Zakeri, Rosita

BACKGROUND: With evolving therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, the benefits of adding a defibrillator in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) remain unclear, particularly for nonischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM). This study evaluates long-term survival among patients with NICM treated with CRT defibrillator (CRT-D) versus CRT pacemaker (CRT-P). METHODS: DECIDE-CRT (Cardiac Resynchronization With or Without Defibrillator in Non-Ischemic Cardiomyopathy) is a multicenter cohort study across 170 US Veterans Affairs hospitals. We identified patients with NICM receiving primary-prevention CRT-P or CRT-D between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2020. Using a propensity score approach, we applied inverse probability of treatment weighting to balance baseline characteristics between the CRT-P and CRT-D groups. An inverse probability of treatment weighting–weighted Cox model estimated hazards for all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included generator replacement, device-related infections, hospitalization for heart failure, and ventricular arrhythmias. RESULTS: Of 16 609 CRT recipients, 3965 met NICM primary-prevention criteria (CRT-D=3158; CRT- P =807). At baseline, patients with NICM receiving CRT-P were much older, with more cardiovascular and noncardiovascular comorbidities compared with the CRT-D group. During the median follow-up of 5.2 years, the mortality rate for CRT-P versus CRT-D was 9.46 versus 9.21 per 100 person-years (RR, 0.97 [95% CI, 0.71–1.13]; P =0.66). The adjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality using the inverse probability of treatment weighting-Cox model was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.71–1.13; P =0.34). There was no difference in adjusted hazard for heart failure hospitalization (hazard ratio, 1.27 [95% CI, 0.86–1.87]), while the CRT-D group had higher rates of generator replacement and device-related infections. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide observational study from the Veterans Affairs Health system did not demonstrate a clear survival advantage with the addition of a defibrillator among patients with NICM receiving CRT although residual confounding cannot be excluded. Given the uncertainty surrounding the incremental benefit of the defibrillator in this setting, a randomized trial is needed to test the incremental value of CRT-D over CRT-P in NICM.

Abstract Multiple guidelines exist for the diagnosis and management of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We systematically reviewed current guidelines and recommendations, developed by national and international medical organizations, on the management of HFpEF in adults to aid clinical decision-making. We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE on 28 February 2024 for publications over the last 10 years as well as websites of organizations relevant to guideline development. Of the 10 guidelines and recommendations retrieved, 7 showed considerable rigour of development and were subsequently retained for analysis. There was consensus on the definition of HFpEF and the diagnostic role of serum natriuretic peptides and resting transthoracic echocardiography. Discrepancies were identified in the thresholds of serum natriuretic peptides and transthoracic echocardiography parameters used to diagnose HFpEF. There was agreement on the general pharmacological and supportive management of acute and chronic HFpEF. However, differences exist in strategies to identify and address specific phenotypes. Contemporary guidelines for HFpEF management agree on measures to avoid its development and the consideration of cardiac transplantation in advanced diseases. There were discrepancies in recommended frequency of surveillance for patients with HFpEF and sparse recommendations on screening for HFpEF in the general population, use of diagnostic scoring systems, and the role of newly emerging therapies.

Aims Despite the common occurrence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), there is limited evidence to guide revascularization. Methods and Results We investigated the long‐term outcomes of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in patients with HF and significant CAD across the spectrum of ejection fraction, using a large national cohort of patients from the Veteran Affairs (VA) Medical Centers in the US. Patients with HF were stratified into groups, HFpEF, HF with mid‐range ejection fraction (HFmrEF), and HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and compared to patients with no preoperative HF. We analysed 10 396 patients. Despite an increased hazard in the first year following revascularization, the long‐term survival (median follow‐up 6.6 years; interquartile range 3.7–10.1) of HFpEF post‐CABG was similar to controls (hazard ratio 0.85, 95% confidence interval 0.68‐1.06), but survival progressively declined with HFmrEF and HFrEF. Similar trends were seen with recurrent HF hospitalization with lower risk with baseline HFpEF (43.9 ± 6.9/100 patient‐years) compared to HFmrEF (65.9 ± 3.8/100 patient‐years) and HFrEF (93.4 ± 4.8/100 patient‐years). Although HFpEF patients had lower mortality and HF hospitalization post‐CABG compared to patients with a lower ejection fraction, they experienced the highest rates of future myocardial infarction. Conclusion Although HFpEF patients with CAD have greater short‐term risk post‐CABG, their long‐term survival is comparable to controls. However, they are at increased risk for HF hospitalizations and myocardial infarction. These data support the safety of CABG in HFpEF patients and suggest continuum of mortality risk for ischaemic HF when stratified by baseline ejection fraction before revascularization.

Background— Daily physical activity assessed by accelerometers represents a novel method to assess the impact of interventions on heart failure (HF) patients’ functional status. We hypothesized that daily activity varies by patient characteristics and correlates with established measures of HF severity in HF with preserved ejection fraction. Methods and Results— In this ancillary study of the NEAT-HFpEF trial (Nitrate’s Effects on Activity Tolerance in HF With Preserved Ejection Fraction), average daily accelerometer units (ADAU) and hours active per day were assessed during a 14-day period before starting isosorbide mononitrate or placebo (n=110). Baseline ADAU was negatively associated with age, female sex, height, and body mass index, and these variables accounted for 28% of the variability in ADAU ( P <0.007 for all). Adjusting for these factors, patients with lower ADAU were more likely to have had an HF hospitalization, orthopnea, diabetes mellitus and anemia, be treated with β-blockers, have higher ejection fraction, relative wall thickness and left atrial volume, and worse New York Heart Association class, HF-specific quality of life scores, 6-minute walk distance, and NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; P <0.05 for all). Associations between hours active per day and clinical characteristics were similar. Relative to baseline, there were no significant associations between changes in ADAU or hours active per day and changes in standard functional assessments (New York Heart Association, quality of life, 6-minute walk distance, and NT-proBNP) with isosorbide mononitrate. Conclusions— Daily activity is a measure of HF-related and global functional status in HF with preserved ejection fraction. As compared with intermittently assessed standard HF assessments, change in daily activity may provide unique information about the impact of HF interventions on functional status. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/ . Unique identifier: NCT02053493

Background— Left atrial (LA) compliance and contractility influence left ventricular stroke volume. We hypothesized that diminished LA compliance and contractile function occur early during the development of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and impair overall cardiac performance. Methods and Results— Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, echocardiography, left ventricular and LA pressure-volume studies, and tissue analyses were performed in a model of early HFpEF (elderly dogs, renal wrap-induced hypertension, exogenous aldosterone; n=9) and young control dogs (sham surgery; n=13). Early HFpEF was associated with LA enlargement, cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, and enhanced LA contractile function (median active emptying fraction 16% [95% confidence interval, 13–24]% versus 12 [10–14]%, P =0.008; end-systolic pressure-volume relationship slope 2.4 [1.9–3.2]mm Hg/mL HFpEF versus 1.5 [1.2–2.2]mm Hg/mL controls, P =0.01). However, atrioventricular coupling was impaired and the curvilinear LA end-reservoir pressure-volume relationship was shifted upward/leftward in HFpEF (LA stiffness constant [β LA ] 0.16 [0.11–0.18]mm Hg/mL versus 0.06 [0.04–0.10]mm Hg/mL controls; P =0.002), indicating reduced LA compliance. Impaired atrioventricular coupling and lower LA compliance correlated with lower left ventricular stroke volume. Total fibrosis and titin isoform composition were similar between groups; however, titin was hyperphosphorylated in HFpEF and correlated with β LA . LA microvascular reactivity was diminished in HFpEF versus controls. LA microvascular density tended to be lower in HFpEF and inversely correlated with β LA . Conclusions— In early-stage hypertensive HFpEF, LA cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, titin hyperphosphorylation, and microvascular dysfunction occur in association with increased systolic and diastolic LA chamber stiffness, impaired atrioventricular coupling, and decreased left ventricular stroke volume. These data indicate that maladaptive LA remodeling occurs early during HFpEF development, supporting a concept of global myocardial remodeling.

Background— Left atrial (LA) structure and function are altered in most heart failure (HF) patients, but there may be fundamental differences in LA properties between HF with preserved (HFpEF) and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and Results— One hundred ninety-eight HF patients (51% HFpEF, New York Heart Association 3.1±0.7) and 40 HF-free controls underwent catheterization, echocardiography, and follow-up. Compared with controls, HF patients had larger and more dysfunctional left atria. At identical mean LA pressure (20 versus 20 mm Hg; P =0.9), HFrEF patients had larger LA volumes (LA volume index 50 versus 41 mL/m 2 ; P <0.001), whereas HFpEF patients had higher LA peak pressures, lower LA minimal pressures, higher LA stiffness (0.79 versus 0.48 mm Hg/mL; P <0.001), greater LA pulsatility (19 versus 13 mm Hg; P <0.001), and higher wall stress variations. Despite smaller LA volumes, better function, and less mitral regurgitation, HFpEF patients had more atrial fibrillation (42 versus 26%; P =0.02). LA dysfunction was associated with increased pulmonary vascular resistance and right ventricular dysfunction in both HF phenotypes. After a median follow-up of 350 days, 31 HFpEF and 28 HFrEF patients died. LA function (total LA EF) was associated with lower mortality in HFpEF (hazard ratio 0.43; 95% confidence interval, 0.2–0.9; P <0.05), but not in HFrEF. Conclusions— HFrEF is characterized by greater eccentric LA remodeling, whereas HFpEF by increased LA stiffness, which might contribute to greater atrial fibrillation burden. LA function is associated with pulmonary vascular disease and right HF in both HF phenotypes, but is associated with outcome more closely in HFpEF, supporting efforts to improve LA function in this cohort.

Background— Exercise intolerance is a hallmark of heart failure, but factors associated with impaired exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are unclear. We hypothesized that in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, the severity of resting ventricular and vascular dysfunction are associated with impairment in exercise tolerance as assessed by peak oxygen consumption. Methods and Results— Subjects with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction enrolled in the PhosphodiesteRasE-5 Inhibition to Improve CLinical Status And EXercise Capacity in Diastolic Heart Failure (RELAX) clinical trial (n=216) underwent baseline Doppler echocardiography, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and cardiac MRI. RELAX participants were elderly (median age 69 years) and 48% were women. Ejection fraction (60%) and stroke volume (77 mL) were normal, while diastolic dysfunction (medial E / e ′, 16; deceleration time, 185 ms; left atrial volume, 44 mL/m 2 ) and increased arterial load (arterial elastance, 1.51 mm Hg/mL) were evident. Peak oxygen consumption was reduced (11.7 mLkg −1 min −1 , 1141 mL/min) and age, sex, body mass index, hemoglobin, and chronotropic response collectively explained 64% of the variance in raw peak oxygen consumption (mL/min). After adjustment for these variables, left ventricular structure (diastolic dimension [1.5%, P =0.008] and left ventricular mass [1.6%, P =0.008]), resting stroke volume (2.0%, P =0.002), left ventricular diastolic dysfunction (deceleration time [0.9%, P =0.03] and E / e ′ [1.4%, P =0.009]), and arterial function (arterial elastance [2.1%, P =0.002] and systemic arterial compliance [1.5%, P =0.007]), each explained only a small additional portion of the variance in peak oxygen consumption. Conclusions— In heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, potentially modifiable factors (obesity, anemia, and chronotropic incompetence) are strongly associated with exercise capacity, whereas resting measures of ventricular and vascular structure and function are not. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867

Background— Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common among patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its clinical profile and impact on exercise capacity remain unclear. RELAX (Phosphodiesterase-5 Inhibition to Improve Clinical Status and Exercise Capacity in HFpEF) was a multicenter randomized trial testing the impact of sildenafil on peak V O 2 in stable outpatients with chronic HFpEF. We sought to compare clinical features and exercise capacity among patients with HFpEF who were in sinus rhythm (SR) or AF. Methods and Results— RELAX enrolled 216 patients with HFpEF, of whom 79 (37%) were in AF, 124 (57%) in SR, and 13 in other rhythms. Participants underwent baseline cardiopulmonary exercise testing, echocardiogram, biomarker assessment, and rhythm status assessment before randomization. Patients with AF were older than those in SR but had similar symptom severity, comorbidities, and renal function. β-blocker use and chronotropic indices were also similar. Despite comparable left ventricular size and mass, AF was associated with worse systolic (lower EF, stroke volume, and cardiac index) and diastolic (shorter deceleration time and larger left atria) function compared with SR. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure was higher in AF. Patients with AF had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, aldosterone, endothelin-1, troponin I, and C-telopeptide for type I collagen levels, suggesting more severe neurohumoral activation, myocyte necrosis, and fibrosis. Peak V O 2 was lower in AF, even after adjustment for age, sex, and chronotropic response, and V E /V CO 2 was higher. Conclusions— AF identifies an HFpEF cohort with more advanced disease and significantly reduced exercise capacity. These data suggest that evaluation of the impact of different rate or rhythm control strategies on exercise tolerance in patients with HFpEF and AF is warranted. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT00763867.