Citations

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. E. Tama: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. S. D'Andre: None. S. Faubion: None. C. Shufelt: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Background: Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) block estrogen synthesis and are used as adjuvant treatment for breast cancer. AIs are associated with weight gain that can lead to increased cardiometabolic risk, thereby affecting health and survivorship quality in these patients. The role of anti-obesity medications (AOMs) in patients using AIs has not been studied. We sought to investigate weight loss outcomes to AOMs in patients taking AIs for breast cancer treatment. Methods: This is a matched case-control retrospective cohort study of breast cancer survivors on AI using FDA-approved AOMs (AI/AOM group). We compared their weight loss outcomes with a group of female patients with obesity, without a history of breast cancer or AI use, on AOMs (AOM group). We matched patients by age and body mass index (BMI). Exclusion criteria: AOM initiation prior to AI therapy, ≤3 months of AOM use, history of bariatric surgery, active malignancy, or pregnancy. Primary endpoint: total body weight loss % (TBWL%) at 12 months. Secondary endpoints: TBWL% at 3 and 6 months and % of patients achieving categorical TBWL ≥5%, ≥10% and ≥15% at 12 months. We used Pearson χ2 and unpaired t-test to compare baseline characteristics and outcomes between groups, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of variables to TBWL% in the AI/AOM group. We present results as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 99 patients: 63 in the AI/AOM group (63.5±10 years, BMI 34.4±7.0 kg/m2) and 36 in the AOM group (60.4±8.7 years, BMI 36.3±6.9 kg/m2). Liraglutide, semaglutide and phentermine were the only AOMs used. There was no difference in the frequency of use of these three AOMs among both groups (p= 0.1). AI/AOM group had a lower TBWL% compared to the AOM group during follow-up: 3.7± 4.3% vs. 5.6 ± 4.1% (p= 0.03) at 3 months, 3.9± 4.3% vs. 9.5± 4.7% (p< 0.0001) at 6 months, and 5.2± 5.3% vs. 10.5± 6.8% (p< 0.0001) at 12 months. Although the AI/AOM group was more likely to use lower doses of AOMs (p= 0.0004), TBWL% differences persisted among groups at 12 months after adjusting for AOM dosing (p< 0.0001). There was no difference in nutritional and behavioral modification sessions among groups (p=0.06 and p=0.9, respectively). At 12 months, the percentage of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% TBWL was greater in the AOM group compared to the AI/AOM group: ≥5% TBWL, 85.7% vs. 50.0% (p< 0.0001); ≥10%, 57.1 vs. 20.0% (p< 0.0001); and ≥15%, 28.6 vs. 5.0% (p< 0.0001); respectively. We found no predictors of TBWL% at 12 months in the AI/AOM group. Conclusion: Weight loss outcomes in breast cancer survivors on AIs taking AOMs are poorer compared to patients without breast cancer history and not taking AIs. Studies are needed to assess the mechanisms behind the different weight loss response to AOMs in women taking AIs, which we hypothesize may relate to AIs’ anti-estrogenic effect on lean and fat mass. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Abstract Disclosure: S. Fansa: None. W. Ghusn: None. B. Nicolalde: None. D. Anazco: None. E. Tama: None. A. Acosta: None. M.D. Hurtado: None. Introduction: The increasing prevalences of obesity and type 2 diabetes (T2D), the “twin epidemics”, have led to the development of drugs targeting both diseases simultaneously. Liraglutide and semaglutide, GLP-1 receptor agonists used for T2DM, are also FDA-approved for weight loss. Tirzepatide, a novel dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonist approved for T2D, has shown promising weight loss outcomes in clinical trials. To date, no study has assessed weight loss outcomes of tirzepatide in a real-world setting. Our aim is to assess its efficacy and safety in patients with overweight or obesity. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study of adults with overweight or obesity taking weekly subcutaneous tirzepatide for T2D or off-label for weight loss. We excluded patients taking tirzepatide for less than one month, prior bariatric procedure, use of any anti-obesity medications, and active malignancy or pregnancy. The primary outcome was total body weight loss percentage (TBWL%) at 3 months. Secondary outcomes included TBWL% at 1 and 2 months; TBWL% difference by T2D status (with and without) and by sex at 3 months; proportion of patients achieving ≥5%, ≥10%, and ≥15% of TBWL% at 3 months; predictors of TBWL% at 3 months; and reported side effects during follow up. We used paired t-test to assess TBWL% compared to baseline, non-paired t-test to compare TBWL% by T2D status and sex, and univariate analyses to estimate the contribution of other variables to TBWL%. Results are presented as mean ± standard deviation. Results: We included 175 participants (81% female, age 49.8±12.2, 91% white, BMI 38.8±7.3 kg/m2). One third of patients had T2D (n=59, 34%). Most patients were on 5mg (39%) or 7.5mg (22%) of tirzepatide weekly. TBWL% at 1, 2, and 3 months was 3.6±2.5% (n=87), 5.8±3.5% (n=100), and 8.4± 4.3% (n=60), respectively (p <0.0001 compared to baseline at all timepoints). Patients with T2D lost less weight at 3 months compared to patients without T2D: 6.9±4.0% vs. 9.1±4.4% (p= 0.03). At 3 months, TBWL% was greater in females, 9.2±4.3% vs. 5.0±2.5% for males, p<0.0001. Greater baseline weight was associated with greater TBWL% (R=0.32, p<0.0001). At 3 months, 60 patients had documented weights with 81.6% achieving ≥ 5%, 30% achieving ≥10%, and 10% achieving ≥15% TBWL. Forty participants (23%) reported side effects. The most frequent were nausea/vomiting (n=27, 15%), constipation (n=6, 3%), and abdominal pain (n=5, 3%). Eight patients (5%) had to either decrease dosage or discontinue the drug due to side effects. Conclusion: In this retrospective cohort study, tirzepatide led to substantial weight loss at 3 months. Patients with T2DM lost less weight than patients without. Further real-world studies with longer follow-up duration and higher tirzepatide doses are needed to establish the long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of this drug in this setting. Presentation: Friday, June 16, 2023

Background For acute proximal intracranial artery occlusions, contact aspiration may be more effective than stent‐retriever for first‐line reperfusion therapy. Due to the lack of data regarding medium vessel occlusion thrombectomy, we evaluated outcomes according to first‐line technique in a large, multicenter registry. Methods Imaging, procedural, and clinical outcomes of patients with acute proximal medium vessel occlusions (M2, A1, or P1) or distal medium vessel occlusions (M3, A2, P2, or further) treated at 37 sites in 10 countries were analyzed according to first‐line endovascular technique (stent‐retriever versus aspiration). Multivariable logistic regression and propensity‐score matching were used to estimate the odds of the primary outcome, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score of 2b–3 (“successful recanalization”), as well as secondary outcomes (first‐pass effect, expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2c‐3, intracerebral hemorrhage, and 90‐day modified Rankin scale, 90‐day mortality) between treatment groups. Results Of the 440 included patients (44.5% stent‐retriever versus 55.5% aspiration), those treated with stent‐retriever had lower baseline Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Scale scores (median 8 versus 9; P <0.01), higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale scores (median 13 versus 11; P =0.02), and nonsignificantly fewer medium‐distal occlusions (M3, A2, P2, or other: 17.4% versus 23.8%; P =0.10). Use of a stent‐retriever was associated with 15% lower odds of successful recanalization (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; [95% CI 0.74–0.98]; P =0.02), but this was not significant after multivariable adjustment in the total cohort (adjusted OR, 0.88; [95% CI 0.72–1.09]; P =0.24), or in the propensity‐score matched cohort (n=105 in each group) (adjusted OR, 0.94; [95% CI 0.75–1.18]; P =0.60). There was no significant association between technique and secondary outcomes in the propensity‐score matched adjusted models. Conclusion In this large, diverse, multinational medium vessel occlusion cohort, we found no significant difference in imaging or clinical outcomes with aspiration versus stent‐retriever thrombectomy.

Abstract A false pituitary tumor describes pituitary enlargement due to intracranial hypotension. Reported previously primarily in the neurological literature, we present this case referred to endocrinology for evaluation of a pituitary mass. A 24-year-old male was referred to endocrinology for evaluation of pituitary enlargement without a hypo-enhancing lesion on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The main symptom reported was headache that was worse in the standing position and in the afternoon. He had no symptoms or signs of pituitary mass-effect, or hormone excess or deficiencies. Past medical history was relevant for a history of nerve schwannoma status post resection with subsequent spinal fusion. Biochemical evaluation of pituitary hormones was normal. Upon review of his pituitary MRI, other abnormalities seen were suggestive of intracranial hypotension. Based on his history and imaging findings, he was diagnosed with intracranial hypotension causing a “false pituitary tumor” rather than pituitary enlargement or abnormality. Further evaluation revealed multiple spinal leaks that were patched. His symptoms subsided within a few days of repair. Endocrinologists should be aware of the possible misdiagnosis of a pituitary mass due to intracranial hypotension.

Abstract Background Guidelines recommend that all patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) undergo endoscopy within 24 h. It is unclear whether a subgroup may benefit from an urgent intervention. We aimed to evaluate the influence of endoscopic hemostasis and urgent endoscopy on mortality in UGIB patients with high-risk stigmata (HRS). Methods Consecutive patients with suspected UGIB were enrolled in three Japanese hospitals with a policy to perform endoscopy within 24 h. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Endoscopic hemostasis and endoscopy timing (urgent, ≤6 h; early, &gt;6 h) were evaluated in a regression model adjusting for age, systolic pressure, heart rate, hemoglobin, creatinine, and variceal bleeding in multivariate analysis. A propensity score of 1:1 matched sensitivity analysis was also performed. Results HRS were present in 886 of 1966 patients, and 35 of 886 (3.95%) patients perished. Median urgent-endoscopy time (n = 769) was 3.0 h (interquartile range [IQR], 2.0–4.0 h) and early endoscopy (n = 117) was 12.0 h (IQR, 8.5–19.0 h). Successful endoscopic hemostasis and urgent endoscopy were significantly associated with reduced mortality in multivariable analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09–0.52; P = 0.0006, and OR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.16–0.87; P = 0.023, respectively). In a propensity-score-matched analysis of 115 pairs, adjusted comparisons showed significantly lower mortality of urgent vs early endoscopy (2.61% vs 7.83%, P &lt; 0.001). Conclusions A subgroup of UGIB patients, namely those harboring HRS, may benefit from endoscopic hemostasis and urgent endoscopy rather than early endoscopy in reducing mortality. Implementing triage scores that predict the presence of such lesions is important.

Abstract Objective Sjögren syndrome in children is a poorly understood autoimmune disease. We aimed to describe the clinical and diagnostic features of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndrome and explore how the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria apply to this population. Methods An international workgroup retrospectively collected cases of Sjögren syndrome diagnosed under 18 years of age from 23 centres across eight nations. We analysed patterns of symptoms, diagnostic workup, and applied the 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Results We identified 300 children with Sjögren syndrome. The majority of patients n = 232 (77%) did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria, but n = 110 (37%) did not have sufficient testing done to even possibly achieve the score necessary to meet criteria. Even among those children with all criteria items tested, only 36% met criteria. The most common non-sicca symptoms were arthralgia [n = 161 (54%)] and parotitis [n = 140 (47%)] with parotitis inversely correlating with age. Conclusion Sjögren syndrome in children can present at any age. Recurrent or persistent parotitis and arthralgias are common symptoms that should prompt clinicians to consider the possibility of Sjögren syndrome. The majority of children diagnosed with Sjögren syndromes did not meet 2016 ACR/EULAR classification criteria. Comprehensive diagnostic testing from the 2016 ACR/EULAR criteria are not universally performed. This may lead to under-recognition and emphasizes a need for further research including creation of paediatric-specific classification criteria.