Citations

Background: Publication of the 2015 American Thyroid Association (ATA) management guidelines for adult patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer was met with disagreement by the extended nuclear medicine community with regard to some of the recommendations related to the diagnostic and therapeutic use of radioiodine ( 131 I). Because of these concerns, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine and the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging declined to endorse the ATA guidelines. As a result of these differences in opinion, patients and clinicians risk receiving conflicting advice with regard to several key thyroid cancer management issues. Summary: To address some of the differences in opinion and controversies associated with the therapeutic uses of 131 I in differentiated thyroid cancer constructively, the ATA, the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, and the European Thyroid Association each sent senior leadership and subject-matter experts to a two-day interactive meeting. The goals of this first meeting were to (i) formalize the dialogue and activities between the four societies; (ii) discuss indications for 131 I adjuvant treatment; (iii) define the optimal prescribed activity of 131 I for adjuvant treatment; and (iv) clarify the definition and classification of 131 I-refractory thyroid cancer. Conclusion: By fostering an open, productive, and evidence-based discussion, the Martinique meeting restored trust, confidence, and a sense of collegiality between individuals and organizations that are committed to optimal thyroid disease management. The result of this first meeting is a set of nine principles (The Martinique Principles) that (i) describe a commitment to proactive, purposeful, and inclusive interdisciplinary cooperation; (ii) define the goals of 131 I therapy as remnant ablation, adjuvant treatment, or treatment of known disease; (iii) describe the importance of evaluating postoperative disease status and multiple other factors beyond clinicopathologic staging in 131 I therapy decision making; (iv) recognize that the optimal administered activity of 131 I adjuvant treatment cannot be definitely determined from the published literature; and (v) acknowledge that current definitions of 131 I-refractory disease are suboptimal and do not represent definitive criteria to mandate whether 131 I therapy should be recommended.

The aims of this study were (1) to identify research publications studying noninvasive electrocardiogram (ECG) monitoring devices, (2) to define and categorize current technology in noninvasive ECG recording, and (3) to discuss desirable noninvasive recording features for personalized syncope evaluation to guide technological advancement and future studies. We performed a systematic review of the literature that assessed noninvasive ECG-monitoring devices, regardless of the reason for monitoring. We performed an Internet search and corresponded with syncope experts and companies to help identify further eligible products. We extracted information about included studies and device features. We found 173 relevant papers. The main reasons for ECG monitoring were atrial fibrillation (n = 45), coronary artery disease (n = 10), syncope (n = 8), palpitations (n = 8), other cardiac diseases (n = 67), and technological aspects of monitoring (n = 35). We identified 198 devices: 5 hospital telemetry devices, 12 patches, 46 event recorders, 70 Holter monitors, 23 external loop recorders, 20 mobile cardiac outpatient telemetries, and 22 multifunctional devices. The features of each device were very heterogeneous. There are a large number of ECG-monitoring devices with different features available in the market. Our findings may help clinicians select the appropriate device for their patients. Since there are only a few published articles analyzing their usefulness in syncope patients, further research might improve their use in this clinical setting.

Introduction: Across 269 international sites, the POINT trial randomly assigned 4881 patients with minor ischemic stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack to receive either clopidogrel at a loading dose of 600 mg on day 1 followed by 75 mg per day, plus aspirin at a dose of 50-325 mg per day or the same range of doses of aspirin alone. Dual antiplatelet therapy significantly reduced the incidence of major ischemic events, but also significantly increased the incidence of major hemorrhage. Clopidogrel is a prodrug that requires metabolism by the cytochrome P450 complex to act on the P2Y12 platelet receptor. CYP2C19 (cytochrome P450 family 2 subfamily C polypeptide 19) variants are associated with variable rates of metabolism of clopidogrel and thus pharmacogenomic effects may be clinically relevant. Methods: Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood monocytes using the standard protocols. Genotyping for CYP2C19 *2, *3 and *17 alleles (rs4244285, rs4986893 and rs12248560) defines metabolizer/activator status and was performed using custom TaqMan Allelic Discrimination Assays on a QuantStudio™ 7 Flex Real-Time PCR System. Results: As of June 28, 2018, a total of 445 trial participants had DNA available for analysis. CYP2C19 allele genotyping demonstrated approximately one quarter of subjects (n=127; 28.6%) would be defined as poor or Intermediate metabolizers of clopidogrel. Conclusions: Based on targeted cytochrome P 450 genotyping, about one quarter of POINT patients have reduced clopidogrel activation. Additional genotyping is ongoing. We plan to present results assessing whether the treatment effect of clopidogrel is limited to those with CYP2C19 genotypes associated with normal drug metabolism.

Level of Evidence : 5 Technical Efficacy : Stage 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019.

Objective To investigate the association between smoking status and pathological response to cisplatin‐based neoadjuvant chemotherapy ( NAC ) and survival outcomes in patients with muscle‐invasive bladder cancer ( MIBC ) treated with radical cystectomy ( RC ). Patients and Methods We reviewed 201 patients treated with NAC and RC for cT 2– cT 4N0M0 BC between 01/1999 and 01/2015. Smoking status was categorised as: ‘never', ‘former', and ‘current' smoker. Pathological response to NAC was defined as: complete (ypT0N0), partial (ypTis/Ta/T1, N0), and no response (ypT2–4 or ypN+). Clinicopathological characteristics were analysed according to smoking status. Logistic regression analyses tested the association between smoking status and pathological response to NAC . Cox regression analyses tested risk factors associated with recurrence, overall ( OM ) and cancer‐specific mortality ( CSM ). Results Overall, there were 58 (28.9%) never smokers, 87 (43.3%) former smokers, and 56 (27.9%) current smokers. No response to NAC was more frequently noted in current smokers (73.2%; P = 0.007). Former smoker ( odds ratio [OR] 2.28; P = 0.024) and current smoker statuses ( OR 4.52; P < 0.001) were significantly associated with no response to NAC , after adjusting for age, gender, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and clinical stage. Similarly, current smoking status ( hazard ratio [HR] 2.14; P = 0.03) and extravesical pathological tumour stage ( HR 3.31; P < 0.001) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrence after RC . Conclusion Cigarette smoking was significantly associated with adverse pathological response to cisplatin‐based NAC in patients with MIBC treated with RC . Current smokers were at significantly higher risk of disease recurrence as compared to former and never smokers.