Citations

Background— Low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis (AS), associated with a poor prognosis, can be caused by a reduced stroke volume despite a preserved ejection fraction (left ventricular ejection fraction). We hypothesized that impaired ventricular diastolic filling secondary to constrictive pericarditis (CP) could contribute to reduced transaortic gradients in patients with AS+CP. We sought to examine the characteristics and outcomes of this unique cohort. Methods and Results— We analyzed 84 patients with different degrees of AS and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%): 28 diagnosed with concomitant CP by echocardiography and 56 patients without CP matched by age, sex, and AS severity during 1998 to 2013. Prior mediastinal radiation (32.1% versus 5.4%; P =0.0072) and cardiac surgery (50.0% versus 3.6%; P =0.0016) were more common in AS+CP patients than those with AS only. AS+CP patients had lower left ventricular stroke volume index and mean transaortic gradients. Five-year survival was 34.3% for AS+CP patients and 89.1% for those with AS only ( P <0.001). In univariate analysis, prior mediastinal radiation (hazard ratio, 8.35; 95% confidence interval, 3.38–20.62; P <0.001), reduced left ventricular stroke volume index of <35 mL/m 2 (hazard ratio, 12.52; 95% confidence interval, 3.97–39.48; P <0.001), and concomitant CP (hazard ratio, 13.65; 95% confidence interval, 4.85–38.41; P <0.001) were highly associated with increased mortality. Conclusions— Our findings highlighted the possibility of CP as a pathophysiological mechanism for low-flow, low-gradient AS. Left ventricular stroke volume index and transaortic gradients were commonly reduced in AS in the setting of CP despite a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, which may result in underestimation of AS severity. Prior mediastinal radiation, lower left ventricular stroke volume index, and concomitant CP were associated with poorer survival in AS patients.

Background— Pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular (RV) dysfunction are common in patients with advanced heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), yet their underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. We sought to examine RV–pulmonary artery (PA) functional reserve responses and RV–PA coupling at rest and during β-adrenergic stimulation in subjects with earlier stage HFpEF. Methods and Results— In a prospective trial, subjects with HFpEF (n=39) and controls (n=18) underwent comprehensive invasive and noninvasive hemodynamic assessment using high fidelity micromanometer catheters, echocardiography, and expired gas analysis at rest and during dobutamine infusion. HFpEF subjects displayed similar RV structure but significantly impaired RV systolic (lower RV d P /d t max /IP and s′) and diastolic function (higher RV τ) coupled with more severe pulmonary vascular disease, manifest by higher PA pressures, higher PA resistance, and lower PA compliance compared with controls. Dobutamine infusion caused greater pulmonary vasodilation in HFpEF compared with controls, with enhanced reductions in PA resistance, greater increase in PA compliance, and a more negative slope in the PA pressure–flow relationship when compared with controls (all P <0.001). RV–PA coupling analysis revealed that dobutamine improved RV ejection in HFpEF subjects through afterload reduction alone, rather than through enhanced contractility, indicating RV systolic reserve dysfunction. Conclusions— Pulmonary hypertension in early stage HFpEF is related to partially reversible pulmonary vasoconstriction coupled with RV systolic and diastolic dysfunction, even in the absence of RV structural remodeling. Pulmonary vascular tone is more favorably responsive to β-adrenergic stimulation in HFpEF than controls, suggesting a potential role for β-agonists in the treatment of patients with HFpEF and pulmonary hypertension. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01418248.

Background— Early studies showed beneficial effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors on cardiovascular function in heart failure (HF) patients, but the RELAX trial observed no improvement in exercise capacity with sildenafil treatment in subjects with HF and preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results— A subgroup of participants in the RELAX trial (n=48) underwent comprehensive noninvasive cardiovascular assessment before and after treatment with sildenafil or placebo in a prospective ancillary study. Left ventricular contractility was assessed by peak power index and stroke work index. Systemic arterial load was assessed by arterial elastance (Ea) and right ventricular afterload by pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Endothelial function was assessed by reactive hyperemia index after upper arm cuff occlusion. Compared with placebo (n=25), sildenafil (n=23) decreased Ea (−0.29±0.28 mm Hg/mL versus +0.02±0.29, P =0.008) and tended to improve reactive hyperemia index (+0.30±0.45 versus −0.17±0.30, P =0.054). In contrast, left ventricular contractility was reduced by 11% to 16% with sildenafil compared with placebo (ΔPWR/EDV −52±70 versus +0±40 mm Hg/s, P =0.006; ΔSW/EDV +0.3±5.8 versus −6.0±5.1 mm Hg, P =0.04). Sildenafil had no effect on pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Conclusions— In subjects with HF and preserved ejection fraction, sildenafil displayed opposing effects on ventricular and vascular function. We speculate that beneficial effects of phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors in the systemic vasculature and endothelium were insufficient to improve clinical status or that the deleterious effects on left ventricular function offset any salutary vascular effects, contributing to the absence of benefit observed with sildenafil in subjects with HF and preserved ejection fraction in the RELAX trial. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00094302.

Background— Left atrial (LA) structure and function are altered in most heart failure (HF) patients, but there may be fundamental differences in LA properties between HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and Results— One hundred ninety-eight HF patients (51% HFpEF, New York Heart Association 3.1±0.7) and 40 HF-free controls underwent catheterization, echocardiography, and follow-up. Compared with controls, HF patients had larger and more dysfunctional left atria. At identical mean LA pressure (20 versus 20 mm Hg; P =0.9), HFrEF patients had larger LA volumes (LA volume index 50 versus 41 mL/m 2 ; P <0.001), whereas HFpEF patients had higher LA peak pressures, lower LA minimal pressures, higher LA stiffness (0.79 versus 0.48 mm Hg/mL; P <0.001), greater LA pulsatility (19 versus 13 mm Hg; P <0.001), and higher wall stress variations. Despite smaller LA volumes, better function, and less mitral regurgitation, HFpEF patients had more atrial fibrillation (42 versus 26%; P =0.02). LA dysfunction was associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular dysfunction in both HF phenotypes. After a median follow-up of 350 days, 31 HFpEF and 28 HFrEF patients died. LA function (total LA EF) was associated with lower mortality in HFpEF (hazard ratio 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–0.9; P <0.05), but not in HFrEF. Conclusions— HFrEF is characterized by greater eccentric LA remodeling, whereas HFpEF by increased LA stiffness, which might contribute to greater atrial fibrillation burden. LA function is associated with pulmonary vascular disease and right HF in both HF phenotypes, but is associated with outcome more closely in HFpEF, supporting efforts to improve LA function in this cohort.