Citations

ABSTRACT Background The optimal timing for basal insulin initiation in diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) remains unclear. British guidelines endorse early basal insulin (EBI), while the American Diabetes Association emphasises overlap duration with intravenous insulin, without mention of timing. This meta‐analysis evaluates whether EBI administration of basal insulin improves clinical outcomes in adults with DKA. Methods A systematic review and meta‐analysis were performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. Databases searched included MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials through December 11, 2024. Inclusion criteria included articles in the English‐language randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies evaluating EBI in adult DKA patients. Non‐human studies, conference abstracts, and case reports were excluded. The primary outcome for this study was hospital length of stay (LOS). Additional outcomes included intensive care unit (ICU) LOS, time to DKA resolution, hypoglycemia, and rebound hyperglycemia between EBI and usual care. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane and Newcastle‐Ottawa tools. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation was performed to evaluate the quality of evidence. Results From 1214 identified studies, eight (4 RCTs, 4 observational) met inclusion criteria for a total of 247 patients in the EBI group and 552 patients in the control group. No significant difference in hospital LOS was found (mean difference −11.17 h; 95% CI: −29.91 to 7.56). ICU LOS, time to DKA resolution, incidence of hypoglycemia, and rebound hyperglycemia also did not demonstrate any significant differences between groups. Significant heterogeneity existed across studies for most outcomes. All studies had a high risk of bias, and the quality of evidence was very low. Conclusion EBI did not result in significant differences in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, or time to DKA resolution; however, there were no increased adverse events with EBI. Current studies of early EBI have significant limitations. Future research should focus on developing high‐quality RCTs.

Summary This nutshell review discusses the pathophysiology, diagnostic features, treatment strategies and avenues for future research in a recently identified thrombotic entity, monoclonal gammopathy of thrombotic significance (MGTS). MGTS is an anti‐platelet factor 4 (PF4) antibody‐mediated disorder distinct from heparin‐induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and vaccine‐induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), as it involves the production of persistent, monoclonal anti‐PF4 antibodies. Several subtypes of MGTS, including ‘HIT‐like’, ‘VITT‐like’ and ‘non‐HIT/VITT‐like’, exhibit unique serological profiles that can complicate diagnosis. Recognition of ‘HIT‐like’ MGTS is critical to avoid heparin exposure in these patients, which can result in adverse effects like those seen in heparin‐exposed HIT patients. ‘Non‐HIT/VITT‐like’ MGTS antibodies have only been detected in PF4‐enhanced functional testing; therefore, we recommend using these platelet‐based tests as the front‐line assay for detecting MGTS antibodies. Mass profiling using mass spectrometry is critical for the ‘fingerprinting’ of monoclonal antibodies to establish a diagnosis of MGTS. Treatments used in HIT and VITT, such as non‐heparin anticoagulants and intravenous immunoglobulin G, are typically insufficient for managing MGTS. Emerging MGTS therapies, such as plasma cell‐directed drugs and Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are discussed. The review concludes with an emphasis on areas of future research in MGTS.

ABSTRACT Background Patients with gastroparesis (Gp) can have a variety of symptoms. Apart from use of prokinetics, symptomatic therapies for the predominant symptom (PrS) are used. Aims (1) To classify Gp patients based on their PrS; (2) To determine differences in Gp symptoms, gastric emptying (GE), quality of life (QOL), treatments, and symptom improvement among Gp patients with different PrS. Methods Gp patients were enrolled in a multicenter registry and followed for 96‐weeks. Patients recorded their PrS and completed questionnaires assessing symptoms and QOL at enrollment and at follow up visits. Results Of 1013 Gp patients (361 diabetic, 607 idiopathic, 45 post‐fundoplication), the PrS were nausea (31%), vomiting (20%), abdominal pain (20%), bloating (9%), fullness (4%), GERD (4%), constipation (3%). Abdominal pain was more often a PrS in idiopathics, whereas vomiting was more often a PrS in diabetics. QOL scores were lower in the abdominal pain PrS group. PrS was associated with greater use of directed symptomatic treatment (antiemetic agents and gastric electrical stimulation for nausea and vomiting, prokinetic agents for vomiting and fullness, and constipation medications for constipation). Of 555 patients followed over 48 weeks, GCSI improved by ≥ 1 in 26% overall, more often in patients with initial PrS of nausea (32%) and bloating (35%) and less often for initial PrS of fullness (13%) or abdominal pain (15%). Conclusions In Gp patients, the most common PrS were nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain. PrS is associated with QOL, treatments utilized, and patient outcomes. Thus, the PrS of a patient with Gp provides useful information about their present condition and future outcome.

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning have emerged as transformative analytic methods capable of identifying patterns and proposing treatment strategies from complex, heterogeneous data generated in patient care settings. However, translating reports of AI tools into clinical decision-making requires careful interpretation and contextualization. Here, we present a structured framework (ABCDEFG framework) for clinicians to critically appraise studies reporting AI tools using a high-profile reinforcement learning analysis of vasopressin initiation in septic shock as a case example. We highlight key methodological strengths including adherence to reporting standards, alignment with clinical outcomes, and external validation. We also identify limitations related to causal inference, reward structure design, assumptions about state representation, and implementation readiness. Our framework emphasizes the importance of rigorous, clinically grounded critique before integrating AI tools into practice, and provides a roadmap for clinicians to assess the reliability and relevance of emerging AI-based decision support.

Abstract INTRODUCTION The tau positron emission tomography (PET) overlap index (OI) has shown promise in maximizing signal‐to‐noise for longitudinal tau PET imaging, particularly for early tau pathology, but requires validation against neuropathology. METHODS Fifty‐seven participants who underwent serial tau PET imaging (flortaucipir) and subsequent autopsy were included. Tau PET OI and standardized uptake value ratios (SUVRs) were compared across neuropathological diagnoses. RESULTS Tau PET OI showed greater concordance with neurofibrillary tangle (NFT) severity in the entorhinal cortex (a key region for Alzheimer's disease [AD] tauopathy) than SUVR, particularly in early Braak tangle stages (positivity: 52.2% for OI vs. 13.0% for SUVR). OI detected overlapping tau voxels that exhibited spatial correspondence with immunohistochemical and autoradiography measures of tau deposition across both AD and non‐AD tauopathies. DISCUSSION These findings demonstrate the enhanced capacity of OI in serial tau PET to robustly detect early and spatially localized tau pathology, supporting its application as a sensitive imaging metric in AD and select non‐AD tauopathies.

Abstract Total wrist arthroplasty (TWA) is a motion-sparing surgical alternative to wrist arthrodesis for patients with radiocarpal arthritis, but prior reports have indicated that its utilization remains limited. This study aimed to quantify Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement for TWA, along with utilization trends for the procedure using Medicare data. Medicare and Medicaid reimbursement rates for three TWA Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes—25446 (TWA), 25332 (TWA with interposition), and 25449 (revision TWA)—were collected for all states except Tennessee for the year 2024 and compared with each other. Prior Medicare rates from 2000 to 2023 were also obtained, adjusted for inflation to represent 2024 dollars, and analyzed for reimbursement trends with a two-tailed t-test between average inflation-adjusted 2000 and 2024 reimbursement. Utilization data from 2000 to 2022 were obtained from the Medicare Part B database. Medicaid reimbursement averaged 16.8% less than Medicare across the three TWA codes, with high variability between states. Inflation-adjusted Medicare reimbursement decreased by an average of 44.2% from 2000 to 2024, with the greatest decline seen in CPT 25446 (TWA) with a 45.1% decrease. Reimbursement for all three codes had decreased significantly from 2000 to 2024 via the two-tailed t-test. Besides an initial dramatic fall from 2000 to 2021 for revision TWA, Medicare utilization gradually increased, with 25332 (TWA with interposition) being the most commonly billed code. TWA reimbursement has decreased significantly over the past two decades for Medicare. Current Medicaid reimbursement is substantially less than Medicare. Although utilization has increased modestly, low reimbursement, along with a variety of other factors, may contribute to a limited adoption of TWA. Addressing these disincentives may encourage further innovation and technological development in TWA.

Intramedullary screw fixation (ISF) of metacarpal fractures is a well-established technique. Prior techniques either involve placement of the intramedullary screw in a retrograde fashion or placement of the guidewire in a retrograde fashion before placing the screw in an antegrade fashion. While effective, previously described techniques have risks of extensor tendon irritation, articular cartilage disruption, and limited access to multiple metacarpals from a single incision. We present a novel antegrade intramedullary screw placement and antegrade guidewire technique for ISF that avoids disruption of the metacarpal head and allows for access to multiple metacarpals through a single incision. Cadaveric evaluation confirmed consistent sparing of the distal carpal row and demonstrated the feasibility of this technique across the index through small finger metacarpals. Compared with previously described methods, this technique offers improved soft tissue preservation, reduced risk of tendon scarring, and enhanced surgical efficiency. Level of Evidence: Level IV—case report; cadaveric study.