Citations

Abstract Purpose: Gemcitabine is a nucleoside analogue with activity against solid tumors. Gemcitabine metabolic inactivation is catalyzed by cytidine deaminase (CDA) or, after phosphorylation, by deoxycytidylate deaminase (DCTD). We set out to study the pharmacogenomics of CDA and DCTD. Experimental Design: The genes encoding CDA and DCTD were resequenced using DNA from 60 African American and 60 Caucasian American subjects. Expression constructs were created for nonsynonymous coding single nucleotide polymorphisms (cSNP) and reporter gene constructs were created for 5′-flanking region polymorphisms. Functional genomic studies were then conducted after the transfection of mammalian cells. Results: CDA resequencing revealed 17 polymorphisms, including one common nonsynonymous cSNP, 79 A>C (Lys27Gln). Recombinant Gln27 CDA had 66 ± 5.1% (mean ± SE) of the wild-type (WT) activity for gemcitabine but without a significant decrease in level of immunoreactive protein. The apparent Km (397 ± 40 μmol/L) for the Gln27 allozyme was significantly higher than that for the WT (289 ± 20 μmol/L; P < 0.025). CDA 5′-flanking region reporter gene studies showed significant differences among 5′-flanking region haplotypes in their ability to drive transcription. There were 29 SNPs in DCTD, including one nonsynonymous cSNP, 172 A>G (Asn58Asp), in Caucasian American DNA. Recombinant Asp58 DCTD had 11 ± 1.4% of WT activity for gemcitabine monophosphate with a significantly elevated level of immunoreactive protein. No DCTD polymorphisms were observed in the initial 500 bp of the 5′-flanking region. Conclusions: These results suggest that pharmacogenomic variation in the deamination of gemcitabine and its monophosphate might contribute to variation in therapeutic response to this antineoplastic agent.

While “sinus” headache is a widely accepted clinical diagnosis, many medical specialists consider it to be an uncommon cause of recurrent headaches. Unnecessary diagnostic studies, surgical interventions, and medical treatments are often the result of the inappropriate diagnosis of sinus headache. Both the International Headache Society and the American Academy of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery have attempted to characterize conditions leading to headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, they have done so from different perspectives and in isolation from the other specialty groups. An interdisciplinary ad hoc committee recently convened to discuss the role of sinus disease and the nose in the etiology of headache and to review recent epidemiologic studies suggesting that sinus headache (headache of rhinogenic origin) and migraine are frequently confused with one another. Clinical trial data are presented which clearly indicate that the majority of sinus headaches can actually be classified as migraines. This committee reviewed scientific evidence available from multiple disciplines and concludes that considerable research and clinical study are needed to further understand and explain the role of nasal pathology and autonomic activation in migraine and headaches of rhinogenic origin. However, there was a consensus from this group that greater diagnostic and therapeutic attention needs to be given to patients complaining of sinus headache that may indeed be due to the nose.