Citations

Mayo Clinic

Clear

4057 citation(s) found for "Yu, Elizabeth".

Calibration of multi‐site raters for prospective visual read of amyloid PET scans acquired across the ADRC Consortium for Clarity in ADRD Research Through Imaging (CLARiTI)
Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N., Joie, Renaud La, Lin, Zoe, Soppe, Carol L., Johnson, Derek R., Koran, Mary Ellen I. , Villemagne, Victor L., Windon, Charles C., Mormino, Elizabeth C., Johnson, Sterling C, Rabinovici, Gil D., Windon, Charles , Windon, Charles , Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Blazhenets, Ganna , Joie, Renaud La , Johnson, Derek R., McConathy, Jonathan , Nasrallah, Ilya M. , Tanner, Jeremy A. , Villemagne, Victor L. , Zeineh, Michael , Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Rabinovici, Gil D.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2026 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_107616 Get It

Abstract Background PET visual reads for multi‐center studies are conducted centrally by one or a few experts. In CLARiTI, a broader network of raters will perform the reads, necessitating methods to ensure their accuracy and reliability. Method All ADRC sites ( N = 37) will prospectively acquire amyloid PET scans for 800 cognitively unimpaired and 1200 cognitively impaired participants. Each site can use one of four amyloid PET tracers ([ 18 F]florbetaben, [ 18 F]florbetapir, [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). PET scans will be visually interpreted by ten PET neuroimaging experts located across eight ADRCs, using their preferred hardware, software, and file format (DICOM, NIFTI). Calibration requires readers to perform blinded, independent visual interpretation of 180 amyloid PET scans (30 unique and 15 duplicate scans per tracer), previously read and selected by an expert (Table 1). An even mix of visually non‐elevated and elevated scans were selected, with quantitation spanning ‐26‐123 Centiloids (Figure 1), and 15% were visually borderline (similar proportion to ADNI4), with quantitation spanning 4‐48 Centiloids (mean 21). Kruskal‐Wallis H test showed no significant difference in the distribution of Centiloid values for scans in each tracer group, Χ 2 (3)=2.133, p = 0.545. Result Calibration scans were read by a second expert not serving in CLARiTI. There was 97% concordance and almost perfect agreement between readers (κ=0.932, p <0.001; Figure 2). Discordantly read scans were visually borderline elevated ( N = 2), borderline non‐elevated ( N = 1), and negative ( N = 1), with quantitation of 8‐21 Centiloids (mean 14). Intra‐rater reads were 98% concordant and had almost perfect agreement (κ=0.966, p <0.001). These findings hold promise for scaling‐up visual reads in CLARiTI, and we expect ≥80% concordance and substantial to almost perfect agreement (κ≥0.7) for inter/intra‐rater reliability. Conclusion Calibration is essential for accurate/reliable amyloid PET visual reads in large multi‐center studies with multiple raters. Through the calibration process, we will develop methods to improve the adjudication of borderline/challenging scans and formalize methods for visual reads of amyloid PET tracers that are investigational (i.e., [ 11 C]PIB, [ 18 F]NAV4694). Involving multiple raters across different sites, who use diverse hardware/software/file format combinations, will mirror the natural heterogeneity present in real‐world clinical practice. This calibration set can also serve as a standardized training tool for other studies incorporating amyloid PET visual reads.
Impact of Neoadjuvant Induction Chemotherapy Prior to Chemoradiation on Survival and Surgical Outcomes in Real-World Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Cohort
Matoska, Thomas, Memon, Abdullah , Moreno, Lou-Anne Acevedo, Bulacan, Calista, Rein, Lisa, Banerjee, A., George, Ben, Jurkowski, Lauren , Phan, Alexandria T. , Johnstone, C. , Shukla, Monica , Gore, Elizabeth , Linsky, Paul L., Gasparri, Mario, Puckett, Lindsay L., Puckett, Lindsay , Memon, Abdullah A , Acevedo Moreno, Lou-Anne , Banerjee, Anjishnu , Phan, Alexandria , Shukla, Monica E , Puckett, Lindsay L , Rein, Lisa , Banerjee, Anjishnu , George, Ben , Johnstone, Candice, Hunt, Mallory L.

Cancers | January 9, 2026 | Volume: 18 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 213

10.3390/cancers18020213 | PMID 41595134 Get It

Background/objectives: Improvements in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) treatment have reduced mortality. While chemoradiation before surgery was previously a standard of care, updated guidelines recommend peri-operative chemotherapy without chemoradiation. Continued investigation into optimal non-operative treatment paradigms for patients who defer surgery or are not candidates for surgery and certain chemotherapy regimens is needed. The impact of induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation on survival and surgical outcomes remains unclear. This study assessed survival and surgical outcomes in a real-world cohort of EAC patients receiving induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation. Methods: This single-institution, IRB-approved, retrospective cohort study included patients with newly diagnosed stage II-IVb (oligometastatic for IVb) EAC who received definitive chemoradiation (radiation ≥ 40 Gy and two cycles of chemotherapy) +/− esophagectomy from 2007 to 2022. Patients receiving induction chemotherapy were compared to those who did not. Endpoints included survival and surgical outcomes. Results: A total of 141 EAC patients received definitive chemoradiation; 83 received induction chemotherapy before chemoradiation. Patients receiving induction chemotherapy were younger (p < 0.01) with slightly lower performance status (p = 0.27) and presented at a more advanced stage (p < 0.001). Median OS was 3.5 years in the induction chemotherapy group compared to 2.2 years (p = 0.10). There was no difference in pathologic complete response (p = 0.81), esophagectomy frequency (p = 0.87), or surgical downstaging between treatment groups (p = 0.84). Conclusions: In this real-world, single-institutional patient cohort investigating induction chemotherapy prior to chemoradiation in EAC, patients receiving induction chemotherapy did well but did not have a statistically significant improvement in survival outcomes or surgical outcomes. This study showed that significant numbers of real-world patients may not receive esophagectomy. Thus, prospective, randomized clinical trials are warranted to better delineate the efficacy and selection of patients for induction chemotherapy when non-operative approaches are favored.
Every Centiloid, from Everywhere, All at Once
Snyder, Heather M. , Apostolova, Liana G., Asken, Breton M., Bombois, Stéphanie, Bourgeat, Pierrick, Braskie, Meredith N., Carrillo, Maria C., Casaletto, Kaitlin B, Cash, David M, Chang, Hsin‐I., Chao, Yishu , Chételat, Gael, Collij, Lyduine E., Dickerson, Brad C., Dubois, Bruno, Valdez, Alfonso Fajardo, Farrar, Gill , Fortea, Juan M., Frisoni, Giovanni B, Gu, Yuna , Guo, Tengfei, Hanseeuw, Bernard J, Hansson, Oskar H., Harrison, Theresa, Huang, Qi, Huang, Shu‐Hua , Ishii, K, Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J., Katou, Rikio, Koeppe, Robert A., Kramer, Joel H, Landau, Susan M., Landeau, Brigitte, Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J, Lowe, Val J. , Mao, Xiaoxie, March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L., Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C., Franquesa‐Mullerat, María , Nakamura, Akinori, O'Bryant, Sid E., Pappas, Ioannis, Rowe, Christopher C., Salvadó, Gemma, Schott, Jonathan M, Schwartz, Daniel, Schwarz, Christopher G, Seo, Sang Won, Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C, Smith, Ruben, Sokolowski, Andrzej, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David, Sperling, Reisa A., Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W., Vaillancourt, D., Giessen, Elsmarieke van de, Flier, Wiesje M. van der, Vemuri, Prashanthi, Villemagne, Victor L., Villeneuve, Sylvia , Wang, Wei‐En, Weiner, Michael S. W., Xiao, Cally , Xie, Fang, Yoon, Yeojun, Yun, M R , Rabinovici, Gil D., Joie, Renaud La, Consortia, AMYPAD and LEADS, Blazhenets, Ganna , Apostolova, Liana G. , Asken, Breton M. , Bejanin, Alexandre , Bombois, Stéphanie , Bourgeat, Pierrick , Braskie, Meredith N. , Carrillo, María C. , Casaletto, Kaitlin B. , Cash, David M. , Chang, Chia‐Hsuin , Chang, Hsin‐I , Chételat, Gaël , Coath, William , Collij, Lyduine , Colmant, Lise , Dickerson, Bradford Clark , Dubois, Bruno , Fortea, Juan , Frisoni, Giovanni B. , Gardner, Raquel C. , Garibotto, Valentina , Guo, Tengfei , Hanseeuw, Bernard , Hansson, Oskar , Harrison, Theresa M. , Ishii, Kenji, Jagust, William J. , Koeppe, Robert A. , Kramer, Joel H. , Landau, Susan , Landeau, Brigitte , Lee, Sangwon, Lopresti, Brian J. , March, Andrew, Masters, Colin L. , Mézenge, Florence, Mormino, Elizabeth C. , Nakamura, Akinori , O’Bryant, Sid E. , Pappas, Ioannis , Peretti, Débora Elisa , Quenon, Lisa , Rowe, Christopher C., Salvadó, Gemma , Schott, Jonathan M. , Schwartz, Daniel L., Schwarz, Christopher G. , Seo, Sang Won , Shekari, Mahnaz , Silbert, Lisa C. , Smith, Ruben, Soleimani‐Meigooni, David N. , Sperling, Reisa Anne , Sun, Pan , Toga, Arthur W. , Vaillancourt, David E. , Giessen, Elsmarieke van de , Flier, Wiesje M. van der , Vemuri, Prashanthi , Villain, Nicolas , Villemagne, Victor L. , Weiner, Michael W. , Xie, Fang , Young, Christina B. , Rabinovici, Gil D. , Joie, Renaud La

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 9, 2026 | Volume: 21 | Issue: S2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz70856_107124 Get It

Abstract Background Ten years after the original publication, the Centiloid framework is now broadly used to harmonize amyloid‐PET quantification, facilitate data sharing and comparison across cohorts, and even assist visual interpretation in clinical settings. We evaluated the global implementation of Centiloids by comparing their distribution and corresponding positivity thresholds across cohorts. Methods We gathered data from publicly available cohorts and reached out to investigators across the world to collect cross‐sectional Centiloids, demographic and clinical information, and visual read data. Gaussian mixture models (GMM, k=2) were fitted to Centiloid values for each cohort and cutoffs were calculated as mean + 2SD of the lower Gaussian. When visual reads were available, we determined Centiloid cutoffs that maximized correspondence with visual reads (Cohen's kappa). Data was combined across cohorts using random effects meta‐analyses. Results As of January 2025, we included 37 cohorts ( n = 41,678 participants) with heterogeneous pipelines, radiotracers, and clinical and demographic characteristics (Table‐1). The low Gaussian peaks ranged from ‐9 to 10CL; the meta‐analysis identified a common peak at 1CL. The second peaks were more heterogeneous (range=38‐102CL; meta‐analysis outcome=64CL). Across cohorts, the proportion of cognitively unimpaired versus impaired participants impacted the position of both peaks, with better separation in cohorts enriched in impaired individuals (Figure 1C). The meta‐analysis indicated a GMM‐based cutoff of 19CL (95%CI: 16‐21CL, Figure 1B); subgroup analyses showed no evidence of significant effect between single versus multicenter settings (17 versus 20CL, p = 0.30), MRI‐based or PET‐only processing (18 versus 19CL, p = 0.88), and no evidence of difference across radiotracers (Flutemetamol: 16CL; PIB: 17CL, Flutafuranol: 18CL, Florbetaben: 19CL, Florbetapir: 20CL, p = 0.78). In a subset of 29,496 participants with visual reads available, binary visual reads corresponded well to Centiloids (common kappa=0.86, Figure 2A). The visual read‐based cutoff of 24CL (95%CI: 21‐27CL, Figure 2B) maximized correspondence between visual read and quantification and was slightly higher than the GMM‐based cutoff. All meta‐analysis models showed high non‐random heterogeneity (I 2 >80%) across studies, suggesting non‐random differences in peaks and cutoffs. Conclusions Meta‐analysis‐based cutoffs align well with thresholds from the existing literature. High heterogeneity among studies underscores the need to investigate contributing factors, raising concerns about applying common cutoffs.
Reference Handbook of Gynecologic Pelvic MRI
Alexander, Lauren F. , Patel-Lippmann, Krupa , Venkatesan, Aradhana M. , Causa-Andrieu, Pamela, Feldman, Myra K., Desai, Madhura , Law, Wyanne , Mansoori, Bahar , Nicola, Refky, Andrieu, Pamela Causa , Nougaret, Stephanie , Patel-Lippmann, Krupa , Venkatesan, Aradhana M , Causa Andrieu, Pamela , Feldman, Myra , Desai, Madhura A , Mansoori, Bahar , Nicola, Refky , Sadowski, Elizabeth A , Lakhman, Yulia , Alexander, Lauren F , Nougaret, Stéphanie , Feldman, Myra , Sadowski, Elizabeth A. , Lakhman, Yulia

RadioGraphics | January 8, 2026 | Volume: 46 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/rg.250029 | PMID 41505283 Get It

The interpretation of gynecologic pelvic MRI benefits from tailored MRI protocols, radiologists' knowledge of normal female pelvic anatomy, and a step-by-step approach focusing on lesion origin, lesion tissue composition, and solid tissue morphology, with findings presented in a structured report.
Characterizing amyloid and tau positron emission tomography‐based stages across the clinical continuum
Cody, Karly Alex , Sokołowski, Andrzej , Johns, Emily , Guerra, Lucah Medina, Dumitrescu, Logan, Durant, Alaina, Sathe, Aditi, Koran, Mary Ellen I. , Mez, Jesse, Saykin, Andrew J., Toga, Arthur W., Cuccaro, M. L., Tosun, Duygu, Insel, Philip S., Johnson, Sterling C., Harrison, Theresa, Hohman, Timothy J., Mormino, Elizabeth C., Cody, Karly A , Sokołowski, Andrzej, Winer, Joseph R. , Young, Christina B. , Younes, Kyan , Dumitrescu, Logan , Archer, Derek B. , Durant, Alaina, Mez, Jesse , Saykin, Andrew J. , Toga, Arthur W. , Cuccaro, Michael L. , Insel, Philip S. , Johnson, Sterling C. , Harrison, Theresa M. , Hohman, Timothy J. , Mormino, Elizabeth C.

Alzheimer's & Dementia | January 8, 2026 | Volume: 22 | Issue: 1 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/alz.71017 | PMID 41505234 Get It

Abstract INTRODUCTION We standardized positron emission tomography (PET) data across multiple cohorts and tracers to characterize the frequency of amyloid and tau PET severity along the clinical continuum. METHODS Clinical stage was defined using cohort‐specific criteria and included cognitively unimpaired (CU), mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and dementia. Amyloid severity was staged using Centiloids (CL). Tau severity was staged using a hierarchical Braak‐based schema. The cumulative probabilities of PET‐based stages were estimated using ordinal logistic regressions. RESULTS Among 10,396 individuals (mean [standard deviation] age: 71.9 [7.1] years), amyloid levels ≥ 25 CL increased with age among CU and MCI, while amyloid levels ≥ 100 CL were most common in dementia. In 3295 with tau PET, tau severity increased with amyloid and clinical stage and showed complex associations with age. Within each clinical stage, the full spectrum of amyloid and tau PET severity was observed. DISCUSSION PET‐based staging revealed heterogeneous amyloid and tau burden along the clinical continuum. Highlights PET‐based staging is feasible across multiple cohorts and PET tracers. There is heterogeneity in amyloid and tau severity across the clinical spectrum. The frequency of amyloid and tau PET severity increased with clinical severity. The likelihood of tau PET severity differed by age, amyloid, and clinical severity.
Exercise recommendations for older adults living with and beyond cancer: A consensus statement by the Advancing Capacity to Integrate Exercise Into the Care of Older Cancer Survivors expert panel
Winters‐Stone, Kerri M. , Meyers, G., Cheville, Andrea , Garcia, José M. , Mohile, Supriya G. , Mustian, Karen, Neil‐Sztramko, Sarah, Schwartz, Anna L. , Sitemba, Jessica, Smith, Robert, Campbell, K., Mustian, Karen M. , Neil‐Sztramko, Sarah , Cheville, Andrea L , McNeely, Margaret L , Neil-Sztramko, Sarah , Schmitz, Kathryn H , Campbell, Kristin L , Winters-Stone, Kerri M , Garcia, Jose M , Eckstrom, Elizabeth , Rogers, Laura Q. , Schmitz, Kathryn H.

Cancer | January 7, 2026 | Volume: 132 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1002/cncr.70252 | PMID 41499155 Get It

Abstract Background The number of cancer survivors aged older than 65 years is rising rapidly. Current evidence‐based exercise guidelines lack specific guidance for older cancer survivors as a result of insufficient evidence. An expert panel was convened to develop consensus‐based recommendations for exercise in older cancer survivors. Methods The development of recommendations was guided by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Evidence‐to‐Decision framework for good practice statements. The panel drew from the available literature, a Delphi survey of exercise and health professionals, other exercise guidelines, clinical and research expertise, and interest‐holder input provided by a community advisory board of older cancer survivors and caregivers ( n = 11). Recommendations had to be deemed accessible (i.e., no added barriers) to older cancer survivors and feasible to implement. The panel voted on the strength of the recommendation for or against each statement, with consensus set at 85% agreement. Results Consensus was reached on 11 recommendations covering the following areas: medical evaluation/clearance for exercise, pre‐exercise assessment, exercise prescription, exercise tolerance and safety, exercise delivery, and behavioral support. The recommendations aimed to promote engagement in and uptake of appropriately prescribed exercise programming by older cancer survivors, while keeping barriers and risks as low as possible. Conclusions Older cancer survivors can benefit from appropriately prescribed exercise, which should be an essential component of their cancer care. Exercise and health professionals need to consider the unique needs of older cancer survivors to ensure that exercise is safe and effective for this population, while also reducing barriers to reach as many people as possible.
Proceedings of the 30th Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society
Wilson, Elizabeth A. , Khan, Mohammad Qasim , Kyaw, A Mi Mi , Magistri, P., Tejedor, Marta , Kathirvel, Manikandan , Moral, Kenan , Shankar, Sadhana , Mao, Shennen A. , Alconchel, Felipe, Maira, Tommaso Di , Hakeem, Abdul Rahman , Rammohan, Ashwin, Alconchel, Felipe , Tejedor, Marta , Magistri, Paolo , Mao, Shennen A , Alconchel, Felipe , Di Maira, Tommaso , Chadha, Ryan , Rammohan, Ashwin , Wilson, Elizabeth , Shankar, Sadhana , Mathew, Johns Shaji , Patel, Madhukar S. , Syn, Nicholas L. X. , Chadha, Ryan , Khan, Mohammad Qasim

Liver Transplantation | January 5, 2026 | Volume: 32 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 765-778

10.1097/lvt.0000000000000802 | PMID 41490533 Get It

The 2025 Annual Congress of the International Liver Transplantation Society (ILTS), themed “ Advancing Liver Transplantation: Embracing Innovation for the Future ,” was held from May 28 to 31 in Singapore. The meeting offered a comprehensive scientific program, featuring 92 sessions and 7 pre-congress workshops spanning living donor liver transplantation, advanced surgery, anesthesia and critical care, transplant oncology and immunology, basic science, pediatrics, and more. The program emphasized collaboration and innovation to advance patient outcomes in liver transplantation. In this report, the ILTS Vanguard Committee summarizes the key proceedings of the congress.
Assessment of Structured Tele-Critical Care Training and Its Impact on Clinician's Perceptions of Delivery of Care: A Survey-Based Pilot Study
Motayar, Nasim , Xiao, Huijun , Wang, Xiaofeng F., Hassaballa, Hesham A., Griffiths, Carrie L. , Scruth, Elizabeth , Winterbottom, Fiona , Conley, Rebecca, Medford, Whitney , Raikhelkar, Jayashree , Hakimi, Ryan, Everhart, Sonia , Holder, Andre L. , Laudański, Krzysztof

Critical Care Explorations | December 29, 2025 | Volume: 8 | Issue: 1 | Pages: e1351

10.1097/cce.0000000000001351 | PMID 41460511 Get It

OBJECTIVES: Current research does not address the existence and impact of structured tele-critical care (TCC) training on the delivery of care in the ICU. This pilot study aimed to evaluate the association between on boarding elements focused on training and clinicians perceptions of delivery of care. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: Critical Care professionals at four U.S. hospitals, professional meetings and Society of Critical Care Medicine’s International Membership base. Participants were active clinicians who practice in the TCC setting. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 432 participants responded to the survey, 227 met the eligibility criteria (52.5%) and were included in the analysis. Respondents were a multi-professional group of TCC clinicians aged between 35–55 years of age (56.4%). Seventy-four percent of respondents reported having orientation before providing TCC, 46% reported having formal mentorship, and 66% reported formal training on their institutional platform. Provision of orientation before participating in a TCC program was associated with higher ratings of feeling prepared (odds ratio [OR], 3.52; p < 0.001) and feeling accepted as part of the ICU team (OR, 2.21; p = 0.008). Mentorship was associated with feeling more prepared (OR, 8.2; p < 0.001) and higher comfort in delivering care (OR, 2.78; p = 0.016). Platform training was associated with feeling more prepared (OR, 4.66; p < 0.001), comfortable in delivering care (OR, 3.6; p = 0.002), feeling accepted as part of the team (OR, 3.18; p < 0.001), and more likely to participate in quality improvement (OR, 2.51; p = 0.001). A site visit also made a positive impact in feeling prepared (OR, 2.86; p < 0.001), comfortable (OR, 4.95; p = 0.002), feeling like recommendations were accepted (OR, 3.73; p < 0.001), more likely to recommend TCC (OR, 3.18; p = 0.001), and participating in quality improvement (OR, 3.24; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, structured training utilizing orientation, mentorship, and platform training as surrogates, along with a site visit before beginning delivery of care in a TCC setting, were associated with more positive perceptions in the delivery of care domains assessed. We highlight potentially important factors that warrant further evaluation and assessment of the need for standardization across TCC programs.
Biophysical Characterization and Structural Insights Into the Complex between the Extracytoplasmic Function Sigma Factor, PupI, with the Antisigma Domain of the Sigma Regulator, PupR, from Pseudomonas capeferrum
Sultana, Tajnin , Kutsi, Robin N. , Froiland, Siri, Gertz, Elizabeth, Jensen, Jaime L. , Auton, Matthew , Sinha, Sangita C. , Colbert, Christopher L. , Jensen, Jaime L , Auton, Matthew , Sinha, Sangita C , Colbert, Christopher L , Tischer, Alexander

ACS Omega | December 29, 2025 | Volume: 11 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 1717-1726

10.1021/acsomega.5c08813 | PMID 41552594 Get It