Citations

Abstract Background Point-of-care testing (POCT) has expanded rapidly across healthcare systems, increasing both program scale and operational complexity. However, quantitative benchmarking data describing how POCT programs are structured and supported across institutions remain limited. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional survey to characterize POCT program support, including program scope, staffing, operational practices, governance, and challenges. The survey was distributed electronically through professional networks, and 93 institutional responses were analyzed. Descriptive analyses were performed, and derived metrics, including sites per point-of-care testing coordinator (POCC), were used to evaluate the relationship between program scale and staffing. Results POCT programs demonstrated substantial variability in scale, with wide ranges in the number of testing sites and operator populations. Adoption spanned multiple test categories, and many institutions reported use of multiple platforms for the same assays. Training, competency assessment, and quality management activities were primarily supported by laboratory staff and POCCs, with documentation frequently partially electronic. Median POCC staffing increased with program size; however, sites per POCC also increased significantly across program scale tiers (Kruskal–Wallis P < 0.001). Governance structures and operational responsibilities varied across institutions, and common challenges included staffing limitations, training and compliance burden, multisite coordination, and IT/connectivity constraints. Conclusions POCT programs are expanding in scale and complexity, but workforce capacity and governance structures have not scaled proportionally. This mismatch creates a cumulative and multiplicative operational burden. These findings provide benchmarking data to inform scalable staffing models, governance strategies, and infrastructure development for sustainable POCT program management.

ABSTRACT Femoral nerve block is an essential regional anesthetic technique for surgery and analgesia of the anterior thigh, hip, and knee. Its effectiveness depends on understanding the femoral nerve's origin, branching pattern, fascial relationships, and common anatomical variations. This review summarizes current anatomical, cadaveric, and imaging studies to clarify the course of the femoral nerve and highlight variations such as high divisions, accessory branches, and vascular overlap that may influence block success. Approaches including landmark, nerve stimulator, and ultrasound‐guided techniques are reviewed with emphasis on procedural anatomy. Ultrasound features of the femoral nerve and fascia iliaca are correlated with cadaveric findings to outline optimal needle placement and spread of injectate. Continuous catheter methods, anesthetic selection, and volume considerations are also described. Comparative evidence indicates that ultrasound guidance improves accuracy, reduces vascular puncture, and decreases local anesthetic requirements compared with blind or stimulator‐based approaches. Clinical applications across orthopedic surgery, trauma care, and multimodal perioperative pathways are discussed, along with potential complications such as nerve injury, hematoma, systemic toxicity, and quadriceps weakness. Specifically, detailed knowledge of the femoral nerve's course beneath the fascia iliaca, its shifting proximity to the femoral vessels, and its variable early branching is the key to accurate needle placement, dependable block success, and fewer procedure‐related complications.

Racial minorities remain underrepresented among allied health providers. Pathway programs address this gap by fostering career exposure and mentorship for underrepresented students. A pilot program was designed to increase underrepresented minority (URM) students entering health professions through career exploration and mentorship. High school students were enrolled into a pre-post survey study through a healthcare magnet school having higher proportions of economically disadvantaged students. Career exploration included healthcare presentations and skills sessions. Students were matched with mentors based on career interests. 22 students participated. The program facilitated career exploration sessions, mentor-mentee meetings, and workshops with diverse healthcare professionals. Participants reported increased likelihood towards pursuing healthcare careers. Preliminary findings suggest similar pilot pathway programs may increase URM student interest in healthcare careers.

Reasonable accommodations in higher education are being more frequently requested by graduate occupational and physical therapy students within didactic and clinical contexts. Researchers aimed to describe the experiences of clinical educators in occupational and physical therapy mentoring graduate students with a disclosed accommodation during terminal clinical education, employing a qualitative design. Semi-structured interviews and one-time electronic survey were completed. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted following the approach described by Braun and Clarke. Twelve occupational or physical therapy clinical educators participated in semi-structured interviews, each having mentored 1–2 students with a disclosed disability accommodation during a terminal clinical education experience. Four major thematic categories regarding accommodation use in terminal clinical emerged: 1) accommodation process, 2) team approach to accommodating, 3) fostering accommodations, and 4) ambiguity in facilitating accommodations. Clinical educators emphasized the importance of being informed about accommodations well in advance, adapting teaching methods, and maintaining regular communication between academic institutions, clinical sites, and students. Training for clinical educators on the disclosure process, legal obligations, and strategies for effective mentorship to ensure alignment of accommodation, academic requirements, and site expectations is essential.

AIMS: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) is a necessary attribute required for quality medical practice. Despite being integral in advancing medicine and improving patient outcomes, research and quality improvement (QI) rarely integrate into medical education. We present our curricular course design and reveal students' perceptions of the implementation of this course. In addition, we compared physician assistant (PA) student perceptions from the first two traditional cohorts (4 years undergraduate before entry to PA program) to the accelerated 3+2 pathway cohorts (3 years pre-PA coursework followed by 2 years PA program). METHODS: Faculty developed an EBM course taught through student participation in QI projects and assessed students' perceptions of discovery, collaboration, cognitive ownership, and global sense toward general outcomes through the implementation and analysis of validated survey instruments. RESULTS: All students contributed to QI projects, achieved Quality Academy Bronze certification and Silver assessment and disseminated their work at peer-reviewed conferences. Over 56.4% earned Silver certification, and 36.2% of students had their project published in a journal. Student perception of experiential impact was positive overall, with 83.3% of students minimally responding 'true' to the prompts. All students indicated that after the experience, they possessed a basic understanding of QI approaches. The accelerated students selected 'true' for all other prompts more frequently than the traditional student population. DISCUSSION: This manuscript presents vital educational strategies, highlighting an approach and plan to extrapolate EBM principles beyond PA students and to generalize to other healthcare professionals and students. Through course completion, students met educational objectives and reaped additional benefits that positively impacted their resume building and future job prospects. By honing these skills, students are better prepared to contribute to patient care and advance the field of medicine. The accelerated students perceived greater course benefit likely due to the life-experience differences between the two cohorts, whereby the traditional students matriculated into the program with a breadth of prior knowledge obtained through years of contributions to education and careers.

The 2026 ASAHP (Association of Schools Advancing Health Professions) Clinical Education Committee recommendations present a framework for advancing clinical education across health professions. This report emphasizes the importance of expanding clinical education settings, integrating artificial intelligence and telehealth into curricula, ensuring alignment of interprofessional competencies with accreditation standards, and continuing to facilitate collaborative practice across disciplines. These efforts are essential to training a workforce that is not only clinically competent but also adaptable, mindful of equity, and capable of thriving in diverse, team-based care settings. Equally critical is the call to elevate research and scholarly activity within clinical education. The report emphasizes the need for academic-clinical partnerships that support and complete an inquiry into the value, effectiveness, and innovation of clinical training. These recommendations aim to advance a responsive, inclusive, and outcomes-driven clinical education system that benefits students, educators, healthcare systems, and the communities they serve. These efforts reflect ASAHP's name and mission to advance health professions.

Abstract Effective filtration and concentration of stool specimens is an essential pre-analytical step for reducing fecal debris and improving organism recovery using microscopy-based ova and parasite (O&P) examination. This study evaluated three commercially available fecal sedimentation-based filtration/concentration systems – ParaPak SpinCon® (Meridian Bioscience), Mini Parasep SF® (Apacor), and the newly-available Paradevice® (Reingenuity) – for qualitative parasite detection and workflow logistics using conventional and artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted microscopy. Forty clinical stool specimens (20 parasite-positive and 20 parasite-negative) were processed with the 3 devices, and the resultant 120 wet mount and 120 trichrome-stained smear preparations were examined using conventional microscopy. Trichrome-stained slides were also scanned at 40x magnification using a Hamamatsu® NanoZoomerS360® flatbed digital slide scanner and images were analyzed using the Techcyte® Fusion Human Fecal Trichrome AI algorithm. Positive and indeterminate digital findings were confirmed by conventional glass slide microscopy. Slides and digital images were reviewed in a blinded manner. Concordance was assessed among the 360 initial evaluations (microscopy and AI-assisted), and discrepant parasitology results were resolved through re-review and specimen reprocessing as needed. Final qualitative agreement across slide/image evaluations using all three concentration systems was 100%. Minor discrepancies in protozoan and white/red blood cell detection/identification were noted in 5 and 7 cases, respectively, and likely reflected sampling and observer variability. While the three concentration systems produced equivalent qualitative results, the Paradevice® and Mini Parasep SF® offered the most streamlined workflows. These findings support the Paradevice® and Mini Parasep SF® as efficient, analytically equivalent systems that are compatible with traditional and AI-assisted O&P workflows. Importance Microscopy-based examination of stool specimens remains an important diagnostic tool for intestinal parasitic infections. Filtration and concentration methods improve test performance by increasing organism recovery and reducing obscuring fecal debris prior to evaluation. These methods may also facilitate the preparation of thin monolayer trichrome-stained slides for digital scanning and automated parasite detection. Because many clinical laboratories rely on commercial filtration and concentration systems, supply chain disruptions, product shortages, and manufacturer recalls threaten testing continuity, underscoring the need for validated alternatives. This study demonstrates that multiple commercially available concentration systems provide equivalent parasite detection while supporting both conventional microscopy and emerging digital workflows. These findings provide laboratories with evidence-based alternatives that enhance operational resilience without compromising diagnostic performance.

The recent approval of encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFOX based on the phase III BREAKWATER trial has introduced a new standard of care for the first-line treatment of BRAF V600E–mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, its safety and efficacy in patients with significant liver dysfunction remains unclear and, as such, patients are often excluded from pivotal clinical trials. This report presents a case of BRAF V600E–mutated mCRC presenting with extensive hepatic involvement and liver dysfunction. Despite the absence of guidelines, the patient was initiated on full-dose encorafenib, cetuximab, and FOLFOX. He experienced a rapid clinical and biochemical response, with near-normalization of liver enzymes after cycle 1, and complete functional recovery by cycle 3. Treatment was well tolerated, with no significant adverse events throughout 9 cycles. He subsequently transitioned to maintenance 5-FU, cetuximab, and encorafenib. Posttreatment blood-based next-generation sequencing revealed no residual actionable mutations. The patient then successfully underwent complete surgical resection of his primary tumor and metastatic disease with negative margins. This case highlights the importance of considering encorafenib-based therapy in select patients with BRAF V600E–mutated mCRC in the setting of compromised liver function.