Citations

34 Background: Patient run community based survivorship programs are rare; most are affiliated with clinics and hospitals. Aim: To highlight a community based non-hospital affiliated program that had operated successfully for 32 years and review their best practices and challenges. Methods: Data collected from Hope in the Valley support group program. In Wichita, Kansas there is a patient formed community based support group/survivorship program supported and operated privately by survivors. Results: Todate a total of 16 disease specific and 13 general cancer support groups are affiliated with the organization and all the services are housed in a building. The support groups meet in different places and are grouped according to their proximity to their residences. Services provided include lodging assistance, women's boutique, support group meetings, transportation, patient assistance program, and a hospitality center. Every new patient with cancer in the community was given a referral to the center. Cancer support groups include breast, gynecologic, lung, kidney, gastrointestinal, lymphoma, leukemia, adolescent, childhood and general cancer group. In 2014 67, 709 patients attended support groups meetings and 2000 patients attended between January- April 2015. The hospitality center had 20, 160 visits and 19,877 physician's office treatment visits were conducted in 2014. There are 3 full time staff, 7 part time staff and 200 volunteers run the organization. Challenges include recruitment of volunteers, funding for the organization, existing as an independent program from churches, hospital, clinics, or national organizations, public awareness of the program, the governance and structure of the organization. Details of the challenges and how their organization is run will be presented. Many of the patients used their services often give back as volunteers, facilitators and others. Conclusions: This is a survivorship program run by patients, actively addressing patients concerns and issues. This could provide a framework for future groups that want to form a community based patient centered cancer support group.

Objectives To determine the cross‐sectional association between cerebral amyloid‐beta (A β ) deposition and gait. Design Cross‐sectional. Setting Population‐based cohort study in Olmsted County, MN . Participants Cognitively normal individuals (n = 611), aged 50 to 69 years, enrolled in the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging with concurrent PiB‐ PET imaging and gait assessment. Participants with a history of stroke, alcoholism, Parkinson's disease, subdural hematoma, traumatic brain injury, or normal pressure hydrocephalus were excluded. Measurements PiB‐ PET SUVR was measured in prefrontal, orbitofrontal, parietal, temporal, anterior cingulate, posterior cingulate, and motor‐specific regions of interest ( ROI s). Gait parameters (speed, cadence, stride length, double support time, and intra‐individual stance time variability) were measured using GAITR ite ® instrumentation. Linear regression models were adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, education, APOE ε 4 allele, Charlson comorbidity index, and depression. In secondary analyses, we additionally adjusted for neurodegeneration (hippocampal volume, FDG PET SUVR , and cortical thickness) in AD ‐associated regions. Results In fully adjusted models including neuroimaging measures of neurodegeneration, higher PiB‐ PET SUVR across all ROI s was associated with slower gait speed ( P < .05 except for the parietal ROI ), lower cadence and longer double support time ( P ≤ .05 except for the motor ROI ), and greater stance time variability ( P < .05). In sex‐stratified analyses, the association between higher PiB‐ PET SUVR across all ROI s and measures of gait was only present among women. Conclusion PiB‐ PET SUVR across ROI s, independent of general measures of AD ‐associated neurodegeneration, is associated with poorer performance on multiple gait parameters among cognitively normal women, aged 50 to 69 years. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine whether A β predicts gait decline in both women and men.

Objectives To investigate the timing (mid‐ vs late life) of physical activity, apolipoprotein ( APO )E ε 4, and risk of incident mild cognitive impairment ( MCI ). Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (Olmsted County, MN ). Participants Cognitively normal elderly adults (N = 1,830, median age 78, 50.2% female). Measurements Light, moderate, and vigorous physical activities in mid‐ and late life were assessed using a validated questionnaire. An expert consensus panel measured MCI based on published criteria. Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios ( HR s) and 95% confidence intervals ( CI s) with age as a time scale after adjusting for sex, education, medical comorbidity, and depression. Results Light ( HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.43–0.79) and vigorous ( HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.63–0.97) physical activity in midlife were associated with lower risk of incident MCI . The association between moderate activity and incident MCI was not significant ( HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67–1.09). In late life, light ( HR = 0.75, 95% CI = 0.58–0.97) and moderate ( HR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66–0.99) but not vigorous physical activity were associated with lower risk of incident MCI . A synergistic interaction was also observed between mid‐ and late‐life activity in reducing risk of incident MCI . Furthermore, APOE ε 4 carriers who did not exercise had a higher risk of incident MCI than noncarriers who reported physical activity. Conclusion Physical activity reduced the risk of incident MCI . Exercising in mid‐ and late life had an additive synergistic interaction in reducing the risk of MCI .

Abstract Introduction Our goal was to develop cut points for amyloid positron emission tomography (PET), tau PET, flouro‐deoxyglucose (FDG) PET, and MRI cortical thickness. Methods We examined five methods for determining cut points. Results The reliable worsening method produced a cut point only for amyloid PET. The specificity, sensitivity, and accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young clinically normal (CN) methods labeled the most people abnormal and all gave similar cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness. Cut points defined using the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age‐matched CN method labeled fewer people abnormal. Discussion In the future, we will use a single cut point for amyloid PET (standardized uptake value ratio, 1.42; centiloid, 19) based on the reliable worsening cut point method. We will base lenient cut points for tau PET, FDG PET, and cortical thickness on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus young CN method and base conservative cut points on the accuracy of cognitively impaired versus age‐matched CN method.

Abstract More than 5 million Americans are living with Alzheimer's disease (AD) today, and nearly two‐thirds of Americans with AD are women. This sex difference may be due to the higher longevity women generally experience; however, increasing evidence suggests that longevity alone is not a sufficient explanation and there may be other factors at play. The Alzheimer's Association convened an expert think tank to focus on the state of the science and level of evidence around gender and biological sex differences for AD, including the knowledge gaps and areas of science that need to be more fully addressed. This article summarizes the think tank discussion, moving forward a research agenda and funding program to better understand the biological underpinnings of sex‐ and gender‐related disparities of risk for AD.

OBJECTIVE Recently, 2 surgeon rating websites (Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica) were published to allow the public to compare surgeons through identifying surgeon volume and complication rates. Among neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons, only cervical and lumbar spine, hip, and knee procedures were included in this assessment. METHODS The authors examined the methodology of each website to assess potential sources of inaccuracy. Each online tool was queried for reports on neurosurgeons specializing in spine surgery and orthopedic surgeons specializing in spine, hip, or knee surgery. Surgeons were chosen from top-ranked hospitals in the US, as recorded by a national consumer publication ranking system, within the fields of neurosurgery and orthopedic surgery. The results were compared for accuracy and surgeon representation, and the results of the 2 websites were also compared. RESULTS The methodology of each site was found to have opportunities for bias and limited risk adjustment. The end points assessed by each site were actually not complications, but proxies of complication occurrence. A search of 510 surgeons (401 orthopedic surgeons [79%] and 109 neurosurgeons [21%]) showed that only 28% and 56% of surgeons had data represented on Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica, respectively. There was a significantly higher chance of finding surgeon data on ProPublica (p < 0.001). Of the surgeons from top-ranked programs with data available, 17% were quoted to have high complication rates, 13% with lower volume than other surgeons, and 79% had a 3-star out of 5-star rating. There was no significant correlation found between the number of stars a surgeon received on Consumers' Checkbook and his or her adjusted complication rate on ProPublica. CONCLUSIONS Both the Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica websites have significant methodological issues. Neither site assessed complication occurrence, but rather readmissions or prolonged length of stay. Risk adjustment was limited or nonexistent. A substantial number of neurosurgeons and orthopedic surgeons from top-ranked hospitals have no ratings on either site, or have data that suggests they are low-volume surgeons or have higher complication rates. Consumers' Checkbook and ProPublica produced different results with little correlation between the 2 websites in how surgeons were graded. Given the significant methodological issues, incomplete data, and lack of appropriate risk stratification of patients, the featured websites may provide erroneous information to the public.