Citations

TPS9162 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a standard of care (SOC) treatment that have improved outcomes for patients (pts) with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, most pts progress, signaling a need for combination approaches to further improve outcomes. CAN-2409 is a replication-defective adenoviral construct encoding the herpes simplex virus thymidine kinase (HSV-tk) gene that is injected intratumorally followed by 2 weeks of prodrug (valacyclovir or acyclovir). HSV-tk converts the prodrug in the tumor microenvironment into a toxic metabolite, resulting in immunogenic cell death, while the adenoviral proteins provide a strong pro-inflammatory signal. Together, this leads to in situ vaccination against the patient’s own tumor. As a result, CD8+ cytotoxic T cells are educated on how to recognize and kill tumor cells in both the injected tumor and the uninjected metastases. A completed neoadjuvant phase I trial in resectable NSCLC demonstrated safety and immune stimulation (Predina et al 2021), warranting further investigation of CAN-2409 + prodrug as a therapy that can lead to improved long-term outcomes for pts with NSCLC who have a suboptimal response to ICI. Methods: LuTK02 (NCT04495153) is an open-label, multi-arm, phase II clinical trial to evaluate CAN-2409 + prodrug added to SOC ICI (anti-PD-(L)1) therapy in pts with stage III/IV NSCLC presenting with inadequate response (as defined below) to ICI. Cohort 1 includes pts with nonresponding but stable disease ≥18 weeks after starting ICI; cohort 2 includes pts with progressive disease ≥18 weeks after starting ICI. Key eligibility criteria include RECIST-evaluable disease; an injectable lesion (via bronchoscopy or US/IR guidance); ability to continue ICI for the treatment period; no change of ICI or prior interruptions of > 4 weeks within 6 months of enrollment; and no focal therapy at > 3 sites of disease within 12 months prior to enrollment. Key exclusion criteria include a history of ICI immune-related adverse events and known alterations in EGFR, ALK, or ROS1. Eligible patients receive 2 injections of CAN-2409 approximately 6 weeks apart followed by prodrug for 14 days. After treatment of ~40 evaluable pts in cohort 2 with two injections of CAN-2409, the protocol has been amended to include a new cohort (n~20) of pts treated with three injections of CAN-2409 approximately 4 weeks apart, each followed by prodrug for 14 days, to further define the optimal therapeutic regimen. Primary endpoints are overall response and/or disease control rate per RECIST 1.1 criteria and safety of CAN-2409 + prodrug. Secondary endpoints include duration of response, PFS, OS, and biomarker studies. Exploratory endpoints include evaluation of effects in non-injected lesions, changes in non-target (per RECIST) lesions, tumor growth trajectory, and viral shedding. Clinical trial information: NCT04495153 .

Background: NASH is the progressive form of NAFLD characterized by lipotoxicity, hepatocyte injury, tissue inflammation, and fibrosis. Previously, Rho-associated protein kinase (ROCK) 1 has been implicated in lipotoxic signaling in hepatocytes in vitro and high-fat diet-induced lipogenesis in vivo. However, whether ROCK1 plays a role in liver inflammation and fibrosis during NASH is unclear. Here, we hypothesized that pathogenic activation of ROCK1 promotes murine NASH pathogenesis. Methods and Results: Patients with NASH had increased hepatic ROCK1 expression compared with patients with fatty liver. Similarly, hepatic ROCK1 levels and activity were increased in mice with NASH induced by a western-like diet that is high in fat, fructose, and cholesterol (FFC). Hepatocyte-specific ROCK1 knockout mice on the FFC diet displayed a decrease in liver steatosis, hepatic cell death, liver inflammation, and fibrosis compared with littermate FFC-fed controls. Mechanistically, these effects were associated with a significant attenuation of myeloid cell recruitment. Interestingly, myeloid cell-specific ROCK1 deletion did not affect NASH development in FFC-fed mice. To explore the therapeutic opportunities, mice with established NASH received ROCKi, a novel small molecule kinase inhibitor of ROCK1/2, which preferentially accumulates in liver tissue. ROCK inhibitor treatment ameliorated insulin resistance and decreased liver injury, inflammation, and fibrosis. Conclusions: Genetic or pharmacologic inhibition of ROCK1 activity attenuates murine NASH, suggesting that ROCK1 may be a therapeutic target for treating human NASH.

Abstract Objective To compare the performance of a newly developed race-free kidney recipient specific glomerular filtration rate (GFR) equation with the three current main equations for measuring GFR in kidney transplant recipients. Design Development and validation study Setting 17 cohorts in Europe, the United States, and Australia (14 transplant centres, three clinical trials). Participants 15 489 adults (3622 in development cohort (Necker, Saint Louis, and Toulouse hospitals, France), 11 867 in multiple external validation cohorts) who received kidney transplants between 1 January 2000 and 1 January 2021. Main outcome measure The main outcome measure was GFR, measured according to local practice. Performance of the GFR equations was assessed using P 30 (proportion of estimated GFR (eGFR) within 30% of measured GFR (mGFR)) and correct classification (agreement between eGFR and mGFR according to GFR stages). The race-free equation, based on creatinine level, age, and sex, was developed using additive and multiplicative linear regressions, and its performance was compared with the three current main GFR equations: Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation, Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) 2009 equation, and race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation. Results The study included 15 489 participants, with 50 464 mGFR and eGFR values. The mean GFR was 53.18 mL/min/1.73m 2 (SD 17.23) in the development cohort and 55.90 mL/min/1.73m 2 (19.69) in the external validation cohorts. Among the current GFR equations, the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation showed the lowest performance compared with the MDRD and CKD-EPI 2009 equations. When race was included in the kidney recipient specific GFR equation, performance did not increase. The race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation showed significantly improved performance compared with the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation and performed well in the external validation cohorts (P 30 ranging from 73.0% to 91.3%). The race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation performed well in several subpopulations of kidney transplant recipients stratified by race (P 30 73.0-91.3%), sex (72.7-91.4%), age (70.3-92.0%), body mass index (64.5-100%), donor type (58.5-92.9%), donor age (68.3-94.3%), treatment (78.5-85.2%), creatinine level (72.8-91.3%), GFR measurement method (73.0-91.3%), and timing of GFR measurement post-transplant (72.9-95.5%). An online application was developed that estimates GFR based on recipient’s creatinine level, age, and sex ( https://transplant-prediction-system.shinyapps.io/eGFR_equation_KTX/ ). Conclusion A new race-free kidney recipient specific GFR equation was developed and validated using multiple, large, international cohorts of kidney transplant recipients. The equation showed high accuracy and outperformed the race-free CKD-EPI 2021 equation that was developed in individuals with native kidneys. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05229939 .

Artificial intelligence (AI) is an emerging technological system that provides a platform to manage and analyze data by emulating human cognitive functions with greater accuracy, revolutionizing patient care and introducing a paradigm shift to the healthcare industry. The purpose of this study is to identify the underlying factors that affect the adoption of artificial intelligence in healthcare (AIH) by healthcare providers and to understand “What are the factors that influence healthcare providers’ behavioral intentions to adopt AIH in their routine practice?” An integrated survey was conducted among healthcare providers, including consultants, residents/students, and nurses. The survey included items related to performance expectancy, effort expectancy, initial trust, personal innovativeness, task complexity, and technology characteristics. The collected data were analyzed using structural equation modeling. A total of 392 healthcare professionals participated in the survey, with 72.4% being male and 50.7% being 30 years old or younger. The results showed that performance expectancy, effort expectancy, and initial trust have a positive influence on the behavioral intentions of healthcare providers to use AIH. Personal innovativeness was found to have a positive influence on effort expectancy, while task complexity and technology characteristics have a positive influence on effort expectancy for AIH. The study’s empirically validated model sheds light on healthcare providers’ intention to adopt AIH, while the study’s findings can be used to develop strategies to encourage this adoption. However, further investigation is necessary to understand the individual factors affecting the adoption of AIH by healthcare providers.

Abstract The Omicron variant was first detected in October 2021, which evolved from the original SARS‐CoV‐2 strain and was found to possess many mutations. Immune evasion was one of the notable consequences of these mutations. Despite Omicron exhibiting increased transmissibility, the rates of hospitalizations and deaths among patients infected with this variant were substantially lower when compared to other strains. However, concluding that the Omicron variant is less severe than other variants of SARS‐CoV‐2 requires consideration of multiple factors, including the vaccination status of infected patients as well as any previous infections with other variants. This review compiled data about any reported indicators of severity in Omicron‐infected patients, including studies comparing Omicron with other variants while adjusting for confounders. A comprehensive search was conducted using different databases to target any studies about Omicron. In total, 62 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in this study. Many studies reported a significantly reduced risk of hospitalization, ICU admission, need for oxygenation/ventilation, and death in Omicron‐infected patients compared to patients infected with other variants, such as Delta. Some studies, however, reported comparable severity in Omicron infected patients as to other variants emphasizing a substantial risk for severe illness. Furthermore, the COVID‐19 vaccines were less effective against Omicron relative to previous lineages, except after receiving the booster dose. One study recommended vaccination during pregnancy, which may help prevent future cases of severe SARS‐CoV‐2 pneumonia in neonates and young infants due to the transfer of humoral response from the mother.

AbstractTo develop a prognostic model for patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) for myelofibrosis (MF), we examined the data of 623 patients undergoing allo-HCT between 2000 and 2016 in the United States (the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research [CIBMTR] cohort). A Cox multivariable model was used to identify factors prognostic of mortality. A weighted score using these factors was assigned to patients who received transplantation in Europe (the European Bone Marrow Transplant [EBMT] cohort; n = 623). Patient age >50 years (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.98-1.96), and HLA-matched unrelated donor (HR, 1.29; 95% CI, 0.98-1.7) were associated with an increased hazard of death and were assigned 1 point. Hemoglobin levels <100 g/L at time of transplantation (HR, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.2-2.19) and a mismatched unrelated donor (HR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.25-2.52) were assigned 2 points. The 3-year overall survival (OS) in patients with a low (1-2 points), intermediate (3-4 points), and high score (5 points) were 69% (95% CI, 61-76), 51% (95% CI, 46-56.4), and 34% (95% CI, 21-49), respectively (P < .001). Increasing score was predictive of increased transplant-related mortality (TRM; P = .0017) but not of relapse (P = .12). The derived score was predictive of OS (P < .001) and TRM (P = .002) but not of relapse (P = .17) in the EBMT cohort as well. The proposed system was prognostic of survival in 2 large cohorts, CIBMTR and EBMT, and can easily be applied by clinicians consulting patients with MF about the transplantation outcomes.

Introduction Various clinical trials addressing large core acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are ongoing from multiple international groups. Future development of clinical guidelines depends on meta‐analyses of these trials calling for a degree of homogeneity of elements across the different studies. The aim of this common data element study was to provide an overview of the key features of pertinent large core infarct trials. Methods PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were screened for published and ongoing clinical trials assessing mechanical thrombectomy in patients with AIS with large core infarct. Nested Knowledge AutoLit living review platform was utilized to categorize primary and secondary outcomes as well as inclusion and exclusion criteria for patient selection in the clinical trials. Results The most reported data element was ASPECTS score, but with varied definitions of what compromises large core. Non‐utility‐weighted modified Rankin Score (mRS) was reported in 6/7 studies as the primary outcome, while the utility‐weighted mRS was the outcome of interest in the TESLA trial, all of them at the 3‐months mark, with only LASTE looking for mRS shift at the 6‐months mark. Secondary outcomes had more variations. Mortality is reported separately only in 4/7 trials, all at the 3‐month mark. Additionally, the TENSION trial reports the frequency of serious adverse events, including mortality, at the 1‐week and 12‐month mark. Conclusions In the published and the ongoing large core trials, there is a large degree of variability in the collected data elements. Differences in definition and timepoints renders reaching a unified standard difficult, which hinders high quality meta‐analyses and cohesive evidence‐driven synthesis.