Citations

Background: Dofetilide, a commonly prescribed class III antiarrhythmic for atrial fibrillation (AF), currently requires a 3-month amiodarone washout period per FDA guidelines. We evaluated the safety of initiating dofetilide within this 3-month washout period. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study across all Mayo Clinic sites and identified patients using centralized datamart that were transitioned from amiodarone to dofetilide in less than 90 days. Patients were included and confirmed by manual chart review if they had been on amiodarone for ≥ 12 weeks and if available amiodarone level >0.3 mg/ml at the time of dofetilide initiation. Serial ECGs were assessed during the hospitalization for dofetilide initiation and at 3-, 6-, and 12-months follow-up to evaluate QT interval. Primary safety end point was torsade de pointes. Results: The final cohort included 66 patients with a mean age of 65 ±14 years; 71.0% were male; and the average BMI was 29.6 ±5.1 kg/m 2 . Of the 66 patients, 65 had a history of AF: 31.8% paroxysmal, 54.5% persistent, and 12.1% long-standing persistent. Permanent pacemakers and ICDs were present in 27.3% and 22.7% of patients. Patients received amiodarone for a median of 7.8 months at a mean daily dose of 187.1±48.3 mg (range: 100 – 400 mg), with a mean transition period of 44.2±20.3 days. Of 66 patients, 16 (24 %) transitioned within 30 days of stopping amiodarone—including 5 (8 %) within 14 days—while the remaining 50 (76 %) was between 30 and 90 days. A total of 24.2% (16/66) patients required dofetilide dose reduction due to QT prolongation and 10.6% of patients (7/66) required drug discontinuation. There was no difference in either discontinuation rate or dose reduction rate in patients with a transition period ≤30 days vs > 30 days [6.25% vs. 12% (p=0.85) and 12.5% vs. 28% (p=0.36), respectively]. No cases of torsades de pointes were observed during dofetilide initiation or follow up. Conclusion: In this cohort, dofetilide initiation less than 90 days after amiodarone discontinuation was not associated with increased torsades de pointes risk. These data challenge and support reconsideration of the blanket 3-month washout and suggest that a monitored, expedited rhythm-control transition is feasible and safe.

Background: Arrhythmogenic and dilated cardiomyopathies (ACM/DCM) are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, including sudden death. Artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled electrocardiographic aging algorithms estimate biological age from 12-lead tracings and predict cardiovascular outcomes in the general population. However, their utility in genetic ACM/DCM has not been studied. Methods: Retrospective review of 1,045 genotype-positive ACM/DCM patients was used to identify those with a pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant in ClinGen-classified definitive/strong evidence ACM/DCM-susceptibility genes. Following exclusion of patients without a baseline ECG for analysis (e.g. paced rhythms), the AI-ECG age gap (AI-EAG) was calculated by subtracting chronological from AI-ECG age. Genes were grouped into functional categories: desmosomal ( PKP2, DSP, DSG2, DSC2, JUP ), nuclear envelope ( LMNA ), sarcomeric ( TTN, MYH7, TNNT2 ), cytoskeleton/Z-disc ( FLNC, DES, DMD, BAG3 ), and regulatory/ion channel ( PLN, RBM20, SCN5A ). Cardiac MRI data included left ventricular structure, function, and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) presence and pattern. Mann-Whitney U was used for group comparisons; results are shown as median (IQR). Results: Overall, 824 patients (52.8% male; median age of 40.7 years, IQR 26.5–53.4; and median AI-EAG of 7.49 years, IQR 0.43–15.26) were included. DES variant-positive patients had the highest (19.98 years, IQR 9.66–23.21) and BAG3 variant-positive patients the lowest (–0.95 years, IQR -6.05–7.61) AI-EAGs. Among gene groups, nuclear envelope had the highest (15.12 years, IQR 6.79–25.17) and sarcomeric the lowest (5.75 years, IQR -0.69-14.01) AI-EAGs. Cardiac MRI was available for 538/824 (65%) of which 233/538 (43.3%) had LGE. No significant difference in AI-EAG was observed between LGE-positive and -negative patients (6.99 vs. 7.94 years; p=0.831). However, several LGE patterns were associated with significantly higher AI-EAGs: subepicardial (9.88 vs. 6.84; p=0.004), transmural (13.83 vs. 7.25; p=0.012), apical (12.89 vs. 7.17; p=0.002), and septal (8.91 vs. 7.19; p=0.016). Conclusion: AI-EAG varies by gene and functional group, possibly reflecting gene-specific myocardial remodeling. While certain LGE patterns were linked to increased biological aging, overall LGE status was not. These findings suggest AI-EAG may capture disease activity that is distinct from LGE and could serve as a complementary, non-invasive biomarker in genetic ACM/DCM.

Background: Renal dysfunction is a known prognostic factor in advanced heart failure and among patients receiving temporary mechanical circulatory support (tMCS). However, the predictive value of post-Impella creatinine in determining healthcare resource utilization in patients bridged to transplant with Impella 5.5 remains unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the association between post-Impella creatinine and key hospitalization metrics in this population. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients who received Impella 5.5 as a bridge-to-transplant between January 2020 and January 2025. Serum creatinine was collected 72 hours after Impella placement. The primary outcome was device-to-discharge time. Secondary outcomes included transplant-to-discharge time, post-transplant ICU length of stay (LOS), and total LOS (admission-discharge). Univariate and multivariable linear regressions were used to examine the association between post-Impella creatinine and each outcome, adjusting for age, gender, BMI, and LVEF. Results: 133 patients were supported with the Impella 5.5 as BTT and were included (median age 58 years (51–65), 82.7% were male, and 71.4% presented with non-ischemic cardiomyopathy. The median BMI was 27.7 (24.3–32.3), LVEF 17% (15–22), and post-Impella creatinine 1.32 mg/dL (0.96–1.71). The median device-to-discharge time was 45 days (29-64), transplant-to-discharge time was 14 days (12–19), ICU LOS post-transplant was 6 days (4–8), and total LOS was 58 days (42–76). Higher post-Impella creatinine was significantly associated with longer device-to-discharge time (β = 6.67, p = 0.004), longer transplant-to-discharge duration (β = 3.42 p = 0.003), longer ICU LOS (β = 2.19, p = 0.007), and longer total LOS (β = 7.24, p = 0.002) on univariate analysis. Post-impella creatinine remained significantly associated with device-to-discharge time in the multivariate model after adjusting for confounders (β = 6.33, p = 0.006). Importantly, this suggests that patients with lower post-Impella creatinine levels may experience shorter hospitalizations and faster recovery trajectories following transplant. Conclusions: Post-Impella creatinine is a significant predictor of prolonged hospitalization in patients supported with Impella 5.5 as a bridge to transplant. These findings emphasize the prognostic importance of early renal function assessment and may guide risk stratification and resource planning in advanced heart failure care.

Importance Adjuvant radiotherapy can improve locoregional control and survival in patients with olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB), particularly with advanced-stage and histologic-grade disease. Standard radiotherapy treatment is with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Proton beam radiotherapy (PBRT) provides theoretical advantages in greater sparing of dose to uninvolved organs at risk. Objective To investigate if there are differences in the effectiveness and radiation treatment–related adverse events (RTAEs) between adjuvant IMRT and PBRT for patients with ONB. Design, Setting, and Participants This propensity score–matched cohort study included patients with ONB treated between February 2005 and April 2021 with either IMRT or PBRT at 9 academic tertiary care centers in North America. Patients were matched 1:2 based on age, modified Kadish stage, and Hyams grade. Data were analyzed from July 2024 to January 2025. Exposure Adjuvant IMRT or adjuvant PBRT. Main Outcomes and Measures Local recurrence-free survival (RFS), any RFS, and overall survival (OS). RTAEs, ie, grade 2 events or higher based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were recorded for both modalities. Results Of 54 included patients, 27 (50%) were female, and the mean (SD) age was 46.2 (15.4) years. A total of 18 were treated with PBRT and 36 were treated with IMRT. Most patients had modified Kadish stage C disease (33 of 54 [61%]), and 24 patients (44%) had Hyams grade III or IV disease. The RTAE rate was 20% (8 of 40); IMRT had a rate of 21% (6 of 29), and PBRT had a rate of 18% (2 of 11). The difference in the point estimates for 10-year RFS showed a potential clinical benefit favoring IMRT, although the wide confidence interval indicates uncertainty (10-year RFS: IMRT, 63.3%; 95% CI, 44.6-89.8; PBRT, 37.8%; 95% CI, 14.2-100; difference, 25.5 percentage points; 95% CI, −17.6 to 68.6). There were no clinically meaningful differences in 10-year local RFS (IMRT, 75.6%; 95% CI, 59.8-95.4; PBRT, 72.7%; 95% CI, 45.2-100; difference, 2.9 percentage points; 95% CI, −35.9 to 41.7) or 10-year OS (IMRT, 61.8%; 95% CI, 42.8-89.1; PBRT, 57.1%; 95% CI, 24.3-100; difference, 4.7 percentage points; 95% CI, −49.2 to 58.6), although wide confidence intervals indicate considerable uncertainty. Conclusions and Relevance Due to the imprecision of estimates, no definitive conclusions can be made regarding the comparative effectiveness of IMRT vs PBRT for patients with ONB. These preliminary data may inform the design of appropriately powered prospective studies evaluating the efficacy of PBRT vs IMRT in this population.

Abstract Objective: The National Institutes of Health (NIH) Executive Abilities: Measures and Instruments for Neurobehavioral Evaluation and Research (EXAMINER) is a validated laptop-based battery of executive functioning tests. A modified tablet version of the EXAMINER was developed on the UCSF Tablet-based Cognitive Assessment Tool (TabCAT-EXAMINER). Here we describe the battery and investigate the reliability and validity of a composite score. Methods: A diagnostically heterogeneous sample of 2135 individuals (mean age = 65.58, SD = 16.07), including controls and participants with a variety of neurodegenerative syndromes, completed the TabCAT-EXAMINER. A composite score was developed using confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. Validity was evaluated via linear regressions that tested associations with neuropsychological tests, demographics, clinical diagnosis, and disease severity. Replicability of cross-sectional results was tested in a separate sample of participants ( n = 342) recruited from a frontotemporal dementia study. As this separate sample also collected longitudinal TabCAT-EXAMINER measures, we additionally assessed test-retest reliability and associations between baseline disease severity and changes in TabCAT-EXAMINER scores. Results: The TabCAT-EXAMINER score was normally distributed, demonstrated high test-retest reliability, and was associated in the expected directions with independent tests of executive functioning, demographics, disease severity, and diagnosis. Greater baseline disease severity was associated with more rapid longitudinal TabCAT-EXAMINER decline. Conclusions: The TabCAT-EXAMINER is a tablet-based executive functioning battery developed for observational research and clinical trials. Performance can be summarized as a single composite score, and results of this study support its reliability and validity in cognitive aging and neurodegenerative disease cohorts.

Background Outcome selection in regional anesthesia and acute pain research is inconsistent, often lacking patient-centered priorities and validated instruments. We aimed to prioritize key outcomes and propose suitable measurement tools to improve the quality, consistency, and relevance of regional anesthesia research. Methods We conducted a multiround Delphi process, including two electronic voting rounds, a multiday in-person meeting, and a patient panel. Experts and patients evaluated existing and proposed outcomes for importance, validity, and relevance. Outcomes reaching ≥70% agreement were prioritized, and appropriate measurement instruments were identified. Results Thirty-two experts and three patients participated. Across three Delphi rounds, 10 outcomes were prioritized for future regional anesthesia research: seven efficacy outcomes (pain scores; opioid consumption; Brief Pain Inventory; functional outcomes; cognitive function; length of stay; block duration); two multidimensional outcomes (quality of recovery and development of a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument); one safety outcome (chronic postsurgical pain). Patients prioritized cognitive recovery, function, chronic pain, and pain scores. Conclusions This consensus-based, patient-centered framework defines the core priorities for future regional anesthesia and acute pain research. Future work should focus on developing and validating a regional anesthesia-specific quality-of-recovery instrument, refining multidimensional measures such as functional recovery, cognitive outcomes, and the Brief Pain Inventory, and standardizing the reporting of chronic pain and opioid-related outcomes. Adoption of these priorities will enhance methodological consistency, comparability, and patient relevance in future clinical trials.

Background: Progressive heart failure cardiogenic shock (HFCS) often requires escalation to temporary or durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) as a bridge to transplant (BTT). Following the 2018 UNOS allocation changes, our center revised its BTT strategy to optimize support and shorten wait times. At our institution, the Impella 5.5 with SmartAssist via the axillary approach was selectively used for patients who remained refractory to guideline-directed medical therapy, failed single-inotrope therapy, and were not considered suitable durable LVAD candidates by our multidisciplinary heart team. We compared transplant-related outcomes of BTT patients supported with Impella 5.5 versus durable LVAD. Methods: We performed a single-center retrospective review of all heart and heart/kidney transplant candidates at Mayo Clinic Florida from October 2018 to February 2021. INTERMACS profile, baseline characteristics, and perioperative data were collected at the time of device implantation and throughout the transplant hospitalization. Results: A total of 87 heart and 4 heart–kidney transplants were completed. Forty-five patients (49%) required MCS as BTT: 27 (60%) with a durable LVAD and 18 (40%) with an Impella 5.5. All eighteen patients with Impella 5.5 as BTT (100%) were transplanted compared to nineteen patients with durable LVAD (70%), p = 0.001. The median time from listing to transplant was substantially shorter with Impella (32 vs. 696 days, p < 0.001), and this difference persisted across INTERMACS profiles. UNOS status at transplant was more urgent for Impella than LVAD (p < 0.001). Transplant surgery following Impella support required shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (181 vs. 219 min, p < 0.001) and resulted in lower postoperative vasoactive-inotropic requirements (7.9 vs. 13, p = 0.003). No patients in the Impella group died or were delisted while awaiting transplant, whereas 5 LVAD patients (26%) died or were removed due to LVAD complications (p < 0.001). Conclusions: Our data demonstrates that the use of the Impella 5.5 as BTT was associated with significantly shorter waitlist time, higher transplantation rates, reduced perioperative morbidity, and lower postoperative vasoactive support compared with durable LVAD as BTT. These benefits were achieved despite a higher severity of illness at transplantation in the Impella cohort.