Citations

593 Background: Cancer stem cells or stemness-high cancer cells are considered to be fundamentally important for resistance to therapy, recurrence and metastasis. Napabucasin, a first-in-class cancer stemness inhibitor in clinical development, suppresses cancer stemness by targeting Stat3-driven gene transcription. Preclinical studies suggest that napabucasin sensitizes heterogeneous cancer cells to chemotherapeutics and targeted agents. Methods: This study was performed to assess signs of anti-tumor activity of napabucasin in combination with FOLFIRI +/- Bev in CRC pts. Napabucasin was administered at 240 mg BID. FOLFIRI (5-FU 400 mg/m2 bolus with 2400 mg/m2, irinotecan 180 mg/m2, and leucovorin 400 mg/m2 infusion) +/- Bev 5 mg/kg was administered biweekly until disease progression or other discontinuation criterion. pSTAT3 status of archival tumor tissue was assayed by immunohistochemistry using the H-score with pSTAT3highdefined as ≥ 5% pSTAT3+ cancer cells and tumor stroma staining at ≥ 2+ intensity. Results: 63 CRC pts with an average of >2 prior therapy lines were enrolled. No pharmacokinetic interactions or dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Most common adverse events (AEs) included grade 1/2 diarrhea, nausea, vomiting and fatigue. 25 pts had grade 3 AEs, including diarrhea (14), fatigue (4), dehydration (2), electrolyte imbalance (4), nausea (1) and weight loss (1) resolved with dose reduction and supportive care. Among 63 pts enrolled who received RECIST evaluation, disease control (CR+PR+SD) was observed in 49 pts (86%) with an overall response (CR+PR) of 28% with 1 pt achieving CR. Clinical trial information: NCT02024607. Conclusions: This phase Ib/II study suggests napabucasin may sensitize chemorefractory CRC to FOLFIRI +/- Bev. Encouraging signs of synergistic activity between napabucasin and FOLFIRI was observed in CRC pts regardless of pSTAT3 status.[Table: see text]

Abstract Background: Abemaciclib, a small molecule inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, induces G1 cell cycle arrest in Rb-proficient human cancers.1 The clinical safety profile of abemaciclib enables continuous oral dosing to achieve sustained target inhibition, resulting in single-agent antitumor activity against multiple human cancers. The drug also reaches relevant concentrations in the central nervous system and, in patients taking the drug orally, can be detected in the cerebrospinal fluid.2 For women with previously treated hormone receptor positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC), abemaciclib as a single agent achieved a six-month clinical benefit rate of 61.1% and an objective response rate of 33.3%.3 Clinical trials investigating abemaciclib combined with fulvestrant4 or aromatase inhibitors5 have led to randomized Phase 3 studies for women with HR+ breast cancer.6,7 Methods: This Phase 1b study (NCT02057133) with multiple cohorts evaluates safety and tolerability of abemaciclib combined with endocrine or HER2-targeted therapies for MBC. Secondary objectives include pharmacokinetics (PK) and antitumor activity of abemaciclib when given in combination with other therapies. Cohorts were opened to enrollment sequentially. Patients with HR+ HER2 negative MBC received abemaciclib orally every 12 hours (Q12H) in combination with the following standard therapies daily until progression: letrozole (Part A), anastrozole (Part B), tamoxifen (Part C), exemestane (Part D), or exemestane plus everolimus (Part E). Patients with HER2 positive MBC received abemaciclib orally Q12H in combination with trastuzumab every 21 days until progression (Part F). Adverse events (AEs) were graded by NCI CTCAE v4.0 and tumor response was assessed radiographically using RECIST v1.1. Results: Abemaciclib has been combined with multiple targeted therapies for the treatment of women with MBC. We previously reported safety and early efficacy results for the combinations of abemaciclib with letrozole, anastrozole, tamoxifen, exemestane, and exemestane plus everolimus.5 Due to limited follow-up at that time, the efficacy results were not mature. Safety, PK, and efficacy results with approximately 6 months of additional follow-up will be reported across all parts of the study. The most common treatment-emergent AEs include effects on the gastrointestinal and hematopoietic systems. Consistent with previously reported results for both single-agent abemaciclib and the combination of abemaciclib with fulvestrant, tumor responses have been observed among women receiving abemaciclib in combination with targeted therapies for MBC. Conclusions: This study for women with MBC demonstrates the potential for abemaciclib to be combined with therapies targeting specific signaling pathways. References: 1Gelbert et al. Invest New Drugs. 2014;32(5):825-37. 2Shapiro et al. J Clin Oncol 31, 2013 (suppl; abstr 2500). 3Tolaney et al. SABCS 2014: Abstract 763. 4Patnaik et al. J Clin Oncol 32:5s, 2014 (suppl; abstr 534). 5Tolaney et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr 522). 6Llombart et al. SABCS 2014: OT1-1-07 (MONARCH 2, NCT02107703). 7Goetz et al. J Clin Oncol 33, 2015 (suppl; abstr TPS624) (MONARCH 3, NCT02246621). Citation Format: Goetz MP, Beeram M, Beck T, Conlin AK, Dees EC, Dickler MN, Helsten TL, Conkling PR, Edenfield WJ, Richards DA, Turner PK, Cai N, Chan EM, Pant S, Becerra CH, Kalinsky K, Puhalla SL, Rexer BN, Burris HA, Tolaney SM. Abemaciclib, an inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6, combined with endocrine and HER2-targeted therapies for women with metastatic breast cancer. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Eighth Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2015 Dec 8-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P4-13-25.

Abstract Patient derived xenografts (PDX) mouse models for many types of cancer have been developed recapitulating therapeutic responses in the patient for which the PDX model was derived. Essentially, live surgically resected or biopsy tumor tissues are directly implanted into immune incompetent mice to develop in vivo models to test therapies, follow tumor progression (gene mutations that occur with patient tumor progression do so in mice) or to better understand drug resistance. However, the use of PDX models also has its limitations and challenges. Our laboratory has attempted to develop PDX models in athymic nude mice for numerous cancer histotypes such as bladder, brain, breast, colon, kidney, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, sarcoma and thyroid. While melanoma and colon cancers have very high tumor take rates (73 - 100%), the other cancer histotypes do not (14 - 50%). We share our experience for each cancer histotype and the techniques used to enhance the success rates in athymic nude mice. We also address the other challenges that include expansion of tumors after cryopreservation and conversion of human tumors to mouse tumors and spontaneous lymphomas. We provide methods to test for human versus mouse content that include QPCR and immunohistochemistry Citation Format: Laura A. Marlow, James L. Miller, Brandy Edenfield, Adam C. Mathias, Louis K. Dawson, William F. Durham, Robert J. Mullin, Daniel L. Small, Aidan J. Synnott, Kevin Wu, John A. Copland. Methods for developing patient derived xenografts in athymic nude mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1453. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1453

Abstract Desmoplasia and an inflammatory environment are defining features of pancreatic cancer. Unclear is how pancreatic cells that undergo oncogenic transformation can cross-talk with immune cells and how this contributes to the development of pancreatic lesions. Here, we demonstrate that pancreatic acinar cells expressing mutant KRAS can expedite their transformation to a duct-like phenotype by inducing local inflammation. Specifically, we show that KRASG12D induces the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which serves as chemoattractant for macrophages. Infiltrating macrophages amplify the formation of KRASG12D-caused abnormal pancreatic structures by remodeling the extracellular matrix and providing cytokines such as TNF. Depletion of macrophages or treatment with a neutralizing antibody for ICAM-1 in mice expressing oncogenic Kras under an acinar cell–specific promoter resulted in both a decreased formation of abnormal structures and decreased progression of acinar-to-ductal metaplasia to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplastic lesions. Significance: We here show that oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic acinar cells upregulates the expression of ICAM-1 to attract macrophages. Hence, our results reveal a direct cooperative mechanism between oncogenic Kras mutations and the inflammatory environment to drive the initiation of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov; 5(1); 52–63. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1

Abstract Primary central nervous system (CNS) lymphoma (PCNSL) is a diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) confined to the CNS. A genome-wide gene expression comparison between PCNSL and non-CNS DLBCL was performed, the latter consisting of both nodal and extranodal DLBCL (nDLBCL and enDLBCL), to identify a “CNS signature.” Pathway analysis with the program SigPathway revealed that PCNSL is characterized notably by significant differential expression of multiple extracellular matrix (ECM) and adhesion-related pathways. The most significantly up-regulated gene is the ECM-related osteopontin (SPP1). Expression at the protein level of ECM-related SPP1 and CHI3L1 in PCNSL cells was demonstrated by immunohistochemistry. The alterations in gene expression can be interpreted within several biologic contexts with implications for PCNSL, including CNS tropism (ECM and adhesion-related pathways, SPP1, DDR1), B-cell migration (CXCL13, SPP1), activated B-cell subtype (MUM1), lymphoproliferation (SPP1, TCL1A, CHI3L1), aggressive clinical behavior (SPP1, CHI3L1, MUM1), and aggressive metastatic cancer phenotype (SPP1, CHI3L1). The gene expression signature discovered in our study may represent a true “CNS signature” because we contrasted PCNSL with wide-spectrum non-CNS DLBCL on a genomic scale and performed an in-depth bioinformatic analysis.