Citations

SummaryThe randomized, double‐blind, double‐dummy, phase 3b RELIEF trial evaluated polycythaemia vera (PV)‐related symptoms in patients who were well controlled with a stable dose of hydroxycarbamide (also termed hydroxyurea) but reported PV‐related symptoms. Patients were randomized 1:1 to ruxolitinib 10 mg BID (n = 54) or hydroxycarbamide (prerandomization dose/schedule; n = 56); crossover to ruxolitinib was permitted after Week 16. The primary endpoint, ≥50% improvement from baseline in myeloproliferative neoplasm ‐symptom assessment form total symptom score cytokine symptom cluster (TSS‐C; sum of tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake) at Week 16, was achieved by 43·4% vs. 29·6% of ruxolitinib‐ and hydroxycarbamide‐treated patients, respectively (odds ratio, 1·82; 95% confidence interval, 0·82–4·04; P = 0·139). The primary endpoint was achieved by 34% of a subgroup who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose from baseline to Weeks 13–16. In a post hoc analysis, the primary endpoint was achieved by more patients with stable screening‐to‐baseline TSS‐C scores (ratio ≤ 2) receiving ruxolitinib than hydroxycarbamide (47·4% vs. 25·0%; P = 0·0346). Ruxolitinib treatment after unblinding was associated with continued symptom score improvements. Adverse events were primarily grades 1/2 with no unexpected safety signals. Ruxolitinib was associated with a nonsignificant trend towards improved PV‐related symptoms versus hydroxycarbamide, although an unexpectedly large proportion of patients who maintained their hydroxycarbamide dose reported symptom improvement.

Context.— The diagnosis and grading of acute cellular and antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in lung allograft biopsies is important because rejection can lead to acute graft dysfunction and/or failure and may contribute to chronic graft failure. While acute cellular rejection is well defined histologically, no reproducible specific features of AMR are currently identified. Therefore, a combination of clinical features, serology, histopathology, and immunologic findings is suggested for the diagnosis of AMR. Objective.— To describe the perspective of members of the Pulmonary Pathology Society (PPS) on the workup of lung allograft transbronchial biopsy and the diagnosis of acute cellular rejection and AMR in lung transplant. Data Sources.— Reports by the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT), experience of members of PPS who routinely review lung allograft biopsies, and search of literature database (PubMed). Conclusions.— Acute cellular rejection should be assessed and graded according to the 2007 working formulation of the ISHLT. As currently no specific features are known for AMR in lung allografts, the triple test (clinical allograft dysfunction, donor-specific antibodies, pathologic findings) should be used for its diagnosis. C4d staining might be performed when morphologic, clinical, and/or serologic features suggestive of AMR are identified.

Abstract The BCR-ABL-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) are clonal stem cell derived malignancies, which include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET), and myelofibrosis (MF). The MPNs are characterized by dysregulated JAK-STAT signaling pathways. PV and ET are associated with an increased risk of thrombo-hemorrhagic complications, risk of progression to MF and leukemia. Presentation of patients with PV and ET is variable and usually as a result of abnormal full blood count indices (raised hemoglobin and hematocrit, leukocytosis, and thrombocytosis). Presentation with thrombosis or splenomegaly occurs in ∼30% of patients. Historically thought of as indolent compared with MF, patients with PV and ET have significant disease symptom burden which does not directly correlate to the current clinical prognostic classifications. The mainstay of therapy is reserved for patients with high-risk disease and thus excludes a population of patients with significant symptom related morbidity impacting their quality-of-life and survival. Recent treatment strategies have aimed to incorporate disease burden assessment into the selection of therapeutic interventions such as JAK2 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors. We will review the advances in the field of MPN symptom assessment and symptom burden experienced by ET and PV patients. We will also discuss the risk-stratified management of ET and PV patients alongside symptom assessment and the impact of potential novel therapies, for patients who fail to respond to conventional treatment.

Abstract Background: Intrinsic resistance has been linked to ER down-regulation and poor clinical outcome in breast tumors. Aurora-A kinase (AURKA) promotes distant metastases through activation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT) programming and expansion of breast tumor initiating cells (BTICs) harboring a CD44high/CD24low phenotype. Moreover, AURKA induces down-regulation of ERα expression and resistance to endocrine therapy that is mediated by SMAD5 transcription factor (D’Assoro et al., Oncogene 2014: 33:599-610). The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of AURKA in endocrine resistance induced by breast cancer stemness and ER down-regulation. Materials and Methods: We employed parental MCF-7 and variant MCF-7 cells ex-vivo (vMCF- 7/LCC9, vMCF-7/FR) that have high endogenous levels of AURKA, are ERlow, and exhibit in vivo resistance to fulvestrant. Real-Time Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis assays were performed to assess response to endocrine and/or AURKA-targeted therapy using the innovative IncuCyte ZOOM System. Stemness activity was assessed by culturing breast cancer cells under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. Expression of ER, CD44 and CD24 markers was characterized by FACS analysis and immunofluorescence. Results: Pharmacologic inhibition of AURKA activity with the small molecule, alisertib, significantly restored sensitivity to fulvestrant in vMCF-7/LCC9 and vMCF-7/FR cells. To establish whether fulvestrant resistance was linked to enrichment of BTICs, breast cancer cells were cultured under non-adherent conditions to generate mammospheres. vMCF-7/FR cells generated mammospheres at higher efficiency compared to parental cells suggesting that vMCF-7/FR cells exhibited high self-renewal activity. vMCF-7/FR-derived mammospheres displayed a stem cell-like CD44high/CD24low phenotype that was further characterized by low levels of ER expression and resistance to fulvestrant. When vMCF-7 FR-derived mammospheres were treated with alisertib alone or combined with fulvestrant, the combination was more effective in mediating restoration of endocrine sensitivity. The phenotype of the alisertib-treated mammospheres was functionally linked to loss of CD44 expression, restoration of CD24 and ER expression, and sensitivity to fulvestrant. Conclusions: These findings provide further evidence that AURKA activity plays a central role in breast cancer progression through the genesis and clonal expansion of BTICs that are characterized by ER down-regulation and resistance to endocrine therapy. These results are important for the treatment of endocrine resistant breast tumors because they provide the rationale for the development of an innovative therapeutic approach to combine endocrine therapy with a targeted inhibitor of AURKA activity. Citation Format: Antonino B. D’Assoro, Tufia Haddad, Matthew Goetz, Mary Kuffel, John Hawse, Vera Suman, Jeffrey Salisbury, James Ingle, Evanthia Galanis. Pharmacologic targeting of Aurora-A kinase restores ERα expression and endocrine sensitivity through impairment of breast cancer stemness. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 3313.

Cancer vaccines have often failed to live up to their promise, although recent results with checkpoint inhibitors are reviving hopes that they will soon fulfill their promise. Although mutation-specific vaccines are under development, there is still high interest in an off-the-shelf vaccine to a ubiquitous antigen, such as MUC1, which is aberrantly expressed on most solid and many hematological tumors, including more than 90% of breast carcinomas. Clinical trials for MUC1 have shown variable success, likely because of immunological tolerance to a self-antigen and to poor immunogenicity of tandem repeat peptides. We hypothesized that MUC1 peptides could be optimized, relying on heteroclitic optimizations of potential anchor amino acids with and without tumor-specific glycosylation of the peptides. We have identified novel MUC1 class I peptides that bind to HLA-A*0201 molecules with significantly higher affinity and function than the native MUC1 peptides. These peptides elicited CTLs from normal donors, as well as breast cancer patients, which were highly effective in killing MUC1-expressing MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Each peptide elicited lytic responses in greater than 6/8 of normal individuals and 3/3 breast cancer patients. The CTLs generated against the glycosylated-anchor modified peptides cross reacted with the native MUC1 peptide, STAPPVHNV, suggesting these analog peptides may offer substantial improvement in the design of epitope-based vaccines.

Abstract Background: Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) accounts for approximately 20% of all breast cancer diagnoses. Clinical management of TNBC is limited to surgery, chemotherapy and radiation due to lack of estrogen receptor alpha and HER2 expression. Recently, we have shown that approximately 40% of TNBCs express estrogen receptor beta (ERβ) and have begun to explore the possibility that this receptor could be utilized as a novel therapeutic target for this disease. Methods: To examine the biological functions of ERβ in TNBC, novel ERβ expressing TN cell lines (MDA-MB-231 and Hs578T) were developed. In vitro experiments were employed to determine alterations in the global gene expression profiles, biological pathways, proliferation rates, and cell cycle progression following estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Cell line xenografts were also established in athymic ovariectomized nude mice to examine tumoral responses to ERβ targeting agents and to investigate gene and protein expression patterns as well as potential serum biomarkers indicative of therapeutic response. Additionally, using the resources of the Mayo Clinic Breast Cancer Genome Guided Therapy Study (BEAUTY), we have identified, and begun to analyze, ERβ+ and ERβ- patient derived xenografts (PDX) established from women with TNBC. Results: Our studies have revealed that both estrogen and multiple ERβ-specific agonists elicit significant anti-proliferative effects in ERβ+ TNBC cells primarily through a G1/S phase cell cycle arrest. These anti-proliferative effects appear to be mediated by cystatins, a family of small secreted cysteine protease inhibitors which are highly induced following estrogen and ERβ-specific agonist treatment. Conditioned media isolated from estrogen or ERβ-specific agonist treated cells decreased the proliferation rates of multiple non-ERβ expressing cell lines; effects that were completely reversed when cystatins were depleted from the media. In addition, we have shown that activation of ERβ, and the subsequent induction of cystatin gene expression, leads to suppression of canonical TGFβ signaling through multiple mechanisms including suppression of TGFβR2 expression, induction of Smad7 expression and blockade of TGFβ ligand-mediated activation of this pathway both in vitro and in vivo. Finally, ERβ+ TNBC PDXs exhibit significantly decreased tumor growth rates in estrogen-treated mice compared to ERβ- TN breast tumors. Conclusions: Our in vitro and in vivo data show that estrogen and ERβ-specific agonists elicit anti-cancer effects in ERβ+ TNBC. These effects appear to be mediated, in part, by cystatins through their inhibitory effects on canonical TGFB signaling, a pathway known to drive TNBC progression. Importantly, these data lay the foundation for studies aimed at examining the ability to therapeutically target ERβ in TNBC patients. Citation Format: Reese J, Bruinsma E, Subramaniam M, Suman V, Pitel K, Kalari K, Yu J, Wang L, Goetz M, Ingle J, Hawse J. ERβ elicits tumor suppressive effects in triple negative breast cancer through the induction of cystatins and suppression of TGFβ signaling. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-04-01.