Back to Authors

Feng, Jamie

0009-0002-3017-1567

Mayo Clinic

Princess Margaret Cancer Centre , Toronto, Canada.

Citations 2

Retreatment with First-Generation Selective RET Inhibitors in RET -Rearranged NSCLC Pretreated with Selpercatinib or Pralsetinib: Results from the RET-MAP Registry
Marinello, A., Rotow, Julia K., Lomibao, Meghanne , Miliziano, Daniela , Leporati, Rita , Feng, Jamie , Metro, Giulio , Brandão, Mariana , Gorría, Teresa , Nassar, Amin H. , Fila, Matteo, Fallet, V., Ricciuti, Biagio, Taylor, Skyler, Remon, Jordi, Planchard, David, Florez, Narjust, Besse, Benjamin, Drilon, Alexander D., Aldea, Mihaela, Nassar, Amin H. , Rotow, Julia , Metro, Giulio , Marinello, Arianna , Marinello, Arianna , Rotow, Julia K. , Citarella, Fabrizio , Fila, Matteo , Fallet, Vincent , Ricciuti, Biagio , Taylor, Skyler , Remon, Jordi , Planchard, David , Duma, Narjust , Besse, Benjamin , Drilon, Alexander , Aldea, Mihaela , Feng, Jamie , Citarella, Fabrizio , Ricciuti, Biagio , Planchard, David , Florez, Narjust , Besse, Benjamin , Aldea, Mihaela

Clinical Cancer Research | April 7, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 13 | Pages: 2637-2643

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4814 Get It

Abstract Purpose: In RET-rearranged non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment options after first-generation selective RET inhibitors (SRI) are limited, and the value of SRI retreatment remains unclear. This study evaluates outcomes of SRI retreatment. Experimental Design: This multicenter retrospective study included patients with advanced RET-rearranged NSCLC who received ≥2 SRI-based therapy lines. Of 411 SRI-treated patients, 41 (10%) underwent SRI retreatment. Outcomes included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), 6-month PFS, time to treatment failure, adverse events (AE). Results: Among 41 patients, 14 (34%) discontinued the initial SRI because of toxicity and 27 (66%) because of progression. After discontinuation for toxicity, all switched to an alternate SRI, achieving an ORR of 67%, median PFS of 9.9 months, and 6-month PFS of 80.3%. AEs reoccurred in nine patients (64%), with grade ≥3 AEs in 3 (21%) who switched at full dose. Among patients who discontinued because of progression, SRI monotherapy (n = 13) achieved an ORR of 23%, median PFS of 7 months, and 6-month PFS of 61.5%. Benefit was observed in patients with brain-only or oligoprogressive disease or dose reduction on first SRI. Combination therapy (n = 14; targeted agents, n = 11; chemotherapy, n = 3) achieved an ORR of 39%, median PFS of 4 months, and 6-month PFS of 27.3%. Conclusions: Same-class SRI switch after toxicity is feasible and clinically active but warrants cautious, dose-adjusted switching to mitigate toxicities. The efficacy of SRI rechallenge after progression seems limited overall. However, selected patients, such as those with brain-only or oligoprogressive disease, may derive benefit.
Landscape of Genomic Mechanisms of Resistance to Selective RET Inhibitors in RET -Altered Solid Tumors: Analysis of the RETgistry Global Consortium
Waliany, Sarah , Cooper, Alissa J. , Liu, Stephen V. , Gautschi, O., Rotow, Julia K. , Smith, Katherine E. , Weber, Urs, Lee, Dae Ho , Loong, H., Patel, Jyoti D. , Nagasaka, Misako , Patel, Shetal , Tan, Daniel S. W., Solomon, Benjamin J., Pall, Georg , Riess, Jonathan W. , Sun, Lova , Früh, Martin, Uy, Natalie F., Gadgeel, Shirish, Feng, Jamie, Leighl, Natasha B., Baik, Christina S. , Lai, G., Ou, S. Ignatius, Cheung, Kingsley S.Y., Patil, Tejas, Weiler, Daniela , Yeap, Beow Y., Wirth, Lori J. , Gainor, Justin F., Drilon, Alexander D., Lin, Jessica J., Loong, Herbert H. , Rotow, Julia , Gautschi, Oliver , Smith, Katherine E R , Weber, Urs M , Loong, Herbert H , Pennell, Nathan A , Nagasaka, Misako , Patel, Shetal A , Tan, Daniel S W , Solomon, Benjamin J , Kim, Tae Min , Pall, Georg , Riess, Jonathan W , Sun, Lova , Früh, Martin , Uy, Natalie F , Gadgeel, Shirish , Feng, Jamie , Do, Andrew , Falcon, Christina , Leighl, Natasha B , Baik, Christina S , Lai, Gillianne G Y , Ou, Sai-Hong I , Cheung, Kingsley S Y , Patil, Tejas , Mansfield, Aaron S , Weiler, Daniela , Yeap, Beow Y , Wirth, Lori J , Gainor, Justin F , Drilon, Alexander , Lin, Jessica J , Liu, Stephen V , Früh, Martin , Gadgeel, Shirish M. , Feng, Jamie , Mansfield, Aaron S. , Gainor, Justin F.

Clinical Cancer Research | January 15, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 1157-1168

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-4382 Get It

Abstract Purpose: Rearranged during transfection (RET) alterations are oncogenic drivers across solid tumors. Selective RET inhibitors (SRI) selpercatinib and pralsetinib have transformed outcomes for patients with RET-altered malignancies. Limited knowledge exists on genomic mechanisms of resistance to SRI. Experimental Design: We established “RETgistry,” a global consortium of patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors who received SRI and underwent postprogression tissue or plasma biopsies assessed by next-generation sequencing. Frequencies of secondary RET resistance mutations and acquired non-RET gene alterations were determined. Progression-free survival (PFS) and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) on first SRI were estimated with the Kaplan–Meier method. Results: RETgistry included 109 patients with RET-altered advanced solid tumors (lung, n = 94; thyroid, n = 15) who underwent 143 post-SRI progression biopsies (tissue, 91; plasma, 52). The median PFS and TTD were 13.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 10.1–16.6] and 17.3 months (95% CI, 14–20.2), respectively. Secondary RET mutations were detected in 20 (14%) biopsies [lung cancer, 15 (12.4%) and thyroid carcinoma, 5 (22.7%)]. Common acquired off-target alterations involved MET (18.2%; amplification, 15%), TP53 (8.2%), APC (7.6%), KRAS (7.1%), KEAP1 (5.9%), and CDKN2A/B (5.3%). MET alterations were enriched in post-SRI versus pre-SRI specimens (full cohort, 17.6% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.022; lung cancer, 19.1% vs. 2.1%, P = 0.022). Conclusions: The prevalence of secondary RET mutations after SRI was low, underscoring a greater role for off-target resistance. Recurrent acquired alterations involving tumor suppressor genes or upstream regulators of MAPK and PI3K pathways were identified, most commonly MET amplification. Continued efforts to characterize SRI resistance biology are critical to guide the development of novel therapeutic strategies.