Citations

Abstract Understanding how fish navigate complex natural environments requires bridging fine-scale biomechanics with ecological behavior. We investigated the volitional movement and energetics of wild red drum ( Sciaenops ocellatus ) across laboratory, mesocosm, and field settings. Using flow-respirometry, we quantified metabolic costs and swimming kinematics under ecologically relevant flow conditions shaped by bluff bodies mimicking mangrove roots and oyster mounds. Fish swimming in turbulent wakes exhibited reduced oxygen consumption and altered tailbeat dynamics, especially at high flow speeds. In a large outdoor mesocosm, dual accelerometers revealed a rich behavioral repertoire, including maneuvering and rest, which is not easily observable in confined lab settings. Spectral analysis and clustering identified eight distinct locomotory states, highlighting the limitations of summed acceleration metrics. Field telemetry tracked wild red drum across a 54 km estuarine corridor for a three-year period through an array of 36 acoustic receivers, revealing movement patterns shaped by tidal flow and physical habitats. Hydrodynamic modeling revealed that while laboratory trials demonstrated substantial energetic savings at high flows (approaching 100 cm/s), wild fish were detected predominantly in low-velocity microhabitats (<30 cm/s) near structurally complex features. This mismatch suggests that habitat selection is an adaptive strategy driven by ecological factors such as foraging opportunities, predation refuge, and site fidelity, rather than hydrodynamic efficiency alone. Our multi-scalar approach demonstrates that while flow-structure interactions can reduce locomotor costs for fish, habitat use in the wild reflects broader ecological constraints, offering a framework for integrating biomechanics, physiology, and ecology in conservation-relevant contexts.

Abstract Purpose: In RET-rearranged non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment options after first-generation selective RET inhibitors (SRI) are limited, and the value of SRI retreatment remains unclear. This study evaluates outcomes of SRI retreatment. Experimental Design: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC who received ≥2 SRI-based therapy lines. Of 411 SRI-treated patients, 41 (10%) underwent SRI retreatment. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, time to treatment failure, adverse events (AE). Results: Among 41 patients, 14 (34%) discontinued the initial SRI because of toxicity and 27 (66%) because of progression. After discontinuation for toxicity, all switched to an alternate SRI, achieving an ORR of 67%, median PFS of 9.9 months, and 6-month PFS of 80.3%. AEs reoccurred in nine patients (64%), with grade ≥3 AEs in 3 (21%) who switched at full dose. Among patients who discontinued because of progression, SRI monotherapy (n = 13) achieved an ORR of 23%, median PFS of 7 months, and 6-month PFS of 61.5%. Benefit was observed in patients with brain-only or oligoprogressive disease or dose reduction on first SRI. Combination therapy (n = 14; targeted agents, n = 11; chemotherapy, n = 3) achieved an ORR of 39%, median PFS of 4 months, and 6-month PFS of 27.3%. Conclusions: Same-class SRI switch after toxicity is feasible and clinically active but warrants cautious, dose-adjusted switching to mitigate toxicities. The efficacy of SRI rechallenge after progression seems limited overall. However, selected patients, such as those with brain-only or oligoprogressive disease, may derive benefit.

Abstract Modern radiation therapy (RT) technologies allow for improved sparing of normal tissues, decreasing the risk of both acute and long-term toxicities. Existing RT dose constraints for prospective trials within the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) were formulated in the context of solid malignancies. As patients with hematologic malignancies are often treated with lower RT doses and are usually younger with more favorable prognoses, customized dose constraints are needed. The NRG Oncology Hematologic Malignancies Working Group (NRG HEME) commissioned a review of existing organ-at-risk (OAR) constraints from published primary literature, the NRG Center for Innovation in Radiation Oncology (CIRO), and national guidelines. Customized constraints were developed by iterative review by NRG HEME. Final recommendations were approved by radiation oncology representatives from all the lymphoma NCTN groups (NRG Oncology, Children’s Oncology Group, Alliance, ECOG-ACRIN, SWOG, Canadian Cancer Trials Group). For 49 OARs, a strict recommended constraint was determined, of which 20 were not present in CIRO. Of the remaining 29 constraints, 20 were lower, 2 were the same, and 5 used different metrics; 2 were higher than at least 1 CIRO trial constraint. Acceptable variations were determined and unacceptable variations were added for select critical OARs for plan scoring. While doses to OARs without explicit unacceptable variations should not exceed acceptable variations, violations should not be considered for plan quality assessment on trials. This consensus list of standard OAR constraints should be incorporated for all future NCTN trials in hematologic malignancies. Strict dose constraints will minimize long-term toxicities in this patient population.