Citations

Abstract BACKGROUND Access to in-person evaluations is challenging for patients with glioma due to disease-related disability and distance from specialized neuro-oncology centers. Telehealth is an alternative to in-person evaluations, but acceptability of and therapy compliance with this model has not been prospectively evaluated. METHODS In this single-arm non-randomized pragmatic clinical trial, we compared patient satisfaction with telehealth and in-person assessments among patients with glioma undergoing chemotherapy with temozolomide. Participants acted as their own controls, alternating between telehealth and in-person visits. Patient satisfaction with care delivered was evaluated by Press-Ganey surveys with Likert response scales (1-5, 1=very poor, 5=very good). A digital pill diary (DPD) was implemented to track chemotherapy compliance. RESULTS We accrued 30 patients (median age 59, 38% female) between October 2024 and May 2025. Half of the patients (n=15) reported a primary residence greater than 150 miles from our institution. Surveys from 25 participants were reviewed, with 17/25 completing one or more surveys following an in-person visit, and 21/25 completing one or more surveys following a telehealth visit. Overall average Press-Ganey scores were similar between the two visit modalities with high scores (telehealth=4.8; in-person=4.7). Median scores for specific modalities were similarly highly rated: likelihood of recommending practice to others (telehealth=5.0; in-person=5.0), concern the care provider showed (telehealth=5.0, in-person=4.7), provider’s discussion of treatment options (telehealth=5.0, in-person=5.0), provider effort to include patients in decision-making (telehealth=5.0, in-person=5.0). DPDs used to monitor treatment compliance indicated adherence to all prescribed doses of temozolomide in 75/79 cycles; the other 4 (of 79) treatment cycles were halted per provider instructions. CONCLUSION This interim assessment demonstrates feasibility of treating patients with similar patient satisfaction of care delivered between telehealth and in-person visits. The DPD was effective in tracking chemotherapy administration. Additional results including visit type preference and acute care utilization data are maturing.

Abstract BACKGROUND The majority of pituitary neuroendocrine tumors (PitNETs) are effectively managed with medical therapy, surgery, and/or radiation therapy; however, a subset of pituitary adenomas exhibit aggressive behavior. Temozolomide is thought to be an effective treatment option for patients with PitNETs. METHODS We identified and retrospectively reviewed 11 patients with pituitary tumors treated with temozolomide. We then conducted a review of the literature, combining 114 previously published cases with our cohort. RESULTS 125 cases were identified with diagnoses of pituitary adenomas (n=45), aggressive pituitary tumors (n=61), and pituitary carcinoma (n=19) treated with temozolomide. 79 patients were male (68.1%) with a median age of 47.5 (range 9-72). A variety of tumor types were represented: 50 corticotroph adenomas (40.7%), 37 prolactinomas (30.1%), 22 hormone nonfunctioning adenomas (17.9%), 8 somatotroph adenomas (6.5%), 6 other functioning adenomas (4.9%), and 2 cases where the functional status was not mentioned. Median treatment duration was 9 cycles (n=91, 150-200 mg/m2 days 1-5, 28-day cycles; n=2, 75 mg/m2, days 1-21, 28-day cycles; n=1, 75 mg/m2 daily). 27 patients received concurrent therapy with a dopamine agonist/somatostatin analogue (n=10), other chemotherapy agent (n=9) or radiotherapy (n=8). Radiographic responses included stable disease (n=40), partial response (n=35), complete response (n=8), and progressive disease (n=30). Hormonal responses included complete response (n=13), partial response (n=32), and no response (n=16). 22 patients (47.8%; out of 46 patients where progression/recurrence was assessed) experienced progression/recurrence following temozolomide initiation with a median progression free survival (PFS) of 24 months. There was no significant association between MGMT methylation status and radiological or hormonal response. No unexpected toxicities were observed. CONCLUSION In this cohort, temozolomide was well-tolerated with a median PFS of 24 months. MGMT methylation status did not predict temozolomide response. Temozolomide is an option with a survival benefit for patients with PitNETs.

Abstract WSD0922-Fu is an oral, CNS-penetrant, small molecule EGFR inhibitor which potently inhibits EGFR aberrations specific to non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and glioblastoma (GBM). MC1914 (NCT04197934) is a first-in-human phase 1 trial in patients with EGFR aberrant recurrent GBM and NSCLC. After determining the maximum tolerated dose, adults with recurrent GBM were treated in two expansion cohorts: (a) non-surgical cohort (6/12 patients thus far): EGFRvIII mutation, first recurrence; food-effect study included (b) surgical cohort (6/6 patients), any EGFR mutation, any recurrence; window-of-opportunity study (WOO) included. Among these 12 patients, median age = 60 years; 50% female; 58% ECOG 0). All patients received prior radiation and temozolomide. After the WOO or food-effect study, patients were dosed at 120 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off), and escalated to 160 mg BID (5 days on, 2 days off) based on tolerability. Common adverse events (>40%) are comparable to other EGFR inhibitors (acneiform rash, diarrhea, fatigue, xerosis, pruritis). Treatment-related grade 3+ adverse events were limited to lymphopenia (n = 1). WSD0922-Fu exposure in the fed state exceeded the fasted state (median plasma Cmax and AUC0-24h are 1.6x and 1.3x, respectively) with a delayed Tmax (6.0 vs 1.8 hours). For the WOO, time between last dose administered to tumor collection ranged between 4 - 13.5 hours. Median tumor WSD0922-Fu concentration was 0.76 µg/g; estimated median unbound tumor concentration was 24.9 ng/g and within expectations for pharmacodynamic effect. Median brain/plasma ratio = 0.59; median unbound brain/unbound plasma = 0.88. Enrollment to the non-surgical cohort is ongoing, so formal efficacy data remain immature. However, examples of clinical efficacy will be shown along with data on recurrence patterns. Phase 2 clinical trial development is in progress.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab is FDA approved for solid tumors with high tumor mutation burden (TMB) and may thus have efficacy in hypermutant glioma. This study aimed to identify factors influencing efficacy of pembrolizumab in recurrent glioma. METHODS This retrospective study at Mayo Clinic included patients with adult-type diffuse gliomas who received pembrolizumab (≥2 cycles) for recurrent disease (01/01/2014–05/01/2025). The Mayo Clinic Solid Tumor Panel (MCSTP), which uses the Illumina TruSight Oncology 500 High-Throughput next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay, was also used to assess the molecular characteristics of the recurrent tumors. Responders to pembrolizumab were defined as patients who did not meet RANO 2.0 criteria for progressive disease on first radiographic response assessment. Progression-free survival (PFS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox-Regression analyses. RESULTS Sixty-two patients were identified (median age: 46 years; 65% male; 94% white). All patients received pembrolizumab and had prior alkylating chemotherapy. The median PFS from pembrolizumab initiation was 2.3 months. Twenty-five (40%) patients were responders. Patients with IDH-mutant, 1p/19q co-deleted gliomas (OLIGO, n=13) had a longer PFS (4.3 months) than IDH wildtype gliomas (IDH-WT, n=33, 2.2 months, p=0.012) and IDH-mutant, 1p/19q non-co-deleted (IDH-MUT, n=16, 1.7 months, p=0.0006). The proportion of responders was significantly greater in OLIGO patients (IDH-WT, 33%; IDH-MUT, 19%; OLIGO, 85%, p=0.0008). Overall PFS was not impacted by patient age, sex, or extent of initial resection. Twenty-nine percent of patient tumors tested thus far (6/21) had a high TMB (≥10 mut/Mb). Two-thirds (4/6) of high TMB patients were responders, while only one-third (5/15) of low TMB patients were responders. CONCLUSIONS Patients with recurrent OLIGO may have a longer PFS with pembrolizumab therapy than IDH-WT and IDH-MUT. Furthermore, high TMB may be associated with longer PFS with pembrolizumab therapy in glioma. Additional patients are being assessed using MCSTP (total expected n=43); complete data will be presented.

Abstract Imaging-based monitoring of gliomas is hampered by treatment-related changes, as well as the insidious growth of gliomas harboring the isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation. The IDH mutation results in elevated D-2-hydroxyglutarate (D-2-HG), which is detectable in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) that can be accessed longitudinally from multiple compartments, including cranially via CSF access devices. As such, we evaluated the early utility of CSF D-2-HG as a serially accessible biomarker for IDH-mutant gliomas. A CLIA-approved gas chromatography mass spectrometry assay was developed for CSF D- and L-2-HG. Lumbar and cranial CSF samples were collected from patients with IDH-mutant gliomas or IDH-wild-type brain tumors and non-tumor pathologies via surgical field collection, lumbar punctures, Ommaya reservoirs, and ventriculoperitoneal shunts. First, to confirm the ability of CSF D-2-HG to detect IDH-mutant gliomas, concentrations were compared between IDH-mutant gliomas and wild-type lesions. Cranial, but not lumbar, CSF D-2-HG distinguished primary IDH-mutant gliomas from IDH-wild type lesions (cranial AUC= 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI)= 0.80-0.97); lumbar AUC= 0.52, 95% CI=0.28-0.76). Indeed, CSF D-2-HG was significantly higher in cranial than lumbar samples from IDH-mutant glioma patients (median lumbar=0.20 μM, cranial = 1.72 μM; p<0.0001), confirming a significantly elevated abundance of CSF D-2-HG only in cranial CSF from IDH-mutant gliomas. Then, response to cytoreduction was evaluated, demonstrating that cranial CSF D-2-HG levels decreased to 0.54x of baseline with resection in seventeen patients (p=0.0129). Changes in tumor-to-CSF contact impacted the serial evaluation of CSF D-2-HG prior to versus after chemoradiation in some patients. Nevertheless, in patients with grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytomas, serial cranial CSF D-2-HG increased with disease progression and differentiated stability from pseudoprogression when tumor-CSF contact was sufficient. In conclusion, serial cranial CSF D-2-HG shows promise as a monitoring biomarker in patients with IDH-mutant gliomas, although anatomic variables must be considered in parallel to CSF D-2-HG evaluation.

Abstract BACKGROUND Pembrolizumab elicits durable responses in many solid tumors, yet activity in gliomas has been limited. Lymphopenia has been reported in association with reduced survival and a shorter time to progression on checkpoint inhibition in other solid tumors. We evaluated whether low absolute lymphocyte count (ALC) is related to worse outcomes in pembrolizumab-treated patients with gliomas. METHODS In this single-center retrospective study, we identified adults with gliomas who received ≥1 dose of pembrolizumab and had available lymphocyte counts at our center between 05/01/2018 and 1/31/2025. Patients’ demographics, dexamethasone use, baseline ALC (before initiation of pembrolizumab), and clinical outcomes were collected. Overall Survival (OS) was estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis from the date of starting pembrolizumab to the date of death. RESULTS Ninety patients met eligibility criteria (glioblastoma [GBM] n = 44, astrocytoma n = 20, oligodendroglioma n = 13, meningioma n = 8, other n = 5); 62% were male and 31% (n = 28) harbored IDH-mutant tumors. Across all histological subtypes, baseline ALC<750 cells/mm³ was associated with significantly shorter OS compared to baseline ALC≥750 cells/mm³ (3.7 vs 7.7 months, P = 0.0063) with similar dexamethasone exposure (63% vs 52%). In the recurrent GBM subgroup (n = 43; MGMT-methylated 26%), ALC≥750 cells/mm³ correlated with longer OS (8.5 vs 3.4 months, P = 0.0065) with a slightly lower proportion of patients on dexamethasone in high ALC group (52% vs 75%). Conversely, among patients with IDH-mutant gliomas (n = 28), no significant difference in OS was observed based on ALC levels (7.8 vs. 7.3 months, P = 0.58) with similar dexamethasone use (57% and 43% in high and low ALC groups, respectively). CONCLUSION Baseline lymphopenia preceding pembrolizumab treatment is associated with shorter OS in patients with GBM, but not in IDH-mutant gliomas. These associations require further validation in additional patient cohorts.

Abstract BACKGROUND Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease is a hereditary cancer syndrome characterized by development of multiple neoplasms, including central nervous system (CNS) hemangioblastomas, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs), and retinal hemangioblastomas. Belzutifan, a hypoxia-inducible factor 2-alpha (HIF-2α) inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in treating VHL-associated tumors. This study evaluates our institutional experience with belzutifan in patients with VHL-related tumors. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a retrospective cohort study across three Mayo Clinic sites, including patients aged ≥18 years with genetically confirmed VHL disease who received belzutifan between October 2021 and March 2025. Clinical/radiological data, and adverse events (AEs) were extracted from electronic health records. Tumor responses were assessed using RECIST v1.1 criteria for RCC, pNET, CNS hemangioblastoma. Retinal hemangioblastoma responses were evaluated through ophthalmologic assessments. RESULTS Forty-five patients were included (median age 44 58% female). Sixty-seven percent had RCC, 91% had CNS hemangioblastomas, 53% had pNETs, and 62% had retinal hemangioblastomas. The median duration of belzutifan therapy was 22.6 months (range 1.0-41.4 months). Among patients with RCC (n=26), overall response rate (ORR) was 19% and median time to best response (MTBR) was 7.4 months. Five patients had partial response (PR), 15 had stable disease (SD), and 1 had progressive disease (PD). For CNS hemangioblastomas (n=41), ORR was 12%, MTBR was 6.2 months. 5 patients had PR, 30 had SD, and none had PD. For pNET (n=17), ORR was 41%, MTBR was 8.2 months. One patient had CR, 6 patients had PR, 6 had SD, none had PD. For retinal hemangioblastomas (n=28), 6 (21%) showed improvement, 9 (32%) remained stable, and 3 (11%) showed progression. MTBR was 6.7 months. Treatment-related AEs occurred in 98% of patients. Common AEs included anemia (89%), fatigue (80%), hypoxia (18%), and headache (13%). Grade 3 AEs were observed in 20% of patients, including anemia (7%), hypoxia (9%), fatigue (4%), pneumonitis (2%), loss of consciousness (2%). One patient experienced a grade 4 event (status epilepticus). Anemia management involved iron supplementation (n=11), RBC transfusion (n=3), dose reduction (n=2), treatment holiday (n=8), permanent discontinuation (n=1). Hypoxia management included dose reduction (n=1), treatment holiday (n=3), discontinuation (n=1). CONCLUSION Belzutifan shows clinical activity across various VHL-associated neoplasms in real-world practice, with a manageable safety profile. The lower ORR compared to the phase III trial may reflect differences in baseline disease, including lower tumor burden in our cohort. These findings support its continued use in VHL disease, with attention to monitoring and managing treatment-related AEs.

Abstract BACKGROUND Adamantinomatous craniopharyngiomas (ACPs) are rare, partially cystic central nervous system tumors driven by the WNT/β-catenin pathway. As they grow, ACPs compress the surrounding pituitary gland, optic chiasm, and third ventricle. ACPs are highly morbid tumors with enormous quality of life impact on patients, often early in life. Thus, better treatments are needed. Current ACP treatment consists of maximally safe surgical resection with radiation for residual disease. Complete surgical resection is challenging, and recurrence is common. Targeted systemic chemotherapy is not routinely used for ACP treatment. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels are elevated within ACPs compared to normal brain tissue, making IL-6 an intriguing therapeutic target. Treatment response of ACP to tocilizumab alone or in combination with bevacizumab has been reported in children. MATERIAL AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of three adults with recurrent ACP who received combination treatment with bevacizumab and tocilizumab on a compassionate basis between June 2022 and April 2025 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, MN. We collected demographic, clinical, treatment, radiologic, and outcome data. RESULTS All three patients were male and median age at initial ACP diagnosis was 38 years (range: 32-42 years). All patients underwent subtotal resection followed by radiation therapy. One patient had repeat surgical resection and two patients required interventions for hydrocephalus. At the time of ACP recurrence, all patients had visual impairment, endocrine dysfunction, and headaches. All patients received bevacizumab (7.5 mg/kg q3 weeks) and tocilizumab (8 mg/kg q3 weeks [n=2] or 4 mg/kg q4 weeks [n=1]). While receiving combination therapy, ACP tumor volume decreased on magnetic resonance imaging for all three patients (64%, 68%, and 29% reduction). None exhibited tumor growth since starting combination therapy. One patient had a small intraparenchymal hemorrhage, suspected secondary to radiation-induced cavernous malformation, so bevacizumab was discontinued, and he remains on tocilizumab alone. The other two patients continue combination therapy (for 344 and 351 days). Two patients experienced improvement in vision, and one had improvement in cognition. Possible adverse effects of treatment included sinus infections, fatigue, neutropenia, and hypertension. CONCLUSION Treatment with combination bevacizumab and tocilizumab was associated with shrinkage of ACP tumors and clinical improvements and obviated the need for further surgery or radiation in all three patients. This combination of medications may reprogram the tumor microenvironment, leading to ACP involution. This well-tolerated regimen provides a noninvasive option for treatment of recurrent ACP, and potentially initial ACP treatment, and may improve quality of life for patients.

Background: High-grade gliomas (HGGs), particularly glioblastoma (GBM), are associated with exceptionally high mortality and inevitable recurrence. In considering novel treatment options for these devastating diseases, immunotherapies represent promising candidates. Immunotherapies have demonstrated efficacy for several advanced tumors outside the central nervous system, highlighting a potential role for these agents in treating HGGs. However, multiple challenges to immunotherapy efficacy have tempered therapeutic benefit in practice, including local and systemic immunosuppression, intratumoral heterogeneity, and various mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance. In the past 30 years, diverse immunotherapeutic subclasses have been assessed for benefit against HGGs. Methods: We performed a PubMed search for randomized clinical trials performed within the last 30 years evaluating the following immunotherapy agents for high-grade gliomas: immune checkpoint inhibitors, vaccines, oncologic viruses, cytokines, and CAR T-cells. The present review offers a critical analysis of key pre-clinical and clinical trials that have shaped the immunotherapy landscape for high-grade gliomas over the past two decades. Results/Conclusions: Across the different immunotherapeutic methods and modalities explored thus far, a recurring theme emerges: while therapeutic strategies with a compelling conceptual basis are continually under development and even demonstrate a benefit in preclinical and early-phase trials, larger and later-phase trials consistently fail to produce concordantly significant outcomes. To date, no large-scale clinical trial has demonstrated a benefit of sufficient consequence to change practice. Continued critical appraisal of the strengths and pitfalls of prior investigative work, optimization of treatment development and delivery, and innovative approaches to combination therapy design will collectively be integral to future therapeutic advancement.

e13893 Background: For individuals with CNS tumors who have experience difficulties with in-person (IP) evaluations due to disease-related neurologic disability or the costs associated with travel, telehealth (TH) offers a convenient and timely alternative for accessing specialized neuro-oncology care. We report our institution’s experience with telehealth utilization in neuro-oncology. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of patients who had at least one neuro-oncology telehealth visit between August 2021 and May 2024 at Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota. Reasons for visits, outcomes of appointments, acute care utilization following visits was reviewed. Results: A total of 660 patients who had at least one TH visit between August 2021 and May 2024 were included in the analysis. Median age was 56 (range 20-98), 49% were female, and 92% were white. Most patients resided in the US Midwest (84%), followed by the South (8%), West (5%), Northeast (1%), and US Territories (< 1%). Less than two percent were international patients. The most common primary visit diagnosis was glioblastoma (GBM, 26%), followed by astrocytoma, IDH-mutant (17%), meningioma (17%), oligodendroglioma, IDH-mutant, 1p/19q codeleted (7%). Of 6657 visits reviewed, 2745 (41%) were conducted via TH. Telehealth visits served various purposes, including consultation for newly diagnosed tumors or abnormal MRIs (n = 26), second opinion for an established tumor diagnosis (n = 119), discussion about clinical trial participation (n = 108), tumor-related treatment discussions (n = 719), chemotherapy education (n = 161), new symptom assessment (n = 117), symptom management (n = 366), and tumor surveillance (n = 1694). Outcomes from telehealth visits included enrollment in clinical trials (n = 28), proceeding with tumor-directed surgery (n = 46), initiation of radiation therapy (n = 88), starting or changing systemic therapy (n = 377), continuing existing systemic therapy (n = 932), transition to supportive care (n = 45), tumor diagnostic workup (n = 28), continuation of tumor surveillance (n = 1254). Acute care utilization, defined as an emergency department visit or hospitalization within one month of an appointment, was the same following telehealth visits compared to in-person visits (6.9% for IP vs 5% for TH, p = 0.507). Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that telehealth can effectively support all aspects of neuro-oncology care, ranging from initial diagnosis discussions to systemic therapy management and transitions to supportive care. Telehealth offers a convenient and accessible method of care delivery option for patients faced with neurologic illness. Additionally, THs do not lead to increased acute care utilization compared to IP evaluations.