Citations

Objectives: To examine whether social determinants of health (SDH) factors are associated with time to diagnosis, treatment selection, and time to recurrent surgical intervention in idiopathic subglottic stenosis (iSGS) patients. Methods: Adult patients with diagnosed iSGS were recruited prospectively (2015-2017) via clinical providers as part of the North American Airway Collaborative (NoAAC) and via an online iSGS support community on Facebook. Patient-specific SDH factors included highest educational attainment (self-reported), median household income (matched from home zip code via U.S. Census data), and number of close friends (self-reported) as a measure of social support. Main outcomes of interest were time to disease diagnosis (years from symptom onset), treatment selection (endoscopic dilation [ED] vs cricotracheal resection [CTR] vs endoscopic resection with adjuvant medical therapy [ERMT]), and time to recurrent surgical intervention (number of days from initial surgical procedure) as a surrogate for disease recurrence. Results: The total 810 participants were 98.5% female, 97.2% Caucasian, and had a median age of 50 years (IQR, 43-58). The cohort had a median household income of $62 307 (IQR, $50 345-$79 773), a median of 7 close friends (IQR, 4-10), and 64.7% of patients completed college or graduate school. Education, income, and number of friends were not associated with time to diagnosis via multivariable linear regression modeling. Univariable multinominal logistic regression demonstrated an association between education and income for selecting ED versus ERMT, but no associations were noted for CTR. No associations were noted for time to recurrent surgical procedure via Kaplan Meier modeling and Cox proportional hazards regression. Conclusions: Patient education, income, and social support were not associated with time to diagnosis or time to disease recurrence. This suggests additional patient, procedure, or disease-specific factors contribute to the observed variations in iSGS surgical outcomes.

e19013 Background: Mutation profiling to assess for potentially druggable mutations in NSCLC is being offered at an increasing number of cancer centers throughout North America and internationally. Although data continue to accumulate for the potential value of mutation testing in designing chemotherapeutic regimens, the treatment impact of obtaining information beyond assessment of EGFR and ALK status remains unclear. How best to obtain and clinically utilize these data, including information from exome and whole genome sequencing, also remains unclear. Methods: Patients were reviewed electronically in a multidisciplinary conference regarding indications for testing and results of mutation profiling from various methods, including the mass-spec based LungCarta test, targeted NexGen sequencing, exome, and whole genome sequencing. Outcomes of the multidisciplinary review were communicated back to treating physicians. Results: Mutation testing was performed on 200 patients using a variety of approaches. The majority (>150) were surgically resected stage I and II tumors. Mutations in at least 1 major cancer driver gene, including EGFR, KRAS, MET, BRAF and PIK3CA, were found in 47% of all patients tested. EGFR mutations were present in 14.8% of patients tested, KRAS 21.3%, BRAF 2.6%, PIK3CA 3.2%, and MET 4.5%. A total of 8 patients underwent either exome or whole genome sequencing. A limited number of patients (<10) had mutation results that impacted treatment decisions from this cohort. Conclusions: Mutation profiling can influence treatment decisions in NSCLC, but at a low frequency. The role of exome and or whole genome sequencing for patients with NSCLC is evolving and remains undefined.