Nikravangolsefid, Nasrin

This systematic review examined multicenter randomized controlled trials (RCTs) conducted during the Sepsis-3 era that evaluated pharmaceutical and mechanistic interventions in adult patients with sepsis or septic shock, with a focus on identifying interventions that demonstrated mortality benefit. A comprehensive search was performed across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO ICTRP, and Web of Science for trials published since 2016. Studies were included if they enrolled adult patients with sepsis or septic shock using Sepsis-3 criteria and reported mortality as either a primary or secondary outcome. Data were extracted by two independent reviewers and included trial design characteristics, funding source, randomization methods, and reported outcomes. Among the 31 eligible multicenter RCTs enrolling over 7,000 patients across 550 centers, only four trials showed a mortality benefit. These included three studies from China—two evaluating herbal anti-inflammatory compounds and one evaluating aminophylline—and one European study assessing corticosteroid therapy in vasopressor-dependent septic shock. The remaining 27 trials reported no mortality benefit, and substantial heterogeneity was observed in patient populations, sepsis definitions, and outcome reporting. Median mortality in control arms was 31.6% (IQR 24.1–45.5), and 35.4% (IQR 25.7–49.6) in intervention arms. These findings suggest that despite extensive efforts, most interventions have not reduced mortality in multicenter sepsis trials. Future research should focus on optimizing trial design, refining patient selection, and incorporating patient-centered outcomes beyond mortality.

Background: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is linked to increased mortality and prolonged hospital stays. The exact relationship between central venous pressure (CVP) and AKI remains unclear. We explored the correlation between CVP and AKI in septic shock patients. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with septic shock admitted to Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2006 and 2018. CVP levels were measured at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the diagnosis of sepsis, and patients were stratified into two groups based on CVP levels (CVP < 8 or ≥8 mmHg). Results: Of 5600 patients with septic shock, 3128 patients without AKI on admission are included. One-thousand-and-ninety-eight patients (35.1%) developed AKI within a median of 4.4 days. The median CVP levels and frequency of elevated CVP at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h are significantly higher in the AKI group. Elevated CVP (≥8 mmHg) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h is associated with AKI incidence, even after adjusting for mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels. This association, after multivariable adjustments, only remains significant at 12 h with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.26–2.05), p < 0.001 and 48 h with an OR of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.29–1.99), p < 0.001. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that CVP ≥ 8 mmHg is strongly associated with an increased risk of AKI, even after adjusting for MAP at the 12 and 48 h time points. These findings underscore a critical 12 or 48h window for interventions to lower CVP.

Abstract Disclosure: B. Bahrani Fard: None. N. Nikravangolsefid: None. J. Maroun: None. A. Cross: None. T. Foster: None. T. McKenzie: None. W. Young Jr: None. B.M. Dy: None. M. Lyden: None. I. Bancos: None. Background: Giant pheochromocytomas (PHEO), defined based on size &gt; 10 cm, are rare. Data on clinical presentation, management, and prognosis of giant PHEOs are scarce. Objectives: to determine prevalence of giant PHEO and compare presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with giant vs non-giant PHEOs. Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with giant PHEO and randomly chosen patients with non-giant PHEO (referents) at 6:1 ratio, evaluated between 2000-2023. All variables were extracted from the electronic medical record. Results: Of 828 patients with PHEO evaluated between 2000 and 2023, 31 (3.7%) had giant PHEO (median size 12 cm, IQR 10.0-13.5). In comparison to referents (n=186, median size 4 cm, IQR, 2.9-5.0), patients with giant PHEO were similar in age (median age 53 vs 55 years, P=.55), more frequently discovered based on symptoms (52% vs 32%, P=.04), and less likely to be bilateral (3% vs 12%, P=.31). Genetic testing was performed in 103 (48%) of patients, without group differences, however, patients with giant PHEO were less likely to have an associated germline mutation detected (7% vs 47%, P=.004). Patients with giant PHEO had more symptoms of catecholamine excess (median of 2 vs 1, P=.04) and presented with a higher prevalence of severe metanephrine excess &gt;10 times above upper normal range (76% vs 30%, P&lt;.0001). Adrenalectomy was performed in 94% of patients with giant PHEOs and in 100% referents, with higher rates of open adrenalectomy in giant PHEO (86% vs 14%, P&lt;.0001). In addition to preoperative alpha-adrenergic blockade (89%), metyrosine was used in 14 (7%) patients, mostly in patients with giant PHEO (26% vs 3%, P&lt;.0001). Patients with giant PHEO had a longer hospital length of stay (laparoscopic: median 5 vs 2 days, P&lt;.0001; open: median 6 vs 5 days, P=.24), and a higher complication rate (31% vs 10%, P=.006).Median follow up was 3 years (IQR 1-8) years, similar in patients and referents. Metastases developed at a much higher rate in patients with giant PHEOs (45% vs 4% in referents, P&lt;.0001). Disease specific mortality was 7% in patients with giant PHEOs and 0% in referents. Conclusion: Patients with giant PHEO were more symptomatic, had a higher degree of catecholamine excess, and a higher rate of perioperative complications. Almost half of patients with giant PHEO developed metastases, warranting a close follow-up. Presentation: 6/2/2024

Abstract Context Data on giant pheochromocytomas (PHEOs), defined based on size 10 cm or greater, are scarce. Objective This work aimed to compare presentation, management, and outcomes of patients with giant vs non–giant PHEOs. Methods A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a referral center from 2000 to 2023. Consecutive patients with giant PHEOs and randomly chosen patients with non–giant PHEO (referents) were studied at a 1:6 ratio. Outcomes included perioperative complications, metastases, and mortality. Results Of 828 patients with PHEOs, 31 (3.7%) had giant PHEO (median size 12 cm, interquartile range [IQR] 10.0-13.5 cm). In comparison to referents (n = 186, median size 4 cm, IQR, 2.9-5.0 cm), patients with giant PHEO had more symptoms of catecholamine excess (median of 2 vs 1; P = .04) and presented with a higher prevalence of severe catecholamine excess (76% vs 30%; P &lt; .0001). Adrenalectomy was performed in 94% of patients with giant PHEOs and 100% of referents. In addition to preoperative α-adrenergic blockade (89%), metyrosine was used in 14 (7%) patients, mostly in patients with giant PHEOs (26% vs 3%; P &lt; .0001). Patients with giant PHEOs had a higher perioperative complication rate (31% vs 10%; P = .004). During a median follow-up of 3 years, metastases developed at a higher rate in patients with giant PHEOs (45% vs 4% in referents; P &lt; .0001). Disease-specific mortality was 7% in patients with giant PHEOs and 0% in referents (P = .02). Conclusion Patients with giant PHEOs compared to referents were more symptomatic, had a higher degree of catecholamine excess, and had a higher rate of perioperative complications. Almost half of patients with giant PHEOs developed metastases, warranting close follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: Conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess prevalence and timing of acute kidney injury (AKI) development after acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and its association with mortality. DATA SOURCES: Ovid MEDLINE(R), Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Ovid PsycINFO database, Scopus, and Web of Science thought April 2023. STUDY SELECTION: Titles and abstracts were screened independently and in duplicate to identify eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials and prospective or retrospective cohort studies reporting the development of AKI following ARDS were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted data using a pre piloted abstraction form. We used Review Manager 5.4 software (Cochrane Library, Oxford, United Kingdom) and Open Meta software (Brown University, Providence, RI) for statistical analyses. DATA SYNTHESIS: Among the 3646 studies identified and screened, 17 studies comprising 9359 ARDS patients met the eligibility criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. AKI developed in 3287 patients (40%) after the diagnosis of ARDS. The incidence of AKI at least 48 hours after ARDS diagnosis was 20% (95% CI, 0.18–0.21%). The pooled risk ratio (RR) for the hospital (or 30-d) mortality among ARDS patients who developed AKI was 1.93 (95% CI, 1.71–2.18). AKI development after ARDS was identified as an independent risk factor for mortality in ARDS patients, with a pooled odds ratio from multivariable analysis of 3.69 (95% CI, 2.24–6.09). Furthermore, two studies comparing mortality between patients with late vs. early AKI initiation after ARDS revealed higher mortality in late AKI patients with RR of 1.46 (95% CI, 1.19–1.8). However, the certainty of evidence for most outcomes was low to very low. CONCLUSIONS: While our findings highlight a significant association between ARDS and subsequent development of AKI, the low to very low certainty of evidence underscores the need for cautious interpretation. This systematic review identified a significant knowledge gap, necessitating further research to establish a more definitive understanding of this relationship and its clinical implications.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a lifelong and recurrent disease of the gastrointestinal tract that afflicts many people in the world. Growing evidence has currently indicated that dysfunction of immune system, particularly toll‐like receptors 4 (TLR4) signaling pathway dysfunction plays a pivotal part in the pathogenesis of IBD. TLR4 signaling is involved both in the pathogenesis and in the efficacy of treatment of IBD. There are some medicinal products and herbal medicines, which their role in the treatment of IBD through modulation of TLR4 signaling has been implicated. The purpose of this review article is to summarize those medicinal products and herbal medicines.