Citations

Abstract Background Individuals increasingly want to access, contribute to, and share their personal health information to improve outcomes, such as through shared decision-making (SDM) with their care teams. Health systems' growing capacity to use person-generated health data (PGHD) expands the opportunities for SDM. However, SDM not only lacks organizational and information infrastructure support but also is actively undermined, despite public interest in it. Objectives This work sought to identify challenges to individual–clinician SDM and policy changes needed to mitigate barriers to SDM. Methods Two multi-stakeholder group of consumers, patients, caregivers; health services researchers; and experts in health policy, informatics, social media, and user experience used a consensus process based on Bardach's policy analysis framework to identify barriers to SDM and develop recommendations to reduce these barriers. Results Technical, legal, organizational, cultural, and logistical obstacles make data sharing difficult, thereby undermining use of PGHD and realization of SDM. Stronger privacy, security, and ethical protections, including informed consent; promoting better consumer access to their data; and easier donation of personal data for research are the most crucial policy changes needed to facilitate an environment that supports SDM. Conclusion Data protection policy lags far behind the technical capacity for third parties to share and reuse electronic information without appropriate permissions, while individuals' right to access their own health information is often restricted unnecessarily, poorly understood, and poorly communicated. Sharing of personal information in a private, secure environment in which data are shared only with individuals' knowledge and consent can be achieved through policy changes.

Abstract Introduction Doxorubicin is an anthracycline used as a chemotherapeutic drug for the treatment of a wide range of adult and pediatric cancers. Doxorubicin is associated with an increased risk of cardiomyopathy and heart failure with up to 10% of patients developing cardiac complications. A GWAS conducted of 1,191 patients from the N9831 clinical trial identified that cardiac gene expression and genetic variants of TRPC6 were associated with a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (p=0.005 and p=1.6x10–6, respectively). TRPC6 is a non-selective cation channel expressed in heart and vascular tissue. TRPC6 participates in the pathogenesis of cardiac hypertrophy as a pathological response to chronic mechanical stress. Chronic activation has been found to promote cardiac fibrosis leading to heart failure. Purpose TRPC6 variants could be associated with increased risk of doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity. Data/tests to determine which patients may progress to cardiomyopathy and heart failure are currently lacking and there are no targeted treatments to prevent cardiomyopathy in these patients. Methods In preliminary in vivo data, B6.129 wild-type mice or TRPC6 knockout mice were treated with either 6x intraperitoneal saline or 4mg/kg doxorubicin injections (cumulative dose of 24mg/kg). Results We found doxorubicin increased cardiac vacuolation (male, p≤0.001 and female, p≤0.05) in WT mice compared to controls. Higher HW/BW ratio was observed in male TRPC6 knock out mice compared to wild-type mice when both were treated with doxorubicin (males, p=0.005 and females, p=0.19). Additionally, we found that doxorubicin-induced cardiac injury was significantly reduced in TRPC6 knock-out mice compared to wild-type mice based on reduced vacuolation (p=0.0004 males, p=0.03 females), with the effect being greater in male mice than female mice. Furthermore, a significant decrease in stroke volume (p=0.007), diastolic volume (p=0.01) and cardiac output (p=0.004) in wild-type male mice treated with doxorubicin compared to control and TRPC6 knock-out mice. Our in vitro preliminary data show that inhibition of TRPC6 using the TRPC6 inhibitor GsMTx-4 in human iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes significantly reduced doxorubicin-induced apoptosis (p<0.0001). Further we treated male mice with the TRPC6 inhibitor, GsMTx4, and found that they had less global longitudinal cardiac strain (p=0.04) and higher ejection fraction (p=0.01) compared to mice who were only treated with doxorubicin. Histologically we found that mice given the TRPC6 inhibitor had less fibrosis as measured by Trichrome stained heart sections (p=0.004) which could account for improvements in cardiac function. Conclusion TRPC6 could be a novel therapeutic target in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy and heart failure. Additionally genetic mapping of TRCP6 functional variants may provide a new screening tool to determine increased risk of developing heart failure. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: Private hospital(s). Main funding source(s): Mayo Clinic

Abstract BACKGROUND Adherence to study medications is crucial to evaluating treatment effects in clinical trials. To assess whether in the SPRINT trial, adherence and cardiovascular outcomes are associated regardless of intervention assignment. METHODS This study included 9,361 participants aged ≥50 years, recruited from 102 clinics. Participants were randomized to a Standard Treatment Group (targeted systolic blood pressure [SBP] <140 mm Hg) or an Intensive Treatment Group (targeted SBP <120 mm Hg) and followed for incident cardiovascular events until the study was halted early for benefit. The 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) was administered at baseline, and at the 12- and 48-month (or close out) visit. RESULTS Adjusting for covariates, there was no association between the baseline 8-item MMAS-8 and the likelihood of the primary composite endpoint, any of the secondary endpoints, or blood pressure (BP) control. Low adherence was associated with a higher body mass index, SBP, diastolic BP, and Patient Health Questionnaire, and high adherence was associated with a higher Montreal Cognitive Assessment. There was no difference in the MMAS-8 over time by treatment arm assignment. For the primary outcome (a composite of myocardial infarction, other acute coronary syndromes, stroke, heart failure, or death from cardiovascular causes), baseline odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for the Low vs. Medium and vs. High; and, for Medium vs. High MMAS-8 were 1.02 (0.82–1.28), 1.07 (0.85–1.34), and 1.05 (0.88–1.250). CONCLUSIONS In SPRINT, medication adherence as measured using the MMAS-8 was not associated with outcomes or BP control.