Citations

ABSTRACT Spontaneous hemobilia is a rare complication after liver transplantation and is largely secondary to the formation of an arteriobiliary fistula, which is generally treated by vascular interventional radiology embolization. We present a case of hemorrhagic shock secondary to arterial hemorrhage at an oversewn bile duct stump after liver transplantation, which failed vascular interventional radiology embolization, and was subsequently controlled using an endoscopic application of a gelatin sponge slurry (Gelfoam). We present this unique approach and review the history of this surgical and interventional hemostasis tool that has not been previously described for endoscopic use.

Abstract Studying gene expression and clinical outcome data from 136 clinical trials for patients with cancer (~21,000 patients with 26 cancer types), we found CD25 as one of the strongest predictors of poor clinical outcome in patients with B-cell malignancies, but not in other cancer types. This was unexpected because CD25 is known as one of three chains of the IL2 receptor on T-cells and NK-cells. Interleukin-2 (IL2) functions as essential T-cell growth factor. IL2 signals through β- and γ-, but not α-chains (CD25) of its heterotrimeric receptor. CD25-deficiency causes lymphoproliferation and autoimmunity, however, its mechanistic role is unclear. Our experiments based on genetic mouse models and engineered patient-derived B-cell leukemia and lymphoma xenografts revealed that CD25 expressed on B-cells is not an IL2 receptor chain, but in fact binds the B-cell receptor (BCR) to regulate its activity. Suggesting IL2-independent functions, defects in CD25-/-B-cells were not replicated in IL2-deficient mice. CD25 bound the BCR but not IL2Rβ- and IL2Rγ-chains. IL2Rβ- and IL2Rγ-chains can pair with other chains to form receptors for different cytokine-ligands. However, CD25 represents the first example of a cytokine receptor chain that binds to the BCR for negative feedback regulation. Likewise, in T-cells, CD25 had a bifunctional role and either functioned as IL2 receptor chain or as negative feedback regulator of T-cell receptor signaling. CD25-function was regulated by cell-membrane translocation, which required phosphorylation of its cytoplasmic tail at S268 (see schematic, left). In a family with monogenic autoimmunity, a mutation immediately preceding S268 compromised CD25-surface translocation, which was restored by homology-directed repair of the S268 motif. CD25-interactome analyses identified PKCd as critical effector molecule downstream of CD25 to mediate B-cell selection during normal B-cell development and calibrate oncogenic BCR signaling in B-cell tumors. In B-cell malignancies, BCR-dependent survival and proliferation signals are often substituted by oncogenic BCR-mimics (e.g. BCR-ABL1, JAK2, BRAFV600E, LMP2A, CD79B mutations; see schematic, right). Accordingly, we identified CD25 surface-expression as biomarker of oncogenic BCR-signaling and predictor of poor clinical outcomes. CD25-/-B-cell leukemia failed to initiate fatal disease in transplant recipients. Owing to imbalances of oncogenic BCR-signaling and p53-checkpoint activation, CD25-/- B-cell leukemia failed to initiate fatal disease in transplant recipients. In patient-derived xenograft models of drug-resistant B-cell malignancies, treatment with a CD25-specific antibody drug-conjugate (ADCT-301) extended survival of transplant recipients or eradicated disease. These findings identified CD25 as previously unrecognized feedback regulator of oncogenic BCR-signaling and provide a rationale for therapeutic targeting of CD25 in refractory B-cell malignancies. Figure. Figure. Disclosures Forman: Mustang Therapeutics: Other: Licensing Agreement, Patents & Royalties, Research Funding. Weinstock:Genentech/Roche, Monsanto: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Research Funding; Novartis, Astra Zeneca, Abbvie, Aileron, Surface Oncology, Daiichi Sankyo: Research Funding; Novartis, Dragonfly, Travera, DxTerity, Travera: Consultancy; Travera: Equity Ownership; Astra Zeneca, JAX, Samumed, Regeneron, Sun Pharma, Prescient: Patents & Royalties. Uzel:Novartis: Research Funding.

Abstract Immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) are widely used in the treatment of patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM) however, only 30% of relapsed MM patients respond to single agent therapy and most patients eventually develop drug resistance. The molecular target of IMiDs in MM is cereblon but other parallel pathways or downstream events which enhance or preclude drug responsiveness are unknown. We therefore conducted a genome scale small interfering RNA (siRNA) lethality study in MM in the presence of increasing concentrations of lenalidomide. Primary screening was performed in a single-siRNA-per-well format with the human druggable genome siRNA set V4 comprising four siRNAs targeting each of 6,992 genes (total 27968 siRNAs). Lenalidomide was added 24 hours post transfection and cell viability was measured by ATP-dependent luminescence at 144 hours after transfection. Primary screen data was rigorously evaluated for multiple quality control metrics and found to exceed all expected performance parameters with >98% global transfection efficiency, <0.25 CV values, and minimal plate-to-plate and set-to-set variations observed. Hit selection was performed by analysis of IC50 value shift in the presence of each testing siRNA compared with three different control siRNA oligos. 160 candidate genes that enhance lenalidomide sensitivity upon silencing (sensitizers) were selected and re-screened with four siRNA oligos targeting each gene. 50 genes were identified as reproducible lenalidomide sensitizers including three Peroxisome (PEX) family proteins (PEX1, PEX10 and PEX7) and seven RAB family proteins (RAB17, RAB1A, RAB26, RAB30, RAB36, RAB4A and RAB8A). Four kinase genes were also identified in sensitizer hits and two of these, I-Kappa-B Kinase-Alpha (IKK1 or CHUK) and ribosomal protein S6 kinase (RPS6KA3 or RSK2), encode proteins that associate with significance together with a phosphorylation dependent transcription factor (CREB1) in Toll signaling pathways (p-value 0.0068). RSK2 is a serine/threonine-protein kinase that acts downstream of oncogenic FGFR3 mediated signaling and is phosphorylated by ERK (MAPK1/ERK2 and MAPK3/ERK1 signaling) during hematopoietic transformation. Phosphorylated RSK2 was previously reported to be frequently expressed in myeloma cell lines and primary myeloma cells. Using lentiviral shRNA expression, we demonstrated that knockdown of RSK2 in three genetically variable MM cell lines induced cyctocytoxiticy and consistently sensitized to lenalidomide. Two selective small molecular inhibitors of RSK2 (SL 0101-1 and BI-D1870) were then demonstrated to synergize with lenalidomide to induce myeloma cell cytotoxicixity. To further understand the mechanism underlying sensitization, immunoblotting analysis was performed to look at downstream changes after either RSK2 knockdown or RSK2 inhibition by BI-D1870. We found that both RSK2 knockdown and BI-D1870 treatment, mimicking lenalidomide treatment or cereblon inhibition, induced downregulation of both IRF4 and MYC in MM cells. The combination of lenalidomide and BI-D1870 not only produced a substantial synergistic effect inducing MM cytotoxicity, but also demonstrated a significant enhancement of downregulation of IRF4 and MYC. Forced overexpression of RSK2 attenuated the synergistic effects of lenalidomide and BI-D1870. In summary, our high throughput screen identified multiple gene targets that associate with increasing sensitivity to IMiDs in MM cells, of which, RSK2 was further validated by both shRNA silencing and specific inhibitors as an effective target to cooperate with IMiDs to induce myeloma cytotoxicity. Clinical studies of RSK2 inhibition in concert with IMiD (cereblon inhibitor) therapy would be appropriate. Disclosures: Stewart: Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Millennium: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria; BMS: Honoraria.

Background The precise molecular mechanism and targets of lenalidomide specific anti-Multiple Myeloma (MM) activity remain largely unknown, although, cereblon (CRBN) has been identified as a central mediator of activity with IRF-4 acting as a downstream molecule. Lenalidomide resistance in MM cells which, despite CRBN depletion, are able to restore their IRF-4 levels suggests the existence of alternative pathways. Methods To measure apoptosis and gene expression analysis 1x 106cells were incubated with 10μm to 50μm of lenalidomide for 24 to 96 hours before they were examined by annexin-PI and FACS analysis. Gene and protein expression were measured by RT-PCR, western blot, and immunohistochemistry. For lenalidomide followed bortezomib serial studies, cells were incubated with 10μm of lenalidomide for 48 hours and later treated with bortezomib for 24 to 48 hrs. CRBN and immunoglobulin light chain knock-down were performed by lentiviral mediated shRNA. Results We found lenalidomide induces Endoplasmic reticulum stress (ERS) via accumulation of intracellular immunoglobulin proteins, but only in the presence of CRBN in a panel of MM cell lines. This accumulation of intracellular proteins resulted in ERS as documented by western blot and RT-PCR in OPM2 and MMIS cell lines. We next utilized OPM2 cells knocked down for CRBN and control, non-target (NT), and treated with different doses of lenalidomide. After three days of treatment an ERS response was occurring in OPM2-NT cells but not in CRBN knockdown cells. Using Western blot we found decreased XBP-1u and increased XBP-1s, ERS marker proteins, in CRBN positive (NT) cells after 72 hours of lenalidomide treatment, but not in CRBN knock-down cells. Another ERS marker GRP78/BiP was also clearly accumulated after lenalidomide treatment in CRBN positive cells. Inactivation of the tumor suppressor p53 by degradation is a mechanism utilized by cells to adapt to ERS has been reported. We also found that p53 protein down regulated after lenalidomide treatment in CRBN positive OPM2 and MMIS cells. We have analyzed other isogenic cell lines MM1.S (lenalidomide-sensitive) and isogenic MM1.Sres (lenalidomide-resistant) HMCLs and found that lenalidomide induces ERS in MM1.S but not MM1.Sres cells. CRBN is important for lenalidomide to induce immunoglobulin protein accumulation and ERS was further proved by over-expressing CRBN in OCI-My5 MM cell line and subsequent lenalidomide treatment. To test the effect of light chain accumulation as ER stressors, we knocked down immunoglobulin light chain lambda in human MM cell line OPM2. Knock-down of lambda light chain in OPM2 cells resulted in lenalidomide resistance and it induced endoplasmic reticulum stress mediated anti-myeloma activity. Our preliminary data reveals that lenalidomide mediated progressive ERS can positively enhance bortezomib induced apoptosis in an in-vitro MM model. We pre-treated myeloma cell lines with lenalidomide and subsequently treated with bortezomib. MM cells pre-treated with lenalidomide for two days and there after treated with bortezomib clearly shown increased sensitivity to bortezomib induced apoptosis than non-pre-lenalidomide treated cells. Conclusion Here we show that lenalidomide causes accumulation of immunoglobulin light chains, inducing progressive ER stress, resulting in anti-myeloma activity and that effect depends on the presence of CRBN. Proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib also sensitize MM cells to endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis. Our data demonstrated the synergistic effect of lenalidomide and proteasome inhibitors, likely due to the augmented protein stress. This data support the use of serial therapy utilizing pre-lenalidomide treatment followed by bortezomib or carfilzomib treatment. Disclosures: Fonseca: Medtronic: Consultancy; Otsuka: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Lilly: Consultancy; Onyx: Consultancy, Research Funding; Binding Site: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; AMGEN: Consultancy; Cylene: Research Funding; Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease: Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease, Prognostication of MM based on genetic categorization of the disease Patents & Royalties.

AbstractThe objective of this mini‐review is to provide insights on the advances in the understanding of the genetic variants associated with different manifestations of Hirschsprung disease, which may present with a range of denervation from a short segment of colon to total colonic and small bowel or extensive aganglionosis. A recent article in this journal documented potential gene variants involved in long‐segment Hirschsprung disease in 23 patients. Gene variants were identified using a 31‐gene panel of genes related to Hirschsprung disease or enteric neural crest cell development, as previously reported in the literature. The study identified potentially harmful variants in eight genes across 13 patients, with a detection rate of 56.5% (13/23 patients). Five patients had pathologic variants in RET, NRG1, and L1CAM, and the remainder were considered variants of unknown significance. The authors attempted prenatal diagnosis of Hirschsprung disease utilizing an amniocentesis sample obtained for advanced maternal age in a family with a known deleterious RET mutation, manifested in the father (long‐segment Hirschsprung disease) and older daughter (total colonic aganglionosis). The fetus had the same RET variant but, after several years of follow‐up, has not developed any symptoms of Hirschsprung disease, supporting the conclusion that this RET mutation is an autosomal dominant gene with incomplete penetrance. This experience suggests that genetic counseling is appropriate to carefully assess the justification of prenatal testing, especially, when the phenotype of long‐segment Hirschsprung disease is so variable and the disease is potentially curable with surgery.

Abstract Abstract 288 BACKGROUND. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with mutated IGHV genes (M-CLL) have better outcomes than patients with unmutated IGHV genes (U-CLL). It has been proposed that this difference reflects the fact that IGHV mutations alter the structure of the B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) such that it no longer binds stimulatory (auto) antigens and therefore cannot deliver trophic signals to the leukemic cells. For this theory to be correct, only replacement (R) mutations and in particular non-conservative R mutations that would more likely alter amino structure of the IGHV/D/J rearrangements would have relevance. Silent (S) mutations by definition do not change amino acid structure and could not alter antigen binding. We sought to investigate this hypothesis by analyzing the types (S, conservative R, non-conservative R) and distribution of mutations that occur in IGHVs of M-CLL clones and then comparing the time to first therapy (TTFT) in patients with different IGHV features. This analysis expanded an initial study of 1569 CLL cases in the US to include 1858 patients from Europe for a total of 3427 cases. METHODS. Using IGMT software and tools, we analyzed the rearranged IGHV sequences of 3427 cases and characterized their mutations in several respects: first, if IGHV mutations altered amino acid structure (S vs. R); second, if mutations occurred in CDRs (antigen binding domains) or FRs (scaffolds of the BCR); third, if R mutations were conservative or non-conservative as determined by charge, hydropathy, and size. TTFT for patients was examined with various combinations of the above parameters. Differences in TTFT were estimated by the method of Kaplan and Meier and assessed using the log rank test. RESULTS. First, TTFT was compared for 4 groups of patients with the following mutation profiles: no mutations; only S mutations (median 1 per sample); only R mutations (median 1 per sample); and mixed S and R mutations (median 16 per sample). These 4 categories were significantly different (P<0.0001), with the median TTFT being 2.0 yrs for no mutations; 2.6 yrs for R only; 2.8 yrs for S only; and 7.3 yrs for mixed. All comparisons used patients with no mutations (n=1234) as the reference group. We identified statistically longer TTFT (2.8 vs 2.0 yrs; P=0.04) in patients with only S mutations (n=62). Patients with only R mutations (n=218) also had superior outcomes (2.6 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs; P=0.008). There was no statistical significance in TTFT between patients with all S vs. all R mutations (2.8 yrs vs. 2.6 yrs; P=0.71). Because exploring the relevance of BCR structural change on TTFT required us to focus on a small subset of patients with only silent IGHV mutations, our sample size was small. Therefore, we expanded the group to include IGHVs with R mutations limited to the FR region (S + R in FR only; n=241) since these mutations would be unlikely to have a major impact on BCR structure, particularly sparing the binding site. When compared to patients with no mutations, this group demonstrated a significantly longer TTFT (2.8 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs, P=0.0002). This finding was upheld when not permitting any non-conservative R mutations in this group, leaving only patients with S plus conservative R mutations in FRs only (n=124); TTFT in this case was 2.8 yrs vs. 2.0 yrs, respectively (P=0.0006). CONCLUSIONS. Our findings show that patients with only S mutations have better outcomes than patients with no mutations, suggesting that a change in BCR structure that could lead to a loss of antigen binding is an unlikely reason for improved clinical course. This is further supported by the finding that the combination of only S plus conservative R mutations located solely in FRs, which probably would not result in major BCR structural changes and therefore antigen binding, is associated with a lengthened TTFT. Therefore, we suggest that the currently accepted paradigm to explain the enhanced survival of M-CLL patients needs to be re-evaluated. Disclosures: Brown: Calistoga: Consultancy, Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding; Genzyme: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding. Kipps:Igenica: Equity Ownership, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene: Consultancy, Research Funding; Abbott Industries: Research Funding; Pharmacyclics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Genentech: Research Funding; GSK: Research Funding; Gilead Sciences: Consultancy, Research Funding; Amgen: Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 602 The molecular target(s) which co-operate with proteasome inhibition in inducing drug sensitivity or resistance in Multiple Myeloma (MM) remain unknown. We therefore conducted a genome scale small interfering RNA (siRNA) lethality study in KMS11 MM cells in the presence or absence of bortezomib without regard to pre-conceived mechanistic notions. Primary screening was performed in a single-siRNA-per-well format with the human druggable genome siRNA set V4 comprising 13,984 siRNA targeting 6,992 genes and comprising two RNAi per gene. siRNA were transfected at low concentration (13nM) to minimize off-target effects using conditions that resulted in transfection of >95% cells and <5% background cytotoxicity. Bortezomib was added (at the IC10, 25, 70 and 90) 24 hours post transfection. After 96 hours (72 hours after bortezomib), viability was measured by ATP-dependent luminescence. In primary screening 320 candidate bortezomib sensitizing genes were identified and rescreened with four siRNA oligos each gene. 57 of the top sensitizer hits were selected for which at least two distinct siRNA decreased the EC50 by 2 standard deviations from cells treated with control siRNAs. By cross referencing gene expression profile (GEP) data of KMS11, we furthered pared the list to 37 plausibly expressed targets (0.5% of those genes originally screened) as bortezomib sensitizers. After silencing, 50% of these 37 genes also sensitized the lung cancer cell line A549 to bortezomib. After further parsing of genes which also modulated the sensitivity of MM to Melphalan (non specific chemosensitizers), 34 genes remained: The strongest sensitizers to bortezomib were the proteasome subunits PSMA5, PSMB2, PSMB3, PSMB7 but included less obvious targets such as BAZ1B, CDK5, CDC42SE2, MDM4, NME7, TFE3, TNFAIP3, TNK1, TOP1, VAMP2 and YY1 were also identified. Of these, the most potent synergetic effects were observed with siRNAs against the proteasome subunits and against cyclin dependent kinase 5 (CDK5), which caused the greatest shift in EC50. CDK5 is of particular interest as a therapeutic target as it is expressed at high levels in MM and neural tissues but has low expression in other organs. Using viral shRNA expression, silencing CDK5 consistently increased the sensitivity of genetically variable MM cell lines (n=5) to all of the proteasome inhibitors tested: bortezomib, carfilzomib and PR047, and the effect could be at least partially rescued by overexpression of an RNAi resistant CDK5. To explore therapeutic relevance the small molecule CDK5 inhibitor, Roscovitin, was shown to be synergistic or additive with bortezomib in both MM cell lines and primary patient samples. Gene expression profiling was then performed to seek an explanation for the CDK5 sensitization effect and regulation of a proteasome subunit PSMB5 by CDK5 was identified as a probable route to sensitization. In summary inhibition of the existing proteasome either directly by suppression of proteasome subunits, or indirectly by suppression of modulators such as CDK5 appears to confer the greatest sensitization effect suggesting that combinations of bortezomib with other unique proteasome inhibitor drugs or combinations with inhibitors of CDK5 is a logical avenue for clinical exploration. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Abstract Abstract 127 The precise molecular mechanism of action and targets through which thalidomide and related immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs) exert their anti-tumor effects remains unclear. A landmark paper has recently identified cereblon (CRBN) as a primary target of thalidomide teratogenicity. We hypothesized that this protein would also be required for myeloma (MM) cytotoxicity. To examine this issue we first tested 12 MM cell lines: 4 of which (OCIMY5, OPM1, SKMM2 and KMS12 PE) were very resistant to treatment with both lenalidomide and pomalidomide. Of these, OCIMY5 and OPM1 showed CRBN gene expression levels at the bottom 10% across the human MM cell lines. We next used CRBN shRNA lentiviral expression constructs to knock down CRBN in 5 human-derived myeloma cell lines (HMCLs) (KMS18, MM1.S, H929, OPM2 and JJN3). HMCLs infected with CRBN shRNAs have a significant reduction of CRBN expression and subsequent diminished cell viability (reduced 65–78%). Surviving MM cells with CRBN knock down demonstrate an acquired (essentially complete) resistance to lenalidomide when compared with controls but retained sensitivity to melphalan, dexamethasone and bortezomib. Gene expression changes induced by lenalidomide were dramatically suppressed in those CRBN depleted cells, e.g., OPM2 cells only showed 30 down regulated (3% of control) and 150 up-regulated genes (24% of control) after lenalidomide treatment, further emphasizing that CRBN is required for lenalidomide activity. We next compared by array comparative genomic hybridization the differences between MM1.S (lenalidomide sensitive) and its isogenic lenalidomide resistant line (MM1.S res), generated by culturing MM1.S in gradually increasing concentrations of lenalidomide. Only three structural abnormalities were noted differentiating the two lines one of which was deletion of CRBN. In fact the baseline MM1.S cell line has a minor population of 9% of cells with CRBN depletion which becomes dominant after lenalidomide treatment. However, further scrutiny of CRBN status in additional HMCLs and MM patients (irrespective of therapy and stage) suggested that copy-number abnormalities affecting this gene are uncommon events in MM, with 12% of HMCLs (7 out of 60) and only 1.2% of MM patients (3 out of 238) showing CRBN monoallelic deletion. Next, we examined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (Q-PCR) ten MM patients who had become resistant to lenalidomide therapy. CRBN expression level by Q-PCR in 8 of 10 patient samples had a significant reduction (20% to 90% reduction compared to baseline) at time of drug resistance, suggesting CRBN expression as a potential biomarker to predict IMiD response. Notably however some clearly resistant patients have normal CRBN, demonstrating that while CRBN is absolutely required for response, multiple resistance mechanisms are likely present. By gene and protein expression downstream targets of CRBN were examined and included interferon regulatory factor 4 (IRF4) previously reported to also be a target of lenalidomide. In summary, we demonstrate here that CRBN is essential for IMiD activity and preliminary data support that low levels of CRBN predict for poor drug response. In addition, our data suggest that CRBN is a critical molecule but not the unique source of IMiD resistance. We suggest that the “IMiDs” be renamed Cereblon binding small molecules to more accurately reflect their mechanism of action. Disclosures: Orlowski: Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Abstract Abstract 601 A paucity of validated kinase targets in human multiple myeloma (MM) has delayed clinical deployment of kinase inhibitors in treatment strategies. We therefore conducted a kinome-wide small interfering RNA (siRNA) lethality study in MM tumor lines bearing common t(4;14), t(14;16) and t(11;14) translocations to identify critically vulnerable kinases in MM tumor cells without regard to preconceived mechanistic notions. Primary screening was performed in duplicate using an 1800-oligo siRNA library in a single-siRNA-per-well format. siRNA were transfected at low concentration (13nM) to minimize off-target effects using conditions that resulted in transfection of >95% cells and <5% background cytotoxicity. After 96 hours, viability was measured by ATP-dependent luminescence. Fifteen kinases were consistently vulnerable in MM cells, including AKT1, AK3L1, AURKA, AURKB, CDC2L1, CDK5R2, FES, FLT4, GAK, GRK6, HK1, PKN1, PLK1, SMG1, and TNK2. While several kinases (PLK1, HK1) were equally vulnerable in epithelial cells, others and particularly the G-protein coupled receptor kinase, GRK6, appeared selectively vulnerable in MM. GRK6 inhibition is selectively lethal to KMS11, OPM1, H929, KMS18 and OCI-MY5 myeloma cells and has minimal effect on 293, MCF7, SF767, A375 or A549 epithelial cells. Persistent expression of FLAG-GRK6 via cDNA rescued KMS11 cells from the lethal effect of a 3'UTR-targeted GRK6 siRNA, but not from control siRNA, validating identification of GRK6 as an essential myeloma survival kinase. Furthermore, concordant results were obtained using four different exon-based GRK6 siRNA, all of which induced GRK6 silencing and similar inhibition of KMS11 proliferation and viability. Significantly, GRK6 is ubiquitously expressed in lymphoid tissues and myeloma, but by comparison appears absent or only weakly expressed in most primary human somatic tissues. From co-immunoprecipitation experiments we demonstrate that GRK6 is highly expressed in myeloma cells via direct association with the HSP90 chaperone. Inhibition of HSP90 with geldanamycin blocks GRK6 protein expression. Importantly, direct GRK6 silencing causes rapid and selective suppression of STAT3 phosphorylation that is associated with sustained reductions in total MCL1 protein levels and MCL1 phosphorylation (within 24 hours), providing a potent mechanism for the cytotoxicity of GRK6 inhibition in MM tumor cells. GF109203X is an inhibitor of both protein kinase C and of GRK6 that causes near total inhibition of these kinases in vitro at distinct concentrations of 0.1μM and 1-10μM respectively. Notably, GF109203X was substantially cytotoxic to 10/14 myeloma tumor lines at concentrations most consistent with GRK6 inhibition (5-20μM), and was selectively more cytotoxic to myeloma tumor cells than to non-myeloma cell lines (P=0.01), highlighting the potential of GRK6 as a pharmaceutical target for selective therapeutic intervention in myeloma. As mice that lack GRK6 are healthy, inhibition of GRK6 represents a uniquely targeted novel therapeutic strategy in human multiple myeloma. Disclosures: Perkins: MMRC: Employment. Reeder:Celgene: Research Funding; Millennium: Research Funding. Fonseca:Otsuka: Consultancy; BMS: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy; Medtronic: Consultancy; Genzyme: Consultancy.