Citations

7104 Background: The use of MRD to predict outcome in AML is controversial. We sought to determine concordance between FC and BM biopsy morphology on day 14 (D14BM) and CR bone marrow (CRBM) specimens and whether MRD detected by FC predicted for inferior outcomes. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of adult AML patients treated between 2005 and 2010 with standard induction chemotherapy. Based upon BM morphology and FC, patients were designated as BM+FC+, BM+FC-, BM-FC+, or BM-FC-. Outcomes assessed included induction failure, RFS and OS. Results were adjusted for age at diagnosis, NCCN risk classification, and secondary AML status. Results: Of 287 evaluable patients, 74 had D14 BM and FC results and 98 had CR BM and FC results. Using BM morphology as the gold standard, discordance rates for the presence and absence of disease for the D14 BM by FC were 29% and 23% respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that patients categorized as BM-FC+ at D14 were more likely to experience induction failure (HR 8.62, CI 0.36-208) and had lower RFS and OS (HR 1.47, 1.95 CI 0.40-5.41, 0.52-7.36 respectively). Analysis of the CR BM samples showed similar results. Conclusions: In this retrospective study there was a high discordance rate between FC and BM morphology on D14 BM and CR BM. While there was a trend toward inferior patient outcomes when disease was detected by FC but not morphology, this was not statistically significant. Limitations of our study include the retrospective nature of the analysis, paucity of patient samples that had a FC evaluation, lack of data to see if positive FC at D14 or CR changed clinician therapy choices and interpretation bias by pathologists as a result of access to FC results during BM morphology interpretation. Larger prospective studies are needed to evaluate whether MRD detected by FC as early as D14 during AML therapy affects clinical outcomes.

4071 Background: Selection of patients for HER2-targeted therapy is based on HER2 analysis in primary EACs. Since EACs metastasize via regional lymph nodes, concordance of HER2 gene amplification results between primary tumors and their metastatic lymph nodes (MLN) is a clinically important issue. Methods: Resected EACs (N = 103) having at least three distinct regional MLNs (total 508 MLNs; median 4 [range 3-11]) were sectioned using routine procedures and tested for HER2 amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Primary tumors were also evaluated for HER2 protein expression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and by FISH. Amplification was defined as HER2/CEP17 ≥ 2. IHC was scored as 0, 1+, 2+, or 3+. Primaries whose HER2 status was positive by both FISH and IHC (ie, amplified and IHC3+), or negative by both (ie, nonamplified and IHC0-1+), were selected. HER2 status was compared between primaries and their MLNs (kappa). Results: Concordant HER2 results between primaries and their MLNs were found in 92% (95/103) of EACs (Table; κ = .76 [95% CI .60 - .92]). However, among patients with HER2-positive primaries, 19% (4/21) had HER2-nonamplified MLNs; among these cases, either all MLNs were HER2-nonamplified (n = 2), or both HER2-nonamplified and –amplified MLNs were present (n = 2). Among HER2-negative primary EACs, 5% (4/82) of cases had MLNs that were all HER2-amplified (n = 3) or both HER2-nonamplified and -amplified (n = 1). Conclusions: A patient subset whose primary EACs were HER2-positive (by both FISH and IHC) were unexpectedly found to lack HER2 amplification in corresponding MLNs. Conversely, a subgroup with HER2-negative primaries had HER2-amplified MLNs, and would have been deemed ineligible for HER2-targeted therapy. These preliminary data suggest that evaluating MLNs in resected EACs has the potential to better identify patients who benefit from HER2-targeted therapy. [Table: see text]

4026 Background: Patients (pts) with locally advanced esophageal or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma commonly receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (chemo-RT). Despite this approach the rate of recurrence remains high. Given the difficulties of postoperative therapy, the efficacy of extended neoadjuvant therapy was assessed. Methods: Eligibility criteria included T3-4,N0 – Tany,N(+) disease amenable to radiation and surgery. Pts were randomized to either arm A (docetaxel 60 mg/m2 day 1 , oxaliplatin [Oxal] 85 mg/m2 day 1, and capecitabine 1250 mg/m2/day days 1-14 x 2 cycles [DOC] followed by 5-FU 180 mg/m2/day continuous IV through radiation + Oxal 85 mg/m2 days 1,15,29 + 50.4 Gy radiation (chemo-RT)) or arm B (chemo-RT alone). Randomization was stratified by ECOG PS (0/1 vs 2) and stage (II vs III/IVA). Primary endpoint was pathologic complete response (PCR) rate, defined as no gross or microscopic tumor identified in the surgical specimen. Interim analysis assessed efficacy and futility of the experimental intervention. Wilcoxon rank sum and Fisher’s exact tests were used to compare clinical/pathologic factors between arms. Results: Baseline and stratification factors were well balanced between arms. Of 42 pts included in the interim analysis (86% male; age [median 63, range 38-88], 100% PS 0/1; 71% stage III; 55% esophagus, 40% GEJ; 36% measurable disease), 4 and 1 pts in arms A and B, respectively, did not have surgery due to death (A, 2), progressive disease (A, 1), alternative treatment (A, 1) or adverse event (B, 1). Among 21 arm A pts, 21, 20, and 19 pts started 1st cycle of DOC, 2nd cycle of DOC and chemo-RT, respectively. All arm B pts received chemo-RT. 33% (7/21) of arm A and 48% (10/21) of arm B pts achieved PCR (p=0.53). Among pts undergoing surgery, 94% (16/17) and 100% (20/20) of arm A and B pts had complete resection (p=0.46). 38% and 24% of arm A and B pts experienced at least one grade 4+ adverse event at least possibly related to treatment (p=0.51). Conclusions: Extended neoadjuvant therapy in pts with locally advanced esophageal or GEJ adenocarcinoma failed to improve the PCR rate. Follow-up in regard to survival and rate of recurrence is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00938470.

2562 Background: Empiric chemotherapy (taxane/platinum) is standard for CUP. Because prognosis is poor, novel approaches are needed. The PI3K/mTOR pathway is frequently dysregulated in cancer. Everolimus (E), an mTOR inhibitor, is approved for multiple malignancies. We performed a phase II study of Pac + Carb + E as first-line therapy in metastatic CUP patients (pts). We additionally determined if a gene expression profiling (GEP) test that identifies tissue of origin (Pathwork Tissue of Origin) could identify responsive pts. (NCT00936702) Methods: Newly diagnosed, untreated CUP pts were eligible. Central pathology review confirmed CUP prior to registration; GEP was performed on formalin fixed tumor tissue. Pac (200 mg/m2), Carb (AUC=6) and E (30 mg once weekly) were delivered every 3 wks until progression or intolerable adverse events (AEs). The primary endpoint was confirmed response, with ≥11 of 50 responses (22%) needed for trial success. Secondary endpoints were OS, progression-free survival (PFS) and AEs. Results: 46 pts (median age 61) received a median 4 cycles (range: 1-33). 39 (85%), 21 (46%) and 1 (2%) experienced ≥1 grade (gr) 3+, 4+, or 5 (sepsis) AE, with gr 3+ hematologic AE most common (74%). Of 44 evaluable pts, 15 had a confirmed response (RR 34%, 95% CI: 21-50%), with a median PFS and OS of 4.1 and 10.1 mos, respectively. Adequate tissue for GEP was available in 36 pts and predicted 10 different sites of origin. In pts with a predicted tissue of origin in which taxane/platinum is standardly used, higher RR and significantly longer PFS and OS were observed compared with pts whose GEP identified a malignancy where taxane/platinum is not standard (Table). Conclusions: In pts with untreated CUP, Carb +Pac +E demonstrated promising antitumor activity. The GEP test identified patients clinically responsive to Carb/Pac/E therapy, and may be useful to select CUP pts for specific antitumor regimens. Clinical trial information: NCT00936702. [Table: see text]

3 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Sunday, June, 2, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Sunday edition of ASCO Daily News.

4075 Background: EAC recurrence after surgery with curative intent is believed to carry a uniformly dismal prognosis that may discourage further therapy. To date, the post-recurrence survival of patients has not been examined in EAC. Our aim was to examine site of recurrence in relation to outcome in EAC patients after surgery. Methods: Among EAC patients (N = 796) rendered margin-free at surgery performed at Mayo Clinic, most were T3-4 and lymph node (LN)-positive; none received neoadjuvant therapy. The patient subset who had documented disease recurrence (N = 401) formed the current study population. Cox models were used to examine overall survival (OS) post-recurrence. Results: Among patients with recurrence, median time to recurrence (TTR) was 11 months. Site of recurrence included loco-regional (regional LNs, esophagogastric, anastomosis), chest, abdomen, or distant sites in 97 (27%), 144 (40%), 181 (50%), and 88 (24%) patients, respectively. Most recurrences (66%) were limited to one site. Chest-involved recurrence was significantly associated with improved OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.78, P = .047), even after adjusting for TTR, number of recurrence sites, tumor pathology, and palliative chemotherapy. This result was confirmed when multivariate analysis was restricted to patients who had only 1 recurrence site (Table) or who had biopsy-proven recurrence (P = .080). In separate models, abdomen-involved (HR = 1.3, P = .016) or bone-involved (HR = 1.6, P= .008) recurrences were independently associated with worse OS. Conclusions: Chest-involved recurrence of EAC independently predicts for improved survival, whereas abdominal and bony sites of recurrence predict for worse outcome. Primary tumor grade and node number were durable prognosticators after recurrence. These novel data provide useful prognostic information and have the potential to influence clinical decision-making. [Table: see text]

4009 Background: HER2 expression in upper digestive cancer is reported to be heterogeneous, which substantially affects interpretation of HER2 positivity in the clinic. Yet the frequency and prognostic impact of HER2 genetic heterogeneity and polysomy 17 (poly17) are unknown in EAC. Methods: HER2 amplification (fluorescence in situ hybridization) and protein expression were examined in untreated surgical EAC specimens (N = 661) at Mayo Clinic. HER2 genetic heterogeneity was defined per ASCO/CAP as amplification (HER2/CEP17 ratio ≥ 2) in 5-50% of cancer cells; poly17 refers to ≥ 3 copies of chromosome 17. Most tumors were T3-4 (68%) or lymph node (LN)-positive (73%). Cox models were used to assess disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). Results: HER2 amplification was detected in 117 of 661 EACs (18%), of which 20 (17%) showed HER2 heterogeneity. HER2 heterogeneous tumors had a significantly higher frequency of poly17 and high tumor grade. HER2 heterogeneity by amplification vs expression were correlated. Since heterogeneity was limited to HER2-amplified tumors, survival analysis was stratified by amplification status. In multivariable analysis, only HER2 heterogeneity and metastatic LN number were prognostic (Table). Conclusions: Among HER2 amplified EACs, 17% show HER2 heterogeneity, which is associated with increased poly17 and independently predicts 2-fold higher risk of cancer-specific death. Among HER2-nonamplified cases, poly17 is independently associated with worse survival. These novel findings demonstrate aggressive subgroups in HER2-amplified and -nonamplified EACs that have important implications for HER2 analysis and evaluation of benefit from HER2 targeted therapy. [Table: see text]

5028 Background: Edmonston vaccine strains of MV have significant antitumor activity against ovarian cancer xenografts (Peng et al, Cancer Res, 2002). Oncolytic selectivity is due to overexpression of the MV CD46 receptor in ovarian cancer cells. Furthermore, engineering the virus to express the marker peptide CEA (MV-CEA) allows real time monitoring of viral gene expression/propagation in vivo. Methods: We are conducting a Phase I trial of MV-CEA in patients (pts) with recurrent, taxol and platinum refractory, ovarian or primary peritoneal carcinoma. Eligible pts should have protective anti-MV antibody (ab) titers and normal CEA levels. A standard phase I cohorts of three statistical design is employed. MV-CEA is administered IP via a port-a-cath, q 4 wks for up to 6 cycles. Results: To date, 12 pts have received viral doses from 103 to 106 TCID50. No dose-limiting toxicity has been observed. Most common toxicities included grade 1–2 nausea (4 pts); grade 1–2 fatigue (4 pts); grade 1 fever (3 pts); grade 1 abdominal pain (2 pts). One pt had grade 2–3 arthralgias in cycles 4–6. There was no treatment induced immunosuppression as assessed by DTH, CD4, CD8, immunoglobulin and complement levels, no significant increase in the titers of anti-MV abs in serum or ascites in response to treatment, and no development of anti-CEA abs. Viral genomes were detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of 2 asymptomatic pts by QRT-PCR. No CEA elevation in the serum was observed in the dose range tested, and there was no viral shedding in urine or mouth gargle specimens. Testing of pt tumor samples for CD46 by IHC demonstrated overexpression of the target receptor in 7/8 pts. Best objective response was stable disease (2 - 9 mo duration) in 5 pts, while 3 pts had significant decrease in CA125 levels, of 44%, 72%, and 78%, respectively. Conclusions: In this first human application of an engineered oncolytic MV strain, we have observed excellent tolerance after repeat IP administration of the virus. Despite the low doses employed so far, there is early evidence of biologic activity. Dose escalation continues to the target dose of 109 TCID50. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3517 Background: The combination of oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin is effective in many patients with colon cancer treated in either the advanced or adjuvant disease setting. To better identify the risks & benefits of this regimen for elderly patients we compared safety & efficacy data for the FOLFOX4 regimen (oxaliplatin plus fluorouracil/leucovorin administered bimonthly) in patients over & under 70 years of age. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 3742 patients (614 aged ≥ 70) with colorectal cancer enrolled in four clinical trials using the same FOLFOX4 regimen as adjuvant therapy, or as first- or second-line therapy in advanced disease. Endpoints included grade ≥ 3 adverse events, response rate (RR) (in studies of advanced disease), progression (metastatic)/relapse free (adjuvant) survival (P/RFS), overall survival (OS), and dose intensity. Results: Age ≥ 70 was associated with slightly higher rates of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia but no other grade ≥ 3 adverse events (see table). There was no difference in 60-day mortality (1.1% vs 2.3%, p=0.20). We observed no significant difference in any measure of therapeutic impact of FOLFOX based on age, including P/RFS, OS, response rate, or dose intensity (see table). Conclusions: The FOLFOX4 regimen maintains its efficacy/safety ratio in elderly patients with colorectal cancer, and was administered per protocol at similar drug doses compared to the younger patients enrolled on these trials. Age alone should not be a factor limiting the use of FOLFOX4 provided patients are carefully evaluated and monitored. This analysis was supported by Sanofi-Aventis [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

5534 Purpose: A number of patients with advanced/recurrent cervical cancer do not respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy. A pool analysis of three published phase III GOG studies was undertaken to identify the predictive factors and develop a model predictive of (non-) response to chemotherapy. Methods: The study population consisted of patients who received single-agent cisplatin or a cisplatin-containing combination in GOG protocols 110, 169 and 179. Prognostic variables (age, race, performance status, stage, histology, grade, disease site, prior chemotherapy—with primary radiation, time to recurrence, single-agent versus combination) were analyzed and multivariate analysis was conducted to identify factors independently predictive of response and survival. These analyses were used to establish a predictive model. Results: 816 patients were evaluable for response. In addition to single-agent treatment, multivariate analysis identified six factors (age, African-American, PS > 0, pelvic disease, prior radiosensitizer, recurrence ≤ one year) independently predictive of poor response. Those factors, but not age and African-American, were also independently associated with increased risk of death. 428 patients treated with a cisplatin- containing combination were classified into three risk groups based on the total number of risk factors (low risk: 0–1 factor; mid risk: 2–3 factors; high risk: 4–5 factors). Patients with 4–5 of risk factors were predicted to have a treatment response of only 13% (observed 10%), and median progression-free and overall survival of PFS of 2.8 months and 5.5 months, respectively. This subgroup of patients consist ∼14% of the target population in clinical practice. The predictive model was externally validated using GOG protocol 149 data that were not used for model development and further supported the predictive accuracy. Conclusions: High risk patients should be directed to non-cisplatin chemotherapy or investigational trials. No significant financial relationships to disclose.