Challagulla, Swetha

e19033 Background: CLL tends to affect older individuals, and older patients often endure greater health disparities and treatment burdens that may impact their access to healthcare resources, adherence to treatment regimens and treatment outcomes (UN, Health Inequalities in Old Age). This study aimed to assess treatment utilization patterns, discontinuation, and healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) of 1L use of BTKi in CLL, focusing on older patients ≥65 years (yrs). Methods: A retrospective observational study using the Symphony Integrated Dataverse was conducted to identify adult CLL patients initiating a 1L BTKi (zanubrutinib [ZANU], acalabrutinib [ACA] or ibrutinib [IBR]) treatment regimen from 02/2022 and 09/2024 (index period). Patients were required to have ≥30 days of continuous enrollment in the pre- and post-index periods. Patients initiating a BTKi were further categorized by age at index date. Patient sociodemographic, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were reported in overall and older (≥65 yrs) CLL patients by each BTKi group. Treatment discontinuation rate was examined at 60, 90, 120, 150, 180, and 360 days, and by median time to discontinuation (TTD), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, censoring patients at the end of follow-up. HCRU (outpatient, inpatient, and other services) was evaluated during time on treatment and over the follow-up period and reported as per-patient-per-year (PPPY). Results: A total of 6,846 patients initiated a 1L BTKi (ZANU: n=1,853; ACA: 3,519; IBR: 1,474) for CLL during the index period. Patients receiving ZANU were older (mean age: 70.9 yrs; 78% ≥65 yrs) than those receiving ACA (69.4 yrs; 71% ≥65 yrs) and IBR (69.6 yrs; 73% ≥65 yrs). Payer type and geography were significantly different across each BTKi group ( p <.001). There were no significant differences across the BTKis regarding baseline comorbidities. ZANU patients had the longest estimated median TTD overall (ZANU: 18.9 months [m], ACA: 17.8 m, IBR: 14.5 m; p <.001) and in patients ≥65 yrs (ZANU: 17.2 m, ACA: 15.2 m, IBR: 12.6 m; p <.001). ZANU patients also had the lowest estimated discontinuation rates at 60- , 90-, 120-, 150-, 180-, and 360-days post BTKi initiation in the overall and ≥65 yrs groups. There were significant differences across the BTKi group for inpatient visits PPPY in all patients and ≥65 yrs with ZANU having the lowest visits of the BTKis (ZANU: 2.6, ACA: 3.6, IBR: 4.6; p =.029 and ZANU: 2.5, ACA: 4.3, IBR: 5.3; p =.004, respectively). Conclusions: This real-world study demonstrated that CLL patients treated with ZANU had longer TTD, lower discontinuation rates, and less HCRU than ACA and IBR across all patients and specifically in older patients ≥65 yrs. Further studies on long-term and clinical outcomes are warranted.

Introduction: The prognosis for CLL/SLL has improved with the advent of novel therapeutic classes, including BTKis. While comparative data for several BTKis have been published, there are limited data on patient preferences in BTKi treatment selection. Understanding and integrating patient perspective in the BTKi treatment selection process is crucial to shared decision-making and attaining optimal treatment outcomes. To understand patients' priorities for different treatment attributes that impact their treatment decisions, a comprehensive quantitative analysis of patient preferences on BTKi treatment attributes was conducted. Methods: A patient survey with a discrete-choice experiment (DCE) design was conducted from March to June 2024 among USA adults (≥18 years) with confirmed diagnosis of CLL/SLL, recruited through online patient panels, physician referrals, and support groups. BTKi treatment attributes were selected based on results of a targeted literature review and clinical inputs. Patients responded to DCE questions on attributes related to efficacy, safety (eg, impacts of diarrhea, headache, atrial fibrillation, and hypertension on quality of life [QoL]), formulation type, and dosing frequency. The impact of adverse events (AEs) on QoL was defined as the extent to which AEs caused interruptions in patients' ability to engage in their usual day-to-day activities. A conditional logistic regression model was used to calculate the relative importance of each attribute, as well as patient willingness to trade off specified BTKi treatment attributes. Results: A total of 200 patients with CLL/SLL completed the survey (median age: 61 years; 78% White; 55% female; 60% commercially insured; 82% suburban/urban residence). Less than half (43%) were diagnosed ≥5 years ago, and 61% received ≥3 lines of therapy. Almost all (89%) patients reported having experienced ≥1 AE from treatment previously, with the most common AEs being fatigue (76%), diarrhea (51%), headache (51%), and nausea and/or vomiting (51%). When considering the importance of efficacy measures, most patients prioritized CLL/SLL treatments that extended life expectancy (93%), followed by those that increased the likelihood of remission or cure (84%) and those that paused the progression of disease (67%). Patients preferred treatments with higher efficacy, less impact of AEs on QoL, and lower dosing frequency (P&lt;.001). The top 3 treatment attributes with the highest relative importance to patients were impact of atrial fibrillation on QoL (24%), progression-free survival (PFS; 19%), and impact of headache on QoL (18%), followed by impact of diarrhea (14%) and hypertension (14%) on QoL, dosing frequency (9%), and formulation type (3%). On average, patients were willing to accept a reduction of 2.6, 1.9, 1.4, and 1.4 years of PFS to receive a treatment with less (none or mild vs significant) impact of atrial fibrillation, headache, diarrhea, and hypertension on QoL, respectively. Patients were willing to accept a reduction of 1.0 year of PFS to receive once-daily vs twice-daily treatment. Conclusions: Findings from this patient preference survey suggested that impact of atrial fibrillation on QoL, PFS, and impact of headache on QoL were the most important attributes of BTKi treatment for patients with CLL/SLL in the USA. Shared decision-making in CLL/SLL treatment selection should include an informed discussion about AEs, as besides efficacy comparisons, patients may prefer treatments with less impact of AEs on their QoL. Future prospective studies evaluating the effects of shared treatment decision-making on treatment adherence and outcomes are needed to better understand their impact on CLL/SLL patient care and inform clinical practice.

e19049 Background: Acala and zanu are 2nd generation Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKis) that have demonstrated improved safety profiles vs 1st generation BTKi ibrutinib in clinical trials. While head-to-head comparison of zanu vs acala is lacking, a recent meta-analysis of clinical trials provided a comprehensive, indirect comparison of the AE profiles in B-cell malignancies (Hwang, Hemasphere. 2023;7(S3):1134). This study aims to evaluate costs and impacts on quality of life (QoL) for zanu vs acala using their AE profiles. Methods: A health economic model was developed to determine cost and QoL associated with AE management for zanu and acala. The incidence rates ( IRs) of all grade and grade ≥3 AEs of interest (n=21, including bleeding events, hypertension, atrial fibrillation, cytopenias, infections, headache, arthralgia, diarrhea) were taken from the meta-analysis. Additional model inputs, such as disutility, average duration of AE, and unit cost of each AE were sourced from published literature and publicly available cost databases in consultation with clinical experts. The model was developed from the US perspective, considering Medicare costs, inflated to 2023 USD. Model outcomes were AE management cost (= IR * unit cost) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) lost due to AE (= IR * Disutility * Duration/365.25). Results: In the base-case scenario (considering all AEs), treating a hypothetical cohort of 1000 patients (pts) with zanu instead of acala yielded cost savings of $124K and 3.7 QALY gains (i.e., 3.7 years extra in full health). Subgroup analysis for severe (grade ≥3) and non-severe AEs (grade 1-2) demonstrated similar trends. A sensitivity analysis limited to AEs significantly different between zanu and acala (n=13) yielded consistent results. Additionally, a probabilistic sensitivity analysis, conducted with 1000 iterations to account for uncertainty in model parameters, confirmed robustness of the model, indicating stable conclusions across a wide range of parameter uncertainties. Conclusions: This analysis suggested that zanu is cost-saving and associated with added health benefits compared to acala in terms of AE management in pts with B-cell malignancies. Should these results derived from meta-analysis of clinical trial data be applicable to real-world pt populations across different indications, the potential cost savings could be considerable. These results could be further improved if the differences in efficacy of zanu vs acala are also incorporated. [Table: see text]

Introduction: Chronic lymphocytic leukemia and small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) are the most prevalent types of leukemia in the United States. Given the emergence of novel CLL/SLL therapies, it is important to understand real-world treatment characteristics and unmet needs. The objectives of this retrospective cohort study were to examine patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and associated outcomes for patients with CLL/SLL, overall, and by CLL and SLL, respectively. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted using Symphony Integrated Dataverse (IDV ®), a comprehensive, longitudinal, open-claims database, and integrated electronic medical record data. Patients aged ≥18 years with ≥1 diagnosis for CLL or SLL and who initiated a first-line or second-line treatment between January 1, 2020, and December 31, 2022 (index period) were included in the study. Index date was defined as the date of treatment initiation. Patients were required to be continuously enrolled for 365 days prior to the index date and ≥90 days following the index date. Patient data were included until patients were lost to follow-up or to the end of the study period (March 31, 2023). Treatment patterns were examined with the following treatment regimens and stratified by line of therapy: chemotherapy (including bendamustine-based and other chemotherapy), anti-CD20-based, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKiibrutinib- and acalabrutinib-based), and venetoclax-based therapy. Zanubrutinib use was not captured in the BTKi treatment category as its CLL/SLL indication approval date (January 19, 2023) was outside the index period. Discontinuation rate was defined as the percentage of patients who discontinued their current treatment regimen within 90 days. Healthcare resource utilization was measured by number of outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and other medical/hospital services per patient per month (PPPM) during the treatment regimen. Results:There were 17,748 and 5,667 patients with CLL/SLL who initiated a first-line or second-line treatment regimen during the index period, respectively. The most frequently used treatment regimens in first line were BTKi (49.9%), followed by anti-CD20 (26.1%), venetoclax (15.4%), and chemotherapy (8.6%). BTKi continued to be the predominant treatment (49.6%) in second line, followed by venetoclax (30.9%), chemotherapy (10.4%), and anti-CD20 (9.2%). First-line patients treated with BTKi regimens were older and Medicare-insured when compared with patients receiving venetoclax-based regimens (65+ years: 77.1% vs 66.9%, P-value &lt;0.001; Medicare: 61.7% vs 53.0%, P-value &lt;0.001). Patients receiving BTKi had significantly lower discontinuation rates compared with other treatment regimens during both first and second lines of therapies (Figure 1). Mean PPPM outpatient visits, inpatient visits, and other medical/hospital services were less frequent with BTKi therapies vs other treatment regimens across both lines of therapy (Table 1). Of the 17,748 patients initiating first line of therapy, 13.3% had SLL while the remaining 86.7% had CLL. The proportion of patients with SLL vs CLL decreased in second line and second line or later (8.0% vs 92.0% and 6.8% vs 93.2%, respectively). Treatment discontinuation rate in SLL patients was higher than that in CLL patients in first line (32.41% and 25.08%, respectively); however, discontinuation rates became comparable with later lines of therapy. Across all lines of therapy, healthcare resource utilization was significantly higher in SLL patients than CLL patients. Median PPPM outpatient visits were 1.02 for SLL and 0.67 for CLL. Median PPPM for other medical/hospital services was 0.7 for SLL and 0.23 for CLL. Conclusions: BTKi therapy, the primary treatment regimen across first- and second-line therapies, has significantly lower discontinuation rate and healthcare resource utilization compared with other treatment regimens. Further studies are needed to evaluate real-world clinical outcomes of CLL/SLL regimens to support evidence-based treatment decisions.

Background: The treatment landscape for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is evolving at a rapid pace, with development of several targeted therapies. The real-world applicability of clinical trial effectiveness is markedly influenced by treatment choices, the specific characteristics of patients' diseases, their overall health, and individual preferences. However, there is limited evidence to understand the impact of multiple treatment options on real-world effectiveness in CLL in routine clinical practice. This study aimed to characterize recent real-world treatment sequencing patterns and associated time to next treatment among patients with CLL in the United States. Methods: This retrospective observational study included patients diagnosed with CLL (≥18 years at diagnosis) from January 1, 2018, through January 1, 2023, who received ≥1 treatment after initial diagnosis. Patients were sourced from the ConcertAI RWD360 dataset, a real-world de-identified dataset &gt;6 million patients from across the United States derived from various electronic health record systems and integrated with a large administrative open claims dataset. Patients were followed through the end of the record or death, whichever occurred first. Patients were classified into the following treatment categories: chemotherapy (including bendamustine-based and other chemotherapy), anti-CD20-based, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi)-based (ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, or zanubrutinib), and venetoclax-based therapy. Demographic and clinical characteristics, treatment sequencing pattern, and time to next treatment were examined across lines of therapy for each treatment category. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate median time to next treatment. Results: The study included 3,431 patients with CLL (median age: 69 years; male: 63.8%). There was a significant variation in average age among the 4 treatment groups ( P&lt;0.0001). Compared with the overall population, patients who received anti-CD20-based therapy were slightly older (median age: 71 years), while patients who received venetoclax-based therapy were relatively younger (median age: 67 years). Patients were primarily treated in community rather than academic settings (76.4% vs 21.3%). First-line patients were most commonly treated with BTKi (60.1%), venetoclax (16.0%), and anti-CD20 (15.4%) regimens. Among patients who initiated BTKi therapies, zanubrutinib use (2.6%) was limited; this may be due to the recent approval date (January 2023). Among CLL patients, 35.0% received second-line treatment and BTKi stayed dominant (35.7%), followed by anti-CD20 (29.6%) and venetoclax (25.8%) therapies. From first- to second-line therapy, the prevailing sequencing pattern was from either one BTKi to another BTKi (23.5%), venetoclax to anti-CD20 (13.2%), or BTKi to an anti-CD20 (9.7%). From second- to third-line therapy, patients most frequently switched from anti-CD20 to venetoclax (24.6%), anti-CD20 to BTKi (13.3%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (12.6%). From third- to fourth-line therapy, the predominant sequencing pattern was from venetoclax to anti-CD20 (21.3%), anti-CD20 back to venetoclax (20.6%), or one BTKi to another BTKi (11.6%). Median time to next treatment in first line was significantly longest for patients receiving BTKi (53.9 months) and shortest for patients treated with venetoclax (7.7 months) ( P&lt;0.0001) (Figure 1). Median time to next treatment in second line was not reached among patients using BTKi, while it was significantly shorter for those on venetoclax and anti-CD20 (10.4 months and 1.5 months, respectively; P&lt;0.0001) (Figure 2). Conclusions: This studydemonstrated unique treatment sequencing patterns among patients with CLL in the real-world setting.As the most commonly used regimen, BTKi therapy was shown to have significantly improved time to next treatment compared with other treatment regimens in first and second lines of therapies. Future studies with extended follow-up are needed to allow for assessment of newer treatments and enable evaluation of long-term clinical outcomes.