Abstract Background Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a common and potentially life-threatening infection. Transplant recipients are vulnerable to CDI due to immune suppression and frequent antibiotic exposure. CDI can lead to serious complications in these patients, including allograft failure. In a population of pancreas transplant recipients, we aimed to identify epidemiologic characteristics and risk factors associated with CDI within 90 days of transplant. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of adults who underwent pancreas transplantation between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020, at three centers in Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota. Patients were excluded if they developed pancreas allograft failure within 48 hours of transplantation. The primary outcome was diagnosis of CDI within 90 days of transplantation and the secondary outcome was pancreas allograft failure. The main analyses were performed by Cox regression. Results A total of 482 patients were included, of which 35 (7.3%) developed CDI within 90 days (Table 1). Within the subset of 35 CDI patients, the median time to CDI was 17.0 (IQR 13.0–28.5) days (Figure 1) with most (83%) diagnosed with non-severe CDI. Most patients with CDI were on current systemic antibiotics (94%), primarily for prophylaxis (73%). CDI treatment was vancomycin for the majority of patients (71%) and metronidazole for the rest (29%). One patient had a fecal transplant for recurrence, and none required surgery. In multivariable cox regression of associations with 90-day CDI, significant associations were anastomotic leak (HR 3.04, 95% CI 1.2-7.4; p=0.015) and simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (HR 8.70, 95% CI 1.15-66.7; p=0.036); age (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.94-1.01; p=0.110) was not significant. In a secondary analysis, CDI was not associated with pancreas allograft failure (p=0.719).Table 1.Characteristics of 482 patients who underwent pancreas transplantation. Conclusion This study identified preceding anastomotic leak as a risk factor for 90-day CDI after pancreas transplantation, likely due to subsequent intra-abdominal infection and antibiotic use. simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation is another risk factor due to additional comorbidity. Transplant providers should be cognizant of the risks of CDI and mitigate these risks as possible. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures
Context Musculoskeletal (MSK) diagnostic ultrasound (US) is increasingly being utilized by physicians to evaluate athletes in outpatient clinics, on the sidelines, and in athletic training facilities. Having a thorough understanding of MSK US will help athletic trainers (ATs) better assist physicians who perform MSK US. Objective To determine if a longitudinal 6-month MSK anatomy and US course would increase ATs’ ability to acquire, label, and optimize US images of normal structures and improve their overall confidence in assisting with performing US and to determine if demographic factors, work-related factors, or higher self-reported confidence was associated with better performance. Design Prospective cohort study. Setting Academic institution. Other Participants Seventeen ATs working with sports medicine physicians at 3 institutions. Interventions Longitudinal 6-month MSK anatomy and US course. Main Outcome Measures Ultrasound image scores (normal structures scored on a 5-point scale) were assessed precourse, during the course, and postcourse. Scores were compared across time points for the assessed body regions (knee, ankle/foot, shoulder, elbow/wrist/hand, and hip). Associations with demographic factors, US experience, and AT self-reported confidence were explored. Results Seventeen ATs completed the course. There was a significant difference among the average overall precourse (average: 1.34/5, range: 0/5 to 4.23/5), during-course (average = 3.53/5; range, 2.6/5 to 4.37/5), and postcourse (average = 3.83/5; range, 2.33/5 to 4.67/5) image scores [χ2(2) = 24.47, P < .001]. There was a significant positive correlation between the numbers of days (rs[17] = 0.62, P = .01) and hours (rs[17] = 0.55, P = .02) per week that the AT spent observing or performing US scanning and the postcourse overall image scores. The ATs’ confidence in identifying structures when they scan and postcourse overall image scores were marginally correlated but not significant (rs[17] = 0.47, P = .06). Conclusions A comprehensive longitudinal MSK diagnostic US course may have resulted in significant improvements in an AT’s ability to acquire, label, and optimize US images of normal MSK structures that are commonly injured by active persons.
Effects of cohort, genotype, variant, and maternal β-blocker treatment on foetal heart rate predictors of inherited long QT syndrome
Abstract Aims In long QT syndrome (LQTS), primary prevention improves outcome; thus, early identification is key. The most common LQTS phenotype is a foetal heart rate (FHR) < 3rd percentile for gestational age (GA) but the effects of cohort, genotype, variant, and maternal β-blocker therapy on FHR are unknown. We assessed the influence of these factors on FHR in pregnancies with familial LQTS and developed a FHR/GA threshold for LQTS. Methods and results In an international cohort of pregnancies in which one parent had LQTS, LQTS genotype, familial variant, and maternal β-blocker effects on FHR were assessed. We developed a testing algorithm for LQTS using FHR and GA as continuous predictors. Data included 1966 FHRs at 7–42 weeks’ GA from 267 pregnancies/164 LQTS families [220 LQTS type 1 (LQT1), 35 LQTS type 2 (LQT2), and 12 LQTS type 3 (LQT3)]. The FHRs were significantly lower in LQT1 and LQT2 but not LQT3 or LQTS negative. The LQT1 variants with non-nonsense and severe function loss (current density or β-adrenergic response) had lower FHR. Maternal β-blockers potentiated bradycardia in LQT1 and LQT2 but did not affect FHR in LQTS negative. A FHR/GA threshold predicted LQT1 and LQT2 with 74.9% accuracy, 71% sensitivity, and 81% specificity. Conclusion Genotype, LQT1 variant, and maternal β-blocker therapy affect FHR. A predictive threshold of FHR/GA significantly improves the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for LQT1 and LQT2, above the infant’s a priori 50% probability. We speculate this model may be useful in screening for LQTS in perinatal subjects without a known LQTS family history.
Flares of autoimmune rheumatic disease following
COVID
‐19 infection: Observations from the
COVAD
study
Objectives The objective is to examine utilisation of cardiovascular preventive services in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), compared with a non-RA population, and to examine cardiovascular disease (CVD) screening rates among RA patients without diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension or hyperlipidaemia to non-RA patients with one of these diagnoses. Methods All ≥18-year-old patients with an RA diagnosis living in one of eight Minnesota counties on 1 January 2015 were included and matched (1:1) by sex, age and county to non-RA comparators. Rates of screening for CVD risk factors, including DM (ie, glucose), hypertension (ie, blood pressure) and hyperlipidaemia (ie, lipids), were compared between groups using Cox models. Results The study included 1614 patients with RA and 1599 non-RA comparators. DM screening was more common among patients with RA (HR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.19), as was hypertension screening (HR: 1.37, 95% CI: 1.24 to 1.52). Hyperlipidaemia screening in RA was similar to comparators (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.89 to 1.10). Conversely, patients with RA and no CVD risk factors had a lower probability of undergoing diabetes (HR: 0.67, 95% CI: 0.57 to 0.78) and hyperlipidaemia screening (HR: 0.65, 95% CI: 0.54 to 0.79) than non-RA patients with only one CVD risk factor diagnosis. Hypertension screening was similar between both groups. Conclusions RA patients undergo CVD preventive screening at rates at least comparable to the general population. However, patients with RA as their sole CVD risk factor were less likely to undergo screenings, despite an equivalent-to-higher risk as the traditional CVD risk factors. These findings demonstrate opportunities for improvement of RA patient care.
Response to Reader Comment: Continuing the Quest for Hemostasis: Can Factor Eight Inhibitor Bypassing Activity (FEIBA) Bypass Post-Pump Coagulopathy?