Citations

Background MEDI5395 is a recombinant attenuated Newcastle disease virus engineered to express a human granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor transgene. Preclinically, MEDI5395 demonstrated broad oncolytic activity, augmented by concomitant programmed cell death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) axis blockade. Durvalumab is an anti-PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of various solid tumors. We describe the results of the first-in-human study combining intravenous MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods This phase I, open-label, multicenter, dose-escalation, dose-expansion study recruited adult patients with advanced solid tumors, who had relapsed or were refractory or intolerant to ≥1 prior line of standard treatment. MEDI5395 was administered intravenously as six doses over 15–18 days. The dose-escalation phase assessed four-dose levels (108, 109, 1010, 1011 focus forming units (FFU)) of MEDI5395, with sequential or delayed durvalumab. Durvalumab 1500 mg was administered intravenously every 4 weeks up to 2 years. The dose-expansion phase was not initiated. The primary objectives were to evaluate safety and tolerability, dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) and the dose and schedule of MEDI5395 plus durvalumab administration. Secondary objectives included the assessment of the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and immunogenicity of MEDI5395. Results 39 patients were treated with MEDI5395; 36 patients also received durvalumab. All 39 patients experienced ≥1 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE), most commonly fatigue (61.5%), nausea (53.8%) and chills (51.3%). Grade 3–4 TEAEs occurred in 27 (69.2%) patients; these were deemed MEDI5395-related in 12 (30.8%) patients. Two patients experienced a DLT, and the maximum tolerated dose of MEDI5395 with sequential and delayed durvalumab at study termination was 1011 and 1010 FFU, respectively. Four patients (10.3%) achieved a partial response (PR). Patients with PR or stable disease tended to have higher baseline PD-L1 and CD8+ levels in their tumor tissue. A tendency to dose-dependent pharmacokinetics of the viral genome was observed in whole blood and a tendency to dose-dependent viral shedding was observed in saliva and urine. Neutralizing antibodies were observed in all patients but did not appear to impact efficacy negatively. Conclusion This study demonstrates the feasibility, safety and preliminary efficacy of MEDI5395 with durvalumab in patients with advanced solid tumors. Trial registration number NCT03889275

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery and/or radiation have limited treatments. Loss of NF2 and CDKN2A/B are common in higher-grade meningiomas and promote meningioma progression. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as part of Alliance A071401, a genomically-driven phase II trial in recurrent or progressive meningiomas. METHODS Eligible patients (pts) with grade 2/3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR); the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. Twenty-four evaluable pts provided ≥85% power to detect a PFS6 ≥41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha=0.02), and ≥89% power to detect RR ≥20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha=0.021). RESULTS Of 83 pts screened while the abemaciclib arm was open between September 15, 2021 and October 3, 2022, 36 eligible pts received abemaciclib. The observed PFS6 rate in the first 24 evaluable pts was 54% (95% CI 33-75%), thus the study met PFS6 endpoint. Of all 35 evaluable pts, median PFS was 7.6 months (95% CI 3.6-17.1 months), estimated 6-month PFS was 55% (95% CI 40-75%) and estimated 6-month OS was 88% (95% CI 77-100%). No objective responses were observed. Of the 36 pts who started treatment, two had a grade 4 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment which included ALT elevation(1), AST elevation(1) and vomiting(1). Patients with NF2 alterations (n=24) had favorable PFS6 outcomes (58%, 95% CI 37-78%) compared to those with CDK (n=4, 25%, 95% CI 1-81%) and CDK+NF2 alterations (n=7, 29% 95% CI 4-71%), (Fisher’s Exact p=0.036). CONCLUSIONS Abemaciclib was well-tolerated and resulted in improved PFS6, meeting the trial’s co-primary endpoint. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for the treatment of patients with progressive meningiomas.

Abstract BACKGROUND Patients with meningiomas who have progressed after multimodal treatments face a significant shortage of viable therapeutic options. Recent advancements in the molecular understanding of meningiomas have identified the FAK and RAF/MEK signaling pathways as potential promising targets for progressive meningiomas. METHODS In vitro, we tested two human meningioma cell lines, IOMM-Lee (NF2 wild-type and CDKN2A loss) and CH157-MN (NF2 mutant). The cells were plated in Matrigel-coated wells, treated with defactinib (FAK inhibitor), VS-6766 (RAF/MEK inhibitor, avutometinib) and the combination over a 7-day period and assessed for cell viability using the CellTiter-Glo 3D assay. In vivo, we tested the efficacy of the FAK inhibitor VS-4718 (possessing favorable pharmacokinetic properties in mice) and RAF/MEK inhibitor VS-6766, both given daily via oral gavage, in athymic nude mice bearing IOMM-Lee or CH157-MN tumors. RESULTS In the matrigel assay, VS-6766 suppressed IOMM-Lee and CH157-MN cells in a dose dependent manner. The drug combination was mostly additive in IOMM-Lee cells. However, CH157-MN cells showed a strong synergistic response across all drug concentrations tested. In the IOMM-Lee flank tumor model, VS-4718 alone had no effect, while VS-6766 alone or in combination significantly reduced tumor growth and extended median survival from 25 days to 47 days (p < 0.05). In the CH157 flank tumor model, VS-4718 monotherapy did not affect tumor growth or survival, but VS-6766 monotherapy slowed tumor growth and increased median survival from 10 days to 31 days (p < 0.001). Combining both drugs further reduced tumor growth and extended median survival to 42 days (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION Treatment with FAK and RAF/MEK inhibitors showed synergistic or combination effects in the NF2 mutant CH157-MN model in vitro and in vivo. RAF/MEK inhibitor monotherapy was effective for the IOMM-Lee model (NF2 wild-type), without clear benefit of combining with the FAK inhibitor. Investigations in intracranial tumor models are underway.

Importance The prognosis for patients with glioblastoma is poor following standard therapy with surgical resection, radiation, temozolomide, and tumor-treating fields. Objectives To evaluate the combination of veliparib and temozolomide in glioblastoma based on preclinical data demonstrating significant chemosensitizing effects of the polyadenosine diphosphate-ribose polymerase 1/2 inhibitor veliparib when combined with temozolomide. Design, Setting, and Participants Patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma with MGMT promoter hypermethylation who had completed concomitant radiation and temozolomide were enrolled between December 15, 2014, and December 15, 2018, in this Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology trial. The data for this analysis were locked on April 21, 2023. Interventions Patients were randomized and treated with standard adjuvant temozolomide (150-200 mg/m 2 orally, days 1-5) combined with either placebo or veliparib (40 mg orally, twice daily, days 1-7) for 6 cycles. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point for the phase 3 portion of the trial was overall survival (OS). Results There were 322 patients randomized during the phase 2 accrual period and an additional 125 patients randomized to complete the phase 3 accrual, for a total of 447 patients in the final phase 3 analysis. The median (range) age for patients was 60 (20-85) years and 190 patients (42.5%) were female. The median OS was 24.8 months (90% CI, 22.6-27.7) for the placebo arm and 28.1 months (90% CI, 24.3-33.3) for the veliparib arm ( P = .17). The difference in survival did not meet the prespecified efficacy end point. However, there was a separation of the survival curves that favored the veliparib arm over 24 to 48 months of follow-up. The experimental combination was well tolerated with an acceptable elevation in grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects. Conclusions and Relevance This trial found that adding veliparib to adjuvant temozolomide did not significantly extend OS in patients with newly diagnosed, MGMT -hypermethylated glioblastoma. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02152982

Abstract BACKGROUND Mouse double minute 2 (MDM2) inhibits the tumor suppressor protein 53 (p53). Brigimadlin, a potent oral MDM2-p53 antagonist, restores wild-type (wt) p53 function and has shown early efficacy in patients with solid tumors. Glioblastoma (GBM) is an area of unmet need with 5-year survival at <10%. In p53 wt GBM patient-derived xenograft models, brigimadlin promotes tumor cell apoptosis and extends survival in combination with radiotherapy (RT). METHODS NCT05376800 is a Phase 0/Ia non-randomized, open-label, single-arm trial that aims to measure brigimadlin concentration in brain tumor tissue in patients with histologically or radiologically newly diagnosed GBM eligible for resection (Phase 0), and determine the maximum tolerated dose of brigimadlin plus RT in patients with TP53 wt, IDH wt, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (Phase Ia). In Phase 0, patients received one brigimadlin dose (30 mg or 45 mg) ~12-24 hours before resection. Phase 0 primary endpoints are the measured total concentration and the calculated unbound concentration of brigimadlin in brain tissue homogenate from non-contrast enhancing (NCE) and contrast enhancing (CE) regions. The predefined threshold for trial continuation is 0.5 nmol/L (corresponding to IC50 in GBM cell lines) unbound brigimadlin in CE samples in ≥50% of patients. Brigimadlin concentration was measured using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and corrected for amount of brigimadlin in residual blood. Unbound concentration was calculated using an in vitro estimate of unbound fraction (fu): 0.654% (rat brain slice). fu in human plasma was 0.22%. Ratio of unbound concentration in brain versus plasma (Kp,uu) was calculated. Biomarker testing was performed. RESULTS Data are available for 11 patients (brigimadlin 30 mg: n=6; 45 mg: n=5). In the 30 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 267 nmol/L (4 samples, range 86-316 nmol/L) and 332 nmol/L (6 samples, range 272-952 nmol/L) in CE samples. In the 45 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 197 nmol/L (5 samples, range 140-347 nmol/L) and 603 nmol/L (5 samples, range 441-905 nmol/L) in CE samples. Unbound concentration exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold in most cases. Post-brigimadlin, an increase in selected p53 target gene expression was observed in CE versus NCE tissue. CONCLUSION Unbound brigimadlin concentrations in CE regions in all patients receiving the low dose of 30 mg brigimadlin exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold. Kp,uu in most patients was close to 1 in CE regions. Biomarker data support target engagement in brain tissue. Our findings support continued investigation of brigimadlin in GBM. Recruitment is ongoing. Updated data will be presented.The trial is funded by Boehringer Ingelheim.

2071 Background: Brigimadlin (BI 907828) is a potent small molecule inhibitor of the p53-MDM2 pathway currently in a phase 0/1 clinical trial in combination with radiotherapy in newly diagnosed MGMTunmethylated glioblastoma (GBM). To inform development of brigimadlin for GBM, we developed a pharmacokinetic (PK)/ pharmacodynamic (PD)/ efficacy model using GBM patient derived xenografts (PDXs). Methods: Brigimadlin PK parameters were evaluated in FVB wild-type and knockout (Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/-) mice and in athymic nude mice. Drug binding was measured by rapid equilibrium dialysis, and drug levels quantified by LC/MS-MS. Dose-response relationships were evaluated in subcutaneous and orthotopic PDXs across a range of doses. Response to brigimadlin (2 mg/kg weekly) +/- RT (2 Gy x 10 fractions) was evaluated in orthotopic PDXs. Results: Brigimadlin significantly delayed median time to regrowth of GBM108 ( MDM2amplified) subcutaneous tumors (vs. placebo; p<0.05) at dose levels of 0.25 mg/kg (1.3-fold), 0.5 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 1 mg/kg (2.6-fold), and 2 mg/kg (5.3-fold). A single dose of brigimadlin resulted in corresponding intra-tumoral drug levels 24 hours post-dose: 84 nM (0.25 mg/kg), 175 nM (0.5 mg/kg), 398 nM (1 mg/kg) and 924 nM (2 mg/kg) and dose-dependent upregulation of p53 target genes (p21 and PUMA). In contrast, GBM14 ( MDM2non-amplified) showed regrowth delay (1.6-fold) only at 2 mg/kg (p=0.008). Brigimadlin was highly bound (fraction unbound = 0.0006 in brain; 0.0017 in GBM tumor tissue), and CNS distribution was limited by efflux; in wild-type mice Kp,uu_brain = 0.002 ± 0.003; in Mdr1a/b-/-Bcrp1-/- mice Kp,uu = 0.043 ± 0.025. Efficacy of brigimadlin was compared in orthotopic GBM108 PDXs grown in athymic nude mice vs. immuno/efflux-deficient (Rag2-/-Mdr1a-/-Bcrp1-/-) mice. In nude mice, median survival was extended at 2 mg/kg brigimadlin (1.4-fold, p=0.009), with corresponding intra-tumoral drug levels of 29 nM. In efflux deficient mice, median survival was extended (p<0.05) at 0.25 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 0.5 mg/kg (1.5-fold), 1 mg/kg (1.8-fold), and 2 mg/kg (>4-fold). Measurement of intra-tumoral drug levels is in progress. In combination with RT in GBM108, brigimadlin (2 mg/kg x 2 weeks) extended median survival vs. vehicle (66 vs. 50 days; p=0.012) and enhanced median survival following RT (128.5 vs. 82 days; p=0.009). In GBM14, 2 mg/kg brigimadlin (2 mg/kg x 12 weeks) extended median survival (39.5 vs. 32.5 days; p=0.0004) and enhanced survival following RT (97 vs. 81 days; p<0.0001). Conclusions: Efficacy of brigimadlin is dependent on adequate CNS delivery. Studies in subcutaneous PDX demonstrated intra-tumoral total drug levels in the mid-nanomolar range provide meaningful tumor effects in a highly sensitive, MDM2 amplified PDX. In orthotopic PDXs with and without MDM2 amplification, brigimadlin provided further benefit in combination with RT. These data support ongoing clinical evaluation of brigimadlin in GBM.

2017 Background: MDM2 inhibits tumor suppressor p53. Brigimadlin, a potent MDM2–p53 antagonist, restores wild-type (wt) p53 function and has shown early efficacy in pts with solid tumors (LoRusso et al Cancer Disc 2023). GBM is an area of unmet need with 5-year survival <10%. In p53 wt GBM pt-derived xenograft models, brigimadlin promotes tumor cell apoptosis and extends survival in combination with RT. Methods: NCT05376800 is a Ph 0/Ia open-label, single-arm trial that aims to measure brigimadlin concentration in brain tumor tissue in pts with histologically or radiologically newly diagnosed GBM eligible for resection (Ph 0) and determine the maximum tolerated dose of brigimadlin plus RT in pts with TP53wt, IDH wt, MGMT promoter unmethylated GBM (Ph Ia). In Ph 0, pts received one brigimadlin dose (30 mg or 45 mg) ~12–24 h before resection. Ph 0 primary endpoints are the measured total concentration and the calculated unbound concentration of brigimadlin in brain tissue homogenate from non-contrast enhancing (NCE) and contrast enhancing (CE) regions. The predefined threshold for trial continuation is 0.5 nmol/L (corresponding to IC50 in GBM cell lines) unbound brigimadlin in CE samples in ≥50% of pts. Brigimadlin concentration was measured using LC/MS and corrected for amount of brigimadlin in residual blood. Unbound concentration was calculated using an in vitro estimate of unbound fraction (fu): 0.654% (rat brain slice). fu in human plasma was 0.22%. Kp,uu (ratio of unbound concentration in brain vs plasma) was calculated. Biomarker testing was performed. Results: Data are available for 11 pts (brigimadlin 30 mg: n=6; 45 mg: n=5). In the 30 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 267 nmol/L (4 samples, range 86–316 nmol/L) and 332 nmol/L (6 samples, range 272–952 nmol/L) in CE samples. In the 45 mg group, median total brigimadlin concentration in NCE samples was 197 nmol/L (5 samples, range 140–347 nmol/L) and 603 nmol/L (5 samples, range 441–905 nmol/L) in CE samples. Unbound concentration exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold in most cases (Table). Post-brigimadlin, an increase in selected p53 target gene expression was observed in CE vs NCE tissue. Conclusions: Unbound brigimadlin concentrations in CE regions in all pts receiving the low dose of 30 mg brigimadlin exceeded the 0.5 nmol/L threshold. Kp,uu in most patients was close to 1 in CE regions. Biomarker data support target engagement in brain tissue. Our findings support continued investigation of brigimadlin in GBM. Recruitment is ongoing. Updated data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT05376800 . [Table: see text]

2001 Background: Systemic treatments are limited for patients with meningiomas that have progressed after surgery and/or radiation. Loss of NF2and CDKN2A/Bare common in higher grade meningiomas and promote meningioma progression in preclinical models. We evaluated the efficacy of abemaciclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitor, as part of Alliance umbrella trial A071401, a genomically driven phase II study in recurrent or progressive meningiomas. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) with grade 2/3 tumors and NF2 mutations or CDK pathway alterations were treated with abemaciclib 200 mg orally twice daily until progressive disease. Two co-primary endpoints were used: progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6) and response rate (RR) by Macdonald criteria; the trial would be declared positive if either endpoint was met. Twenty-four evaluable pts provided >85% power to detect a PFS6 >41.5% (vs. null 15%; alpha =0.02). The threshold for promising results for PFS6 was 8+/24 pts. For RR, 24 evaluable pts provided >89% power to detect RR >20% (vs. null 2.5%; alpha = 0.021). The threshold for promising results for RR was 3+/24 pts. Results: Of 83 pts screened while the abemaciclib arm was open between September 15, 2021 and October 3, 2022, 36 eligible pts received treatment. The mean number of treatment cycles administered was 7 and median follow-up since start of treatment was 11 months. The first 24 pts that met eligibility criteria and began treatment were considered evaluable for the primary endpoint analysis. Of the 24 pts evaluated, 58% were female and the median age was 62 years. The observed PFS6 rate was 54% (13/24 pts, 95% confidence interval 33-75%), thus the study met PFS6 endpoint. No objective responses were observed. Of the 36 pts who started treatment, eight had a grade 3 and two had a grade 4 adverse event at least possibly related to treatment. Grade 3 toxicities included anemia (2), neutropenia (2), leukopenia (1), blurry vision (1), diarrhea (2), fatigue (2), ALT elevation (1), dehydration (1), hyperkalemia (1), hyponatremia (1), dizziness (1), acute kidney injury (1), and thromboembolic event (1). Grade 4 toxicities included ALT elevation (1), AST elevation (1) and vomiting (1). Conclusions: Abemaciclib was well tolerated and resulted in an improved PFS6. The overall trial endpoint was met. Abemaciclib warrants further investigation for the treatment of patients with progressive grade 2/3 meningiomas. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882; UG1CA189867 (NRG Oncology); Eli Lilly; https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org . Clinical trial information: NCT02523014 .

AbstractIntroductionStructured data capture requires defined languages such as minimal Common Oncology Data Elements (mCODE). This pilot assessed the feasibility of capturing 5 mCODE categories (stage, disease status, performance status (PS), intent of therapy and intent to change therapy).MethodsA tool (SmartPhrase) using existing and custom structured data elements was Built to capture 4 data categories (disease status, PS, intent of therapy and intent to change therapy) typically documented as free‐text within notes. Existing functionality for stage was supported by the Build. Participant survey data, presence of data (per encounter), and time in chart were collected prior to go‐live and repeat timepoints. The anticipated outcome was capture of >50% sustained over time without undue burden.ResultsPre‐intervention (5‐weeks before go‐live), participants had 1390 encounters (1207 patients). The median percent capture across all participants was 32% for stage; no structured data was available for other categories pre‐intervention. During a 6‐month pilot with 14 participants across three sites, 4995 encounters (3071 patients) occurred. The median percent capture across all participants and all post‐intervention months increased to 64% for stage and 81%–82% for the other data categories post‐intervention. No increase in participant time in chart was noted. Participants reported that data were meaningful to capture.ConclusionsStructured data can be captured (1) in real‐time, (2) sustained over time without (3) undue provider burden using note‐based tools. Our system is expanding the pilot, with integration of these data into clinical decision support, practice dashboards and potential for clinical trial matching.

Abstract Despite major strides in cancer research and therapy, these advances have not been equitable across race and ethnicity. Historically marginalized groups (HMG) are more likely to have inadequate preventive screening, increased delays in diagnosis, and poor representation in clinical trials. Notably, Black, Hispanic, and Indigenous people represent 30% of the population but only 9% of oncology clinical trial participants. As a result, HMGs lack equitable access to novel therapies, contradicting the principle of distributive justice, as enshrined in the Belmont report, which demands the equitable selection of subjects in research involving human subjects. The lack of clinical trial diversity also leads to low generalizability and potentially harmful medical practices. Specifically, patients with brain cancer face unique barriers to clinical trial enrollment and completion due to disease-specific neurologic and treatment-induced conditions. Collectively, the intersection of these disease-specific conditions with social determinants of health fosters a lack of diversity in clinical trials. To ameliorate this disparity in neuro-oncology clinical trial participation, we present interventions focused on improving engagement of HMGs. Proposals range from inclusive trial design, decreasing barriers to care, expanding trial eligibility, access to tumor profiling for personalized medical trials, setting reasonable metrics and goals for accrual, working with patient community stakeholders, diversifying the neuro-oncology workforce, and development of tools to overcome biases with options to incentivize equity. The diversification of participation amongst neuro-oncology clinical trials is imperative. Equitable access and inclusion of HMG patients with brain tumors will not only enhance research discoveries but will also improve patient care.