Citations

Abstract Background: Thrombocytopenia commonly occurs in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury (AKI) receiving continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) and is associated with poor outcomes. While previous studies have examined static platelet counts and relative declines, the prognostic significance of platelet trajectory patterns before and after CRRT initiation remains unclear. This study investigates the association between platelet count trajectories and in-hospital mortality in critically ill adult patients with AKI receiving CRRT. Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective cohort study utilizing electronic health record (EHR) data from critically ill adults (≥18 years) with AKI who received CRRT at the University of Alabama at Birmingham between January 2012 and December 2023. Platelet trajectories were assessed using mixed-effects models incorporating all platelet measurements within seven days before and after CRRT initiation. The slopes of platelet count change were categorized as descending (≤ -10 × 10³/μL/day), stable (-10 to 10), or ascending (≥ 10), creating a total of nine trajectory patterns by combining the three pre-CRRT and three during-CRRT categories. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, which was analyzed in relation to these trajectory patterns using logistic regression models adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, medications, and use of other organ support devices as covariates. Results: The study included 2,226 critically ill adults with AKI on CRRT, encompassing 8,569 patient-days before and 11,699 patient-days after CRRT initiation for platelet slope calculation. The median age was 59 years (IQR 48–69) and the median SOFA score at CRRT initiation was 12 (9–14). The in-hospital mortality rate was 57.8%. Before CRRT initiation, the most common trajectory was descending (46.2%), while after CRRT initiation, the stable pattern was most prevalent (58.3%). All patterns with a descending platelet trajectory during-CRRT were significantly associated with higher in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.92 [95% CI: 1.16–3.21] for ascending-descending; 1.49 [1.07–2.08] for stable-descending; 1.52 [1.04–2.23] for descending-descending). In contrast, all patterns with stable or increasing platelet counts during-CRRT tended to have lower mortality. Conclusions: A descending platelet trajectory after CRRT initiation was independently associated with increased in-hospital mortality.

Background: Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) is linked to increased mortality and prolonged hospital stays. The exact relationship between central venous pressure (CVP) and AKI remains unclear. We explored the correlation between CVP and AKI in septic shock patients. Methods: This retrospective study included adult patients with septic shock admitted to Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2006 and 2018. CVP levels were measured at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h after the diagnosis of sepsis, and patients were stratified into two groups based on CVP levels (CVP < 8 or ≥8 mmHg). Results: Of 5600 patients with septic shock, 3128 patients without AKI on admission are included. One-thousand-and-ninety-eight patients (35.1%) developed AKI within a median of 4.4 days. The median CVP levels and frequency of elevated CVP at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h are significantly higher in the AKI group. Elevated CVP (≥8 mmHg) at 6, 12, 24, and 48 h is associated with AKI incidence, even after adjusting for mean arterial pressure (MAP) levels. This association, after multivariable adjustments, only remains significant at 12 h with an odds ratio (OR) of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.26–2.05), p < 0.001 and 48 h with an OR of 1.60 (95% CI, 1.29–1.99), p < 0.001. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that CVP ≥ 8 mmHg is strongly associated with an increased risk of AKI, even after adjusting for MAP at the 12 and 48 h time points. These findings underscore a critical 12 or 48h window for interventions to lower CVP.

Abstract Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a syndrome that entails a rapid decline in kidney function with or without injury. The consequences of AKI among acutely ill patients are dire and lead to higher mortality, morbidity, and healthcare cost. To prevent AKI and its short and long‐term repercussions, understanding its pathophysiology is essential. Depending on the baseline kidney histology and function reserves, the number of kidney insults, and the intensity of each insult, the clinical presentation of AKI may differ. While many factors are capable of inducing renal injury, they can be categorized into a few processes. The three primary processes reported in the literature are hemodynamic changes, inflammatory reactions, and nephrotoxicity. The majority of patients with AKI will suffer from more than one during their development and/or progression of AKI. Moreover, the development of one usually leads to the instigation of another. Thus, the interactions and progression between these mechanisms may determine the severity and duration of the AKI. Other factors such as organ crosstalk and how our concurrent therapies interact with these mechanisms complicate the pathophysiology of the progression of the AKI even further. In this narrative review article, we describe these three main pathophysiological processes that lead to the development and progression of AKI. © 2022 American Physiological Society. Compr Physiol 12: 3767–3780, 2022.

Background The digital transformation in medical education is reshaping how clinical skills, such as point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS), are taught. In nephrology fellowship programs, POCUS is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy, guiding procedures, and optimizing patient management. To address these evolving demands, we developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-driven POCUS curriculum using a multiagent approach that integrates human expertise with advanced AI models, thereby elevating educational standards and better preparing fellows for contemporary clinical practice. Methods In April 2024, the Mayo Clinic Minnesota Nephrology Fellowship Program initiated a novel AI-assisted process to design a comprehensive POCUS curriculum. This process integrated multiple advanced AI models—including GPT-4.0, Claude 3.0 Opus, Gemini Advanced, and Meta AI with Llama 3—to generate initial drafts and iteratively refine content. A panel of blinded nephrology POCUS experts subsequently reviewed and modified the AI-generated material to ensure both clinical relevance and educational rigor. Results The curriculum underwent 12 iterative revisions, incorporating feedback from 29 communications across AI models. Key features of the final curriculum included expanded core topics, diversified teaching methods, enhanced assessment tools, and integration into inpatient and outpatient nephrology rotations. The curriculum emphasized quality assurance, POCUS limitations, and essential clinical applications, such as fistula/graft evaluation and software integration. Alignment with certification standards further strengthened its utility. AI models contributed significantly to the curriculum's foundational structure, while human experts provided critical clinical insights. Conclusion This curriculum, enhanced through a multiagent approach that combines AI and human collaboration, exemplifies the transformative potential of digital tools in nephrology education. The innovative framework seamlessly integrates advanced AI models with expert clinical insights, providing a scalable model for medical curriculum development that is responsive to evolving educational demands. The synergy between technological innovation and human expertise holds promising implications for advancing fellowship training. Future studies should evaluate its impact on clinical competencies and patient outcomes across diverse practice environments.

Key Points The Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI trial found that starting dialysis earlier for AKI resulted in a 74% higher risk of still receiving dialysis at 90 days. Among patients who likely would have started dialysis under usual practice, the risks of dialysis dependence were similar. This suggests much of the risk observed may have been due to starting dialysis (versus never starting) rather than starting slightly earlier. Background The Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI Trial showed that among critically ill patients with AKI, an accelerated KRT initiation strategy resulted in more KRT dependence at 90 days, as compared with a standard strategy. However, it is unclear whether this difference exists among participants who likely would have been treated with KRT in usual practice. Methods Secondary analysis of the Standard versus Accelerated Initiation of Renal Replacement Therapy in AKI randomized controlled trial, analyzing participants who received more than the median number of days of KRT, which served as a proxy for high probability of requiring KRT under usual practice. Two sensitivity analyses redefined the cohort as ( 1 ) those with ≥24 hours of oliguria who received KRT and ( 2 ) those who received any KRT. Using the same statistical approach as the original trial, we calculated unadjusted relative risks with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the exposure of randomized KRT initiation strategy (accelerated versus standard) on the outcome of KRT dependence at 90 days among survivors. Results Among the 1184 participants who received ≥6 days of KRT (670 and 514 in the accelerated and standard arms, respectively), baseline characteristics remained balanced between treatment arms. The relative risk of KRT dependence at 90 days was attenuated and nonsignificant: 1.21 (95% CI, 0.84 to 1.78), compared with 1.74 (95% CI, 1.24 to 2.43) in the overall trial. The results were similar in sensitivity analyses. Conclusions Among patients who likely would have been treated with KRT in usual practice, there was no significant difference in 90-day KRT dependence among survivors between those randomized to the accelerated and standard KRT initiation strategies. These results suggest that the harm of long-term KRT dependence may be largely due to KRT initiation (versus never initiation) rather than earlier initiation. Clinical Trial registry name and registration number: NCT02568722.