Citations

Abstract Background Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols reduce length of stay, complications and costs for a large number of elective surgical procedures. A similar, structured approach appears to improve outcomes, including mortality, for patients undergoing high‐risk emergency general surgery, and specifically emergency laparotomy. These are the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of these patients using an ERAS approach. Methods Experts in aspects of management of the high‐risk and emergency general surgical patient were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. Pubmed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE database searches on English language publications were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies on each item were selected with particular attention to randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, meta‐analyses and large cohort studies, and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on non‐emergency patients when appropriate. The Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. The guideline has been divided into two parts: Part 1—Preoperative Care and Part 2—Intraoperative and Postoperative management. This paper provides guidelines for Part 1. Results Twelve components of preoperative care were considered. Consensus was reached after three rounds. Conclusions These guidelines are based on the best available evidence for an ERAS approach to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. Initial management is particularly important for patients with sepsis and physiological derangement. These guidelines should be used to improve outcomes for these high‐risk patients.

Abstract Background and introduction Cardioversion is commonly used to terminate cardiac arrhythmias. Some previous reports have suggested that cardioversion results in myocardial injury as evidenced by increased levels of cardiac troponin. However, many of these studies were done years ago with less sensitive troponin assays and monophasic waveform defibrillators. Purpose To determine if external direct current (DC) cardioversion with biphasic rectilinear waveform shocks results in myocardial injury as assessed by high sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) and I (hs-cTnI). Methods Patients scheduled for elective DC cardioversion for atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter were recruited. Plasma samples for measurement of hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI were obtained pre-cardioversion and as late as feasible but at least 6 hours post-cardioversion [median of 9 (7–11) hours]. Results A total of 96 patients were recruited. One patient was excluded because the pre-cardioversion sample was hemolysed. Median (25th–75th interquartile range) cumulative energy delivered was 121.6J (62.4–277.4J) and median highest energy individual shock was 121.0J (62.1–146.2J). A total of 39 (41.1%) patients received more than 1 shock, 23 (24.2%) patients received a cumulative energy of 300J or higher and 5 (5.3%) patients received a cumulative energy of 1,000J or more. The median pre-cardioversion hs-cTnT value was 11.48 (7.19–18.38) ng/L and the median hs-cTnI value was 5.1 (2.0–9.4) ng/L. Median post-cardioversion hs-cTnT value were 12.46 (7.98–20.28) ng/L and hs-cTnI value were 6.3 (3.5–10.0) ng/L. Wilcoxon-Signed ranks test showed a statistically significant change between the pre-and-post cardioversion hs-cTnT values (Z=−4.237, p<0.001) and hs-cTnI values (Z=−4.822, p<0.001). In only 5 (hs-cTnT) and 4 patients (hs-cTnI) was there an increase of >5 ng/L. There were 5 cases where the post-cardioversion values of both hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI were above the 50% reference change value. There was no relation between the change in hs-cTn values and sex, number of shocks, total energy delivered (even in those who received more than 1,000J), highest energy per shock, total current delivered, highest current delivered per shock or transthoracic impedance. Conclusion(s) There is a statistically significant but very small change in median hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI values (1 ng/L and 1.2 ng/L respectively) after DC cardioversion. The results were similar even in patients where high energy shocks were delivered and did not vary based on the pre cardioversion baseline value. Patients who have marked troponin elevations after cardioversion should be assessed for other causes of myocardial injury. It should not be assumed that they have myocardial injury from the cardioversion alone. Figure 1 Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Other. Main funding source(s): Dr. Allan Jaffe has substantial research funds from both grants and private industry. Funds were used to pay for blood sample collection and analysis of high sensitivity cardiac troponin T at Mayo Clinic. Abbott Laboratories donated reagents for the high sensitivity cardiac troponin I analysis.

Summary This international multidisciplinary consensus statement was developed to provide balanced guidance on the safe peri‐operative use of opioids in adults. An international panel of healthcare professionals evaluated the literature relating to postoperative opioid‐related harm, including persistent postoperative opioid use; opioid‐induced ventilatory impairment; non‐medical opioid use; opioid diversion and dependence; and driving under the influence of prescription opioids. Recommended strategies to reduce harm include pre‐operative assessment of the risk of persistent postoperative opioid use; use of an assessment of patient function rather than unidimensional pain scores alone to guide adequacy of analgesia; avoidance of long‐acting (modified‐release and transdermal patches) opioid formulations and combination analgesics; limiting the number of tablets prescribed at discharge; providing deprescribing advice; avoidance of automatic prescription refills; safe disposal of unused medicines; reducing the risk of opioid diversion; and better education of healthcare professionals, patients and carers. This consensus statement provides a framework for better prescribing practices that could help reduce the risk of postoperative opioid‐related harm in adults.

ABSTRACTObjectivesThe aim of this study is to identify anatomical regions related to stimulation‐induced dyskinesia (SID) after pallidal deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's disease (PD) patients and to analyze connectivity associated with SID.MethodsThis retrospective study analyzed the clinical and imaging data of PD patients who experienced SID during the monopolar review after pallidal DBS. We analyzed structural and functional connectivity using normative connectivity data with the volume of tissue activated (VTA) modeling. Each contact was assigned to either that producing SID (SID VTA) or that without SID (non‐SID VTA). Structural and functional connectivity was compared between SID and non‐SID VTAs. “Optimized VTAs” were also estimated using the DBS settings at 6 months after implantation.ResultsOf the 68 consecutive PD patients who underwent pallidal implantation, 20 patients (29%) experienced SID. SID VTAs were located more dorsally and anteriorly compared with non‐SID and optimized VTAs and were primarily in the dorsal globus pallidus internus (GPi) and dorsal globus pallidus externus (GPe). SID VTAs showed significantly higher structural connectivity than non‐SID VTAs to the associative cortex and supplementary motor area/premotor cortex (P < 0.0001). Simultaneously, non‐SID VTAs showed greater connectivity to the primary sensory cortex, cerebellum, subthalamic nucleus, and motor thalamus (all P < 0.0004). Functional connectivity analysis showed significant differences between SID and non‐SID VTAs in multiple regions, including the primary motor, premotor, and prefrontal cortices and cerebellum.ConclusionSID VTAs were primarily in the dorsal GPi/GPe. The connectivity difference between the motor‐related cortices and subcortical regions may explain the presence and absence of SID. © 2020 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society

Objective: Vasopressin increases water permeability and activity of the epithelial sodium channel ENaC in the distal nephron of the kidney, favoring increased water and sodium retention. We hypothesized that genetically mediated differences in circulating vasopressin concentrations could contribute to features of hypertension that vary between non-Hispanic blacks and whites. To test this hypothesis we measured copeptin, a fragment of pre-pro arginine vasopressin with a prolonged half-life that is more easily quantified. Methods: The Genetic Epidemiology of Responses to Antihypertensives (GERA) I study was designed to identify predictors of response to diuretic therapy in non-Hispanic black and non-Hispanic white adults with essential hypertension. Blood samples were obtained after a 4 week washout of anti-hypertensive medication while on a sodium intake of 2 mmol/kg. Copeptin was measured from thawed EDTA plasma samples using the copeptin proAVP homogeneous automated immunofluorescent assay on the BRAHMS Kryptor Compact PLUS (Thermo Fisher). Results: Copeptin was significantly higher in blacks (median: 7.4 pmol/L, IQR: 4.4-10.2 pmol/L) than in whites (median: 5.4 pmol/L, IQR: 3.6-8.0 pmol/L) (p <0.001), while renin was lower (Table 1). Racial differences remained significant (p = 0.001) in multivariate models that included 24 hour urine sodium excretion and calculated plasma osmolality. Conclusions: Higher copeptin (vasopressin) concentrations in non-Hispanic blacks compared to whites may contribute to the distinct differences in the hypertensive phenotypes between these racial groups. The underlying mechanism(s) require further study.

Summary Chronic pain causes significant suffering, limitation of daily activities and reduced quality of life. Infection from COVID ‐19 is responsible for an ongoing pandemic that causes severe acute respiratory syndrome, leading to systemic complications and death. Led by the World Health Organization, healthcare systems across the world are engaged in limiting the spread of infection. As a result, all elective surgical procedures, outpatient procedures and patient visits, including pain management services, have been postponed or cancelled. This has affected the care of chronic pain patients. Most are elderly with multiple comorbidities, which puts them at risk of COVID ‐19 infection. Important considerations that need to be recognised during this pandemic for chronic pain patients include: ensuring continuity of care and pain medications, especially opioids; use of telemedicine; maintaining biopsychosocial management; use of anti‐inflammatory drugs; use of steroids; and prioritising necessary procedural visits. There are no guidelines to inform physicians and healthcare providers engaged in caring for patients with pain during this period of crisis. We assembled an expert panel of pain physicians, psychologists and researchers from North America and Europe to formulate recommendations to guide practice. As the COVID ‐19 situation continues to evolve rapidly, these recommendations are based on the best available evidence and expert opinion at this present time and may need adapting to local workplace policies.

AbstractObjectiveDescribe a reliable anatomical landmark that can be used to locate the maxillary sinus natural ostium (MSNO) during endoscopic surgery, even if the uncinate process is preserved.DesignDescriptive anatomical.SettingAn anatomical and radiological study was performed to evaluate the consistency of the landmark, denominated "M" line.Subjects and MethodsDissections were performed in 57 cadaver heads (114 sides). In addition, 73 computerised tomography (CT) scans (146 sides) of patients with chronic inflammatory sinonasal disease were analysed using a three‐dimensional (3D) reconstruction computer program.ResultsThe "M" line crossed the MSNO in 112 dissected sides (98.2%) and 140 sides at CT 3D reconstruction (95.9%).ConclusionThe "M" line is a reliable anatomical landmark for predicting MSNO location. As such, it could improve and facilitate endoscopic sinus surgery, using traditional, minimally invasive or uncinate preserving techniques.

Abstract Background This is the fourth updated Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS ® ) Society guideline presenting a consensus for optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery and providing graded recommendations for each ERAS item within the ERAS ® protocol. Methods A wide database search on English literature publications was performed. Studies on each item within the protocol were selected with particular attention paid to meta‐analyses, randomised controlled trials and large prospective cohorts and examined, reviewed and graded according to Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. Results All recommendations on ERAS ® protocol items are based on best available evidence; good‐quality trials; meta‐analyses of good‐quality trials; or large cohort studies. The level of evidence for the use of each item is presented accordingly. Conclusions The evidence base and recommendation for items within the multimodal perioperative care pathway are presented by the ERAS ® Society in this comprehensive consensus review.