Citations

Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of lateral epicondylitis (LE) have been characterized by substantial variability in reported outcomes. The source of this heterogeneity is uncertain. Purpose: To determine the effect of estimated platelet concentration on the efficacy of PRP for the management of LE. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: All RCTs evaluating the efficacy of PRP in managing LE were identified. RCTs were classified according to whether the study documented a platelet concentration factor of PRP representing a greater than 3-fold increase over whole blood or a supraphysiological platelet dose (high-dose vs low-dose PRP). The primary outcome was the mean difference (MD) in the visual analog scale (VAS) score at latest follow-up. Random-effects and mixed-effects meta-analyses were performed, and meta-regression was used to evaluate whether differences in outcomes after treatment with PRP could be explained by differences in the concentration of PRP used. Results: Overall, 13 RCTs with a total of 791 patients were included in this analysis, with 5 that utilized low-dose PRP and 8 that used high-dose PRP. Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used high-dose PRP resulted in an MD of −1.31 (95% CI, −1.87 to −0.75) in favor of PRP over all alternative treatment strategies ( P < .001). Meta-analysis of VAS scores reported by studies that used low-dose PRP resulted in an MD of 0.08 (95% CI, −0.51 to 0.68), suggesting no difference in the effect between PRP and all alternative treatment strategies ( P = .79). The platelet concentration factor of PRP used in each RCT was found to be strongly predictive of the VAS score at final follow-up in meta-regression ( P < .001), with 58.5% of the heterogeneity in the outcomes of PRP between studies explained by the platelet concentration factor alone. Conclusion: The platelet concentration of PRP may play a significant role in the outcomes of patients with LE. A direct linear relationship was observed between the platelet concentration factor of PRP used and the magnitude of patient-reported symptom relief after the management of LE with PRP. Clinicians should ensure a supraphysiological platelet concentration when preparing PRP for the management of LE.

224 Background: Metabolic pathways are reprogrammed during CRC development, leading to increased glycolysis, glutaminolysis, and fatty acid synthesis. Understanding the impact of metabolic reprogramming on treatment outcomes is paramount. Hence, we investigated whether the tumor gene expression of 4 selected major metabolic genes ( PKM, SLC2A1 , SLC16A1 , and CAV1 ) could affect treatment response in pts enrolled in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial. Methods: 433 mCRC pts treated with either bevacizumab (bev, n = 226) or cetuximab (cet, n = 207) in combination with first-line chemotherapy were analyzed. RNA was isolated from FFPE tumor samples and sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between groups of pts categorized by tertiles of gene expression (high [H], medium [M] and low [L]). Logrank P -values provide a non-parametric unadjusted assessment of differences. Likelihood ratio tests (LRT) were computed from multivariate Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG, tumor side, number of metastatic sites, KRAS , CMS, and treatment. Results: PKM gene expression was associated with cet treatment outcomes with PKM- low tumors showing significantly longer PFS and OS (median PFS: 14.3 vs 9.8 vs 8.1 months, L vs M vs H, P < 0.0001, LRT P = 0.011; median OS: 45.9 vs 31.2 vs 20.9 months, P < 0.0001, LRT P = 0.12). Low SLC2A1 was also associated with longer OS in cet-treated pts (32.4 vs 35.8 vs 25.2 months, P = 0.02, LRT P < 0.0001). Similar results were observed in bev-treated pts where low SLC2A1 expressing tumors had longer OS (37.4 vs 26.1 vs 29 months, P = 0.037, LRT P = 0.069) and a non-significant trend for longer PFS (13.1 vs 11 vs 9.5 months, P = 0.076). CAV1 low gene expression was associated with longer OS in cet-treated pts (37.4 vs 34 vs 21.5 months, P = 0.0048, LRT P = 0.013), while no significant associations were found in bev-treated (interaction LRT P = 0.0009). No significant results were observed for SLC16A1 . Conclusions: The intratumoral expression of metabolic genes was prognostic and predictive in mCRC pts treated with first-line therapy. GLUT1 (encoded by SLC2A1 ) and PKM2 (encoded by PKM ) promote aerobic glycolysis of cancer cells, known as Warburg effect, supporting rapid cell proliferation and survival. CAV1 has been shown to be involved in mitochondrial bioenergetics and fatty acid metabolism and to play either a tumor suppressor or oncogenic role depending on the cancer type and stage. Lower expression of SLC2A1 and PKM was associated with improved survival and increased benefit from cet treatment in our cohort. Low CAV1 expression was also associated with increase survival suggesting a cancer-promoting role in mCRC. Our results suggest that targeting cancer cell metabolism through novel inhibitors of the aforementioned pathways may be a promising therapeutic strategy.

269 Background: Sirtuins (SIRT1-7) are class III histone deacetylases with different roles in CRC as tumor suppressive and oncogenic, mainly influencing proliferation, migration, invasion, DNA damage and chemoresistance. In the present study, we explored the association between tumor gene expression of sirtuins and first-line treatment outcomes in mCRC pts. Methods: We evaluated the impact of the tumor gene expression of sirtuin genes ( SIRT1 -7) on treatment outcomes (overall survival: OS; progression free survival: PFS) in 433 pts enrolled in the randomized, phase III CALGB/SWOG 80405 (NCT00265850) trial. RNA extracted from FFPE tumor samples was sequenced using the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina). Subgroup analyses were based on treatment (bevacizumab [bev] (N = 226) vs. cetuximab [cet] (N = 207)). For each gene, expression was divided into tertiles of high, medium and low. The associations between tumor gene expression and outcomes (PFS and OS) were assessed using log-rank test in univariate analysis. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to compute hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals while adjusting for baseline characteristics. Treatment-gene interactions were analyzed using the likelihood ratio test. Results: Of the seven genes analyzed, SIRT3 high was associated with both longer PFS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.46-0.74], P < 0.001) and OS (HR:0.64 [95% CI: 0.50-0.83], P = 0.002) overall. Treatment-gene interaction testing found significant interactions for SIRT1 and SIRT5 with PFS ( P values: 0.021 and 0.016, respectively) and OS ( P values: 0.038 and 0.014, respectively) with targeted therapies (bev vs. cet). Multivariate analysis showed SIRT1 high associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.62 [95% CI: 0.42-0.89], P = 0.014) and OS (HR: 0.59 [95% CI: 0.40-0.89], P = 0.036) in cet-treated pts; in contrast with shorter observed PFS (HR: 1.38 [95% CI: 0.96-1.99], P = 0.22) and OS (HR: 1.31 [95% CI: 0.90-1.93], P = 0.23) in bev-treated pts. SIRT5 high showed similar results and associated with longer PFS (HR: 0.64 [95% CI: 0.45-0.91], P = 0.039) and OS (HR: 0.57 [95% CI: 0.39-0.83], P = 0.013) in cet-treated pts, with no similar associations in bev-treated pts. Conclusions: Our results highlight a potential role for SIRT3 as prognostic and, SIRT1 and SIRT5 as predictive biomarkers for first-line treatment in mCRC, with differential effects based on targeted agents. Significant interaction favored cet treatment in SIRT1 high and SIRT5 high tumors. However, previous reports suggest an opposite role of SIRT5 that has been linked to chemotherapy and/or cet resistance in CRC via the inactivation of succinate dehydrogenase complex subunit A. Therefore, further studies are warranted to dissect the mechanism behind the interaction of SIRT5 with cetuximab activity and establish the potential of targeting SIRT1/5 in CRC.

254 Background: SLFN11 was recently identified as a dominant determinant of response to DNA-damaging anticancer agents. Several studies showed SLFN11 expression led to better sensitivity to topoisomerase inhibitors and PARP inhibitors. However, clinical evidence in mCRC has been lacking. Methods: Two independent cohorts (CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial and a real-world patient [Caris CODEai] cohort) were included in this study. Patients were stratified into SLFN11 -high and -low groups based on the median SLFN11 gene expression levels. Survival outcomes were compared between SLFN11 -high and SLFN11 -low in irinotecan-treated and oxaliplatin-treated patients. Median time was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used for covariate adjustment. Endpoints of interest were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: In the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial cohort, 433 patients were included (110 treated with FOLFIRI-based chemotherapy and 323 treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy). In patients treated with FOLFIRI-based chemotherapy, SLFN11 -low patients exhibited numerically better PFS (median PFS, 13.4 vs 11.2 months, log-rank p = 0.03, adjusted hazard ratio [HR] = 0.86, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.55-1.39, p = 0.50) and OS (median OS, 39.6 vs 30.3 months, log-rank p = 0.02, adjusted HR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.46-1.16, p = 0.19) compared to SLFN11 -high patients. In patients treated with FOLFOX-based chemotherapy, SLFN11 -low patients exhibited numerically better PFS (median PFS 11.2 vs 9.8 months, log-rank p = 0.03, adjusted HR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.65-1.05, p = 0.12) and OS (31.1 vs 26.1 months, log-rank p = 0.07, adjusted HR = 0.84, 95% CI 0.65-1.08, p = 0.16) compared to SLFN11 -high patients. No significant interaction was observed between treatment and SLFN11 expression in terms of PFS ( p = 0.69) and OS ( p = 0.44). In the Caris CODEai cohort, a better OS in SLFN11 -low patients than in SLFN11 -high patients was observed in irinotecan-treated patients ( N = 2906) (median OS, 25.5 vs 21.7 months, HR = 0.90, 95% CI 0.82-1.00, p = 0.048). However, no significant difference in OS between SLFN11 -low and SLFN11-high was observed in oxaliplatin-treated patients ( N = 4428) (median OS, 39.5 vs 35.8 months, HR = 0.98, 95% CI 0.90-1.06, p = 0.56). Conclusions: Low SLFN11 expression showed a potential for better prognosis in mCRC patients receiving irinotecan- and oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapies. These findings are not consistently aligned with preclinical data and clinical evidence in other cancer types previously reported. Further investigation is warranted to better understand the biological role and clinical implication of SLFN11 in mCRC.

131 Background: KRAS G12C mutations occur in 3%–4% of CRC cases and are associated with poor prognosis. In the phase 1/2 KRYSTAL-1 study (NCT03785249), at a median follow-up of 11.9 months (mo), Ada (irreversible inhibitor of KRAS G12C ) in combination with Cetux (anti-EGFR antibody) demonstrated promising clinical activity (objective response rate [ORR] of 34% per blinded independent central review [BICR] and 43% per investigator [INV]) and was well tolerated in patients (pts) with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC. Based on these findings, Ada + Cetux was granted accelerated approval in the United States for these pts. Here, we present longer-term follow-up analyses from this study. Methods: Adults with previously treated KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC and ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 were treated with Ada (600 mg BID) in combination with Cetux (400 mg/m 2 followed by 250 mg/m 2 QW or 500 mg/m 2 Q2W) until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death, in separate phase 1 and phase 2 cohorts. Primary endpoints were safety (phase 1) and ORR per BICR (phase 2). Secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety (phase 2). Results: A total of 94 pts received Ada + Cetux. The median number of prior lines of systemic therapy was 3 (range, 1–9); 23 pts (24%) had received ≥ 4 prior lines of systemic therapy. The most frequent sites of metastases at baseline were the lung (71%) and liver (64%). At a median follow-up of 20.4 mo, ORR per INV was 43% (95% CI 32–53) and all were partial responses; median DOR was 5.9 (95% CI 5.5–7.6) mo. Disease control rate per INV was 86% (95% CI 78–92). Median PFS per INV was 6.9 (95% CI 5.9–7.4) mo; 6- and 12-mo PFS rates were 61% and 19%, respectively. Median OS was 16.0 (95% CI 13.3–18.8) mo; 6- and 12-mo OS rates were 88% and 66%, respectively. Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were reported in 100% of pts, 28% of which were grade 3/4. TRAEs led to discontinuation in 10% of pts. Efficacy analyses by BICR, subgroup analyses, and additional safety results will be presented. Conclusions: In heavily pretreated pts with KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC, Ada + Cetux continued to demonstrate clinically meaningful activity and tolerable safety with longer follow-up. These updated results are consistent with those from the primary analysis and constitute the longest duration of follow-up for dual KRAS G12C /EGFR blockade in this setting. Efficacy of second-line Ada + Cetux vs chemotherapy in KRAS G12C -mutated mCRC is being investigated in the phase 3 KRYSTAL-10 study (NCT04793958). Clinical trial information: NCT03785249 .

285 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown limited efficacy in colorectal cancer (CRC) outside of mismatch repair (MMR) deficient/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) tumors. Most CRC cases are MMR proficient /microsatellite stable and demonstrate resistance to ICIs, attributed to the tumor microenvironment. Colony Stimulating Factor 1 Receptor (CSF1R), a regulator of tumor-associated macrophages, has emerged as a potential target due to its association with poor prognosis in CRC. Methods: Data from 433 metastatic CRC (mCRC) patients in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 trial were analyzed. CSF1R RNA was extracted from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tumor samples and sequenced. Patients were divided into tertiles of CSF1R expression (high, medium, low). Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and Cox proportional hazards models. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on liver metastases, treatment type (Bevacizumab, Cetuximab, FOLFOX, FOLFIRI), and MSI status. Results: Low CSF1R expression (CSF1R-L) was associated with significantly better survival outcomes. Median PFS was 12.9 months for CSF1R-L, compared to 11.2 and 9.2 months for CSF1R-M and CSF1R-H (p = 0.003). Median OS was 35.8 months for CSF1R-L versus 32.5 and 24.4 months for CSF1R-M and CSF1R-H (p = 0.00086). Stratification by liver metastases showed that CSF1R-L remained a strong prognostic factor only in patients with liver metastases. There were no significant survival differences based on CSF1R expression in bevacizumab-treated patients. However, in cetuximab-treated patients, CSF1R-L tumors had significantly longer PFS (12.9 vs 8.8 months, p = 0.037) and OS (35.8 vs 21.4 months, p = 0.002) than CSF1R-H tumors. Similarly, in FOLFOX-treated patients, CSF1R-L tumors showed longer PFS and OS (p = 0.018 and p = 0.013, respectively), and in FOLFIRI-treated patients, OS was significantly longer for CSF1R-L tumors (42.2 vs 24.7 months, p = 0.022) than CSF1R-H tumors. Conclusions: Our data suggests that CSF1R expression may serve as a prognostic biomarker in CRC, with lower expression potentially linked to improved survival, particularly in patients with liver metastases. These findings warrant further investigation of CSF1R as a possible prognostic and predictive biomarker, as well as a potential therapeutic target in CRC. Clinical trial information: NCT00265850 .

PURPOSE Over 50% of households in the United States have at least one musician—many musicians are also breast cancer survivors. This group has not been well studied, and given the level of fine sensory-motor skill required for musicianship, we hypothesized that musicians experience unique manifestations of breast cancer treatment toxicities. METHODS A nine-item Musical Toxicity Questionnaire (MTQ) was distributed to patients who had consented to participate in the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Registry. The MTQ screened participants by asking if they played a musical instrument or sang in the last 10 years: questions populated for those who answered yes. Respondents were asked if they noticed difficulty with their musical endeavor during or after breast cancer treatment, defined as acute musical toxicity (AMT). The questionnaire asked which side effect and cancer-directed therapy most influenced musical ability, what musical attributes were affected, and the timeline of resolution. Multivariable and classification tree analyses assessed relationships between AMT and treatment characteristics. RESULTS Of 1,871 survey respondents, 29% (535/1,871) self-identified as musicians. Over a quarter (27%, 144/535) reported AMT, and for 57% (82/144), AMT had not resolved at the time of survey. Of the treatments each participant received, chemotherapy was most often reported as most negatively impactful (63/89 who received chemotherapy, 71%). Decreased endurance was the most common musical difficulty (64% of those with AMT, 92/144), followed by decreased accuracy, trouble playing/singing quickly, and difficulty using proper technique. Multivariable and classification tree analyses revealed that receipt of chemotherapy was most strongly correlated with AMT. CONCLUSION These results will help oncology care teams counsel musicians, answer questions about impacts on musicality, and provide a timeline for resolution of musical symptoms.

Abstract Background Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) predisposes individuals to frailty, linked with adverse outcomes. While the Fried Frailty Index (FFI) is a well-established phenotypic tool to assess frailty, its administration is cumbersome. The FRAIL scale, simpler but not widely used in IBD patients, presents an alternative. We aimed to assess the prevalence of frailty and compare the FRAIL scale with the FFI. Methods Two hundred and nine confirmed IBD patients underwent assessment using both the FFI and the FRAIL scale. Patients were categorized as non-frail, pre-frail, or frail. Pearson coefficients evaluated correlation, and unadjusted analyses assessed frailty risk factors. ROC curve analysis evaluated the FRAIL scale. Results Among participants (53.5% female, median age 44), 37% were non-frail, 50% pre-frail, and 13% frail. The FRAIL scale exhibited strong correlation with the FFI for all three categories. Age showed no significant association with frailty. Frail individuals displayed higher inflammatory markers and more severe clinical disease, with frailty more prevalent in UC than CD patients. Frail individuals also exhibited lower hemoglobin, creatinine, and albumin levels. Conclusion Frailty and pre-frailty are prevalent in the IBD population, not necessarily linked with older age. The FRAIL scale demonstrated excellent correlation with the FFI, offering a practical tool for identifying frailty in IBD without physical measurements. Future studies should explore multivariable models incorporating frailty risk factors and interventions to mitigate adverse outcomes in the IBD population.