Citations

Endovascular recanalization is increasingly being utilized in symptomatic patients with chronically occluded carotid arteries. 1 In carefully selected patients, endovascular recanalization has shown to lower the risk of ischemic events when compared to medical management alone.1 However, successful endovascular revascularization is technically challenging and not without risk. 1 , 2 In this video, we demonstrate a case of a 64-year-old woman who presented with recurrent transient ischemic attacks. On imaging she was found to have a chronic total occlusion of the common carotid artery from the arch. After obtaining informed consent, the patient underwent a successful endovascular recanalization and stenting of a chronically occluded left common carotid artery with aid from an intravascular guided re-entry catheter. Post operatively the patient developed a neck hematoma which improved and she returned to her neurological baseline. She reported no further symptoms on her three month follow up.

We assessed the available evidence regarding adverse effects on surrogate and patient-important health outcomes of third- and fourth-generation combined oral contraceptives among premenopausal women. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis including randomized controlled trials and observational studies comparing third- and fourth-generation combined oral contraceptives with other generation contraceptives or placebo. Studies that enrolled women aged 15 to 50 years, with at least three cycles of intervention and 6 months of follow-up were included. A total of 33 studies comprising 629,783 women were included. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly lower in fourth-generation oral contraceptives (mean differences (MD): −0.24 mmol/L; [95% CI −0.39 to −0.08]), while total cholesterol was significantly increased in levonorgestrel users when compared to third-generation oral contraceptives (MD: 0.27 mmol/L; [95% CI 0.04 to 0.50]). A decreased arterial thrombosis incidence was shown in fourth-generation oral contraceptive users, as compared to levonorgestrel (incidence rate ratio (IRR): 0.41; [95% CI 0.19 to 0.86]). No difference was found in the occurrence of deep venous thrombosis between fourth-generation oral contraceptives and levonorgestrel users (IRR: 0.91; [95% CI 0.66 to 1.27]; p = 0.60; I 2 = 0%). Regarding the remaining outcomes, data were heterogeneous and showed no clear difference. In premenopausal women, the use of third- and fourth-generation oral contraceptives is associated with an improved lipid profile and lower risk of arterial thrombosis. Data were inconclusive regarding the rest of outcomes assessed. This review was registered in PROSPERO with CRD42020211133.

Objective: To describe outcomes after elective and non-elective fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic repair (FB-EVAR) for thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs). Background: FB-EVAR has been increasingly utilized to treat TAAAs; however, outcomes after non-elective versus elective repair are not well described. Methods: Clinical data of consecutive patients undergoing FB-EVAR for TAAAs at 24 centers (2006–2021) were reviewed. Endpoints including early mortality and major adverse events (MAEs), all-cause mortality, and aortic-related mortality (ARM), were analyzed and compared in patients who had non-elective versus elective repair. Results: A total of 2603 patients (69% males; mean age 72±10 year old) underwent FB-EVAR for TAAAs. Elective repair was performed in 2187 patients (84%) and non-elective repair in 416 patients [16%; 268 (64%) symptomatic, 148 (36%) ruptured]. Non-elective FB-EVAR was associated with higher early mortality (17% vs 5%, P<0.001) and rates of MAEs (34% vs 20%, P<0.001). Median follow-up was 15 months (interquartile range, 7–37 months). Survival and cumulative incidence of ARM at 3 years were both lower for non-elective versus elective patients (50±4% vs 70±1% and 21±3% vs 7±1%, P<0.001). On multivariable analysis, non-elective repair was associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 1.92; 95% CI] 1.50–2.44; P<0.001) and ARM (hazard ratio, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.63–3.62; P<0.001). Conclusions: Non-elective FB-EVAR of symptomatic or ruptured TAAAs is feasible, but carries higher incidence of early MAEs and increased all-cause mortality and ARM than elective repair. Long-term follow-up is warranted to justify the treatment.

OBJECTIVE While single-position surgery (SPS) eliminates the need for patient repositioning, the placement of screws in the unconventional lateral position poses unique challenges related to asymmetry relative to the surgical table. Use of robotic guidance or intraoperative navigation can help to overcome this. The aim of this study was to compare the relative accuracies offered by these various navigation modalities for pedicle screws placed in lateral SPS. METHODS According to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the PubMed/Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were queried for studies reporting pedicle screw placement accuracy using fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, or robotic guidance in lateral SPS, and a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed. Included studies all compared evaluated screw placement accuracy in lateral SPS using a single navigation method. Quality assessment was performed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system; risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. The primary outcome, rate of pedicle screw breach, was analyzed using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Eleven studies were included comprising 548 patients who underwent the placement of instrumentation with 2488 screws. For the fluoroscopic, CT-navigated, O-arm, and robotic guidance cohorts, there were 3, 2, 3, and 3 studies, respectively. Breach rates by modality were as follows: fluoroscopic guidance (6.6%), CT navigation (4.7%), O-arm (3.9%), and robotic guidance (3.9%). Random-effects meta-analysis showed a significant difference between studies, with an overall breach rate of 4.9% (95% CI 3.1%–7.5%; p < 0.001); however, testing for subgroup differences failed to show a significant difference between guidance modalities (QM = 0.69, df = 3; p = 0.88). Heterogeneity between studies was significant (I2 = 79.0%, τ2 = 0.41, χ2 = 47.65, df = 10; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Robotic guidance of screws is noninferior to alternative guidance modalities in lateral SPS; however, additional prospective studies directly comparing different guidance types are merited.

Introduction: Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a recognized cause of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. It was found to be associated with accelerated bioprosthetic degeneration and higher rates of valve re-replacement. Hypothesis: Warfarin for 3 months after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) protects against accelerated valve degeneration and is therefore associated with better outcomes compared to dual antiplatelet (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapies (SAPT). Methods: Adult patients who underwent TAVR (2012-2019) were identified retrospectively (n=1,501). Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded (n=657). Patients were classified into warfarin, DAPT, and SAPT groups based on antithrombotic regimen. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was considered when patients developed new ≥ moderate trans-prosthetic regurgitation, increase in mean gradients ≥10 mmHg from baseline, or when gradients exceeded 20 mmHg. Discharge date was considered time zero. Results: Overall, 844 patients [mean age 80 (±9), 43% females, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 6.7 (±5.0)] were included. Warfarin was used in 633 (75%) patients, DAPT in 164 (19%), and SAPT in 47 (6%). Median follow-up time was 2.5 (IQR 1.2-3.9) years. There was no difference in outcomes of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-intervention, SVD, their composite endpoint, or hemorrhagic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke/RBC transfusion events (Figures 1 & 2), even after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion: Warfarin after TAVR was not associated with better clinical or hemodynamic outcomes or with worse adverse events compared to DAPT and SAPT.

Background: Long-term outcomes of lead management strategies of lead abandonment (LA) or transvenous lead extraction (TLE) during cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) procedures requiring lead addition or replacement remain unclear. Hypothesis: We hypothesized that there is no difference in long-term (10-year) outcomes of LA versus TLE during CIED procedures requiring lead addition. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of a population residing in seven adjacent counties of southeastern Minnesota with follow-up at the Mayo Clinic and its health systems. Patients who underwent LA or TLE for sterile leads from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2011, and had follow-up for at least 10-years or until their death were included. Outcomes were identified through a detailed chart review of the electronic health record from within the Mayo Clinic system. Results: A total of 172 patients were included in the study with 153 patients who underwent LA and 19 who underwent TLE for sterile leads. In long-term follow-up, indications for subsequent lead extraction arose in 9.1% (n=14) of patients with initial LA and 5.3% (n=1) in patients with initial TLE, after an average of 7-years. Moreover, out of 14 patients, who required secondary extraction in the LA cohort, 28.6% did not proceed with the extraction. Of the remaining 10 patients, 60% had clinical success and 40% had a clinical failure with the extraction. Subsequent device upgrades or revisions were performed in 18.3% of patients in the LA group and 31.6% in the TLE group, with no significant differences in procedural challenges such as requiring balloon venoplasty or serial dilation (5.2% vs. 5.3%, P=1.0). There was no difference in 10-year survival probability among LA group and TLE group (P=0.64). Conclusion: Indications for subsequent extraction arose in 9.1% of patients with the initial LA approach for sterile leads after an average of 7.3 years and 28.6% did not proceed with the extraction. Of the patients who underwent the subsequent extraction, 60% had clinical success and 40% had a clinical failure. There was no difference in 10-year survival probability between patients with the initial LA approach or TLE approach.

Background: RCTs studying the effect of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) on cardiovascular (CV) risk factors and outcomes have been underpowered to assess patients with overweight or obesity, thus presenting the need for a meta-analysis. Methods: Electronic databases were queried up till February 2022 for RCTs comparing SGLT2i with placebo in patients with overweight (BMI ≥25 kg/m2) or obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m2) - irrespective of diabetes status - with a follow-up of ≥24 weeks. Meta-analyses were performed using the generic inverse variance technique and a random-effects model. Results are presented as weighted mean differences (WMD) for continuous outcomes, and hazard ratios (HR) for dichotomous outcomes. Outcomes studied were: (i) weight; (ii) systolic BP; (iii) diastolic BP; (iv) heart rate; (v) HDL-C; (vi) LDL-C; (vii) major adverse cardiac events (MACE), i.e., composite of CV death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and non-fatal stroke; (viii) composite of heart failure hospitalization and CV death (HFH/CV death); (ix) mortality; (x) MI; and (xi) stroke. Results: Seventeen RCTs (47,649 patients) were included. Compared with placebo, SGLT2i significantly reduced weight (WMD: -2.32 kg [-2.77, -1.88]), HbA1c (WMD: -0.79 % [-0.98, - 0.61]) and systolic BP (WMD: -2.15 mm Hg [-3.08, - 1.22]). SGLT2i did not have a significant effect on diastolic BP (WMD: -0.55 mmHg [-1.51, 0.41]), heart rate (WMD: 0.08 bpm. [-0.21, 0.37]), HDL-C (WMD: 1.62 mmol l -1 [-0.21, 3.45]) or LDL-C (WMD: 0.53 mmol l -1 [-0.88, 1.94]). Amongst CV outcomes, SGLT2i reduced the risk of MACE (HR: 0.90 [0.81, 0.99]), HFH/CV death (HR: 0.82 [0.75, 0.90]), and mortality (HR: 0.85 [0.77, 0.94]). No effect was noted on stroke (HR: 0.99 [0.85, 1.26]) or MI (HR: 0.89 [0.77, 1.02]). Conclusions: In patients with overweight or obesity, SGLT2i produce a modest but significant reduction in weight, systolic BP and HbA1c. SGLT2i may also reduce the risk of MACE, HFH/CV death, and mortality.

Introduction: Rare cardiac complications of COVID-19 and COVID-19 mRNA vaccination include pericarditis and myocarditis. Patients with recurrent pericarditis may be at increased risk of triggered recurrence. The known efficacy of the interleukin (IL)-1 antagonist rilonacept in treating and preventing recurrence could inform COVID-19 disease and vaccination management. Methods: The Phase 3 trial RHAPSODY was a global, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized-withdrawal study. A long-term extension (LTE) enabled up to 24 months further open-label treatment from May 2020 until June 2022. Concomitant vaccination data and adverse events, including COVID-19, were collected. Results: No COVID-19 cases were reported during the run-in and randomized withdrawal periods (n=86). As of the 6 May 2022 data cutoff, a COVID-19 AE was reported in 19% (14/74) of LTE subjects, of whom 12 were on rilonacept: 5 of 44 fully-vaccinated (≥14 days beyond second serial dose) subjects (11.4%) and 9 of 30 unvaccinated or partially-vaccinated subjects (30.0%). Of the fully-vaccinated subjects, 1 case occurred ~11 months post primary vaccination cycle (no booster). COVID-19 severity was mild (n= 11), moderate (n=2), or severe (n=1). All cases resolved except the severe AE complicated by comorbidities; the subject discontinued. Of 12 subjects receiving rilonacept at the time of COVID-19 diagnosis, 10 maintained dosing with rilonacept, 1 interrupted rilonacept for ~4 weeks, and 1 discontinued rilonacept permanently; none experienced a pericarditis recurrence (PR) after the AE. The remaining 2 subjects had previously interrupted rilonacept for off-treatment observation: one had a PR >4.5 months after suspending rilonacept and 18 days after COVID-19 resolution; no PR in the other (>6 months). There were no PR AEs associated with COVID-19 vaccination (all subjects were receiving rilonacept). Conclusions: In patients on rilonacept in this study, although numbers are small, vaccination reduced COVID-19 events, pericarditis recurrence was not increased by vaccination or disease, and no pericarditis recurrences occurred during rilonacept treatment. One pericarditis recurrence occurred remotely after rilonacept suspension in the peri-COVID-19 period.

Introduction: Rilonacept reduced pericarditis recurrence in the phase 3 trial RHAPSODY. The long-term extension (LTE) enabled further insights into efficacy, safety, and clinical decision making. Methods: The RHAPSODY run-in (RI) and randomized-withdrawal periods were followed by an LTE that enabled open-label rilonacept treatment up to 24 additional months. A decision at 18 months after the most recent recurrence was based on clinical status at investigator discretion: 1) continue rilonacept on-study, 2) suspend rilonacept for observation or 3) discontinue from the LTE without observation. Endpoints included recurrence and quality of life. Results: In May 2020, 74 of 75 eligible subjects continued to LTE; US subjects (n=45) switched to commercial therapy or discontinued in April 2021 (treatment duration from RI baseline [median; maximum] 18; 27 months). Non-US subjects (n=29) completed the LTE in June 2022 (treatment duration from RI baseline [median; maximum] 27; 33 months). Concomitant oral medications during LTE: 22% NSAIDS, 20% colchicine, 0% corticosteroids, 43% none. Inflammation signs (CRP), RP symptoms (PGIPS), and recurrences were low on-treatment. Before the 18-month decision (n=74), there were 3 investigator-assessed recurrences (0.04 per patient-year). At the 18-month decision (n=52), 64% (n=33) continued rilonacept on-study, 15% (n=8) suspended rilonacept for observation, and 21% (n=11) discontinued the study without observation, of whom 7 switched to commercial rilonacept. There was a 75% recurrence rate (n=6/8) in the off-treatment observation group (median time to event 11.8 [3.7, Not-Estimable (NE)] weeks) but only 1 recurrence in subjects on rilonacept (time to event NE [too few events]) associated with a 4-week interruption; HR 0.018, p<0.0001; Fig 1. Conclusions: Continued rilonacept treatment resulted in continued treatment response, whereas treatment suspension at 18 months may be associated with pericarditis recurrence.