Necela, Brian

Tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) are non-mutated antigenic peptides expressed in cancer tissue at abnormally high levels but in normal tissue either at negligible levels, during only particular developmental stages, or in a tissue-restricted manner. The shared nature of TAAs across patients makes them attractive targets for off-the-shelf immunotherapies. However, no studies have comprehensively surveyed the TAA potential of all possible wild-type peptides originating from cancer-associated genes. In this study of 16 cancer tissue types and 39 normal tissue types, we analyzed the expression profiles of protein-coding genes to identify those with aberrantly high RNA levels across multiple solid tumor types and low RNA levels across all normal tissue types examined. We then developed a score to quantify tumor specificity of gene expression. Compared to previously reported TAA genes, those we identified exhibited substantially greater tumor specificity. Seven of these genes demonstrated consistently elevated expression in at least five tumor types and minimal expression across all non-immune-privileged normal tissues. To assess Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) class I presentation potential of the multi-cancer-associated genes, we computationally predicted the binding affinities between the most common class I HLA alleles and all possible wild-type TAA epitopes of 8–11 amino acids arising from those genes. We then applied rigorous filtering criteria to prioritize the most promising multi-cancer TAA peptide candidates and evaluated their HLA binding and cell-surface presentation using T2 and immunopeptidome analysis. Our results highlight new potential targets for multi-cancer immunotherapies.

Background While SARS-CoV-2 vaccines are highly effective in healthy individuals, the magnitude and durability of humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy remain understudied. Previous reports suggest that patients with cancer may not mount adequate immune response after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Additionally, most studies focused on humoral responses, while data regarding cellular immune responses are scarce. In this study, we evaluated humoral and cellular responses in patients with solid tumors receiving chemotherapy compared to healthy individuals up to one year after vaccinations. Methods Patients aged ≥18 who were willing to receive the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine were enrolled. Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassays were used to detect antibodies against nucleocapsid and spike proteins. Human IFN-γ Fluorospot assay was used to determine antigen−specific T-cell responses. Data were compared between groups using Mann−Whitney test for continuous variables and Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. Results A total of 67 subjects (47 patients with cancer and 20 healthy individuals) were included. 1–3 months following the second vaccine doses, 96% of patients with cancer and 100% of healthy individuals demonstrated a positive humoral response. While the positivity rate was not significantly different, patients with cancer had significantly lower spike IgG antibodies than healthy individuals. However, this difference diminished at 6 months when patients with cancer had increased antibodies compared to decreased antibodies in the healthy cohort and no difference was noticed at 12-month. Patients with cancer developed a similar antigen-specific T-cell response as healthy individuals at 1–3 months, 6 months and 12 months. There were no significant differences when comparing patients aged ≤ 55 years vs. >55 years, stages I-III vs. IV, single vs. multiple chemotherapy, and BNT162b2 vs. mRNA-1273 vaccines. There was a significant moderate correlation between neutralization and antibody levels at 12 months. However, despite patients with cancer having a significantly higher COVID risk score, there were no significant differences in COVID-19 infection and hospitalization between patients with cancer and healthy individuals. Conclusion Despite initial impaired antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, patients with solid malignancies receiving chemotherapy effectively generated long-term cellular and humoral responses by 6 and 12 months, leading to similar infection and hospitalization rates compared to healthy individuals.

Abstract Desmoplasia and an inflammatory environment are defining features of pancreatic cancer. Unclear is how pancreatic cells that undergo oncogenic transformation can cross-talk with immune cells and how this contributes to the development of pancreatic lesions. Here, we demonstrate that pancreatic acinar cells expressing mutant KRAS can expedite their transformation to a duct-like phenotype by inducing local inflammation. Specifically, we show that KRASG12D induces the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), which serves as chemoattractant for macrophages. Infiltrating macrophages amplify the formation of KRASG12D-caused abnormal pancreatic structures by remodeling the extracellular matrix and providing cytokines such as TNF. Depletion of macrophages or treatment with a neutralizing antibody for ICAM-1 in mice expressing oncogenic Kras under an acinar cell–specific promoter resulted in both a decreased formation of abnormal structures and decreased progression of acinar-to-ductal metaplasia to pancreatic intraepithelial neoplastic lesions. Significance: We here show that oncogenic KRAS in pancreatic acinar cells upregulates the expression of ICAM-1 to attract macrophages. Hence, our results reveal a direct cooperative mechanism between oncogenic Kras mutations and the inflammatory environment to drive the initiation of pancreatic cancer. Cancer Discov; 5(1); 52–63. ©2014 AACR. This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 1