses were conducted. Results: After meeting the eligibility, 597 patients were included in the analysis. The AKI recovery was considerably different among the groups ( P = 0.006). Patients in group 1 who received fluid resuscitation faster had a higher rate of AKI recovery (53%) compared to group 2 and group 3 (50% and 37.8%). Conclusion: In septic shock patients with AKI, a higher fluid resuscitation rate of 30 ml/kg IV fluids within the 1 st -h sepsis diagnosis (i.e., >0.50 ml/kg/min) lead to higher AKI recovery compared with slower infusion rates.