Citations

Introduction: Lineage switch (LS) refers to the transformation of acute leukemia from one cell lineage to another (e.g., lymphoid (ALL) to myeloid (AML)). This rare phenomenon, distinct from treatment induced malignancy (i.e., t-AML) and mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL), is increasingly being observed following cell surface antigen targeting. Given challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of LS, Project EVOLVE was developed to globally identify cases of LS following immunotherapy. Methods: A protocol and data collection form for this IRB exempt study was widely disseminated to capture deidentified LS case information across multiple centers and cancer consortia. This included collection of data from published reports of LS, with authors contacted to obtain additional information. For this analysis, LS was defined by the emergence of cell-surface markers warranting reclassification of the original leukemia as a different lineage derivation based on the immunophenotype, including cases of AML emerging alongside the original ALL. “Confirmed” LS cases included those where retention of original cytogenetic or molecular aberrations and/or the clonal immunoglobulin rearrangement patterns were verified to confirm the clonal relationship. “Suspected” LS cases included those where samples to confirm clonality marker retention could not be obtained, but the clinical presentation was consistent with LS. The term “transition” was applied when immunophenotypic shifts were transient. Cases with new cytogenetic abnormalities unrelated to the original diagnosis and compatible with t-AML were excluded. Statistical analysis was primarily descriptive. Data cut-off was July 26, 2023. Results: A total of 58 cases were identified, including 19 cases referenced in prior publications. Of the 58, 11 cases were excluded from this initial analysis, including: 4 cases of t-AML, 2 cases of T-ALL to AML, and 5 “transition” cases. Collectively, 47 cases of LS (43 “confirmed”; 4 “suspected”), spanning across 3 continents and 8 countries, were analyzed. (Fig. 1A) Cases included transition from B-ALL to AML in 36 (76.6%) and to MPAL/biphenotypic/ambiguous lineage in 11 (23.4%). Two likely had MPAL at diagnosis and a third with chronic myeloid leukemia. The median age at initial diagnosis was 8.4 years (range, 1 day-76.5 years); median age at LS presentation was 11.0 years (range 0.4-77.3 years). Twenty-three (48.9%) were male and 19 (40.4%) had prior stem cell transplant (SCT). Baseline cytogenetics showed KMT2A rearrangement in 27 (57.4%). Baseline myeloid antigen co-expression was seen in 22 of 23 patients with submitted data, but variation in degree of expression across patients and antigens was substantial. The most proximal immunotherapy prior to development of LS was CAR T-cells in 23 (48.9%) and blinatumomab in 24 (51.1%). The median time from the most proximal immunotherapy to development of LS was 1.6 months (range, 7 days-36.5 months). In 7 (29.2%) patients receiving blinatumomab, LS developed during the infusion. LS presented as isolated marrow relapse in 27 (57.4%), isolated CNS in 2 (4.3%), isolated non-CNS extramedullary disease in 3 (6.4%), combined relapse in 14 (29.8%) and unreported in 1. First line treatment for LS was chemotherapy induction in 31 (66.0%), palliative care/no therapy in 8 (17.0%), and alternative therapies in the remaining 8 (17.0%). In 35 (74.5%) patients, remission induction was the goal of first line therapy. Fifteen (31.9%) achieved a complete remission (CR) of whom 2 were treated with palliative intent. Across all patients, 8 (17.0%) are alive in remission, the longest being 4.7 years from LS diagnosis; 2 (4.3%) are alive with active LS and 37 (78.7%) died from LS, their original disease, or complications of treatment of LS (Fig 1B). For those alive in CR (n=8), 7 (87.5%) proceeded to a consolidative SCT for treatment of LS and 1 patient, an octogenarian remains in remission after AML directed therapy. Conclusions: LS is emerging as an important mechanism of immune escape following immunotherapy. Project EVOLVE provides the largest dataset of patients with LS to date. This systematic, international effort reveals substantial complexity and variability in diagnosing and managing LS. Unfortunately, outcomes following LS are grim, underscoring the critical need to identify risk factors of and optimal therapies for this leukemia transformation.

Background: Core-binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) is characterized by the presence of inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21), and is classified as favorable risk by the 2022 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) guidelines. High remission rates are observed in the setting of cytarabine- or anthracycline-based induction regimens. The CD33-targeted antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is FDA-approved for use in newly-diagnosed CD33+ AML; a meta-analysis of 5 prospective randomized studies investigating intensive chemotherapy (IC) +/- GO demonstrated an improved overall survival (OS) with the addition of GO to IC for favorable-risk AML (Hills et al, Lancet Oncol 2014). The trials included in the meta-analysis did not restrict inclusion criteria to CBF-AML alone and there remains variation amongst IC regimens utilized in CBF-AML treatment. In addition, IC combined with the KIT inhibitor dasatinib has shown remission rates and promising overall survival in prospective studies (Paschka et al, Leukemia 2018; Marcucci et al, Blood Adv 2020). We set out to investigate the outcomes of patients (pts) with CBF-AML treated with IC +/- targeted agents (GO or KIT inhibitor) across 5 institutions that are part of the Consortium on Myeloid Malignancies and Neoplastic Diseases (COMMAND). Methods: Retrospective chart review was done to identify pts who were treated with IC with AML harboring inv(16)/t(16;16) or t(8;21) identified on cytogenetics, from January 2010 through April 2023, and were treated across 5 geographically-diverse academic institutions. Pt clinical characteristics, cytogenetics, molecular mutations, treatment, relapse, and OS data were collected. Relapse-free survival (RFS) and OS were both analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Results: One-hundred forty-nine consecutive pts with CBF-AML were identified, 76 (51%) with inv(16) and 73 (49%) with t(8;21). Median age of pts was 47 years (yrs) (range 18-80yrs), with 64% male pts, and 106 (71%) pts had an ECOG performance status of 0-1. One-hundred seven (72%) pts identified as non-Hispanic White, 22 (15%) identified as non-Hispanic Black, and 12 (8%) identified as Hispanic. Molecular testing via next-generation sequencing was available for 124 pts (83%); 49 (33%) pts had adverse-risk ELN cytogenetics or mutations when excluding CBF status, and 27 (18%) pts harbored KIT mutations. Other baseline pt characteristics are listed in Table 1A. All pts underwent induction with IC; 44 (30%) pts received IC + GO, 21 (14%) received IC + KIT inhibitor (14 received dasatinib, 7 received midostaurin), and the remaining 84 (56%) received IC without a targeted agent. One-hundred fourteen (77%) pts achieved a complete response (CR) to induction therapy, and 1 pt experienced induction-related mortality. Fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) data was available in 82 pts at end of induction with 83% achieving FISH negativity. Measurable residual disease (MRD) testing was done by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in 62 pts with 76% achieving MRD-negativity. One-hundred forty pts underwent consolidation with a median of 3 cycles of chemotherapy; 21 (15%) pts received GO with consolidation and 17 (12%) received a KIT inhibitor with consolidation. Forty-four (30%) pts underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (alloSCT), with 17 in first CR, and 27 after second-line or beyond therapy. With a median follow-up of 22.5 months, the observed 3-yr RFS was 51% (95% CI: 43-61%) and the 3-yr OS was 69% (95% CI: 61-78%). Pts treated with IC + KIT inhibitor had significantly improved 3-yr RFS of 85% (95% CI: 70-100%) compared to other pts, including those who received IC + GO who had a 3-yr RFS of 51% (95% CI: 37-70%) and those who received IC without targeted therapy who had a 3-yr RFS of 45% (95% CI: 35-58%) ( p = 0.02) ( Figure 1). Full survival statistics are shown in Table 1B and Figure 1. Conclusions: In this multi-center retrospective study of pts with CBF-AML undergoing induction with IC regimens with diverse national treatment practices, we find that the addition of GO to IC is not associated with improved outcomes. Pts treated with IC + KIT inhibitor had significantly improved RFS; of note, pts receiving a KIT inhibitor oftentimes continued on maintenance even after consolidation. These data suggest that there may be a role for targeted therapies other than GO to be explored in randomized prospective studies of intensive induction chemotherapy for CBF-AML.

Introduction Secondary central nervous system (CNS) involvement develops in 2-10% of large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) cases. Current treatment approaches for relapsed or refractory CNS disease generally do not provide durable responses. Limited data suggest efficacy and feasibility of CAR-T therapy in SCNSL. We report here the largest multicenter retrospective analysis of the safety and efficacy of CD19-directed CAR-T therapy in SCNSL patients. Methods This study included SCNSL patients who received commercial CD19-directed CAR-T therapy at 9 academic institutions in the United States between 2016 and 2022. SCNSL was defined as history of parenchymal and/or leptomeningeal/cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) involvement by lymphoma at any time prior to receiving CAR-T therapy. Systemic response was assessed using the Lugano criteria while CNS response was assessed as per International PCNSL Collaborative Group criteria. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for entire cohort, as well as subsets of patients with and without active CNS disease at the time of CAR-T infusion. Results Ninety patients were included in the analysis, with baseline characteristics shown in Table 1. CAR-T products utilized include axicabtagene ciloleucel (n= 38, 42%), tisagenlecleucel (n=37, 41%) and lisocabtagene maraleucel (n= 15, 14%). Fludarabine/cyclophosphamide was used as lymphodepletion in 84 patients (93%). 28 patients received CNS directed radiation therapy (RT) prior to CAR-T infusion (31%) within a median time of 28.5 days (range 5 - 906) from last day of RT. Amongst all patients at the time of CAR-T infusion 82 (91.1%) had active CNS and/or systemic involvement while 8 (8.9%) had no evidence of disease; 68 (75.5%) had active CNS involvement while 22 (24.5%) had a prior history of CNS involvement but no active at the time of CAR-T infusion. ( Table 1) Median follow up all patients was 0.5 year (range 0.01 - 4.7). 71 patients (79%) developed cytokine release syndrome (CRS; median time to onset 3 days) with 3.3% patients developing Grade 3-4. Immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS; median time to onset 5 days) was reported in 55 patients (61%), with 28.8% developing Grade 3-4. No patients died due to CRS or ICANS. At 1-month post CAR-T, 80 patients were evaluable for CNS response and 71 patients in the entire cohort were evaluable for systemic response. Similarly, at 3-months these numbers were 66 and 60, respectively. Objective response rates (ORR) were 75% and 80% at 1-month for CNS and systemic disease respectively, while corresponding ORRs at 3-months were 68% and 76.7%. At 1- and 3-months timepoint 36 (45%) and 33 (50%) patients, respectively achieved CNS complete remission (CR), while 44 (62%) and 42 (70%) patients respectively achieved systemic CR. 1- and 2-year PFS for entire cohort were 25% (95%Cl 15% - 34%) and 16% (95%Cl 8.5% - 28%) respectively, while 1- and 2-year OS were 46% (95%Cl 36% - 59%) and 31% (95%Cl 22% - 46%). Non-relapse mortality (NRM) were 4.6% (95%CI, 1.8% -12%) and 7.2% (95%CI 2.9% - 18%) at 1- and 2-year. Cumulative incidence of relapse at 1- and 2-year were 73% (95%Cl 63% - 83%) and 77% (95%Cl 68% - 88%), respectively. ORRs for CNS response in patients with active CNS disease at 1-month and 3-month interval were 71% (n=45) and 60% (n=31). Similarly, ORR for systemic response with active CNS disease at 1-month and 3-month interval were 85% (n=43) and 74.3% (n=32).The 2-year PFS for patients with and without active CNS disease at CAR-T infusion were 12% (95%Cl 5.4% - 27%) and 28% (95%Cl 12% - 65%) respectively, with a corresponding OS of 25% (95%Cl 15% - 41%) and 58% (95%Cl 37% - 91%). ( Figure 1) The 2-year NRM rates for patients with and without active CNS disease at CAR-T infusion were 4.6% (95%Cl 1.5% - 14%) and 14% (95%Cl 3.6% - 53%) respectively, while the cumulative incidence of relapse in similar order were 83% (95%Cl 73% - 95%) and 58% (95%Cl 39% - 88%). Conclusion In this largest known case series to date, CAR-T therapy appeared safe and feasible in patients with SCNSL, but is associated with high rates of treatment failure, particularly in patients with active CNS disease at CAR-T infusion. This warrants further study of optimal CNS-directed treatment strategies prior to CAR-T, development of novel cellular therapy platforms or consideration of post CAR-T maintenance therapy in these high-risk patients.